Alif; Laam and Meem with ancillary glyph/prolongation sign
-
By the way, here is what Lisan Al-3arab says about Al-zar3
Here is what Lisan Al-3arab says about Al-zar3
I hope that you can see the inconsistency in Lisan Al-3arab.
May I know what you think the inconsistency is? And if you think there is insistency in the explanation by Lisan how can you attribute it to the language itself that it suffers from inconsistencies? Some one could have said that the language is inconsistent because it applies the same Root for menses and quraan; but today we would have said that he was himself ignorant of the reality and fact.
And have given a thought to the fact that you are basically not aware of the Plant Kingdom and its classification that might be causing inconsitency in your perception? Qur'aan and Arabic Mubeen are not based on generalizations; both are specific and act as making everything specific and distinct. When you say Arabic suffers from inconsistences you in fact refute the "Grand Reading" which tells its language is Mubeen.
-
Peace Mazhar,
I visited quite many times and witness that in that valley there is no cultivation of . And let me tell you it will remain so till the last day because I know the words of the man who gave information about this fact are nothing but the truth since he was cautious about his reputition to be known as truthful in history and Allah has confirmed he was absolutely a truthful person. The people who keep spraying conjectural thoughts and opinions are never considered truthful.
Then tell us where that valley is so that we can visit it too and verify if you are truthful or lying.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Mazhar,
May I know what you think the inconsistency is? And if you think there is insistency in the explanation by Lisan how can you attribute it to the language itself that it suffers from inconsistencies?
Among other things, it is saying that "7arth" and "zar3" can have the same meaning while they are clearly used in the great reading to mean plants at different stages of the agriculture cycle.
Some one could have said that the language is inconsistent because it applies the same Root for menses and quraan; but today we would have said that he was himself ignorant of the reality and fact.
This is a wrong classification by Lisan Al-3arab. The term "QuR'AN" should be under QR'A not under QRW. There are many such classification errors in Lisan Al-3arab. Another example is its misclassification of Allat in 5319 under LTT as opposed to its correct classification under ALH, etc.
And have given a thought to the fact that you are basically not aware of the Plant Kingdom and its classification that might be causing inconsitency in your perception? Qur'aan and Arabic Mubeen are not based on generalizations; both are specific and act as making everything specific and distinct. When you say Arabic suffers from inconsistences you in fact refute the "Grand Reading" which tells its language is Mubeen.
You are spraying conjectural thoughts and opinions that contradict reality.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Some one could have said that the language is inconsistent because it applies the same Root for menses and quraan;
but today we would have said that he was himself ignorant of the reality and fact.This is a wrong classification by Lisan Al-3arab. The term "QuR'AN" should be under QR'A not under QRW.
Where did you find that Quran is under QRW? Both menses and quran is under qra, in Lane's lexicon. one meaning collection of blood and the other means collection of words; commonaility is that of collection, the basic perception of the Root.
-
Peace Mazhar,
Where did you find that Quran is under QRW? Both menses and quran is under qra, in Lane's lexicon. one meaning collection of blood and the other means collection of words; commonaility is that of collection, the basic perception of the Root.
Lisan Al-arab is wrong. Menses should be under QRA/QRW not under QR'A. The meaning of "collection of words" would make 7517 illogical since "its collection and its collection" is nonsense. On the other hand, / is a synonym of .
I also noticed that you evaded addressing my other points. It seems that your idea about the valley where Abraham settled some of his descendants was nothing but conjecture.
Peace,
Ayman
-
I also noticed that you evaded addressing my other points. It seems that your idea about the valley where Abraham settled some of his descendants was nothing but conjecture.
The valley he referred is the one where he said "your honourable bait is located" and that is what I know Mecca. I hope you agree and restrit yourself to the word "valley" and do not expand it whole of Arabia. Kaaba is located in the valley. That valley is not cultivated for crops even today. It is not conjecture but ground reality. This valley was not created for cultivation and agriculture; its purpose is defined and it only takes the visitors from outside it.
-
Peace Mazhar,
The valley he referred is the one where he said "your honourable bait is located" and that is what I know Mecca.
The great reading never says "your honourable bait is located in the valley of Mecca". You are spreading basless lies.
