Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Muhammad is a White Man?

Muhammad is a White Man?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
288 Posts 26 Posters 22.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Ahmad_Bilal
    wrote on last edited by
    #249

    Peace Chris,

    first Iblis was INhuman according to the Quran and not SUBhuman like you stated.

    Please show me where I said Iblis was "subhuman". I never made this statement at all, and you're trying to attribute words to me to prove your point, even though it's incorrect.

    Second it is YOUR STORY about Iblis and "Eve" what implies that in your worldview white peopple are inferior. And others here can see the same.

    Again, you are attributing lies to me to support your false theories. It's not "MY STORY" that Iblis reproduced with Adam's wife (i.e. "Eve&quot. It actually comes from a Jewish concept, and aspects of it are found in the Torah and in their oral history... And how many times to I have to repeat that I don't believe white people are inferior? ) I never said white people are inferior to anyone, and I never promoted black/Nubian superiority. I simply said they didn't come from the same ancestor.

    Third I still refute strongly YOU STORY and until now you have not given ANY evidence from the Quran supporting that YOUR STORY about Iblis breeding with Eve and creating a different than black offspring is true.
    Until now you have not refuted my evidence from the Quran that Allah created the various colours of the people.

    Posted on Yesterday at 111127 AMPosted by Christoph Haupt

    But I refute strongly and vehemently your claim and that of Al Khidr and Amin74 that caucasoid people are not descendants of Adam. That is a racial biased and separatist view with no support in the Quran!! Rather the opposite

    1. And from His signs is the creation of the heavens and the Earth, and the difference of your languages and your colors. In that are signs for the world.

    2. And from the people, and the animals, and the livestock, are various colors. As such, only the knowledgeable among Gods servants reverence Him. God is Noble, Forgiving.

    Allah tells us that it was IT that is responsible for our different appearances and not Iblis breeding with Adams wife like you want people to believe.
    If it is beyond your comprehension to understand the matter of diversity I would advise to seek knowledge the way Allah tells us

    1. Say Roam the Earth and observe how the creation was initiated. Thus God will establish the final creation. God is capable of all things.

    The answer can be found in exploring creation itself and not in mythological books.


    Until know you did not answer to this post of mine so for you convience to read i put it again in here.

    What was the point of quoting your opinionated comment? It says that the languages and colors of the people are among the signs from Allah. Does this illustrate a separation between blacks and whites? ABSOLUTELY. White people have considered themselves free from color and differentiation, which is why they call black people "colored". This shows the different colors of human skin tones in similar groups, not the difference between whites and blacks. If you're correct, then why doesn't the Qur'an mention different hair textures, eye colors, or featural dominance? Here's a basic answer the people obviously had similar features which wouldn't serve as clear identifiers for separation. They're only general difference was their skin tone and colors.

    I also suggest you examine creation, and see what the differences are between black people and white people, and maybe you'll understand the truth. Also, since when has the Torah been regarded as a "mythological book"? According to the Qur'an, the Torah is a revelation from Allah.

    Peace,

    Ahmad

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      Ahmad_Bilal
      wrote on last edited by
      #250

      Peace Chris,

      1. Do you not see that God sends down water from the sky, thus We produce
        with it fruits of various colors? And of the mountains are peaks that are
        white, red, or some other color and intense black.
      2. And from the people, and the animals, and the livestock, are various colors.
        As such, only the knowledgeable among God?s servants reverence Him. God is Noble, Forgiving.

      This 2 ayat explain beautiful that all colours in nature are a creation of Allah, including the skincolour of people. Our Creator is even pointing out some colours in particular white, red, or some other color and intense black.
      white people and black people and all other vrious skincolours are Creations from Allah, descendants of the first human being Adam

      I already showed you how black people and white people having the same general ancestor is NOT physically possible. So, I won't even go back into detail on that matter... And regarding all the colors being creations of Allah, I suggest you read through the scriptures (i.e. the "mythological books" you mentioned). EVERYTHING is a creation from Allah, and this includes all people and jinns. Even Iblis himself was a creation of Allah. So, your showing that white people and black people are all creations of God doesn't mean anything at all; you're just stating the plainly obvious that Allah created EVERYTHING in existence, seen and unseen. This is already an established fact.

      Ahmad Bilal, Al Khidr I CHALLENGE YOU to produce a verse from the Quran that supports your claim of white people not being the offspring from ADAM!
      According to your claims white people are the Al-Jinn. Produce a verse from the Quran stating that a Jinn has a white skin!

      Brother Al Khidr and I have already showed you this several times. We don't have to post a verse that says "jinns are white", because that's not necessary at all. This is a clearly derived conclusion by the Qur'anic confirmation of Adam being BLACK. That means if it's not black, it didn't come from Adam, plain and simple. Adam was formed from black mud, and Iblis wasn't. So, if Adam's descendants had black skin like their forefather, the reverse would be that Iblis' descendants did NOT have black skin, which is like their forefather... So, if you disagree, please show your proofs of jinns having wings and horns, flying around with pitchforks, like what is commonly referred to as a "devil". If you don't have any evidence of your claims, then it's most reasonable to at least look into the facts which can be backed up with evidence.

      Peace,

      Ahmad

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        Christoph_Haupt
        wrote on last edited by
        #251

        Salaam Ahmad

        Your stance regarding white people as satanic offspring is the focalpoint of your being and to take any other stance would shatter your self.
        From this further discussion and argumentation is fruitless.
        You don't view white people as inferior but seeing them NOT descandent of Adam you don't view them equal either.

