Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Which book cover is better?

Which book cover is better?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
14 Posts 9 Posters 45 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Offline
    WakasW Offline
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Thanks for the heads up.

    My link was pointing to the 3rd one, the green ball of dots one.

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Roshan
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      reform_003ikili.jpg is the best, IMO. Looks the most serious. I would most likely pick up a book with this design and peruse through it.

      reform_001ikili.jpg is too 'tabliody'. I may look at the cover, but would put it down because I would consider it too trashy (judging a book by it's cover etc!) and the other one is in between.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        Rami
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        http//19.org/forum/index.php/fa/1317/0/

        Best imo.

        Others for comparison.

        http//19.org/forum/index.php/fa/1315/0/
        http//19.org/forum/index.php/fa/1316/0/

        Peace,

        Rami

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N Offline
          N Offline
          nimnimak_11
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          Peace Edip

          100% the third one with green dots.

          First dosn't look formal.
          Second one Is there a purpose in the arrow? Even if there is, the colours and overall shape of the third cover looks more attractive to me.

          peace peace

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            Edip_Yuksel
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            I thank each of you for your feedback, especailly those with some supportive reasons... I will inshallah think on it further and make the decision.

            As for Wakas' question regarding his article... The book you are referring to (Critical Thinkers for Islamic Reform) is already in print. Inshallah we will consider your article for the second volume of this annual periodical.

            Peace,
            Edip

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              burhan
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              I thank each of you for your feedback, especailly those with some supportive reasons... I will inshallah think on it further and make the decision.

              As for Wakas' question regarding his article... The book you are referring to (Critical Thinkers for Islamic Reform) is already in print. Inshallah we will consider your article for the second volume of this annual periodical.

              Peace,
              Edip

              The 3rd is the only that looks serious, the fonts, the colours etc. The others have "cult" written all over them.
              Maybe it's too late, but instead of the green bolb a picture of an old oil lamp would be better.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • WakasW Offline
                WakasW Offline
                Wakas
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                As for Wakas' question regarding his article... The book you are referring to (Critical Thinkers for Islamic Reform) is already in print. Inshallah we will consider your article for the second volume of this annual periodical.

                The pictures show a book called "Manifesto for Islamic Reform", which I assume is this version found online or an updated version of it.

                What is the book "Critical Thinkers for Islamic Reform"? And what is this annual periodical you refer to? Link?

                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Offline
                  E Offline
                  Edip_Yuksel
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  Thank you very much for the feedback. I received similar feedback from 19.org and http//groups.google.com/group/19org too.

                  Thus, I decided to use the third one, the matrix on the black bacground. I might change the color of the light, though. Yes, Wakas, it is the same as the Manifesto published at www.islamicreform.org

                  As for the Critical Thinkers... It contains 30+ articles by 30+ authors. It is almost ready to be available at www.brainbowpress.com, amazan.com, etc., and bookstores.

                  Peace,
                  Edip

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Ahmad_Bilal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Peace Edip,

                    Thus, I decided to use the third one, the matrix on the black bacground. I might change the color of the light, though. Yes, Wakas, it is the same as the Manifesto published at www.islamicreform.org

                    Very good choice. Out of the three, the third one (with the dots) was definately the best choice.

                    Peace,

                    Ahmad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      truthseeker11
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      Peace,

                      To add to all the comments, the second one is actually a male symbol and thus can be misunderstood as biased towards males.

                      I would go with the third choice too with the change in colors.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users