Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Word usage in Al Quran - has anyone come across this?

Word usage in Al Quran - has anyone come across this?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
5 Posts 3 Posters 10 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Offline
    WakasW Offline
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    peace all,

    I had this thought a while ago, but I haven't researched it but wanted to throw it out there, see what happens

    From my studies, and reviewing of PRL data, I would say AQ seems to use the more well known / common / oft-used meanings of words, rather than obscure meanings of roots/words. It is interesting there is discussion in AQ itself about people distorting word usage and fabrication, which would imply there would be a preference to use the more well known / common / oft-used meanings of words.

    So I was wondering has anyone come across words where AQ has used the less well known /obscure word meaning?

    Also, I have sometimes read that it is interesting/amazing that AQ only uses about 1850 roots. Those who are familiar with Arabic prose, is this normal for a book of its size, is this unusually low or fairly normal?

    Thanks.

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      huruf
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      As far as I can remember some that I have looked up, there is no exclusivity. If at all, it may the that the frequency is the same. That is, it shows up in the Quran with a certain value in the same frequency as in the language. But this is very much in the aire. Just a suggestion, I know it doesn't limit itself to one meaning or two.

      Salaam

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        If we could come up with a few examples that would invalidate the observation.

        So I was wondering has anyone come across words where AQ has used the less well known /obscure word meaning?

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S Offline
          S Offline
          Samia
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          So I was wondering has anyone come across words where AQ has used the less well known /obscure word meaning?

          Thanks.

          How would we know that they were the "less well known/obscure" meanings? In Morocco I came accross the word "mihajj " meaning "Avenue". Was the word "hajj" a very everyday word and now it means "pilgrimage" whereas "way", or its derivatives, became the less well known/obscure meaning?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • WakasW Offline
            WakasW Offline
            Wakas
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            One way to check would be with Calssical Arabic dictionaries.

            For example, AQ uses a word to mean ABC, and this is a rare usage according to the dictionaries, very few examples etc.

            All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Users