Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Online Arabic-English dictionary

Online Arabic-English dictionary

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
30 Posts 8 Posters 133 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Joe_Betik
    wrote on last edited by
    #16

    salaamun alaykum

    perhaps we have not properly addressed this question

    A Student Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic The word "Modern" would have deterred me from this publication (as well as Hans Wehr's). Is it your belief that there has been such little change in the meaning of words used within the Quran so that it does not matter whether I use classical or modern arabic-english dictionaries / resources?<<

    please do not be deterred by the word 'modern'. hans wehr has the closest to classical explanation of words. for cross checks, please consult lane's lexicon. the two should go hand-in-hand. the grammar books are also important, for the arabic grammar explains the word formations, and shifts in general meanings. classical arabic will deal with more finese in usage of words and phrases. lane has done a brilliant job in his lexicon.

    there are other good classical arabic dictionaries, but they are in arabic. if we read through the references made by lane, then you know what we mean. the arabs have not published a good arabic-english dictionary. and for that matter, a standard arabic grammar guide. we sensed a general 'black-out' by the arabs in as far as learning arabic (and al-Qur'an) is concerned.

    and perhaps you may want to consider the fact that, a standardization of arabic grammar (their version) was done by the jews during the time of uthman, when they wanted to study al-Qur'an. today, we have to go to western universities to learn arabic grammar as employed by the jews. we took lessons from an ustaz who studied arabic in the uk (soas, univ. of london).

    hopefully the above suffices.

    offtopic when we consider the 'basmallah' as the first verse of al-fatiha, then we have it as verse 15, though for us it is 14. irrespective, the verse reads (according to popular translations)

    001005 Khan You (Alone) we worship, and You (Alone) we ask for help (for each and everything).
    001005 Maulana Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.
    001005 Pickthal Thee (alone) we worship; Thee (alone) we ask for help.
    001005 Rashad You alone we worship; You alone we ask for help.
    001005 Sarwar (Lord), You alone We do worship and from You alone we do seek assistance.
    001005 Shakir Thee do we serve and Thee do we beseech for help.
    001005 Sherali THEE alone do we worship and THEE alone do we implore for help.
    001005 Yusufali Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek.

    in our translation, it is

    naAAbudu p586 - (3p; Ind.) we serve / we worship (a god) / we adore / we venerate (s.o., a god or human being) / we idolize / we deify (s.o.)

    nastaAAeenu p659 - X (1p; Ind.) we ask for s.o.?s help (against) / we call for s.o.?s help (against) / we turn to s.o. for help (from s.o. in sth., against) / we resort (in or of sth.) / we have a recourse (in or of sth.) | we make use (in or of sth., in or for)

    please refer to the respective pages (hans wehr) for the radicals. either you take a pick, or allow 'jibril' to explain the truth about the verse. any which one one picks, it is still right. it is simply a matter of someone's truth, vs Allah's truth. as we always say, don't hurry.

    so, how should 'i' explain 'we' then? 'i' would be more than happy if 'we' here refers to the whole ummah, don't you think? perhaps you may want to ponder (better still, meditate) on this issue of 'we' as opposed to 'i'. but don't rush. seek recourse in Allah. seek closely and patiently. insha-Allah. if however an immediate decision to agree or disagree has to be made, then, do not aggree to it, but do not throw it away either. just put it aside. insha-Allah. a comprehension will be arrive in due time. insha-Allah.

    and if it must be made known (hope we do not sound bragging peace , please have mercy upon us O Allah), we do not work for anyone (university, or other institutions), but Allah, the Compassionate Mercy. at least that is in our deepest thoughts, and that is what we strive for.

    peace
    joe

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      savage_carrot
      wrote on last edited by
      #17

      so, how should 'i' explain 'we' then? 'i' would be more than happy if 'we' here refers to the whole ummah, don't you think? perhaps you may want to ponder (better still, meditate) on this issue of 'we' as opposed to 'i'. but don't rush. seek recourse in Allah. seek closely and patiently. insha-Allah. if however an immediate decision to agree or disagree has to be made, then, do not aggree to it, but do not throw it away either. just put it aside. insha-Allah. a comprehension will be arrive in due time. insha-Allah.

