Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Adam - 'blackskinned human' ?

Adam - 'blackskinned human' ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
60 Posts 15 Posters 1.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Ahmad_Bilal
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    Peace,

    These have already been discussed in detail in other threads. You should check them out...

    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9598861.msg216611#msg216611
    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597416.0
    http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597651.0

    There is some very good information contained in all of those threads...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Meteora
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      I'll check them out after I wage war (jihad) against a sunni in hadith discussions (he's not really here...just published a bunch of stupid PDF files attacking and bashing Quranites).

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • E Offline
        E Offline
        No longer a Sunna-rejecter
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Peace,

        These have already been discussed in detail in other threads. You should check them out...

        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9598861.msg216611#msg216611
        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597416.0
        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597651.0

        There is some very good information contained in all of those threads...

        Yep, absolutely right. The first human was black. bravo

        I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • A Offline
          A Offline
          Alen
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Yes, the Qur'aan says that the first of humanity were BLACK skinned people... see 1526, 28, 33

          Peace,
          Respectfully.

          Good point.
          This is something to think about.

          God knows best,
          Glory be to our God.
          Peace.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • E Offline
            E Offline
            No longer a Sunna-rejecter
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            Peace,
            Respectfully.

            Good point.
            This is something to think about.

            God knows best,
            Glory be to our God.
            Peace.

            Well, we might as well go one step further than just "thinking" accepting.

            1528 Your Lord said to the angels "I am creating a human from black mud/clay."
            1528 Wa-ith qala rabbuka lilmala-ikatiinnee khaliqun basharan min salsalin min hamain masnoonin

            Hamaa/Hamaain = Black
            Salsalin = Clay or Mud

            Scroll down to the middle/last third of the following article for more info http//www.freewebs.com/tawhiyd/3salaattheoryexposed.htm

            Peace

            I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Offline
              T Offline
              TheNabi
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              Peace

              He was created from black mud/clay so logically his eyes, organs, hair, nails, tongue, teeth, and skin were black. )

              Joe

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                afridi220
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                Peace

                He was created from black mud/clay so logically his eyes, organs, hair, nails, tongue, teeth, and skin were black. )

                Joe

                Yeah you are right laugh

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Rev_John
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Yeah you are right laugh

                  Well that is logical

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Ahmad_Bilal
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    Peace Joe,

                    He was created from black mud/clay so logically his eyes, organs, hair, nails, tongue, teeth, and skin were black.

                    That's not sensible based on the context of the passage. The word used is "salsaal", which refers to a type of vessel, and the outside of this vessel (in this case, the human body) was shaped by black mud. But also, in the context of this word's usage, "salsaal" oftentimes refers to a type of fixed vessel where things can still be placed inside, such as blood, bones, organs, eyes, etc. Therefore, based on the word usage, only the EXTERIOR of the human's body was shaped by "salsaalin min hamaain"/black mud. It's not referring to anything beneath the skin...

                    Peace,

                    Ahmad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Offline
                      T Offline
                      TheNabi
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      Peace

                      Vessels are inherently internal and external.

                      Joe

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Ahmad_Bilal
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        Peace,

                        When this topic was originally discussed, everyone did research on the roots of the word. Here's something that Wakas came up with

                        The word in question...

                        From
                        http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                        Sad-Lam-Lam / Sad-Lam-Sad-Lam = to resound, clash, be dried up, emit a sound. sallatun - sound, clank, dry earth. salsaal - dry ringing clay, sounding/dried clay.

                        salsal n.m. 1526, 1528, 1533, 2533?, 5514

                        LL, V4, p 433, 434, 435

                        #####################################################

                        It is interesting that it implies that a form of vessel was created, ready for something to be put into it.

                        Ready for something to be "put into it". This can refer to internal organs and factors, all of which are NOT black (i.e. eyes, blood, muscles, bones, etc.)... The mud traces found within the human body were discovered in the SKIN, which the Qur'aan says was shaped by BLACK mud. So, why is it so hard to believe that Adam had black skin?

                        Like I said, if this passage openly said that Adam had "white" skin, people would jump all over this in defense of Adam's "whiteness". But because it says he was BLACK ("hamaa&quot, people are skeptical and disbelieving, even though this conclusion is supported by science...

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rev_John
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          Peace,

                          When this topic was originally discussed, everyone did research on the roots of the word. Here's something that Wakas came up with

                          Ready for something to be "put into it". This can refer to internal organs and factors, all of which are NOT black (i.e. eyes, blood, muscles, bones, etc.)... The mud traces found within the human body were discovered in the SKIN, which the Qur'aan says was shaped by BLACK mud. So, why is it so hard to believe that Adam had black skin?