Peace,
Ayman
-
The valley he referred is the one where he said "your honourable bait is located" and that is what I know Mecca.
The great reading never says "your honourable bait is located in the valley of Mecca". You are spreading basless lies.
Do you refer to Grand Qur'aan by the words "great reading"? If so it is in it
-
Peace Mazhar,
Do you refer to Grand Qur'aan by the words "great reading"? If so it is in it
Here is what you said earlier
The valley he referred is the one where he said "your honourable bait is located" and that is what I know Mecca.
You are a liar because Mecca is not mentioned at all. If you are not a liar then please undeline for everyone the word Mecca here
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Mazhar,
Here is what you said earlier
You are a liar because dear Mazhar Mecca is not mentioned at all. If you are not a liar then would you please undeline for everyone the word Mecca here
Peace,
Ayman
peace
-
Peace Mazhar,
Here is what you said earlier
You are a liar because Mecca is not mentioned at all. If you are not a liar then please undeline for everyone the word Mecca here
Peace,
Ayman
qualfies/indicates the valley where he made to reside one of his progeny. is a definite physically existing point/location. And I exclusively submit allegiance to the Sustainer Lord of this particular house, adhering to the command of my Sustainer Lord.
Therefore/for reason you people be subservient/allegiant to the Sustainer Lord of this House.
Any one who does not know this house and its location, he may be worshipping some lord but then that is not the Sustainer Lord of this House.
-
Peace Mazhar,
qualfies/indicates the valley where he made to reside one of his progeny. is a definite physically existing point/location. And I exclusively submit allegiance to the Sustainer Lord of this particular house, adhering to the command of my Sustainer Lord.
Therefore/for reason you people be subservient/allegiant to the Sustainer Lord of this House.
Please underline Mecca in the above. If you can't then have the decency to admit the indisputable fact that your argument that the house is in Mecca has no basis in the great reading.
Any one who does not know this house and its location, he may be worshipping some lord but then that is not the Sustainer Lord of this House.
Any one who does not know this inviolable house and its real clear physical location given in 2226, he may be worshipping some false stone cube in Mecca but then that is not the sustainer lord of the real inviolable house.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Any one who does not know this inviolable house and its real clear physical location given in 2226, he may be worshipping some false stone cube in Mecca but then that is not the sustainer lord of the real inviolable house.
Where is this particular location/plot of the house? Can you show me "clear physical location" on the map?
-
Peace Mazhar,
Where is this particular location/plot of the house? Can you show me "clear physical location" on the map?
The clear physcial loaction is given in 2226 in no uncertain terms and it is certainly not Mecca. Just read the rest of 2226 and don't snip it.
Peace,
Ayman
-
Peace Mazhar,
The clear physcial loaction is given in 2226 in no uncertain terms and it is certainly not Mecca. Just read the rest of 2226 and don't snip it.
Peace,
Ayman
Let us notsnip it
here is definite and certain. If it is not Mecca, then why are you reluctant to point it out where is it? Pl tell us which place is this?
-
Peace Meteora,
The word "ka'ba" is not meaningless. So to know the answer you have to translate it.
Peace,
Ayman
Peace
There is no such word as "Ka3bah" in the Quran . It is Al - Ka3bah. It is a "Definite Noun" .I hope you know the significance of the "alif laam " in Arabic language.
It is exactly like the difference between
A democrate
BThe DemorcrateRegards
-
Peace Mazhar,
Let us notsnip it
here is definite and certain. If it is not Mecca, then why are you reluctant to point it out where is it? Pl tell us which place is this?
2226 points out exactly where it is. The location of the house is where those who maintain it do not setup any partners with the god and cleanse it from dirt, idols and falsehood.
Since those who maintain the pagan stone cube in Mecca idolize the prophet, their clergy, the stone cube, a Black Stone, etc. etc. then their house is certainly not the god's house.
Their pagan house is not clean but is full of filthy idols ranging from the stone cube to the black stone to footprints to magical water etc. etc. so it cannot be the god's house.
So the question is who are you going to believe? Are you going to believe the god's clear instructions in 2226 or your forefathers and imagine that Mecca is mentioned in 2226?
Once you believe in the god alone instead of in Mecca and its pagan idols then you will understand 2226.
Peace,
Ayman