Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Translation 2:78-"Ummi", "Gentile", "Illiterate"???

Translation 2:78-"Ummi", "Gentile", "Illiterate"???

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
16 Posts 12 Posters 133 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Al_Khidr
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    As Salaamu Alaykum Samia

    I would like to thank you for providing some information, you were the first to respond and any information that I can get is worthy of note taking. Insight from others always help.

    Salaam

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A Offline
      A Offline
      andy
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Salaam Al Khidr,

      My quran reading leads me to choose gentile but my perception of gentile might be a bit different than merely "people who have not been given scriptures". Gentile in my perception also includes those who have been given scriptures but recite it like parrot (only hearing from their clerics without trying to understand it by themselves).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        matinbhagat
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Peace,

        I would choose gentile too.This is because it is also in line with God sending messengers to every people.Arabs had no messenger with a scripture in their tongue prior to muhammad,so they were gentiles in that sense.Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Offline
          L Offline
          lovelymoslems
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Say "O men! I am sent unto you all, as the Messenger of Allah, to Whom belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth there is no god but He it is He that giveth both life and death. So believe in Allah and His Messenger, the ummiy Prophet, who believed in Allah and His Words follow him that (so) ye may be guided."

          Israelis believe that the prophets shall be comes from their tribe. But Musa predicted (in this verse) that a prophet will come from ummi people, he meant Arabs not Israelis. So ummi is a nation not Israeli, neither gentile nor illiterate.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Meteora
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            ^But I looked up the word's definition on dictionary.com and it said someone who is NOT A JEW.

            Btw for the past hour I was confusing gentile with gentle, lol. Silly me.

            And yeah, wtf is up with people translating it to illiterate...what the hell does that have to do with being a non-Jew or a pagan?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Offline
              A Offline
              almarh0m
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Salamun alaykum

              Peace,

              I would choose gentile too.This is because it is also in line with God sending messengers to every people.Arabs had no messenger with a scripture in their tongue prior to muhammad,so they were gentiles in that sense.Peace

              If "gentile" means non 'children of Israel ' or non people of the book , then this is the best and appropriate meaning , reason being as stated above and it is consistent with 3440 ( the verse that says neither scripture nor a 'Warner' were ever given or sent to Arabs ) .

              Peace

              almarh0m

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Offline
                C Offline
                Cushan
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                I have a number of problems with this issue. I'm glad somebody gave it a three year bump.

                Both in the Ummi verse and the Night Journey verse, the context is discussing Moses. Why and how the sudden leap to Mohammed? Could it be a reference to Moses being the first National Prophet? Or Mohammed being a National Prophet?

                If the previous scriptures are corrupt why anchor the veracity of the Ummi Prophet to both? I don't know of the slightest hint anywhere in Christianity or Judaism of a singular gentile or illiterate prophet coming in the future. You'd really have to assume both parties are unanimously and profounding obstinate to so successfully obscure such a prophecy.

                I don't know anything about Arabic grammar or syntax. Why is it written Al Nabi Al Ummi?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rami
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  I have a number of problems with this issue. I'm glad somebody gave it a three year bump.

                  Both in the Ummi verse and the Night Journey verse, the context is discussing Moses. Why and how the sudden leap to Mohammed? Could it be a reference to Moses being the first National Prophet? Or Mohammed being a National Prophet?

                  If the previous scriptures are corrupt why anchor the veracity of the Ummi Prophet to both? I don't know of the slightest hint anywhere in Christianity or Judaism of a singular gentile or illiterate prophet coming in the future. You'd really have to assume both parties are unanimously and profounding obstinate to so successfully obscure such a prophecy.

                  I don't know anything about Arabic grammar or syntax. Why is it written Al Nabi Al Ummi?

                  Welcome to my world. Ummy doesn't mean gentile nor illiterate. It means he can't understand the very mysterious and invisible Book that was given to Moses and the Quran is an Arabic exegesis of that ghost Book.

                  Peace,

                  Rami

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Q Offline
                    Q Offline
                    Q_student
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Salamun alaykum

                    If "gentile" means non 'children of Israel ' or non people of the book , then this is the best and appropriate meaning , reason being as stated above and it is consistent with 3440 ( the verse that says neither scripture nor a 'Warner' were ever given or sent to Arabs ) .

                    Peace

                    almarh0m

                    Peace Brother

                    3440

                    (3440) And the Day when He will gather all mankind together, He will ask the angels, "Did they really worship you?"

                    Regards

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      I have a number of problems with this issue. I'm glad somebody gave it a three year bump.

                      Both in the Ummi verse and the Night Journey verse, the context is discussing Moses. Why and how the sudden leap to Mohammed? Could it be a reference to Moses being the first National Prophet? Or Mohammed being a National Prophet?

                      If the previous scriptures are corrupt why anchor the veracity of the Ummi Prophet to both? I don't know of the slightest hint anywhere in Christianity or Judaism of a singular gentile or illiterate prophet coming in the future. You'd really have to assume both parties are unanimously and profounding obstinate to so successfully obscure such a prophecy.

                      I don't know anything about Arabic grammar or syntax. Why is it written Al Nabi Al Ummi?

                      good post cushan.

                      Here is another link that substantiates your post, I think.

                      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597787.0

                      who is Ummi? Its a possibility-Moses. jedi

                      peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        almarh0m
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Peace Q_s

                        Peace Brother

                        3440

                        (3440) And the Day when He will gather all mankind together, He will ask the angels, "Did they really worship you?"

                        Regards

                        Begging your pardon Brother Q_s , I was meant to write 3444 , heard of a typo ?

                        " And We have not given them any books which they read, nor did We send to them before you a warner " ( 3444 ) .

                        It was a genuine typo , hope it is now corrected .

                        Thank you

                        almarh0m

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          And among Bani Iesraa'eel are such commoners who do not know Book, except wishful/hopeful hearsay/conjectural myths made/thrown popular in society and/as such that they do nothing except conjecturing/supposing/assuming.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • A Offline
                            A Offline
                            almarh0m
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            And among Bani Iesraa'eel are such commoners who do not know Book, except wishful/hopeful hearsay/conjectural myths made/thrown popular in society and/as such that they do nothing except conjecturing/supposing/assuming.

                            Looks like this is an "Elitists" translation to me , but then perhaps Iam wrong .

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Looks like this is an "Elitists" translation to me , but then perhaps Iam wrong .

                              Grand Qur'aan is a statement of proven fact, for all time and space. There is possibility that Jews/Bani Israel attain 100 percent literacy. Here the knowledge is with reference to the revealed Book, and common public never 100 percent comprises of those who know the revealed Book. Ummi is also for common men. Thanks

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Users