A very humble call/request for help with Qur'nic interperatation
-
Samia, first of all Grammar rules were developed much later to understand Al Qur'an, when linguistic chaos was already taking place.
Furthermore, where did I imply that it is suffixed to a noun. It is not. It is a prefix to a noun i.e., Allahi. It is we who have some how assumed that Arabic is cursive in script exacltly like English as Layth suggested above. It is only cursive partly in script. However, words can be written in cursive joined together, but seperations are indicated by marks of "jezm and "sukoon". Hope this helps.
Badar Kanwar
-
What law makes "min" "mi"? Is there any (other) occurence of this "mi" in the qur'aan?
Sorry, didn't mean to ignore this question. The law for shortening the Min to Mi is from Arabic poetry, same as ala can be a. Examples are mil-ibili "from the camels", and al-mai mening "on the water (RefA GRAMMAR OF CLASSICAL ARABIC by Wolfdietrich Fischer 3rd edition page 152). Furthermore, here is the referance from Lane.
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume8/00000270.pdf
Does it occur in Qur'an? most likely. But you have a task cut out for me for several days. Thanks for it, this is how learning is enhanced and thats what we as believers, should be doing. Al-Furqan will be the ultimate criteria.
Badar Kanwar
-
Samia, first of all Grammar rules were developed much later to understand Al Qur'an, when linguistic chaos was already taking place.
I was speaking of universal grammar that rules the sentence construction, not the grammar.
Furthermore, where did I imply that it is suffixed to a noun. It is not. It is a prefix to a noun i.e., Allahi. It is we who have some how assumed that Arabic is cursive in script exacltly like English as Layth suggested above. It is only cursive partly in script. However, words can be written in cursive joined together, but seperations are indicated by marks of "jezm and "sukoon". Hope this helps.
Badar Kanwar
I wish you could write your senetnce in Arabic. Is this what you mean ?
What law makes "min" "mi"? Is there any (other) occurence of this "mi" in the qur'aan?
Sorry, didn't mean to ignore this question. The law for shortening the Min to Mi is from Arabic poetry, same as ala can be a. Examples are mil-ibili "from the camels", and al-mai mening "on the water (RefA GRAMMAR OF CLASSICAL ARABIC by Wolfdietrich Fischer 3rd edition page 152). Furthermore, here is the referance from Lane.
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume8/00000270.pdf
I know of something like "mil__ for min al__" in the Cairo dialect only.
But what I understood from Lane is that he was talking about "min" following another preposition such as another min, ila, 3an, etc..; as in mimma; ilaama; 3amma... all used as interrogation articles. As for "rubba rubbama", this is not an interrogation article. These have occurences in the qur'aan, but not mi. for the interrogative ; immediately following
a prep.So, in Arabic, here are the two connected preposition, ending with for
-
I was speaking of universal grammar that rules the sentence construction, not the grammar.
Thanks Samia for this clearification.
I wish you could write your senetnce in Arabic. Is this what you mean ?
No, what I am understanding using the concept of sign "jezm", indicating the final letter of a word is as follows that a portion of written script could have more than one word combined together. However, this sign demarks word seperation. Hence not should only be read seperatly, but as well be understood seperatly as regards meaning. This would obviously lead to diffrent roots.
BiAss Mi Allhai or once "Mi" is seperated from BiAss it should be written as BiAss Min Allahi. It is only issue of Morphology or Al Surf, of written scripture. I have not seen lot of work from Arabs on this issue, have you. Please share.
How are you able to type in Arabic? Please teach me.
Also Lane has referances for the concept of Jezm from Arabic lexicons. If you have access to those could you please, confirm or refute his understanding with referances. Thanks
Just to continue verse's understanding further
becomes
Ar reh Mani= "Ar="The" , Reh "ample and easy state of life that man can not think by himself (see Lane)
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume3/00000216.pdf
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume3/00000217.pdf
MAani= from one who undertakes your sustinance and maintenance.