      I'm sorry if you thought it was OT, the usage just jarred me awake from my normal laziness, enough to ask the question a second time. Thanks for the reply, I think I'll just leave it at that -. Peace.

      Peace Samir,

      Thanks, I hope they were the ones I posted on the good days . Welcome to the forum!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        SAbboushi
        wrote on last edited by
        #18

        Thanks again Joe-

        And thanks for the welcome savage_carrot. "OT"?? confused

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          savage_carrot
          wrote on last edited by
          #19

          Sorry, means Off Topic .

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            SAbboushi
            wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Thanks for those who referred me to Omar's dictionary. I have received Omar's dictionary and find it very helpful, particularly for those cases where TIM (Text in Motion) does not (yet) provide the root of a word.

            As I find instances where Omar has identified the root of a word that is NOT yet available in TIM, I would be happy to provide the root identification (per Omar) to those who are building TIM. Does anyone know how I can go about making such an offer to see if they are interested?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • WakasW Offline
              WakasW Offline
              Wakas
              wrote on last edited by
              #21

              yes, its on the website http//www.textinmotion.com/feedback.jsp

              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                SAbboushi
                wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Thanks wakas!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • W Offline
                  W Offline
                  wildguest1956
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  Another dictionary
                  http//www.alislam.org/quran/dictionary/dictionary_quran.pdf

                  Mainly copied from Lane.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    Another dictionary
                    http//www.alislam.org/quran/dictionary/dictionary_quran.pdf
                    Mainly copied from Lane.

                    Thanks brother JM

                    Peace, Hamsa

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • WakasW Offline
                      WakasW Offline
                      Wakas
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      SAbboushi,

                      I found out a while ago that the basis of the root info in TIM is PRL
                      http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                      The Qur'an Institute (TQI) is pleased to announce that our "Text In Motion" project is going ever stronger. Our developer, Hoag, has been doing an amazing job. May Allah give him time and health to continue on many important TQI projects. We now have an Alpha (initial) version that is being tested at

                      http//www.textinmotion.com

                      Please check it out and send comments to liaquat222 yahoo com.

                      Important Notes It is TQI's stated policy that we give prompt credits to those who assist us in our wide-ranging undertakings related to the Qur'an. "Text In Motion" is based on the innovative work done by Burhan on http//www.openburhan.com.

                      The Qur'an Institute thanks Burhan for allowing us to utilize his brilliant work for the betterment of humanity. May Allah give him manifold rewards in the world and in the Hereafter.

                      TQI also appreciate the superb linguistic data provided by Study Qur'an's Project Root List.

                      Thus, if you want to help input info into TIM, may as well go through the source, i.e. PRL.

                      pm me if interested.

                      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        SAbboushi
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #26

                        Hi Joe Betik

                        in our research, we have only two, i.e. lane's lexicon and hans wehr. however, those without a training in arabic grammar will have difficulties in using them.

                        And here we are almost two years after your post and I find you are correct. I want better knowledge so that I can better examine the Quran. And so I realize I must learn Arabic grammar - which makes me realize I need to learn English grammar first (again?) - I figure it will be easier learning (re-learning?) the parts of speech in English before I try to learn Arabic grammar.

                        so, how should 'i' explain 'we' then? 'i' would be more than happy if 'we' here refers to the whole ummah, don't you think? perhaps you may want to ponder (better still, meditate) on this issue of 'we' as opposed to 'i'. but don't rush. seek recourse in Allah. seek closely and patiently. insha-Allah. if however an immediate decision to agree or disagree has to be made, then, do not aggree to it, but do not throw it away either. just put it aside. insha-Allah. a comprehension will be arrive in due time. insha-Allah.

                        I would also like to follow up on your point about "we". Would you please post more on this?

                        Peace-

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          Joe_Betik
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          salaam SAbboushi, & all,

                          (please read without prejudice)

                          my apology please for the late reply, as i have been quite busy with some advertising work.

