Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Are Gospel and Torah in the Quran the ones we know nowadays in the BIBLE?

Are Gospel and Torah in the Quran the ones we know nowadays in the BIBLE?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
32 Posts 7 Posters 372 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #20

    Peace arnab

    You mean as the Sustainer and ot as Father & Do not scare me;
    Salam

    The word father can be used metaphorically in English and if one keeps this in mind, then there will be no misunderstanding.

    Salam,
    Arnab

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • B Offline
      B Offline
      belH
      wrote on last edited by
      #21

      The word father can be used metaphorically in English and if one keeps this in mind, then there will be no misunderstanding.

      Salam,
      Arnab

      Peace Arnab

      The word Father means the following in dictionary

      Main Entry 1fa?ther
      Pronunciation \f?-thr
      Function noun
      Etymology Middle English fader, from Old English f?der; akin to Old High German fater father, Latin pater, Greek patr
      Date before 12th century
      1 a a man who has begotten a child ; also sire 3 bcapitalized (1) god 1 (2) the first person of the Trinity

      Now, I think using the word Father will lead to a Great Sin.

      Peace

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B Offline
        B Offline
        Bigmo
        wrote on last edited by
        #22

        Son of God is a nickname given by his followers in recognition of his miraculous birth. Semitic society always named a person as the son of his father. Since he had no human father his followers called him son of God. The disbelievers called him a bastard.

        Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b of the Soncino edition, it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.

        "According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.

        "The more popular accounts--which were nevertheless taken quite seriously--such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name 'Jesus' was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists...

        The koran tells us
        4.157. That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of God.;- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not-

        4.156 Quran
        That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge;

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #23

          Peace Arnab

          The word Father means the following in dictionary

          Main Entry 1fa?ther
          Pronunciation \f?-thr
          Function noun
          Etymology Middle English fader, from Old English f?der; akin to Old High German fater father, Latin pater, Greek patr
          Date before 12th century
          1 a a man who has begotten a child ; also sire 3 bcapitalized (1) god 1 (2) the first person of the Trinity

          Now, I think using the word Father will lead to a Great Sin.

          Peace

          Salam,

          Allah is also said as having a hand, a side, walking (implies having legs and feet), talking (implies having a mouth and by extension a face) and many more.

          Allah is above limitation.

          IF we say that Allah is not father, mother, king, capable of talking, walking, having a side, then that in itself, is a limitation.
          God is beyond limits.

          I say "father" and expect it to be understood as the best one word English translation available.
          It is best to understand all the characteristics of the semitic words used and to consider English translations unrestricted to their literal meaning.

          Salam,
          Arnab

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • T Offline
            T Offline
            the_seeker
            wrote on last edited by
            #24

            Some say Jesus, some say God.
            I say it doesn't matter the Quran says both are correct

            5111

            And when I revealed to the disciples, saying, Believe in Me and My messenger, they said We believe and bear witness that we submit (ourselves).

            The root word amen (alif-meem-nun) means faith/belief/to be strengthened/secure etc in all the semitic languages. One English word does not really give the true depth of meanint that the root represents.

            As for saying it at the end of prayers, this is tradition, not a command. I see nothing wrong with it.

            We are to believe in Allah and all his messengers. Some say Adam was a messenger and some say that he was not. I personally think he was, but this is a subject of debate.

            The root that is translated as good in John 1011, Luke 1819 and Mark 1018 is towb and has the same meaning in all the semitic languages good/beneficial

            And, no it would be a contradiction. In Luke 1819 and Mark 1018 you have a man approaching Jesus and trying to exault him by calling him good teacher. This person went on to not only exalt Jesus but himself in this passage. Jesus (always speaking in metaphors and speech that made a point) tells this man that there is none Good except the ONE God. In order to help this man see the error of his ways, is how I see it.

            Raheem is not used in John 1030....see how confusing English translations can be and why I say that none are accurate? The root word used is khann and briefly means as I stated before compassionate (the root word literally means to bend or stoop in kindness to an inferior).