        Chapter 109

        In the name of God, the Almighty, the Merciful.

        1. Say "O rejecters," (of equality)
        2. "I do not serve what you serve,"
        3. "Nor do you serve what I serve,"
        4. "Nor will I serve what you serve,"
        5. "Nor will you serve what I serve,"
        6. "To you is your system, and to me is mine."

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Ahmad_Bilal
          wrote on last edited by
          #252

          Peace Chris,

          Your stance regarding white people as satanic offspring is the focalpoint of your being and to take any other stance would shatter your self.
          From this further discussion and argumentation is fruitless.
          You don't view white people as inferior but seeing them NOT descandent of Adam you don't view them equal either.

          This is ridiculous. Like I've said numerous times, I BELIEVE IN RACIAL EQUALITY FOR ALL PEOPLE. The real question is Does being considered a descendant of Iblis make you feel inferior to descendants of Adam? You're disregarding the fact that Allah judges us by our righteousness and our belief, not by our ancestry. So, if being called a descendant of Iblis makes you feel inferior, then you should examine the Qur'an more carefully, and there you'll see how we are judged by the Almighty.

          Peace,

          Ahmad

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Al_Khidr
            wrote on last edited by
            #253

            Thanks Al Khidr for the long repley to my postings stating nothing new but I refute strongly and vehemently your claim and that of Al Khidr and Amin74 that caucasoid people are not descendants of Adam. That is a racial biased and separatist view with no support in the Quran!! Rather the opposite

            1. And from His signs is the creation of the heavens and the Earth, and THE DIFFERENCE OF your languages and YOUR COLOURS. In that are signs for the world.

            2. And FROM THE PEOPLE, and the animals, and the livestock, ARE VARIOUS COLOURS. As such, only the knowledgeable among God?s servants reverence Him. God is Noble, Forgiving.

            Allah tells us that it was IT that is responsible for our different appearances and not Iblis breeding with Adams wife like you want people to believe.
            If it is beyond your comprehension to understand the matter of diversity I would advise to seek knowledge the way Allah tells us

            1. Say ?Roam the Earth and observe how the creation was initiated. Thus God will establish the final creation. God is capable of all things.?

            The answer can be found in exploring creation itself and not in mythological books.

            Peace....Chris

            Chris

            You said I made a claim huh..... You are jumping to fast with the gun. I challenge YOU to quote me to back up your statement.

            But I will leave you with this

            http//ipconcealer.com/goto/nph-proxy.cgi/010110A/uggc/=2fserr-zvaqf.bet/sbehz/vaqrk.cuc=3fgbcvp=3d9597416.zft188095#msg188095

            You can also download the JINN

            http//kushite.webs.com/jinn.htm

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              marleya
              wrote on last edited by
              #254

              Salaam aleikum.

              I am sorry Bilal that I forgot the link,been a little distracted.Didnt check the post.

              http//exploring-africa.blogspot.com/2008/01/skin-pigmentation-gene-alleles-part-2.html

              Mutation is the word Bilal.Thats how they know today that black men were the first creation,because the mutation is numerous.The skin colour is a mutation,and it is likely to have had happen not so long ago.From 6000 to 12000 years ago.The european have been darker longer than they have been white.

              I find it strange how you people can from the Koran,draw the thougt that white men is not from Allah.

              If you think that your thoughts is more nobel or different than the white racism,you are wrong Bilal.

              To unite,and to reforme the character of men,is the way Allah gives us.To be the beings,he knew we could be.

              Al Kidr,there is a good articel,here on free minds of jinn,easy to understand and good.

              http//www.free-minds.org/jinn Search "who are the jinn" by Layth

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                Ahmad_Bilal
                wrote on last edited by
                #255

                Peace Marleya,

                I am sorry Bilal that I forgot the link,been a little distracted.Didnt check the post.

                http//exploring-africa.blogspot.com/2008/01/skin-pigmentation-gene-alleles-part-2.html

                Mutation is the word Bilal.Thats how they know today that black men were the first creation,because the mutation is numerous.The skin colour is a mutation,and it is likely to have had happen not so long ago.From 6000 to 12000 years ago.The european have been darker longer than they have been white.

                This doesn't have anything to do with Europeans. This is about the ancestry of black people and white people. What you are speaking is ridiculous nonsense. I already told you that racial differences between white people and black people goes FAR BEYOND skin pigmentation. Plus, regarding physical and genetic mutation, this wouldn't have happened in the case of Adam and his wife because THEY WERE THE FIRST BEINGS. In other words, they were created without genetic flaws and recessive traits; all of their features were dominant, which means they were passed on to their offspring.

                I find it strange how you people can from the Koran,draw the thougt that white men is not from Allah.

                I find that strange too... You need to stop your denial of the truth, and escape from the mental prison where you've enslaved yourself with your false reasoning. What you have stated is YOUR OWN conclusion. Show me ANYWHERE I ever mentioned that white people are not from Allah, ANYWHERE. Stop your blasphemies. Everything is from Allah; He is the creator of all things seen and unseen. If white people are descendants of Iblis, guess what! Iblis is from Allah too, just like Adam. That doesn't change who their (and your) ancestors are...

                By the way, what's with the "you people" comment? wow laugh

                If you think that your thoughts is more nobel or different than the white racism,you are wrong Bilal.