                          to tell you the truth, i am not an arab (i am a malay), and don't speak arabic either (only english, malay, & javanese). i did learn some basic arabic from a graduate of soas (school of oriental and african studies) university of london. strange as it may seem, we learnt the jewish method that can be traced back to the times when the jews were translating arabic texts, the qur'an included. and we used hans wehr's dictionery. and perhaps you would have by now noticed, that most arabic grammar books in the market were written by the jews. and refering to lane's lexicon is not a problem to us since he used the same form structures (wazan), and hans wehr also noted that lane's work was also among his source of references.

                          i am not a trained translator, and neither a linguist, but for me, dictioneries are merely tools, or simply a means. as such we should use them with due caution. the grammar provides the general rule to understanding the phrases or sentences, but i sensed that those who speak arabic as their mother tongue should have a better grasp of the arabic language, thus an understanding of the qur'an.

                          however, until now, we could not find a translation authored or originated by an arab. most arab translators have edited earlier works by non arabs. the qur'an was understood by prophet muhammad, and his companions who were a good mix of the arab community then - merchants, ordinary people, and even slaves. but now, even arab linguists are claiming to have problems with understanding the qur'an. it is amazing indeed, at least to me.

                          but i have a high level of surety that the problem lies in the synchronization of the understood with the generally accepted meaning of the text. when the generally accepted is diabolically opposed to the understood, most people tend to dismiss, forget or even deny, the understood. if only they could for a while put the understood aside for contemplation, or pondering, i am sure that the truth will insha-Allah be revealed.

                          the common attitude is the majority is the truth, and therefore, wins. though in the qur'an we have read that it is always otherwise, most people ignored this very advise. if the generally accepted is a limp, then the guy who has understood in the contrary (hence a normal guy) has to be turned into a limp by his community. and the irony is most of the normal guys accepted this - willingly or otherwise, so a limp they have become!

                          God has made things easy for man. therefore we should not make things difficult for ourselves. follow the qur'an. the method of learning with God as the Teacher is detailed and spread all over the pages. study with an open mind. don't easily jump into conclusions. what one discovers in his/her private study by his/herself might be the truth, no matter how diametrically opposed they are to the generally accepted. let God teach us. ask God to guide us. ask God with all the humbleness or humility. have due respect for God. spend more time with Him. so be quiet. be silent. be quiet, and be silent most of the time, and dedicate that moments of silence or quetness for God. insha-Allah He will guide us. He will guide us in everything, learning arabic included.

                          i have posted something short regarding 'we', and here is the link http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=13751.msg118157#msg118157

                          we read in the qur'an something like this; "... when you kill a self, you have actually killed a community (ummah)..." (my apology that i do not have the specific verse right now, but if you have read any of the translations, then you could surely recall such a phrase). or another is; "Do not say about those killed in the path of God as 'dead', but 'alive', eventhough you have no understanding of it."

                          in our understanding, each and everyone of us is a community or an ummah. they make up the unseen (ghayb) in each and everyone of us (read al-muzzammil). generally they are dormant within us, and are activated only when we remember them. when for example we read a story on ibrahim, or moosa, and reflect upon their experiences, we are actually activating them, or they became active (activated), and the more or often we remember them, the more active they become in us. sometimes they even became manifest in us (the enlightened can identify them, either within themselves or in others), usually to impart their knowledge or wisdom. but since most people are unaware (unattentive, oblivious, careless, etc.), they do not recognize it when such events happened to them. so, when you see a close friend is behaving rather perculiarly, say like another person that you know very well, then most likely that person became manifest in your friend, because your friend has been thinking of him/her (the other friend). your friend is not being possessed, because he remembers exactly whatever act he is doing or whatever word he utters (the opposite of being possessed). most manifestations are of parents, grand parents, siblings, spouses, friends, etc., because these are people that most people often remember consciously or otherwise.

                          in the qur'an God asks us to remember Him. the more often one remembers God, then the more often God is active in him. so perhaps you can now understand why God speaks to the prophets. it's because they spend a lot of time with God - remembering, correcting the relationship, praising, honoring, imploring, having dialogue, etc., with God. and they practice meditations. remember ibrahim? remember moosa? remember maryam? they have conversations with God. have we?

