Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Islamic Calendar & Ramadhan.
  4. Hot/"ramadan" Answer

Hot/"ramadan" Answer

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Islamic Calendar & Ramadhan.
2.6k Posts 145 Posters 383.4k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    Sharp001
    wrote on last edited by
    #1192

    Br. TS,

    I think I may have misunderstood the whole thing from the outset, because my line of thinking appears to be based on the fact that the "year" starts on the day after the "Shahar Ramadan" and ends on the night of the next "Shahar Ramadan", but your thinking is that a Solar Year (which is the period between one Summer/Winter Solistice to the next Summer/Winter Solistice) would contain either 12 or 13 Full Moons. Am I correct in this assumption?

    The answer to your above question is yes.

    That's good to hear. Now I know what page I should be on.

    my line of thinking appears to be based on the fact that the "year" starts on the day after the "Shahar Ramadan" and ends on the night of the next "Shahar Ramadan"

    The problem with this line of thinking is that firstly it ignores the role of the sun in determining the year per the great reading (1712 and 105) and secondly this line of thinking will result in a year that will not be in sync with the seasons thereby ending up violating the hunting restrictions as ordained by the god in the inviolable shuhoor.

    True, but Br. Progressive asks a pertinent question about 105.

    105 He is the One who made the sun an illuminator, and the moon a light, and He measured its phases so that you would know the number of the years and the calculation. God has not created this except for truth. He details the signs for a people who know.

    Not sure if the verse says the sun has stages, but that could just mean for calculating the day. Tell me, ayman, is the thing about phases for the moon or the sun?

    This creates an apparent contradiction to the understanding of 1712. Br. Ayman has reasoned that out in his article as follows

    10.5. It is He who made the sun a shining brightness and the moon a light and made it stages; so that you might know the number of years and the calculation. The God didn't create this except with the truth, He explains His signs to people who know.

    From 105, it can be seen that the learning of the number of years and calculation are helped by either or both the sun and the moon, however there is no mention of a specific stage of the moon. Another sign that makes it absolutely clear that the year is solar is in 1712

    17.12. We have made the night and the day as two signs the sign of the night We have obscured, while the sign of the day we have made visible so that you may seek favors from your Lord, and so that you may know the number of years and the calculation, and We have explained all things in detail.

    Given that night and day is certainly determined by the sun and not the moon, the sign in 1712 leaves absolutely no doubt that the year is solar.

    Both verses use "know the number of years and the calculation" in the same sense. The explanation that Br. Ayman gave for the firse verse that, "the learning of the number of years and calculation are helped by either or both the sun and the moon", does seem to apply to the second verse as well.

    On a side note, I found this article on Miraclesofthequran.com, which I post here

    CALCULATING THE LUNAR YEAR

    It is He Who appointed the sun to give radiance, and the moon to give light, assigning it phases so you would know the number of years and the reckoning of time. Allah did not create these things except with truth. We make the Signs clear for people who know. (Qur'an, 105)

    And We have decreed set phases for the moon, until it ends up looking like an old date branch. (Qur'an, 3639)

    In the first of the above verses, Allah has clearly revealed that the Moon will be a means of measurement for people to calculate the year. Furthermore, our attention is also drawn to the fact that these calculations will be performed according to the positions of the Moon as it revolves in its orbit. Since the angles between the Earth and Moon and the Moon and Sun constantly change, we see the Moon in different forms at different times. Furthermore, our ability to see the Moon is made possible by the fact that it is illuminated by the Sun. The amount of the lighted half of the Moon we see from Earth changes. Bearing in mind these changes, a number of calculations can be made, making it possible for human beings to measure the year.

    In former times a month was calculated as the time between two full moons, or the time it took the Moon to travel around the Earth. According to this, one month was equal to 29 days, 12 hours and 44 minutes. This is known as the "lunar month." Twelve lunar months represent one year, according to the Hijri calendar. However, there is a difference of eleven days between the Hijri calendar and the Gregorian calendar, in which a year is the time it takes the Earth to orbit the Sun. Indeed, attention is drawn to this difference in another verse

    They stayed in their Cave for three hundred years and added nine. (Qur'an, 1825)

    We can clarify the time referred to in the verse thus 300 years x 11 days (the difference which forms every year) = 3,300 days. Bearing in mind that one solar year lasts 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes and 45.5 seconds, 3,300 days/365.24 days = 9 years. To put it another way, 300 years according to the Gregorian calendar is equal to 300+9 years according to the Hijri calendar. As we can see, the verse refers to this finely calculated difference of 9 years. (Allah knows best.) There is no doubt that the Qur'an, which contains such pieces of information, which transcended the everyday knowledge of the time, is a miraculous revelation.

    http//www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_13.html

    Not entirely sure if this is of any significance or relevance, but it looked like food for thought.