                How am I promoting racism by speaking the truth? The fact of the matter is this You are speaking from emotion rather than common sense (or as Anwar says, "good sense&quot, and this is ridiculous. Is it wrong for me to say that black people were first given the scriptures as the children of Adam? Even modern-day scientists agree that the so-called Afro-Asiatic languages, which includes Semitic languages (i.e. Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, etc.), were originally spoken around Ethiopia, and the original Hebrews were dark-skinned people, just like the early Arabs. What you're speaking are your own emotion-based opinions, and when weighed against facts, your opinions don't mean anything.

                Peace,

                Ahmad

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  marleya
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #256

                  Salaam aleikum

                  Which truth Bilal?

                  You have said that it is impossible for black people to produce white people,I have proved that the europeans have not always been white,they started out black!

                  The truth is that the difference only goes skindeep,and the variation beetween africans themselves,are bigger than the differences beetween africans and europeans,or asians,or aboriginies.

                  For centuries tha white people have tried to search for the race gene,that would favourable the white man,but ended up with the knowledge that black people were their ancestors,that life was created in Africa.

                  What is more right than emotion?When somethings sounds wrong,feels wrong,than I trust my emotion.

                  Peace Bilal,may Allah guide us all.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sarat
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #257

                    Peace,

                    Black people and White people and everyone in between are the descendants of the same person.

                    Its scientifically proven and its clearly mentioned in the Qur'an (if the science wasen't enough for you).

                    To say otherwise is blasphemous on both levels.

                    Btw, Progod are you a professor by chance? You could do a lot of good in an anthropology, middle east studies, or Islamic studies department, not to mention an Arabic department with your knowledge.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Ahmad_Bilal
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #258

                      Peace Marleya,

                      You have said that it is impossible for black people to produce white people!

                      Where did I say it's impossible for black people to produce white people? o Please quote me. I didn't say that at all, and once again, you're putting words into my mouth for fit your own false belief.

                      The truth is that the difference only goes skindeep,and the variation beetween africans themselves,are bigger than the differences beetween africans and europeans,or asians,or aboriginies.

                      This is completely ridiculous. Please show proof of your claim. This has already been discussed, and resources have been used. So, if you're going to make a statement like that, please cite some examples or some evidence.

                      For centuries tha white people have tried to search for the race gene,that would favourable the white man,but ended up with the knowledge that black people were their ancestors,that life was created in Africa.

                      Then, why dp white people still deny this fact? Most of them still claim to be descendants of the ancient Arabs, not Africans/Nubians. In fact, most of them attest to the theory that ancient white civilization developed somewhere in Iraq, and they refuse to acknowledge ancient Nubian civilization as being part of their ancestry.

                      What is more right than emotion?When somethings sounds wrong,feels wrong,than I trust my emotion.

                      This is outrageous. Just because you "feel" something is right doesn't make it correct. Plenty of people "feel" good about making fast money, but does this make it okay to rob a bank? Most Christians "feel" that Jesus is so-called God-Incarnate, but does this make it true? ) Maybe you need to STOP trusting your emotion so much, and stick to facts.

                      Peace,

                      Ahmad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Offline
                        C Offline
                        CousCous
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #259

                        If any of you guys are wondering whether the description of Mohamed in the hadith is reliable, check out the sunni inspired description of Ali; Fat, Black and Bald! Any political motivations?

                        Also remember that a 'White' Arab usually is nowhere near as 'White' as a European so even though the hadith says he was a 'White Man' doesn't make him a Northern European.

                        Just something to take into account guys.

                        CousCous

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Ahmad_Bilal
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #260

                          Peace Sarat,

                          Black people and White people and everyone in between are the descendants of the same person.

                          Its scientifically proven and its clearly mentioned in the Qur'an (if the science wasen't enough for you).

                          To say otherwise is blasphemous on both levels.

                          Okay... ) Can you please show some of this scientific evidence and proof from the Qur'an to back up your claim?

                          Peace,

                          Ahmad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Ahmad_Bilal
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #261

                            Peace CousCous,

                            If any of you guys are wondering whether the description of Mohamed in the hadith is reliable, check out the sunni inspired description of Ali; Fat, Black and Bald! Any political motivations?

                            We don't particular know about the political motivations regarding Ali and his description according to Sunni scholars. All we know is that, according to their hadiths, he was sternly rejected by almost everyone, including Muhammad's wife Aisha, and nobody wanted to see him lead the people. They even tried assassinating him, which eventually occurred by a separate group of "Muslims" who regarded Ali as a disbeliever. But again, these are only rumors and hadiths, not actual facts, and we don't know the truth of any of these people and circumstances because we weren't there...

                            Also remember that a 'White' Arab usually is nowhere near as 'White' as a European so even though the hadith says he was a 'White Man' doesn't make him a Northern European.

                            You are correct. Pale Arabs are not necessarily as "white" as Europeans, and this could've possibly been manipulated by modern scholars. Maybe they were implying that he had a lighter skin complexion... However, this doesn't change the inconsistencies within these hadiths. There were previously texts in the hadith and sunna writings that described Muhammad as being black, and they've been replaced with hadiths about Muhammad being a pale Arab.

