How comes there's no Quran channel
-
How comes there's no quran channel, but on sky you can find "islam channel", "ramadan channel"... plenty of cultural shoes giving religion in their own language.
Wouldn't it be nice to have a channel solely devoted to researching the quran and aiming to teach the things about the quran that we do agree on?
-
How comes there's no quran channel, but on sky you can find "islam channel", "ramadan channel"... plenty of cultural shoes giving religion in their own language.
Wouldn't it be nice to have a channel solely devoted to researching the quran and aiming to teach the things about the quran that we do agree on?
Peace,
Respect.It's difficult to reach TV executives and convince them into anything.
Having such a channel would be next to impossible with certain people ....God knows best.
Peace. -
In Canada, they apparently have a weekly show on TV
http//www.youtube.com/user/QuranSpeaksPeace
Religious dress code appearance is reflecting the mentality of person. There are several kinds that believe prophet was using and naturally they are loosing attracting people like me that do not waste time on such people when they show by dress code what they think. 6 months viewers )
How about you ?
Peace. -
Doesn't sound like the quran channel I was thinking about.
Some of his views are good though... Like once i listened to one of his talks regarding the second coming of Jesus and he acknowledged that this concept is not mentioned in the Quran and quran is silent on it. Once he also speak a little on mathematical miracle of the Quran... not code 19 but the other ones like the pairs and so on.
-
Some of his views are good though... Like once i listened to one of his talks regarding the second coming of Jesus and he acknowledged that this concept is not mentioned in the Quran and quran is silent on it. Once he also speak a little on mathematical miracle of the Quran... not code 19 but the other ones like the pairs and so on.
Interesting... the quran is silent on Jesus peace be upon him in regard to his sign before the hour as according to quran Qur'an 4361 and the verses before it?
-
Interesting... the quran is silent on Jesus peace be upon him in regard to his sign before the hour as according to quran Qur'an 4361 and the verses before it?
This is a wrong interpretation... because there is enough proof in quran indicating that Jesus passed away... so it is not logical for Jesus to be a sign before the Hour unless you say he WAS a sign... However, the pronoun HU is being interpreted as referring to the Quran itself... Here is what M.Asad wrote in his interpretation of the verse.
Whereas most of the commentators regard the pronoun hu in innahu as relating to Jesus and, consequently, interpret the above phrase as "he is indeed a means to know the Last Hour", some authorities - e.g., Qatadah, Al-Hasan al-Basri and Sa'id ibn Jubayr (all of them quoted by Tabari, Baghawi and Ibn Kathir) - relate the pronoun to the Qur'an, and understand the phrase in the sense adopted in my rendering. The specific mention of the Last Hour in the above context is meant to stress man's ultimate responsibility before the Creator and, therefore, the fact that worship is due to Him alone and so this parenthetic passage follows logically upon the mention of the false deification of Jesus.
Peace
-
This is a wrong interpretation... because there is enough proof in quran indicating that Jesus passed away... so it is not logical for Jesus to be a sign before the Hour unless you say he WAS a sign... However, the pronoun HU is being interpreted as referring to the Quran itself... Here is what M.Asad wrote in his interpretation of the verse.
Whereas most of the commentators regard the pronoun hu in innahu as relating to Jesus and, consequently, interpret the above phrase as "he is indeed a means to know the Last Hour", some authorities - e.g., Qatadah, Al-Hasan al-Basri and Sa'id ibn Jubayr (all of them quoted by Tabari, Baghawi and Ibn Kathir) - relate the pronoun to the Qur'an, and understand the phrase in the sense adopted in my rendering. The specific mention of the Last Hour in the above context is meant to stress man's ultimate responsibility before the Creator and, therefore, the fact that worship is due to Him alone and so this parenthetic passage follows logically upon the mention of the false deification of Jesus.
Peace
Wrong according to some? Yet innahu still ends in a 3rd person masculine pronoun. There is nothing in the previous verses which suggests "man's ulimtate responsibility", what we read mainly is the "it/he" Jesus is mentioned, a sign is mentioned, the children of israel are mentioned, angels to earth are mentioned. Where is mankind mentioned?