            That being said, we all have the capability to be raheem (merciful/compassionate) and it can be a human attribute as well as an attribute of Allah. The believers strive to always be compassionate and merciful in everything they do.

            I do not agree with those who say that verses of the Quran should be taken out. To me this is a very serious transgression and the action of a disbeliever not the action of a believer.

            Salam,
            Arnab

            peace arnab,

            thanks.

            ramon

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Offline
              J Offline
              Jafar
              wrote on last edited by
              #25

              Son of God is a nickname given by his followers in recognition of his miraculous birth. Semitic society always named a person as the son of his father. Since he had no human father his followers called him son of God. The disbelievers called him a bastard.

              Peace Bigmo,

              I think you're mistaken..
              Son Of God is an english translation from "Ben Elohym" in Hebrew.
              "Ben Elohym" (singular) is a metaphorical 'title' within Jewish Culture, which means "God's man".

              The plural form; "Beney Elohym" was translated as "Sons Of God" in English which actually means "God's People".

              Jesus himself clearly clarify what "Son Of God" and "Sons Of God" actually means

              "Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the sons of God (Hebrew Beney Elohym)"
              Matthew 59

              Even David was also entitled as "Son Of God"..

              "YHVH had said onto me (David), thou art my Son ; this day have I begotten thee."
              Psalm 27

              There is huge difference in meanings between Jesus/David's "Son Of God" within Jewish Culture and Hercules Son Of Zeus within Pagan/Greek culture.
              The misunderstanding came when the bible gets exported to (back then) the pagan worlds. (Europe, Egypt, Arab)

              They interpret Jesus Son Of God is the same as Hercules Son Of Zeus or Horus Son Of Isis..
              Thus God had an "offspring" which of course also a God...

              Salam / Peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                Jafar
                wrote on last edited by
                #26

                This is your opinion, and you are entitled to it. However, it does not make it factual.

                Then what is the fact from your viewpoint?
                Gospel Of John was originally written in Aramaic????
                Kindly shows me where it is!

                Salam / Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #27

                  Peace Bigmo,

                  I think you're mistaken..
                  Son Of God is an english translation from "Ben Elohym" in Hebrew.
                  "Ben Elohym" (singular) is a metaphorical 'title' within Jewish Culture, which means "God's man".

                  The plural form; "Beney Elohym" was translated as "Sons Of God" in English which actually means "God's People".

                  Jesus himself clearly clarify what "Son Of God" and "Sons Of God" actually means

                  "Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the sons of God (Hebrew Beney Elohym)"
                  Matthew 59

                  Even David was also entitled as "Son Of God"..

                  "YHVH had said onto me (David), thou art my Son ; this day have I begotten thee."
                  Psalm 27

                  There is huge difference in meanings between Jesus/David's "Son Of God" within Jewish Culture and Hercules Son Of Zeus within Pagan/Greek culture.
                  The misunderstanding came when the bible gets exported to (back then) the pagan worlds. (Europe, Egypt, Arab)

                  They interpret Jesus Son Of God is the same as Hercules Son Of Zeus or Horus Son Of Isis..
                  Thus God had an "offspring" which of course also a God...

                  Salam / Peace

                  The root word ben literally means a builder.....it has come to mean son as the builder of the family name. A beni Eloheem is a "builder of God"

                  Then what is the fact from your viewpoint?
                  Gospel Of John was originally written in Aramaic????
                  Kindly shows me where it is!

                  Salam / Peace

                  www.peshitta.org
                  The only thing I recommend on the site is the Aramaic.
                  They use Syriac instead of Aramaic to translate the Gospels and the translation is utter nonsense in most cases.

                  Salam,
                  Arnab

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Offline
                    J Offline
                    Jafar
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #28

                    www.peshitta.org
                    The only thing I recommend on the site is the Aramaic.
                    They use Syriac instead of Aramaic to translate the Gospels and the translation is utter nonsense in most cases.