    I will leave brother Ayman to carry on the discussion with you because now that the old Sharp is back, it should be an interesting discussion. handshake

    )... I wouldn't get your hopes up, if I were you, because I don't think I'll bring anything new to the table that Br. Ayman has already heard or read. I'll just go through this thread, jot down my questions as and when they arise, and see if they were addressed by him or anybody else in the thread or his article. If not, then I post a question, otherwise, I don't want to bother him by asking him the same questions that he or anybody else has already answered repeatedly over and over again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Offline
      T Offline
      truthseeker11
      wrote on last edited by
      #1193

      Peace Br. Sharp,

      Sorry for the late modification of my above post but your theory got me thinking. I will re-post the relevant portion that you missed with some minor changes

      my line of thinking appears to be based on the fact that the "year" starts on the day after the "Shahar Ramadan" and ends on the night of the next "Shahar Ramadan"

      Now everyone can see why I am a Sharp fan. This Sharp theory is the best attack I have ever seen on Ayman theory bravo bravo bravo It has gotten me excited on this topic again !!

      This theory will pass the 936 test with flying colors !! One always counts 12 lunar cycles from one shahr ramadhan to start of the next. Once every 3 years there will be thirteen shahrs (lunar cycles) from the start of the first cycle (shahr ramadhan) until the end of the last lunar cycle before the next shahr ramadhan cycle but the thirteenth shahr is then skipped. INGENIOUS theory but it has some problems as I will discuss later.

      Ayman theory of counting 12 nearly full moons in a solar year passes this test also. So this point is a draw !!

      The year will be synchronized to the seasons in both theories and hunting restriction in the inviolable shuhoor will not be violated. I just realized that. So this will be a draw between the two theories also !!

      One will have to witness the whole shahr ramadhan cycle of 29-30 days first and can then abstain for a few days starting from the second full moon at the end of shahr ramadhan and complete the count of the few days by abstaining for ten days. This would pass the 2185 test also !!

      This point is a draw also between Ayman theory and Sharp theory !!

      If I tell you today that I was born in March, and tomorrow I tell you that on the night I was born there was a Full Moon, (A) Would you take the first statement to mean that I was born through-out the month? (B) Would the statements be contradictory to each other?

      So basically what I was trying to say is if] the time frame of "Ramadan" started from witnessing of the "Scorching Full Moon" and ended at the witnessing of the next "Full Moon", and the Book was sent down on the night of the 'Scorching Full Moon", which falls into that time frame, then the verse mentioning that the Book being sent down in the "month" of Ramadan doesn't automatically imply that it was sent down throughout the "month".

      I will accede this point because it can go either way.

      Shahr ramadhan allathee unzila fihi al-qur'an can also be used to refer to descent in one night of the lunar cycle of shahr ramadhan so it wouldnt contradict either Ayman theory or Sharp theory !! So this point is a draw also between the two theories !!

      There are two problems however with Sharp theory. If it was not for the signs mentioning the menstrual periods to determine interim compared to count of shahr determining the interim and the sign mentioning night and day as the sole determinants of the solar year, Sharp theory would have been a complete draw with Ayman theory !!

      1. Sharp theory makes the year primarily lunar whereas according to 1712 it is primarily solar. According to 1712 one should be able to determine the year using only day and night and the only way to do that is from one solstice to the next and not from one shahr ramadhan to the next.

      One point to Ayman theory !!

      1. Shahr has been used in the same way as a woman's menstrual period in the relevant signs. The women are asked to use their menstrual periods as markers to determine the interim after divorce. If a menstruating woman waits for three menstrual periods that time interval will be similar to waiting for three nearly full moons i.e. both will be almost two lunar cycles plus the time before the first period or the first nearly full moon. If "shahr" means the interval between two nearly full moons, then the interim of the post menopausal woman will be one lunar cycle more than that of a menstruating woman which does not make any sense.

      One point to Ayman theory !!

      End result

      Ayman theory wins by 2-0 with four draws !!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Q Offline
        Q Offline
        quickduck
        wrote on last edited by
        #1194

        Peace all,
        Here is my latest understanding for 105
        It is He Who appointed the sun to give radiance, and the moon to give light, assigning it in phases so you would know the number of years and the Calculation. Allah did not create these things except with truth. We make the Signs clear for people who know.

        For me, God Appointed TWO things for TWO purposes. The sun to know the number of years AND the moon to know how to calculate. TWO things for TWO purposes.

        example in the restaurant, the waiter gives you a knife AND a fork , to be able to cut AND pick the meat.