                            According to certain hadiths (i.e. Hadith, Vol. 9162, 163), Muhammad claimed that his dreams of black/Nubian women meant that disease and pestilence was approaching. According to these hadiths, he also called black people "raisin heads" (Hadith Vol. 1662; Vol. 9256). Plus

                            Muslims are told through the hadiths that
                            (1) Africans/Nubians "annoy the Prophet" (Ishaq 243)
                            (2) Blacks/Nubians should be left to die if injured, and should be denied intercession and entrance to heaven (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 137)

                            Still not shocked? Look at some of these hadiths

                            Abu Darda' reported God's messenger as saying, "God created Adam when He created him and struck his right shoulder and brought forth his offspring white like small ants. And He struck his left shoulder and brought forth his offspring BLACK as though they were charcoal. Then He said to the party on his right said, 'To paradise, and I do not care', and He said to the party in his left shoulder 'To hell, and I do not care'." Ahmad transmitted it. (Mishkat Al Masabih, English translation with explanatory notes by Dr. James Robson , Volume I, Chapter IV, Book I.- Faith, pp. 31-32)

                            Narrated AbudDarda'
                            Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said Allah created Adam when He had to create him and He struck his right shoulder and there emitted from it white offspring as if they were white ants. He struck his left shoulder and there emitted from it THE BLACK OFFSPRINGS as if they were charcoal. He then said (to those who had been emitted) from the right (shoulder) For Paradise and I do not mind. Then He said to those (who had been emitted) from his left shoulder They are for Hell and I do not mind.
                            Transmitted by Ahmad. (Al-Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 38- ALIM CD ROM Version)

                            According to these hadiths, black people were created by Allah specifically with the purpose of going to hell! This doesn't sound racist to you? Or what about this

                            Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, "Anyone who says that the Prophet was black SHOULD BE KILLED." (Muhammad Messenger of Allah (Ash-Shifa of Qadi 'Iyad), Qadi 'Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley , p. 375)

                            Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, Sahnun's companion, said that whoever says that the Prophet was black IS KILLED. The Prophet was not black. (Ibid., p. 387)

                            These state that Muhammad was definately WHITE, as in EUROPEAN WHITE, and anyone who claimed him to be black/darker skinned should be killed! According to their hadiths, they even imply that Satan himself is black

                            ... The apostle said, "Whoever wants to see Satan let him take a look at Nabtal b. al-Harith!" He was a sturdy black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks. He used to come and talk to the apostle and listen to him and then carry what he had said to the hypocrites. It was he who said "Muhammad is all ears if anyone tells him anything he believes it." God sent down concerning him "And of them are those who annoy the prophet and say he is all ears, Say Good ears for you. He believes in God and trusts the believers and is a mercy for those of you who believe; and those who annoy the apostle of God for them there is a painful punishment." (Sura 961) (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasulallah, translated as, The Life of Muhammad by A. Guillaume, page 243)

                            Now, I don't know how you interpret these, but to me, it looks like the writers had fierce objections and prejudices against black Arabs and Africans/Nubians, even to the extent of saying they are all destined for hell and Satan looks like a black man. This is ridiculous! So, even though the hadiths may have not been literally speaking of Muhammad being as white as Europeans, it is still implying that he, being called "the white man", had lighter skin than the other people around him, and they illustrate that he had extreme views against blacks.

                            Plenty of hadiths speak of Muhammad owning and selling black slaves, and even raping black women! Do you think this is a good example of Muhammad, a prophet of God? Regardless of whether you view Muhammad as European white, pale, light-brown skinned, or pitch black, it doesn't change the view of blacks that is exhibited throughout the racist Saudi Arabian Muslim society, promoted by pale Arabs and white people. And it's still wrong...

                            Peace,

                            Ahmad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              Al_Khidr
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #262

                              If any of you guys are wondering whether the description of Mohamed in the hadith is reliable, check out the sunni inspired description of Ali; Fat, Black and Bald! Any political motivations?

                              Also remember that a 'White' Arab usually is nowhere near as 'White' as a European so even though the hadith says he was a 'White Man' doesn't make him a Northern European.

                              Just something to take into account guys.

                              CousCous

                              I think its so funny to see how people try to water down racism. Those hadiyths were design to make it appear that Prophet Muhammad was a white/european and the white man in Islaam only credits Bilal as Black and no one else and if you can understand that then you definately can see that there was a scheme or an agenda to make everything white in Islaam just like how they did in Christianity. When you look at their HIS-STORY, they even make the Moors (who are originally Black) white in their videos and pictures they create. Prophet Muhammad was 360 degrees away from being white, he was dark skinned, he was Black of Nubian/African descent. Those who conquered the original Nubians in Africa, Saudi Arabia, etc. came from Europe. The people consider the present day Jews in Israel are actually europeans, they are not the original Nubians who are the original Hebrews/Jews etc.

                              There is a lot of racism in hadiyth. There are hadiyth which states that the Black stone they kiss in Mecca was originally white and it turned Black because of the sins of the people who kissed it. The white man has always given the color Black, evil, negative, satanic connotations. Remember Angel Food Cake is WHITE and Devil Food Cake is BLACK. This is a demonstration of how racism is institutionalized which effects the conscious and unconscious level of all people and this same for of racism has been institutionalized in all religions. The prophets did not teach this, this is a result of the dirty practice of men.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                Al_Khidr
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #263

                                Salaam aleikum.

                                I am sorry Bilal that I forgot the link,been a little distracted.Didnt check the post.

                                http//exploring-africa.blogspot.com/2008/01/skin-pigmentation-gene-alleles-part-2.html

                                Mutation is the word Bilal.Thats how they know today that black men were the first creation,because the mutation is numerous.The skin colour is a mutation,and it is likely to have had happen not so long ago.From 6000 to 12000 years ago.The european have been darker longer than they have been white.

