What's so bad about Interest?
-
But then, what decides what's unfair? How high is too high?
The thing is it's subjective (high profit); I think it imo probably means contrasted to something else. What we have as a standard would be the market value/rate and if it costs/is costing way above that, the only way to do/charge so would be a monopoly, not a free market ('cause no one would buy it and the guy out of business). Thus, to keep it at the same level would be encouraging/sustaining a free market and not a monopoly/cartel.
-
When you take a loan, you often do it out of choice.. so you agree to pay interest. So the bank is allowed to charge interest. Both parties enter the agreement willfully by choice.
The problematic situation is when a person is in dire need of money, and the lender puts a high interest rate just because he can, because the needy has to borrow, and has no option but to go along with whatever the lender says. This is exploitation. -
Selling something at excessive profit is unethical perhaps, but classifying it as "riba"? Evidence please.
Agreed, it's a bit fuzzy.
-
God didn't say "Give money to your children." when God told us about inheritance, rather, wrote a few volumes on the topic, but when God forbids us usury, he tells us nothing. Hmmph...
-
riba is taking advantage of people's inability to repay loans,
which increases the divide between rich and poor.What God is saying is that don't do money lending unless you are
willing to write-off your losses (as way of charity).But firstly, don't lend money unless you are willing to make a loss.
In trade (business) you can make profit as well as loss. Infact that is the definition of business.The kind of money-lending we see today the banks never make a loss. That is not trade that is riba.
When banks say they have written-off losses, they are lying ... they get it all back with interest through
insurance.God isn't stopping you from making money from lending money, but he wants you accpet your losses aswell.
Ofcourse God doesn't want you to go crazy with the charity thing and loose all your money, it about doing
things justly and accepting losses where the client has no means to pay you ... not reposses everything he owns and drive him further into debt. In most cases you can always recover the orginal sum. -
The kind of money-lending we see today the banks never make a loss. That is not trade that is riba.
When banks say they have written-off losses, they are lying ... they get it all back with interest through
insurance.I do not totally agree here. Insurance is for when the borrower loses their job or be sick (loses means of getting money), and it is voluntary. Yet, without insurance there are other ways the bank writes off their loans, and that's through bankruptcy and voluntary insolvency, or even debt management when the installments are high compared to income. Some debt management companies succeed in freezing the interest and the borrower pays what they can, or be directed to insolvency or bankruptcy.
-
Who's justifying what now?
I thought i cleared this up in the "riba" thread. "Interest" is nothing more than a rent charged on currency and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
That's why God says "And they say trade is like ribaa, and God makes trade (bai`/bai3) lawful and prohibits "ribaa". If ribaa is interest on money, why would people say trade is like ribaa?
so "riba" is overly excessive profit. that makes sense.
in memory of this http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=14716.0
When you take a loan, you often do it out of choice..
Layth posted this story a good while back.
I Want the Earth Plus 5%
http//www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_99/hannigan092099.htmlChildren used to, when asked, "What do you want to be when you grow up?" say certain occupations like, "I want to be a fireman" etc.. etc... today studies have found most children answer the question with "I want to be rich!"
Generation Me.
http//www.generationme.org/Born to Buy
http//www.amazon.com/Born-Buy-Commercialized-Consumer-Culture/dp/068487055Xetc...
-
) in memory of this http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=14716.0
Layth posted this story a good while back.
I Want the Earth Plus 5%
http//www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_99/hannigan092099.htmlChildren used to, when asked, "What do you want to be when you grow up?" say certain occupations like, "I want to be a fireman" etc.. etc... today studies have found most children answer the question with "I want to be rich!"
Generation Me.
http//www.generationme.org/Born to Buy
http//www.amazon.com/Born-Buy-Commercialized-Consumer-Culture/dp/068487055Xetc...
That story is a very good piece, sums up my thoughts on usury.
Usury is forbidden, no additional details are given, period.
-
) in memory of this http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=14716.0
Layth posted this story a good while back.
I Want the Earth Plus 5%
http//www.gold-eagle.com/editorials_99/hannigan092099.htmlChildren used to, when asked, "What do you want to be when you grow up?" say certain occupations like, "I want to be a fireman" etc.. etc... today studies have found most children answer the question with "I want to be rich!"
Generation Me.
http//www.generationme.org/Born to Buy
http//www.amazon.com/Born-Buy-Commercialized-Consumer-Culture/dp/068487055Xetc...
uhhh...what are you trying to say?
I would appreciate it if you would just say what you have to say.
If I'm wrong, I would honestly be very grateful if you point out my mistake and explain your point of view to me.