                          as to whether God will speak to us or not, it is up to Him. for example, when you want to speak to the king of the land, if you are lucky your first conversation is either with the security guard, or the phone operator. sometimes, not even one wants to speak to you! the consequent effort could most probably ended with a conversation with the clerk, then the private secretary, one of the lords, etc. so be patient with God. in the qur'an we are reminded to seek recourse closely and patiently. thus be patient. prophet muhammad had his first message after meditating in the cave of hirak for some years - some said 5, while others said 7. how often and long have we attempted? in the qur'an we are reminded that some meditations are pleasing, while others are hardly enjoyable, but whatever is the experience meditations are for our own good. be patient with God please, especially when we have been oblivious of Him all these while.

                          when we study the qur'an, please consider that it was originally the speeches uttered by prophet muhammad. then years after his passing, people compiled them into a book. so, the qur'an is a book that should be viewed as something easy to be understood. since it was easily understood by even the slaves (no college graduates, mind you), therefore it should be easy enough for everyone today.

                          i hope this explanation suffices. but this is just a personal comprehension. i can always be wrong, but then, read and ponder without prejudice, please. don't be too quick to jump into conclusions. we will be held responsible and accountable, for whatever opinions we have accumulated.

                          may God guide us all.

                          cheers!

                          mohammed noh
                          (j b)

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Muslimtruthrevealed
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            Hi Joe Betik
                            And here we are almost two years after your post and I find you are correct. I want better knowledge so that I can better examine the Quran. And so I realize I must learn Arabic grammar - which makes me realize I need to learn English grammar first (again?) - I figure it will be easier learning (re-learning?) the parts of speech in English before I try to learn Arabic grammar.
                            I would also like to follow up on your point about "we". Would you please post more on this?

                            Peace-

                            'Learn The Language of the Holy Quran' by Nadwi
                            'Vocabulary of the Holy Quran' by Nadwi
                            Dictionary of the Holy Quran by Omar

                            Arabic Language Site

                            http//arabic.tripod.com/

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Armando
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              salaam SAbboushi, & all,

                              in our understanding, each and everyone of us is a community or an ummah. they make up the unseen (ghayb) in each and everyone of us (read al-muzzammil). generally they are dormant within us, and are activated only when we remember them. when for example we read a story on ibrahim, or moosa, and reflect upon their experiences, we are actually activating them, or they became active (activated), and the more or often we remember them, the more active they become in us. sometimes they even became manifest in us (the enlightened can identify them, either within themselves or in others), usually to impart their knowledge or wisdom. but since most people are unaware (unattentive, oblivious, careless, etc.), they do not recognize it when such events happened to them. so, when you see a close friend is behaving rather perculiarly, say like another person that you know very well, then most likely that person became manifest in your friend, because your friend has been thinking of him/her (the other friend). your friend is not being possessed, because he remembers exactly whatever act he is doing or whatever word he utters (the opposite of being possessed). most manifestations are of parents, grand parents, siblings, spouses, friends, etc., because these are people that most people often remember consciously or otherwise.

                              mohammed noh
                              (j b)

                              Salaam

                              Can you start a different topic and continue to elaborate on this information? would appreciate it very much.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Offline
                                J Offline
                                Joe_Betik
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                salaam armando n all

                                i wish i could spend more time on this topic right now, but unfortunately i couldn't.

                                fyi, when back home in my home town, only occasionally do i go to a cyber cafe to go on-line. but in a couple of weeks insha-Allah, i should be able to dedicate more time on it since i'll be going to the office in the city. my home and the office is about 250km away! only occasionally do i go to the office. my time here in this 'slow-paced' home town of mine is mostly spent on meditating, angling, reading, talking to the chickens, dogs, trees, birds, cats, winds, stars, etc.

                                please be patient.

                                btw, where shall we place a discussion of this subject?

                                peace

                                mohammed noh

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Users