                                I find it strange how you people can from the Koran,draw the thougt that white men is not from Allah.

                                If you think that your thoughts is more nobel or different than the white racism,you are wrong Bilal.

                                To unite,and to reforme the character of men,is the way Allah gives us.To be the beings,he knew we could be.

                                Al Kidr,there is a good articel,here on free minds of jinn,easy to understand and good.

                                http//www.free-minds.org/jinn Search "who are the jinn" by Layth

                                Salaam

                                Thanks for the link and I read it a long time ago. You may want to check this link out on the Jinn

                                http//kushite.webs.com/jinn.htm

                                Now what you have said below is ridiculous

                                "The truth is that the difference only goes skindeep,and the variation beetween africans themselves,are bigger than the differences beetween africans and europeans,or asians,or aboriginies."

                                All Africans on the continent of Africa are closer to each other in terms of race genetics and this holds true for us Africans throughout the world. All Africans no matter where they are on the planet are genetically closer to each other.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Al_Khidr
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #264

                                  Peace CousCous,

                                  We don't particular know about the political motivations regarding Ali and his description according to Sunni scholars. All we know is that, according to their hadiths, he was sternly rejected by almost everyone, including Muhammad's wife Aisha, and nobody wanted to see him lead the people. They even tried assassinating him, which eventually occurred by a separate group of "Muslims" who regarded Ali as a disbeliever. But again, these are only rumors and hadiths, not actual facts, and we don't know the truth of any of these people and circumstances because we weren't there...

                                  You are correct. Pale Arabs are not necessarily as "white" as Europeans, and this could've possibly been manipulated by modern scholars. Maybe they were implying that he had a lighter skin complexion... However, this doesn't change the inconsistencies within these hadiths. There were previously texts in the hadith and sunna writings that described Muhammad as being black, and they've been replaced with hadiths about Muhammad being a pale Arab.

                                  According to certain hadiths (i.e. Hadith, Vol. 9162, 163), Muhammad claimed that his dreams of black/Nubian women meant that disease and pestilence was approaching. According to these hadiths, he also called black people "raisin heads" (Hadith Vol. 1662; Vol. 9256). Plus

                                  Muslims are told through the hadiths that
                                  (1) Africans/Nubians "annoy the Prophet" (Ishaq 243)
                                  (2) Blacks/Nubians should be left to die if injured, and should be denied intercession and entrance to heaven (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 137)

                                  Still not shocked? Look at some of these hadiths

                                  Abu Darda' reported God's messenger as saying, "God created Adam when He created him and struck his right shoulder and brought forth his offspring white like small ants. And He struck his left shoulder and brought forth his offspring BLACK as though they were charcoal. Then He said to the party on his right said, 'To paradise, and I do not care', and He said to the party in his left shoulder 'To hell, and I do not care'." Ahmad transmitted it. (Mishkat Al Masabih, English translation with explanatory notes by Dr. James Robson , Volume I, Chapter IV, Book I.- Faith, pp. 31-32)

                                  Narrated AbudDarda'
                                  Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said Allah created Adam when He had to create him and He struck his right shoulder and there emitted from it white offspring as if they were white ants. He struck his left shoulder and there emitted from it THE BLACK OFFSPRINGS as if they were charcoal. He then said (to those who had been emitted) from the right (shoulder) For Paradise and I do not mind. Then He said to those (who had been emitted) from his left shoulder They are for Hell and I do not mind.
                                  Transmitted by Ahmad. (Al-Tirmidhi Hadith, Number 38- ALIM CD ROM Version)

                                  According to these hadiths, black people were created by Allah specifically with the purpose of going to hell! This doesn't sound racist to you? Or what about this

                                  Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun, said, "Anyone who says that the Prophet was black SHOULD BE KILLED." (Muhammad Messenger of Allah (Ash-Shifa of Qadi 'Iyad), Qadi 'Iyad Musa al-Yahsubi, translated by Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley , p. 375)

                                  Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, Sahnun's companion, said that whoever says that the Prophet was black IS KILLED. The Prophet was not black. (Ibid., p. 387)

                                  These state that Muhammad was definately WHITE, as in EUROPEAN WHITE, and anyone who claimed him to be black/darker skinned should be killed! According to their hadiths, they even imply that Satan himself is black

                                  ... The apostle said, "Whoever wants to see Satan let him take a look at Nabtal b. al-Harith!" He was a sturdy black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks. He used to come and talk to the apostle and listen to him and then carry what he had said to the hypocrites. It was he who said "Muhammad is all ears if anyone tells him anything he believes it." God sent down concerning him "And of them are those who annoy the prophet and say he is all ears, Say Good ears for you. He believes in God and trusts the believers and is a mercy for those of you who believe; and those who annoy the apostle of God for them there is a painful punishment." (Sura 961) (Ibn Ishaq, Sirat Rasulallah, translated as, The Life of Muhammad by A. Guillaume, page 243)

                                  Now, I don't know how you interpret these, but to me, it looks like the writers had fierce objections and prejudices against black Arabs and Africans/Nubians, even to the extent of saying they are all destined for hell and Satan looks like a black man. This is ridiculous! So, even though the hadiths may have not been literally speaking of Muhammad being as white as Europeans, it is still implying that he, being called "the white man", had lighter skin than the other people around him, and they illustrate that he had extreme views against blacks.

