does one need, according to this ayah, wash the whole body after toilet.
-
What is hilarious about this view of yours, is your translations throw cross-referencing in the bin, yet you use cross-referencing here to critique another's translation and think you have a point.
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+pot
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+kettle
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+blackI agree with you though, some people are stuck in their ways, whether it be tradition/culture, patterns of behaviour, illogical thinking etc.
I think you got hold of the wrong end.
I was saying we need to use cross referencing, we shouldn't say Maan is water at 56 and blessings at another place rather the same procedure needs to be applied where ever Maan crops up.
peace
-
No, I know exactly what you are saying.
Let's make it clear for all to see
I was saying we need to use cross referencing
If you are allegedly such a fan of cross referencing, can you please link me to any translation you have ever done and posted on this forum (that promoted your alternative view) that contained cross referencing?
I cant recall ever seeing you use cross referencing. Mind you, for a while now I haven't been reading most of your posts, so maybe you did sneak one in recently.
When I translate with an alternative, I usually like to give enough verification info (e.g. the root, occurrences) for the reader to study and possibly find holes in my view, because all the better for me, as then I can improve my view. Of course, some dont appreciate this subtle way of doing things.
-
No, I know exactly what you are saying.
Let's make it clear for all to see
If you are allegedly such a fan of cross referencing, can you please link me to any translation you have ever done and posted on this forum (that promoted your alternative view) that contained cross referencing?
I cant recall ever seeing you use cross referencing. Mind you, for a while now I haven't been reading most of your posts, so maybe you did sneak one in recently.
When I translate with an alternative, I usually like to give enough verification info (e.g. the root, occurrences) for the reader to study and possibly find holes in my view, because all the better for me, as then I can improve my view. Of course, some dont appreciate this subtle way of doing things.
Come on, why on earth will i try and prove what you are saying, where on earth is the gain in that, except may be waste an hour or so? There are far better things to do.
confused
peace
Thanks be to God.
-
The only potential gain is to salvage what credibility, if any, you have left.
In any case, I recommend playing blind man's bluff.
Credibilty for you? now that is a laugh, bloody hell.
yeah
-
Okay so am i right in saying that a whole body wash isn't what is being said for after being in contact with women either as they both accur in this ayah, is that right???
-\
God Bless.
Thanks.
-
Okay so am i right in saying that a whole body wash isn't what is being said for after being in contact with women either as they both accur in this ayah, is that right???
Blind man's bluff
Vs
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+research (systematic investigation to establish facts)Which method are you using?
Background
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16400.0
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597176.45 -
Blind man's bluff
Vs
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+research (systematic investigation to establish facts)Which method are you using?
Background
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=16400.0
http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597176.45The quran says it?s easy to understand- I think.
All I am doing is applying the same rule to both coming from the toilet, or from the touching of women, as they both occur in this same ayah- I asume the same rule applies to both of them-surely.
If the same rule doesn't apply , please explain to everybody, why not!
if you can!
peace
-
Oh, so you want me to answer your question yet you did not answer mine?
My question is simple, simple what method are you using?
Blind man's bluff (i.e. stumble and fumble about in the dark blind hoping to catch the answer)
OR
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+research (systematic investigation to establish facts)Once you show me your systematic reasoning and/or the possibilities you can see for these verses, then I will give you my view. If you dont, you are welcome to continue playing blind man's bluff with The Quran.
If you are wondering why I am taking this approach with you, simply read the threads I linked to.
There are two types of hard-headed people in this world
- those whom you tell that their head is not harder than the cement and they consider, reflect, research and take on board your info and proceed appropriately/conservatively/cautiously/forethoughtfully.
- those who wont believe it till their head hits the cement.
-
Oh, so you want me to answer your question yet you did not answer mine?
My question is simple, simple what method are you using?
Blind man's bluff (i.e. stumble and fumble about in the dark blind hoping to catch the answer)
OR
http//www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=define%3A+research (systematic investigation to establish facts)Once you show me your systematic reasoning and/or the possibilities you can see for these verses, then I will give you my view. If you dont, you are welcome to continue playing blind man's bluff with The Quran.
If you are wondering why I am taking this approach with you, simply read the threads I linked to.
There are two types of hard-headed people in this world
- those whom you tell that their head is not harder than the cement and they consider, reflect, research and take on board your info and proceed appropriately/conservatively/cautiously/forethoughtfully.
- those who wont believe it till their head hits the cement.
Well Br,
having studied to masters- what method do you think i would use -stumble and fumble about in the dark blind hoping to catch the answer?
rotfl
Thanks
wow
