Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. "We" vs God Alone

"We" vs God Alone

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
138 Posts 26 Posters 4.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    Elke
    wrote on last edited by
    #75

    paece nerspi,

    question should be the angels (alone) or both (the angels and satan). Second would be my guess.

    lk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Offline
      N Offline
      nerspi
      wrote on last edited by
      #76

      peace

      were there witnesses when God was creating humans?

      i thought based on 1851 there were not any witnesses, so why do i hear people say that there were angels participating.

      or is 1851 talking about creating something other then humans?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        Jack
        wrote on last edited by
        #77

        peace nerspi

        i think 1851 is referring to the just the jinns, watch the wording carefully

        1850 And We said to the angels "Yield to Adam." So they all yielded except for Satan, he was of the Jinn, so he disobeyed the order of his Lord. Will you take him and his progeny as allies besides Me, while they are your enemy? Miserable for the wicked is the substitute!

        1851 I did not make them (satan and his progeny) witness the creation of heavens and Earth, nor the creation of themselves. Nor do I take the misleaders as helpers.

        the misleaders would be referring to the evil ones thus 'angels' excluded.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Offline
          P Offline
          progod
          wrote on last edited by
          #78

          Peace,

          I looked in Muheetul-Muheeti under Jinn and it has alot of meanings (even jannatun does)

          Jannatun (from jannatul-laili) cover/darkeness
          Jinnun dhulmatun (darkness), ikhtilaatudhalaami(covering/coming of darkness), most (mu&thamanaasi=jinnunaasi (most people).

          Al-jinnu the angels (al-malaa'ikatu) just like Jinnatun (ka-jinnatin)
          As it concerns the youth or besides the youth (ashabaabu wa ghairuhu) it means the first(or best) and the most recent/youngest (awwaluhu wa hidthaanuhu(plural of hadeeth meaning recent/new))
          As it concerns plants it's flowers or its blossoms (wa anabtu zahruhu wa nawruhu).
          Jannatun a garden with palms and trees
          the expression laa jinna = laa khafaa'a (there's not hiding (it), nothing hidden)
          and baitujinnin= below a snowy mountain and the description is jinaaneeyun.

          Strangely enough I didn't read anything about spirits.

          Godbless,
          Anwar

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            maxq
            wrote on last edited by
            #79

            Anwar, keep up the good work bro!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #80

              In Urdu language too "I" and "We" is used by one person, when giving command, instructions, orders or telling about some thing big done by him. Some people commonly use "We" instead of "I" even in ordinary conversation.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                siki
                wrote on last edited by
                #81

                In Urdu language too "I" and "We" is used by one person, when giving command, instructions, orders or telling about some thing big done by him. Some people commonly use "We" instead of "I" even in ordinary conversation.

                Brother! i recommend , that you go through the whole thread.(for royal we)

                siki

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #82

                  Just to revisit this thread, can it be said that if the quran uses its own grammatical constructs, that it is wrong?

                  In 7156, either the case is made for a trinity, or polytheism, or simply, there is a royal We in use. Since when did other books restrict quranic grammar?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Samia
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #83

                    Just to revisit this thread, can it be said that if the quran uses its own grammatical constructs, that it is wrong?

                    In 7156, either the case is made for a trinity, or polytheism, or simply, there is a royal We in use. Since when did other books restrict quranic grammar?

                    The quraan was revealed in a spoken language. Spoken Arabic does not respect grammar.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #84

                      The quraan was revealed in a spoken language. Spoken Arabic does not respect grammar.

                      The quran itself disagrees with that? I.e. in 121-2, 413. But more importantly, 4612 is related to the topic, mentioning Moses directly and again, describes it as a book, not just a recital. Evidently it is primarily a book.

                      So why the hubbub, either way? You have one God equated with a plural, and your answer is that it doesn't follow grammar, why the different case for the other instances of "We" or "Our"?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • N Offline
                        N Offline
                        nerspi
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #85

                        peace

                        i'm very interested in this 'We','Us',or 'Our' topic.
                        in some verses it does imply that 'We' does not refer to God

                        359 And God is the One who sends the winds so it stirs up a cloud, then We drive it to a town that is dead, and We revive with it the land after it had died. Such is the resurrection.

                        3527 Do you not see that God sends down water from the sky, thus We produce with it fruits of various colors? And of the mountains are peaks that are white, red, or some other color and intense black.

                        but what about these verses

                        1526 And We have created man from a clay hardened and shaped.
                        2021 He said "Take it and do not be fearful, We will turn it back to its previous form."
                        4380 Or do they think that We do not hear their secrets and private counsel? Yes indeed; and Our messengers are with them, recording.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P Offline
                          P Offline
                          progod
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #86

                          Peace,

                          Samia said

                          The quraan was revealed in a spoken language. Spoken Arabic does not respect grammar.