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume8/00000270.pdf
Badar Kanwar MD., FCCP
-
Hence so far verse
Becomes like this
"a" " A foundation (A heart, Arabs believed that is the first part that come into exsistence in womb) for man/mankind from Allaha" for "The" "ample and easy state of life that man can not think by himself" "from one who undertakes your sustinance and maintenance".
-
Peace bkanwar2,
http//www.indiana.edu/~arabic/typing_arabic.htm
Type a word, and then copy-paste..
-
Samia, while waiting for your help about the issues indicated in the previous post. Let me continue to share my understanding that stems from concept of Jezm/sukoon
Ar=Al "the" Rahimi= "Mercy"= The mercy
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume3/00000221.pdfAl= "the" Ham= "the decree"
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume2/00000271.pdf
Du= "in the land"
http//www.studyquran.org/LaneLexicon/Volume3/00000094.pdf
Li= "on account of" Allahi
so this part of verse should read as " The decree for the land on account of Allah"
Badar Kanwar MD., FCCP
-
Salaam Badr
I see RHamsa took care of the typing issue, thanks to him.
Now, would it be too much if I ask you to type the Arabic portions in Arabic? That makes it easier for me to understand what you mean.
But before that, would you please tell me about this concept of "jezm & sukoon" and where you read about it? -
Samia, sorry for the late response. Do you have any specific questions about concept of Sukoon and Jezm, that I can try to elaborate further. I have posted with referances right from the start of this thread. I realise this is a totally new understanding it needs further confirmation and research, that involves referance that are old and in Arabic. Do you feel any intrest to be a part of this. I understand that your native language is Arabic, as well you have implied that you may have access to some of the Arabic books i.e., old grammar and lexicon.
Badar Kanwar
-
I just want to bring this topic to forefront again. It is important as it has huge implication regarding Qur?anic understanding. I know that lot of contributors on this forum are doing very important work. One such work being assigning roots to the Qur?anic words. This concept of Jezm and Sukoon is very important in this respect.
Let us elaborate this with an example.
In translation of Sura Fatiha, the wordAlmost everyone says, it's root to be . However, I could not find a word like this in Lane under this root; nor could I find a grammatical explanation of any inflections. Although, if we separate it into two based on understanding of Jezm and Sukoon It becomes and . Now it becomes very easy and clear. IS PRESENT UNDER ROOT and UNDER
Badar
-
salam. while reading through the posts on this thread, discussing diacritical marks, prefixes, and suffixes. this reminded me of three issues in language that i have reviewed.
if for example i start typing english like this, cn yo undrstnd ths sntnc tht i hve typd? you will realize that you can read what is written even if letters are missing. if i type the sentence like this cxn yxu uxxxxxxd txxs sxxxxxxe txxt i hxxe txxxd again it is more difficult, however it is still possible to discern parts of the sentence. if i type, would you comprehend the sentence, versus, understand you this sentence, again you are able to discern the different algorithm involved.
when reading an english text, the brain uses an algorithm to decode the letters on the page, and this algorithm is unique to english. when reading a french text, the brain uses another, different, algorithm to decode the letters on the page. when reading arabic, the brain uses yet another, third, algorithm to decode the letters on the page. this ability of the brain to develop these algorithms is familiar to us, we refere to a sentence as being poorly written when we see the wrong algorithm being used.
the task in comprehending the quran, is to develop the algorithm in the brain that allows us to comprehend the quran. the algorithm of quranic arabic is best developed by constant repetition of the quran, this trains the nerve pathways in the brain to make the correct associations, between concepts and words. once this training of the mind is complete, a person unconsciously recognizes the text of the quran, even if the text is typed in english. this book no doubt is there in it leading the pious, is immediately recognized as one of the opening lines of the quran.
recite quran, inshallah it will lead you to being pious. allah is the truth.
-
Salam and thanks. Brother look at this issue as, if one were to go from Chicago to New York and instead of directing himself eastward directs to west. He can keep travelling whole life without getting to his desired destination. Same is true if one develops a wrong algorithm, he would never get to the destination intended.
Badar