Yes.

Source?!?!?!??!??!?!??!?!?!?!?

The dinosaurs? bones came to light during house-building in the village of Frick, near the German border.

?A hobby paleontologist looked at a construction site for a house and happened to discover the bones,? said Monica Ruembeli from the Frick dinosaur museum.

The finds show that an area known for Plateosaurus finds for decades may be much larger than originally thought.

?It could be that the area extends for 1.5 kilometres (0.9 miles) and in that case, you could certainly say it?s the biggest site in Europe,? said Martin Sander, a dinosaur paleontologist at the university of Bonn in Germany.

The Frick area contained the bones of one animal per 100 square metres, Sander said, so the entire area might contain bones of 100 more Plateosaurus.

The peaceful herbivore -- measuring up to 10 metres from head to tail -- roamed river deltas in large herds some 210 million years ago, according to some scientists, when most of Switzerland was covered with desert and its landscape may have looked much like the estuary of the Nile now.

There are two other large Plateosaurus sites in Germany, Sander said. It is not known how big they are because one is covered by the town of Halberstadt and the other, near Trossingen, by a forest.

Khi- Well then i guess the argument is over. GOD Bless!

Too bad. I haven't got the chance to make you understand that dinosaurs never coexisted with man!

Khi- Well then i guess the argument is over. GOD Bless!

Oh, and ask him when he or his associate plans to debate me over the internet, please.

Khi- Salam. Y dont u call him urself? I gave u the phone no. Then u can directly ask him. GOD Bless!

You're the one who dragged his views into Free-minds, you do it. I don't need his authority over scientific matters.

Oh, and ask him when he or his associate plans to debate me over the internet, please.

Khi- Salam. Y dont u call him urself? I gave u the phone no. Then u can directly ask him. GOD Bless!

Call him again and ask him where I can find these dinos, and if he has good evidence about their existence now. An expedition to document their existence could confirm his words. If we can confirm that this is a fact, this will really add to Kent Hovind's credibility.

Oh, and ask him when he or his associate plans to debate me over the internet, please.

Khi- Salam. I phoned Kent a few days ago n he told me tht dinos r even alive 2day i.e. ofcourse not as big as they once were but in the form of long reptile lizards. Continuous mutation has degradedd them over time so tht they no longer can get so big. Again the 2nd law of thermodynamics comes into play. GOD Bless!

The impact theory has good evidence behind it, and we know where it struck 63 million years ago. The crater is in Central America, it's really large.

http//www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/Chicx.html

And there's alsothe fact that there are no fossil dinosaurs dated younger than 63 million years, which lead to the conclusion that this impact ended their time on earth.

They're fakes.

Khi- Slam. Again see every "evidence" tax funded evolutionists bring forth is true while tht which creationists bring forth is "false". Duh! No need 4 further arguments. GOD Bless!

Heh...

Even creationists like Answers in Genesis say don't use it.

http//www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/dont_use.asp#paluxy

The Paluxy 'human' footprints is actually dinosaur footprints.

Again I want to tell you that all dinosaurs died out long before humans appear. 63 million years ago a large meteorite struck the earth and caused a global change in climate. All dinosaur lineages went extinct.

You say that dinosaurs survive this catastrophe and lived on for another 63 million years and some humans coexisted with them. I say this is implausible. Why? Because

1. We know that there are plenty of dinosaur fossils. This means that dinosaurs have a good chance of fossilization--after all, ther bones are huge. Therefore, if you are correct and they survived the catastrophe, there should be dinosaur fossils found alongside fossils of more recent animals like mammoths, ground sloths, and humans.

2. We know that the fossil record fom the Quarternary (geological period from 63 million years ago until now) do not include dinosaur fossils. There are fossils of large mammals, some of which reach near-dinosaur proportion like the giant rhinoceros Indricotherium from the Miocene of Pakistan, or the ancient whale Basilosaurus from the Eocene of North America. Therefore, if there are any dinosaurs around at this time, they have a good chance of being fossilized just like these creatures.

I try to study any evidence brought forth before I jump to conclusions, and I am not afraid to prove myself wrong if the evidence says so. I also try to consider all the available evidence, not shutting my eyes to those that potentially disprove my opinions. You might want to do that also.

Anyway, I still don't understand what you are trying to do by raising the issue of coexistence of dinosaurs and humans. This has nothing to do with evolution, nothing to do with the Qur'an, even nothing to do with the Bible! What is it that you want to achieve in trying to prove that humans lived alongside dinosaurs?

They're fakes.

Khi- Slam. Again see every "evidence" tax funded evolutionists bring forth is true while tht which creationists bring forth is "false". Duh! No need 4 further arguments. GOD Bless!

This is a joke, the Lochness Monster ia man made lol

Too bad, it would make a great attraction in a zoo roll roll

This is a joke, the Lochness Monster ia man made lol

It looks like The Lochness Monster lol

Have you seen the Lochness Monster, my sis? roll

It looks like The Lochness Monster lol

No, there are not.

Did that. No fossils. Only drawings, sculptures, and legends.

Khi- Wht abt the footprints? Dino fprints 2gether with humans? GOD Bless!

Do you mean the Paluxy footprints?
http//www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/2437/paluxy.htm

They're fakes.

Oh, if you want to set a debate between me and Kent Hovind, go ahead! I'd love to debate him, and I prefer a web debate, correspondence style, like what we are doing now. Call him.

Khi- I called him. His secretary was on. Left her my name n phone no.

GREAT! Let's see how this turns out to be.

Regards,

Regards,

Khi- Salam. Yes tht wld be great indeed. Hpowever i doubt tht hed be able 2 manage 2 come n debate on this forum but wht he cld do is arrange 4 one of his fellow ppl 2 come n debate. Hes a very busy man n even 2day he was out 4 a debate n so was his son Eric Hovind who will be holding a debate quite soon. GOD Bless!

That should be good. Can't wait for this -). Let him come here then we can all participate in the debate.

Regards,

Khi- Although the age is another issue of dispute i never denied the existance of dinos.

There is evidence for dinosaurs coexisting with primitive mammals. There is evidence that humans coexisted with mammoths, sabertooth tigers, cave bears. But there is no fossil evidence that shows humans and dinosaurs coexisting.

Khi- Theres also evidence tht dinos coexisted with humans.

Oh, if you want to set a debate between me and Kent Hovind, go ahead! I'd love to debate him, and I prefer a web debate, correspondence style, like what we are doing now. Call him.

Khi- I called him. His secretary was on. Left her my name n phone no.

Did that. No fossils. Only drawings, sculptures, and legends.

Khi- Wht abt the footprints? Dino fprints 2gether with humans? GOD Bless!