Are darwinists lying about Ida being a transitional form?
-
STOP LYING
Darwinists are wretched out of desperation!They attempted to show the complete lemur fossil named Ida--which is an extinct species--as a transitional form.
And about 90 percent of the animal and plant species on earth became extinct. There are 99 species of lemurs. And 16 species of lemurs became extinct and many other species are now being determined as extinct. And many more species have been lost. All the extinct species are all perfect living forms with no sign of the so-called transitional forms.
Ida, is one the extinct species of lemur. It is a perfect developed lemur and it shows no sign of intermediary form. It is an evidence of creation...
http//us1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/14374
-
STOP LYING
Darwinists are wretched out of desperation!They attempted to show the complete lemur fossil named Ida--which is an extinct species--as a transitional form.
And about 90 percent of the animal and plant species on earth became extinct. There are 99 species of lemurs. And 16 species of lemurs became extinct and many other species are now being determined as extinct. And many more species have been lost. All the extinct species are all perfect living forms with no sign of the so-called transitional forms.
Ida, is one the extinct species of lemur. It is a perfect developed lemur and it shows no sign of intermediary form. It is an evidence of creation...
http//us1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/14374
Darwinian theory of evolution is very shaky as far as i am concerned. I personally do not believe in it, but most scientist and many people do. They have their reasons but I am not sure about the scientific evidence. I agree with Dr. Jonathan Wells. He has videos and speeches at google video.
-
Evolution is scientific garbage. Mutations leads to dysfunctional proteins that don't fold properly and so don't perform their function either as an enzyme or a structural molecule. Every species has its own genomic library that interact with the environment. No additional information is added. Functional irregular irregularity code patterns have no room for chance. Scientists know this. They simply don't like the alternative. They think it is boring.
Even abiogenesis is idiotic. Proteins need DNA and DNA need proteins and BOTH are code patterns that depend on one another. Give me a break! Thats why scientists don't like to talk about abiogenesis. It is pointless. All the laws of physics are against you. Frankly, according to the Laws of Nature, this universe should not have existed in the first place.
So when you talk origins, it will be never ever be a scientific debate. it is a philosophical one. Nothing can be proven, disproven or repeated. Thats why the Creation-Evolution debate never ends! Because its NOT scientific and has no relation to science. It is a belief. Frankly, I find evolution harder to believe than creation. Yeah, we live in a crazy world but we take everything for granted as long as we see it everyday.
-
Darwinian theory of evolution is very shaky as far as i am concerned. I personally do not believe in it, but most scientist and many people do. They have their reasons but I am not sure about the scientific evidence. I agree with Dr. Jonathan Wells. He has videos and speeches at google video.
fossils dont show gradual change, but changes in leaps, so yeah the darwinian theory has still not been proven ultimately, but i dont think evolution is garbage, and i dont think the quran denies evolution either.
-
Ida, is one the extinct species of lemur. It is a perfect developed lemur and it shows no sign of intermediary form. It is an evidence of creation...
http//us1.harunyahya.com/Detail/T/EDCRFV/productId/14374
Everything is a creation of God, so your arguement "evidence of creation" is erronous.
Do you really believe that the world was created 5000 years ago? Do you think the first human being looked exactly the same as today's human beings?Where is your proof for creationism in the Quran?
BTW Harun Yahya's site is a very bias source to quote.
-
Harun Yahya's work is complete pseudoscience. Please don't use his authority to argue a point.
Check these out.
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4d-eshn3fc&feature=related
and then
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAVqEA6JO0o&feature=related
and finally
http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZukpFNS5cs
-
fossils dont show gradual change, but changes in leaps, so yeah the darwinian theory has still not been proven ultimately, but i dont think evolution is garbage, and i dont think the quran denies evolution either.
there is no physiochemical possibilities for these leaps. its nonsense.
-
Of course it is. Even Darwin admitted he couldn't explain many things with evolution
Ofcourse he couldnt, evolutionary theory doesnt rest upon Darwin's work, that was over 200 years ago. There were tons of things he got wrong, but modern atomic theory isnt wrong because Niels Bohr was wrong about things in the 20th century! We've made advancements in leaps and bounds in areas like genetics. Genetics itself is a proof, among others, of evolution.
The fact is that evolution took place.
The theory attempts to explain how it occured.
Similar to how the fact is that atoms exist,
the theory attempts to explain how they work.