                          This is falsehood of the utmost. Just pure and utter falsehood. The written Arabic today was the spoken Arabic of then. (Just as the people during Shakespeares age and the King's James Bible actually spoke that way (on the streets and everything, as opposed to now) The spoken Arabic of today is an invention of the Creolization era where Arabs through contact with non-Arabs formed a creole Arabic which spread and evolved within each different country. Please do not speak these untruths Samia, it cries ignorance. I'm sorry. What you have said above is just wrong, wrong, wrong. Please go listen to Shiekh Sha'rawi or somone from whom you can gleam some truth on these lingustic issues.

                          Godbless,
                          Anwar

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Offline
                            T Offline
                            tarikh
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #87

                            The we refers to God, and it implies the job was done by His servants-angels.
                            God knows best

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              maxq
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #88

                              I think I am going senile... sorry for repeating my question

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Offline
                                T Offline
                                tarikh
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #89

                                How old are ya?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • P Offline
                                  P Offline
                                  progod
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #90

                                  Peace,

                                  I concur with Tarikh. My take on it is that I's with no sign of quote is Angel Gabriel (God bless him) for instance ("I am the servant of this land" I believe which is in Chpt. 29). Quoted I's are usually God (quotes in Classical Arabic don't have to begin with 'he said or he says' different ways to quote are the use of wa, an, the obvious qaala and just going into the quote after you have mentioned the subject. See the passages of Abraham's quotes (God bless him) in Chpter 2 of the Quran.

                                  Godbless,
                                  Anwar

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mazhar
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #91

                                    Samia said

                                    Quote
                                    The quraan was revealed in a spoken language. Spoken Arabic does not respect grammar.

                                    This is falsehood of the utmost. Just pure and utter falsehood. The written Arabic today was the spoken Arabic of then. (Just as the people during Shakespeares age and the King's James Bible actually spoke that way (on the streets and everything, as opposed to now) The spoken Arabic of today is an invention of the Creolization era where Arabs through contact with non-Arabs formed a creole Arabic which spread and evolved within each different country. Please do not speak these untruths Samia, it cries ignorance. I'm sorry. What you have said above is just wrong, wrong, wrong. Please go listen to Shiekh Sha'rawi or somone from whom you can gleam some truth on these lingustic issues.

                                    Godbless,
                                    Anwar

                                    This is the first time during my stay on this forum that I felt disappointed. A man like me , a non Arab with little knowledge of Arabic, after going through the Quran even once, realizes immediately that it is an address/speech by One in front of whom is the gathering of everyone in time and space. A speaker addressing a very large crowd uses spoken language which conveys the message/perception/thought of the Speaker to everyone in a distinct manner.
                                    Do we find the details of "Arabic Grammer" written somewhere before the revelation of Quran?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      arnoldyasin
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #92

                                      Salaam Aleikum,

                                      Here are my 2 cents on the Plural use in the Quran

                                      http//ourbeacon.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=113

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #93

                                        Salaam Aleikum,

                                        Here are my 2 cents on the Plural use in the Quran

                                        http//ourbeacon.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=113

                                        That was generally my view. Thanks, it was a good read.

                                        This is the first time during my stay on this forum that I felt disappointed. A man like me , a non Arab with little knowledge of Arabic, after going through the Quran even once, realizes immediately that it is an address/speech by One in front of whom is the gathering of everyone in time and space. A speaker addressing a very large crowd uses spoken language which conveys the message/perception/thought of the Speaker to everyone in a distinct manner.
                                        Do we find the details of "Arabic Grammer" written somewhere before the revelation of Quran?

                                        It is both a recital and a book. That implies no division between the language into "spoken" and "unspoken". Also, the messenger is declared as a commoner. Unless you wish to say God's usage of "kitab" is erroneous.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Offline
                                          M Offline
                                          Mazhar
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #94

                                          Also, the messenger is declared as a commoner.{OPF}

                                          Quran does not describe the Messengers of Allah as "a commoner". It is the perception of the arrogant rich people of the societies who tried to convince the people under their influence that the Messenger was a "commoner" like them. In front of their people they even never said "Messenger is like us". they told ordinary, common people "He is like you" and dear OPF today you have also started talking in their tone and manner.

                                          If the speech of a speaker is recorded and written that will also be called a Book. Had the Book not been recorded as a speech none would have ever been able to remember it by heart. Where were the principles of grammer recorded/determined/written before or at the time of revelation of Quran? Any reference!! Who taught the Arabic Grammer to Non Arabs/say people of Persia of that time?

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users