                                  Plenty of hadiths speak of Muhammad owning and selling black slaves, and even raping black women! Do you think this is a good example of Muhammad, a prophet of God? Regardless of whether you view Muhammad as European white, pale, light-brown skinned, or pitch black, it doesn't change the view of blacks that is exhibited throughout the racist Saudi Arabian Muslim society, promoted by pale Arabs and white people. And it's still wrong...

                                  Peace,

                                  Ahmad

                                  Salaam Ahmad Bilal

                                  Thanks brother for presenting those hadiyth which demonstrates the racism in Islaam and how deep this racism actually is. As Islaam dominates the globe this form of racism definately has to be exposed to the masses so that we will not have another repeat of Christianity.

                                  "Now, I don't know how you interpret these, but to me, it looks like the writers had fierce objections and prejudices against black Arabs and Africans/Nubians, even to the extent of saying they are all destined for hell and Satan looks like a black man."

                                  And this is one of the reason why Al Jahiz wrote his book because of the racism the original Nubian Arabs were going through with the imposter White Arabs.

                                  http//www.ipconcealer.com/goto/nph-proxy.cgi/010110A/uggc/=2fserr-zvaqf.bet/sbehz/vaqrk.cuc=3fgbcvp=3d9597416.zft187127#msg187127

                                  Ahmad, I know that you also observed how many people on here are calling us a racist because we are taking a stand to speak out and condemn racism in Islaam and this only testifies to their racism and indoctrination.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Ahmad_Bilal
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #265

                                    Salaam Al Khidr,

                                    And this is one of the reason why Al Jahiz wrote his book because of the racism the original Nubian Arabs were going through with the imposter White Arabs.

                                    http//www.ipconcealer.com/goto/nph-proxy.cgi/010110A/uggc/=2fserr-zvaqf.bet/sbehz/vaqrk.cuc=3fgbcvp=3d9597416.zft187127#msg187127

                                    You're absolutely right. This kind of racism was prevalent then, and it is still prevalent, even throughout the Islamic world. The only people who don't see this are those who have blinded themselves from reality. The original Arabs and Hebrews were Nubians, but throughout the world, they are presented as white people. And they're not even illustrated as "pale Arabs"; they're actually illustrated to be white Europeans!

                                    Ahmad, I know that you also observed how many people on here are calling us a racist because we are taking a stand to speak out and condemn racism in Islaam and this only testifies to their racism and indoctrination.

                                    I completely agree. The only way we can solve this problem is if we identify it. Islam (general) is the fastest growing religion in the world, and if we don't identify and put and end to these racist fabrications and ideologies, our system will become just like what Christianity is today. The Christian depictions of a white Jesus teach Christians that white means "purity" and even "God-like", and that black is evil and demonic. This is the same standard spreading throughout sectarian Islam by their depictions of a white Muhammad, a white Abraham, a white Jesus, a white Moses, and displaying all the other prophets as white too. One thing I've realized is it's influencing the mindset of the so-called "Quranists" too, and this thread is evidence of the fact that it has crept into some people's beliefs, and many of the white Muslims on here who don't consider themselves having racial prejudices still deny that racism even exists in the Islamic world...

                                    So, for that reason, Al Khidr, we need strong brothers like you who are willing to take a stand for the truth, even if it means other will reject it. Your speaking out on the issues of racism in Islam is certainly noticed, acknowledged, and appreciated by all those who see the truth.

                                    Peace,

                                    Ahmad

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Offline
                                      P Offline
                                      progod
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #266

                                      Peace,

                                      I think it would prove interesting to study the root Black in Arabic. Saada or seen, alif dawd means to predominate, to be master/chief of and alot of other positive things. And sawwada (second form) in addtion to 'to make black', means 'to make master or lord/master, predominant.' Sayyid is from this same root. It kind of gives a clue as to the original Arabs and why Aswad is connected to this root. And then you can see some of the derivations of the Aswad only (as in the verb Aswadda) and see how they became negative and particularly 'to be disgraced, to be dishonored' etc etc. This tells us what the role of black people was originally (they were the predominant and chief kind of people among the Arabs) among Arabic speakers (Classical Arabic of course) and what happened to them (they were conquered over a period of time by Caucasians, NOT FROM EUROPE but from Southern Russia and south of Modern day Russia) and after time disgraced and dishonored.

                                      I want to add that white people don't just come from Europe. They are also in all of the lands of Eastern Russia, Southern Russia and the areas directly south of Russia. And Caucasians made their way into the Middle East and India from these areas. They made their way into Africa and the Americas from Europe. In Most areas they had been mixing with native blacks for a very long time leading to the not so white populations, but still relatively fair skinned, of Southern Europe, North Africa, the Middle East and Northern and Central India. Their blood even made it as far down as Ethiopia and in more recent times Southern Egypt and Northern Sudan (Because of the Ottomans and the influx of European slaves to Egypt and Sudan as well as already mixed individuals (like Arabs, Copts and Berbers) having children with more pure Blacks in those regions). And this is why they look like they have Caucasian (NOT necessarily EUROPEAN) admixture. Have you ever seen Haile Selassie? He looks like what a more pure Black person would look like if we mixed that Black person up and gave him some signficant Caucasian ancestry. If you find a black person who looks like that in the Americas or in Mauritania or North African it is becuz he has a good dose of Caucasian ancestry. So that mixing in the Middle East bled into Ethiopia, Eritrea and Djibouti.