                    Here is the hard evidence of the oldest remnants of Gospel Of John
                    http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rylands_Library_Papyrus_P52
                    It is originally written in Greek (Not Aramaic).

                    The Gospel Of John within the Peshita is a translation from Greek to Aramaic.

                    Someone has wrote an excellent review on Gospel Of John which I tend to agree..
                    http//www.infidels.org/library/modern/james_still/gospel_john.html

                    In Summary The Gospel Of John is

                    • Originally written in Greek.
                    • Anti Jewish
                    • Show strong influence of Hellenism concept and paradigm (e.g. LOGOS)
                    • Very distinct compared to the synoptic gospels (mark,matt,luke)
                    • Written as early as 100 AD
                    • Most probably written by a pagan/greek convert to christian.
                    • Thus not suprisingly it is also the most popular and oft-referenced gospel by the pagan christians (which form the majority of today christians)

                    Salam / Peace

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #29

                      Here is the hard evidence of the oldest remnants of Gospel Of John
                      http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rylands_Library_Papyrus_P52
                      It is originally written in Greek (Not Aramaic).

                      The Gospel Of John within the Peshita is a translation from Greek to Aramaic.

                      Someone has wrote an excellent review on Gospel Of John which I tend to agree..
                      http//www.infidels.org/library/modern/james_still/gospel_john.html

                      In Summary The Gospel Of John is

                      • Originally written in Greek.
                      • Anti Jewish
                      • Show strong influence of Hellenism concept and paradigm (e.g. LOGOS)
                      • Very distinct compared to the synoptic gospels (mark,matt,luke)
                      • Written as early as 100 AD
                      • Most probably written by a pagan/greek convert to christian.
                      • Thus not suprisingly it is also the most popular and oft-referenced gospel by the pagan christians (which form the majority of today christians)

                      Salam / Peace

                      Salam,
                      Again, all of the above is your opinion.

                      This is a brief overview (not a complete explaination) of why I believe in the Aramaic Primacy
                      http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aramaic_Primacy

                      Salam,
                      Arnab

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        herbman
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #30

                        Appart from the fact that there are translation problem as mentionned by Arnab, don't you really think that the writing style of the Bible cleary shows that it is a man made scripture.
                        I agree the source is divine but saying "The Bible is word of God" is pretty hard to accept. By reading it we clearly see that the authors are men.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B Offline
                          B Offline
                          Bigmo
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #31

                          Peace Bigmo,

                          I think you're mistaken..
                          Son Of God is an english translation from "Ben Elohym" in Hebrew.
                          "Ben Elohym" (singular) is a metaphorical 'title' within Jewish Culture, which means "God's man".

                          The plural form; "Beney Elohym" was translated as "Sons Of God" in English which actually means "God's People".

                          Jesus himself clearly clarify what "Son Of God" and "Sons Of God" actually means

                          "Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called the sons of God (Hebrew Beney Elohym)"
                          Matthew 59

                          Even David was also entitled as "Son Of God"..

                          "YHVH had said onto me (David), thou art my Son ; this day have I begotten thee."
                          Psalm 27

                          There is huge difference in meanings between Jesus/David's "Son Of God" within Jewish Culture and Hercules Son Of Zeus within Pagan/Greek culture.
                          The misunderstanding came when the bible gets exported to (back then) the pagan worlds. (Europe, Egypt, Arab)

                          They interpret Jesus Son Of God is the same as Hercules Son Of Zeus or Horus Son Of Isis..
                          Thus God had an "offspring" which of course also a God...

                          Salam / Peace

                          But Jesus and his disciples spoke in Aramaic.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            herbman
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #32

                            About the Bible

                            I am not expert in Bible, Gospel and Torah, but as there are mentioned in Quran, I question myself.

                            The so called "Bible King James version", the one most used nowadays is the Bible with the 5th majeur revision!

                            The red letter Bible is a Bible where all what Jesus says is written in red. This Bible still exist and 21 of the 27 books doesn't have any red mark!!!

                            So I think the Bible we know today is not the Injeel.

                            source Ahmed Deedat

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users