Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Arguments against Trinity.

Arguments against Trinity.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
5 Posts 3 Posters 11 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    The early christians did not believe in the Trinity. According to history, In year 325 A.D the trinity was establish in the Council of Nicea. This means that the Trinity was established 325 years after Jesus died. Therefore the trinity was not approved by God. and It was not approved by Jesus (because Jesus didn't live while the trinity was established). The word trinity does not exist in the bible, and the formulation of the Trinity is not mentioned in the bible neither. Therefore trinity is based on falsehood and has nothing to do with the original teachings of christianity. And it is obvious that christianity has become distorted.

    Most christians believe that Jesus was God's son. If Jesus was God's son, then when does he become God? Because if someone is a son, then he one day must become a father. As we can see, the belief that Jesus was the son of God, is illogical and it is based on falsehood. God can not have a son. God is not a human being. Only a human being can have a son. If God had a son, then it would exist two Gods. And that would be illogical. Therefore, when Jesus is described as God's son in the bible, it should not be understood literally. The word son, in the bible, most likely have a symbolic meaning. In the bible, other persons are also described as the sons of God. For example, David is described as the Son of God in the bible (See Psalms 27).

    Quran 6101
    Originator of the heavens and the earth,
    how can He have a son when He did not
    take a wife? He created all things and He
    is knowledgeable over all things.

    Many christians even go as far claiming that Jesus was God. They claim that Jesus was God reincarnated. If Jesus was God, then why did christians believe that he died? As we know, God is immortal. But human beings die. Ergo, Jesus could not have been God.
    If Jesus was God, then why did he prayed to God? Does a god need to pray to a god? That would be completely illogical and absurd. The reason why Jesus prayed to God, was because he was a human being and needed help and support from God. In the bible, it says that Jesus prayed to God (see Matthew 2639 Matthew 2642 Matthew 2644 Luke 516).

    There is not a single verse in the bible, where it says that Jesus is God. The christians who claim that Jesus is God, has misunderstood the whole christian religion. And they have ignored the original teachings of christianity. All messengers that came before Jesus were humans. So it makes no sense when people claim that Jesus was more than a human. Noah, Abraham, Jakob, Isak, Josef, Moses, and Muhammed were only humans. So Jesus was just a human, just like all of the other messengers.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      Kaiokenred
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      This is all correct even tho christians wont change their opinion they're idiots, except a few cases

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Peace Kaiokenred

        If you have a discussion with a christian, I recommend using the arguments in my last post. The christian might get convinced, and change his/her belief system.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Abdul-Hadi
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Greetings and Peace, all group

          Using AQ to debunk trinity is not as effective as using the Bible itself. The following book, (e-text available for free from Project Gutenberg, link provided) demonstrates how. One can invite others, but bludgeoning people with knowledge will generally not generate positive results. Not all Christians believe in trinity.

          The Grounds of Christianity Examined by Comparing The New Testament with the Old

          http//www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/15968

          Personally, I found SAB to be illuminating (it also shreds literalism)--but it isn't generally speaking productive.

          http//skepticsannotatedbible.com/

          May Allah see fit to Guide all seekers.

          peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Abdul-Hadi
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Using AQ to debunk trinity is not as effective as using the Bible itself.

            <clarification> I mean to Christians, of course. To a Christian, the Bible is more credible than AQ.

            AQ 547 And let the people of the Gospel judge with what God has sent down in it. And whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the wicked.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Users