                                      And if you don't believe me I think a trip to Latin America would do you some good. I recommend the Dominican Republic, Northern Brazil, Western Colombia, Loiza or Carolina in Puerto Rico, Cuba, southern Mexico, panama and some other places. But in this way you all can see what black people who have significant European ancestry start to look like compared to other black people from those same populations who have less. really all you have to do is start paying attention to Caucasian-Negroid mixes even here in the States, taking into consideration if the Black person already has some European in him. And then it will start o become clear why Arabs, Indians, Southern Europeans, North African and many Latin Americans (mostly the stereotypical ones we see on TV) look like they do. (this even will account for why Southeast Asians look like they do, once you realize that the Papua New Guineans, Melanesians, and Negritos were black. And the Northern Mongoloids migrated into most of their territories and mixed in with them)

                                      Then hopefully maybe we can loosen up on the purely genetic/racial tone of Negroid and Caucasiod being incompatible antipathies, and realize that what we need to address is a cultural phenomenon caused by historical clashes between Caucasoid cultures and Negroid civilizations/cultures in the ancient world, and where Caucasoids happened to come out the winners. Why exactly all this negativity towards the Negroid populations that the Caucasoids mixed into and came to generally dominate in the ancient world? I think it has to do with the psychologies that Caucasoid CULTURES developed in their places of origin AND through their conflicts with Negroid civilizatons. But its persistence to this day PRIMARILY has to do with the WORLD WIDE effects of the PSYCHOLOGY OF EUROPEAN COLONIALISM, which trumped (and enhanced) any prejudicial attitudes that the original caucasians who came to these lands ever brought.

                                      Godbless,
                                      Anwar

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        Ahmad_Bilal
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #267

                                        Peace Anwar,

                                        Why exactly all this negativity towards the Negroid populations that the Caucasoids mixed into and came to generally dominate in the ancient world? I think it has to do with the psychologies that Caucasoid CULTURES developed in their places of origin AND through their conflicts with Negroid civilizatons. But its persistence to this day PRIMARILY has to do with the WORLD WIDE effects of the PSYCHOLOGY OF EUROPEAN COLONIALISM, which trumped (and enhanced) any prejudicial attitudes that the original caucasians who came to these lands ever brought.

                                        I was already familiar with what you were explaining, and most of it is factual. Regarding the ideologies, I agree with all of them except for this part, regarding why this has been happening... In my opinion, which has been also shown throughout history, the reason this type of cultural and social domination is occurring between white people and black people is because whites/Caucasians and blacks/Nubians are socially and economically incompatible. Throughout history, white people (in general) have made it their personal desire and responsibility to completely control the world, and they have sought to govern every aspect of life, dominating everyone who doesn't fit into their white mold. This is still happening today, and this is evident by the objective white dominance throughout Africa and the Middle East. This has been happening for thousands of years too. This European colonialism, which generally expresses racism and diversified prejudices, has existed as long as white people have existed. There is NOWHERE IN THE WORLD where white people (in general) have walked and colonized that has not become a social, political, and economical wasteland, and they have completely corrupted the entire world... Now, I'm not emphasizing that black people are better than whites or vice versa, but truth is truth, no matter how you sugar-coat it. In order to effectively, significantly improve the world, people of color need to establish separate countries and colonies, and white people need to STAY OUT, as bad as that might sound... When white people and black people can effectively work separately and develop separate colonies, countries, and cultures, then they may be able to work together to improve the rest of the world. As long as there's no general unity among black people as a race and unity among white people as a race, there's NO WAY there can be unity between black and white people together.

                                        Peace,

                                        Ahmad

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • P Offline
                                          P Offline
                                          progod
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #268

                                          Peace,

                                          As long as there's no general unity among black people as a race and unity among white people as a race, there's NO WAY there can be unity between black and white people together.

                                          I understand your point here. This was Malcom X's point. I really don't know what to say. I agree with this tendency of Caucasian civilization to devalue and undermine black civilization. And I do agree that there are a number of issues that black people (mainly just American Blacks, North, Central and South American) need to work out solo, becuz of the legacy we've inherited from Eurocentric domination. Unfortunately, many Caucasian people haven't gotten past their own Eurocentricity (many find it to be normal and even academic). And extreme Afro-centricity is not a real answer either. Only truth is. Unfortunately, many Eurocentrists will brand the truths of the Negroid influence in the world as Afrocentricity when it is just truth. But I have seen abuse on both sides. Afro-centrists refuse to take into account or recognize the validity of mixture and how Caucasians have been mixing with Negroids for a long time around the globe (as well as Mongoloids with Negroids) in such a way that we can learn to see the truth of our conflicts as a matter of demonic cultural tendencies and not demonic races. However I know that there will be no real progress unless there is some real alternative being presented in the form of successful civlizations that offer truth and a way of thinking that transcends Eurocentrism, Afrocentricism, the greedy rat race, anti-nature-ism, anti-Godism, poverty and dependence. Civilizations that embrace the truths (positive and negative) of our Negroid, Caucasoid and Mongoloid ancestors, and most of all how significant areas of the world have populations that have originated in large part from the mixture of 2 or all three of these elements.

                                          When I say civilizations, I mean an organizations that could be tight connections of small communities spread about, or tight connections of large communities over large areas. But the key to understanding this is that civilzation = organization and Quranic civilization = organization with a Quranic agenda, an agenda of telling all truths and exposing all lies, and an agenda of self-sustenence and indepedence from un-Quranic and anti-Quranic elements in the world. An agenda which we are horribly failing at, mainly becuz of our disunity, lack of comprehension and extreme individuality.