So yeah, what's your point? -
Banks do not make money from giving out loans. They make money by invetsing that money with other banks or institutions. They invets in bonds, real estate, currencies and commodities. Banks don't always make money. Many here are looking at it fro a laymna's point of view. In fact only 15% of bank deposits are available with a bank at any one time, the rest is invested. Just as bank make interest, banks also pay interest to depositors and provide various services to clients. The trick for banks is to make use of the deposits by inversting on them and making more money than the interests they pay these depositors. Plus banks must operate in regards to the over all economy and currency rates. its not as simple as many here think. When the intersts rates fall down, people would not deposit their moneys with banks but would rather invest it elsewhere. When it goes up they would rather deposit their money than invest it. Currency rates also plays a big role. Banks also have to compete with many other servises like bonds and deposits and reas estate. The money supply by the federal banks also affects banks as people would choose to invets with goverment bonds. So banks operate according to market forces and are never guaranteed profits.
Banks inverstments carries lots of risks for banks such as market fluctauations and foreign exchange rate fluctuations and also political turmoils. Banking is a business like any other.
Riba is about individulas who lend people money from their own sources and then demand interests from them. They are not using people's money and paying them interests also. Its a one way street. Its rich people getting richer.
When you deposit 100 dollars with a bank they will pay you, lets say, 110 dollars in one year time. However they will take that 100 dollars and either lend it to a business man who has to pay them more than 10 dollars a year or else they would be making a loss. If the business man does not want to take a loan they will have to invest that money somewhere and make more than 10 dollars on that 100 dollars. The business man might feel the economy is doing bad so why should i take a loan and start a business when i can just put my 100 dollars with the bank and make 10 dollars a year. So banks have to balance those tow forces becuae either way they have to pay you your 10 dollars. Banks also have to provide services like credit cards and mortgage payments that carries risks of default.
Riba is when you
-
I would appreciate it if you would just say what you have to say.
If I'm wrong, I would honestly be very grateful if you point out my mistake and explain your point of view to me.
So yeah, what's your point?Thank you for asking, I'll do my best insha_Allah...
Making an agreement which obliges you to pay interest is no different than any other agreement or contract. Two people can agree on whatever they want, as long as they both agree, it's fair.
This thought process is not entirely true. People do not agree to this but rather have very little choice in it. As an example, the price of housing has made it so the greater amount of the population have to get a loan to be able to afford a house. In order to get the loan, then they have to agree with the terms of the loan. Very little choice is given in practice. To further the example, when one looks at their amortization schedule, I'm sure if given the choice, most would choose some other type of schedule. Not even taking into account such loans as "interest only" loans etc... even on most conventional loans the amotization schedule has you paying the greater amount of interest first. So in short if your mortgage is $10 per month... $9.50 of that goes towards paying off the interest while $.50 is going to towards the actual amount you borrowed.
-
That story is a very good piece, sums up my thoughts on usury.
Usury is forbidden, no additional details are given, period.I agree and still thank Layth for posting that story! That story was a great primer for me to start to understand more about the money system. I thought the way it was written made it easy to understand for economics novices like myself. From that I started to look into it and the idea of central banks etc etc. I feel that it also helps in understanding much of the "why" questions in our global news aswell.
-
Thank you for asking, I'll do my best insha_Allah...
This thought process is not entirely true. People do not agree to this but rather have very little choice in it. As an example, the price of housing has made it so the greater amount of the population have to get a loan to be able to afford a house. In order to get the loan, then they have to agree with the terms of the loan. Very little choice is given in practice. To further the example, when one looks at their amortization schedule, I'm sure if given the choice, most would choose some other type of schedule. Not even taking into account such loans as "interest only" loans etc... even on most conventional loans the amotization schedule has you paying the greater amount of interest first. So in short if your mortgage is $10 per month... $9.50 of that goes towards paying off the interest while $.50 is going to towards the actual amount you borrowed.Yes, I agree with you that our system is corrupt.
What the banks are doing is wrong because people don't have any choice, and they're exploiting that.
I think that you can make as much money as you want as long as those you are taking money from are capable of giving it to you, we shouldn't take advantage of people's ignorance or stupidity or poverty.
But what if the circumstances are not similar to your example?
Like if my friend comes to me and says, "I want to buy a new TV and I need to borrow $500."
I say, "okay, I'll lend you the money, and you can pay me back for the favor by giving me 10% interest."
He says, "Alright, I agree."Here, both sides know the terms and conditions and they both agree, and my friend can avoid buying the TV if he wants.
Is there something wrong with what I did here?