                          Like I said, if this passage openly said that Adam had "white" skin, people would jump all over this in defense of Adam's "whiteness". But because it says he was BLACK ("hamaa&quot, people are skeptical and disbelieving, even though this conclusion is supported by science...

                          To be quite honest, I don't care if he was black, white, yellow, brown or blue with pink spots.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rami
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #23

                            The problem is that the compund that makes the skin apparently black has no relation to black mud. So I say that this is just a speculation. But I don't disagree that the first humans were black but I think this has no relation to the color of the raw material they are made up of.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Rev_John
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #24

                              Unfortunately you are wrong when you say "science" supports it. It does not. All science can do at the moment is speculate on where humans first evolved. First they thought it was Europe or the Middle East, then Africa, then Asia. Who knows what colour they were a couple of hundred thousand years ago. Science can only base it's speculation on the earliest human remains that have been found, so far the oldest remains are not Adams.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                MUNZIR_ALI
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #25

                                Unfortunately you are wrong when you say "science" supports it. It does not. All science can do at the moment is speculate on where humans first evolved. First they thought it was Europe or the Middle East, then Africa, then Asia. Who knows what colour they were a couple of hundred thousand years ago. Science can only base it's speculation on the earliest human remains that have been found, so far the oldest remains are not Adams.

                                that is true!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  Ahmad_Bilal
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #26

                                  Unfortunately you are wrong when you say "science" supports it. It does not. All science can do at the moment is speculate on where humans first evolved. First they thought it was Europe or the Middle East, then Africa, then Asia. Who knows what colour they were a couple of hundred thousand years ago. Science can only base it's speculation on the earliest human remains that have been found, so far the oldest remains are not Adams.

                                  They don't have to be Adam's. If they are the oldest human remains to date, and they were of black people, then it's more likely to believe that the first humans were black people... Also, based on concepts of biogenetics, black people were the original inhabiters of the planet, since human melanin composition actively lowers over time. That's why it's IMPOSSIBLY for two white people to have a black child, while it is possible, under certain conditions, for two black people to have a white child. White (pale) skin was most likely caused by a recurring genetic deformity, stimulated by a melanin deficiency, resulting in albinism. Over time, when several people of a certain region, who all possess these same albino traits, reproduce, the result is an entire race of melanin deficient people (i.e. white people)...

                                  These things are all carefully considered and explained in this thread, from a Qur'aanic viewpoint.
                                  http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597416.0

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    Ahmad_Bilal
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #27

                                    The problem is that the compund that makes the skin apparently black has no relation to black mud. So I say that this is just a speculation. But I don't disagree that the first humans were black but I think this has no relation to the color of the raw material they are made up of.

                                    Don't you think that's a little hypocritical? The Qur'aan says that humanity was created from BLACK mud, and you're admitting that the first humans were most likely BLACK people. Yet, these two ideas don't have anything to do with eachother?? Then, what is the point of the Qur'aan even mentioning the color of the mud in the first place? Allah could've easily said that humanity was simply created from mud/"salsaal". But instead, it specifically describes it's color. What is the purpose of this, if not to describe the color of Adam (and humanity)?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      Rev_John
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #28

                                      They don't have to be Adam's. If they are the oldest human remains to date, and they were of black people, then it's more likely to believe that the first humans were black people... Also, based on concepts of biogenetics, black people were the original inhabiters of the planet, since human melanin composition actively lowers over time. That's why it's IMPOSSIBLY for two white people to have a black child, while it is possible, under certain conditions, for two black people to have a white child. White (pale) skin was most likely caused by a recurring genetic deformity, stimulated by a melanin deficiency, resulting in albinism. Over time, when several people of a certain region, who all possess these same albino traits, reproduce, the result is an entire race of melanin deficient people (i.e. white people)...

                                      These things are all carefully considered and explained in this thread, from a Qur'aanic viewpoint.
                                      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597416.0

                                      They didn't say they were black. The bones were just found in Africa. Don't forget about the so-called "Ice-man" He wasn't black and he is the oldest complete body found.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        afridi220
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #29

                                        To be quite honest, I don't care if he was black, white, yellow, brown or blue with pink spots.

                                        What if he was multicolor? !

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Rev_John
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #30

                                          What if he was multicolor? !

                                          Maybe he was. Or maybe he was coffee coloured

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users