                                          But we should be careful not to mix the appropriateness of cultural trends for the good of humanity with racial associations. In the end the masses (all masses, Caucasiod, Negroid, Mongoloid or mixtures of these three) usually have their cultures shaped by brainwashers, false-leaders, false-prophets, soothesayers and hate-mongerers. And Mankind himself is often motived by very base ambitions unless he has godly aspirations.

                                          And as it stands, ideas with money and social influence behind them make the world go around. The golden rule whoever has the gold, makes the rules. I think we can intelligenty imagine the fear, the envy and the harsh social world that Caucasians developed coming from Glacier stricken areas and threatened by the military and other technologies within the Negroid civilzations south of them during ancient times. Envy and fear breed hatred, and it is very likely that as Caucasian socieities began to filter into Negroid civilizations and benefit and mix from the contact that those advances along with the natural faltering of Negroid civilizations (all civilzations rise and fall) that the invasions by the cultural stong-holds of the "barbarians" of the day led to the anti-negroid sentiment we find in India, the middle east, North Africa, Southern Europe and even among the Mongoloid-Negroid mixed populations of Indonesia. These sentiments died down in many places, in other places these sentiments flared up from time to time and in some places the awkward relationships have remained although in many cases lying dormant. And all of you know what I see as happening with the advent of European colonialism into most of these countries (Latin America is relatively new to this scene as well as the color-mentality of Afro-Americans both of which share the same symptoms as the older scenarios in Southern Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India and Indonesia).

                                          I say all that to say that although these are the truths of this issue, someone's race does not make them 100% subject to the cultural ideas they grew up in. ALTHOUGH most people who grow up in certain cultural contexts do not surpass the cultural ideas they grew up with (positive or negative). That may seem contradictory but the first has to do with genetic taint (which does not exist) and the second with mental taint (which does exist). So I agree with Malcom's suggestion and yours that Afro-Americans need to establish their own so they can work their own problems out. HOWEVER, this does not take into account the psychology of Afro-Americans who have developed a mindset that needs White people in the picture. And our culture has been deeply shaped by the (mostly demeaning) presence of Caucasiods. Unfortunately anything that the Caucasiod mainstream (mostly in the American context) offers Afro-Americans, they will go along with despite the truth, and that is a human mental disorder (following the mainstream or people who you think are better) as well as an Afro-american mental disorder.

                                          To illustrate this sickness, I know an Afro-American girl who told me once while we were talking that she wanted to travel the world and get outside of the U.S. That's understandable, right? Well, when I mentioned going to Africa (as this is a very important thing to do for the psyche of a black person in the Americas, especially going to West Africa) she absolutely objected to going to Africa (and I've seen this scenario many times over). The crazy part is she ended up telling me that she really wanted to go to Spain becuz the people there (white people of course) LOOOVE (her emphasis) black people. That made me upset, but she (along with many other Afro-Americans) don't get how much they have been affected by Eurocentrism/Caucaso-centrism. What made me more upset is that she didn't get the gravity of what she was saying.

                                          And as we all know this Eurocentrism has affected even purely African countries through their ruling classes mostly, but also through the commericials and all the other whistles and bells of capitalism catered to Europeans and totally oblivious to all others. So even where we have all black nations they still have not worked out their problems. Look at Liberia and Sierra Leone (where Afro-Americans were expatriated), and look at the rest of the continent still caught up on the Eurocentric, white supremacist mindsets that Colonialsm convinced them about. So with these examples out there, think of what fully Westernized (for centuries) Afro-Americans would do if they got their own country, their own communities, their own schools. They would try to employ a system that really doesn't work for anyone but the people at the top, and these people at the top would employ it badly unfortunately becuz they would find themselves negotiating with bigger powers because all they care about is themselves. Which is where we find most African, Carribbean and Latin American countries to this day. The proof of what would happen is already out there.

                                          Caucasiods are not as united as we might think. A trip to a few trailer parks or Eastern Europe would prove that. Those who would have proven to be a threat to the lies (financial and racial) have been targeted since the beginning through brainwashing and appeals to the baser elements of the human mindset; vanity. So unfortunately many caucasoids have been convinced to target their anger and dejection towards non-Caucasiods as the cause of their problems and the stepping stone (that they must step on) for their self-pride. Hence they become puppets, ignorant accomplices and contributors to the demonic games being played by those same brainwashers, false-leaders, false-prophets, soothesayers and hate-mongerers who make sure that they get some worldy benefit from the mischief and destruction that they wreak.

                                          But personally I think we might want to give up the idea of trying to save Afro-Americans or even humanity from themselves, but rather focus on building our own Quranic communities that uphold the truth, good and bad, of all peoples, and establish a Quranic agenda for our good and hopefully for the good of all who wish for good. We are all going to come with baggage, which is why we must sit at the table first and make clear what our prirorities are and what is non-negotiable for us. And I for one, can FULLY understand how bringing to light the integral part of the Negroid influence in the world and the lies of Caucaso-centrism and the centrism of any people can be a non-negotiable. I can fully agree with that. But let's try to get to know the real reasons for all these things, nor take things too far. And let's deal with ALL the issues as they are. So we need to see these "racial" issues as the incorrectness of our cultures, not the incorrectness of our races.

                                          Ahmad, I know you see where I'm coming from perfectly, so all of this wasn't directed towards you, but to everyone interested in the truth.

                                          Godbless,
                                          Anwar

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users