        So in my point of view, the sun is for knowing the number of years (the year is solar) and the moon for calculating (waiting periods, fasting, interim,etc...)

        I hope this is clear , and in accordance with other verses that you already know as well.

        salam

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Offline
          T Offline
          truthseeker11
          wrote on last edited by
          #1195

          Peace everyone,

          Here is my latest understanding for 105
          It is He Who appointed the sun to give radiance, and the moon to give light, assigning it in phases so you would know the number of years and the Calculation. Allah did not create these things except with truth. We make the Signs clear for people who know.

          For me, God Appointed TWO things for TWO purposes. The sun to know the number of years AND the moon to know how to calculate. TWO things for TWO purposes.

          example in the restaurant, the waiter gives you a knife AND a fork , to be able to cut AND pick the meat.

          So in my point of view, the sun is for knowing the number of years (the year is solar) and the moon for calculating (waiting periods, fasting, interim,etc...)

          I hope this is clear , and in accordance with other verses that you already know as well.

          bravo bravo bravo

          I am becoming a quickduck fan also !!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • S Offline
            S Offline
            Sharp001
            wrote on last edited by
            #1196

            Br. TS,

            Now everyone can see why I am a Sharp fan. This Sharp theory is the best attack I have ever seen on Ayman theory bravo bravo bravo It has gotten me excited on this topic again !!

            Thanks for the compliment and all, but I don't think I'm anybody new who presented this "theory". Now that I'm re-reading the thread, most of my questions and observations mirror what Sis. Marie made in the first 3 pages of this topic.

            1. Sharp theory makes the year primarily lunar whereas according to 1712 it is primarily solar. According to 1712 one should be able to determine the year using only day and night and the only way to do that is from one solstice to the next and not from one shahr ramadhan to the next.

            I'm still trying to understand the connection between the signs of the night and the day with the year being solar. Br. Ayman reasoned that the night and the day are both functions of the Sun. How was that conclusion reached?

            1. Shahr has been used in the same way as a woman's menstrual period in the relevant signs. The women are asked to use their menstrual periods as markers to determine the interim after divorce. If a menstruating woman waits for three menstrual periods that time interval will be similar to waiting for three nearly full moons i.e. both will be almost two lunar cycles plus the time before the first period or the first nearly full moon. If "shahr" means the interval between two nearly full moons, then the interim of the post menopausal woman will be one lunar cycle more than that of a menstruating woman which does not make any sense.

            As I mention in an earlier post of mine,

            (1) The meaning of the word "Shahar" has been debated about a lot in the discussion. Some say it means "Full Moon", others contend that it means "Month". Don't know if there are other meanings which have been attributed to the word, but these seem to enjoy most popularity. So, I looked up the root word used throughout the Book to see the context that it's been used in different places, namely 2185, 2194, 2197, 2217, 2226, 2234, 492, 52, 597, 92, 95, 936, 3412, 4615, 584, 654 & 973, and used both "Full Moon" and "Month" to translate. In all instances, it gave me the impression of a time frame, although in some verses, a significance was attached to these time frames, i.e. "Shahru Ramadana" (2185) and "Alshahra Alharam" (2194, 2217, 52, 597, 95). "Shahar" could very well be a time frame between two markers, which would make sense, for the sake of continuing consistency and giving structure to time measurement. Whatever markers are used, the time frame between them would be the same, I believe. Correct me, if I'm mistaken.

            If "Shahar" is taken in the sense a period between two markers, then in the case of 654 it can be understood as the period between one event of Menstruation to the next.

            1st Menstruation - 2nd Menstruation = 1st Shahar (Approx. 28 days)
            2nd Menstruation - 3rd Menstruation = 2nd Shahar (Approx. 28 days)
            3rd Menstruation - 4th Menstruation = 3rd Shahar (Approx. 28 days)


            Br. QD

            Peace all,
            Here is my latest understanding for 105
            It is He Who appointed the sun to give radiance, and the moon to give light, assigning it in phases so you would know the number of years and the Calculation. Allah did not create these things except with truth. We make the Signs clear for people who know.

            For me, God Appointed TWO things for TWO purposes. The sun to know the number of years AND the moon to know how to calculate. TWO things for TWO purposes.

            example in the restaurant, the waiter gives you a knife AND a fork , to be able to cut AND pick the meat.

            So in my point of view, the sun is for knowing the number of years (the year is solar) and the moon for calculating (waiting periods, fasting, interim,etc...)

            I hope this is clear , and in accordance with other verses that you already know as well.

            salam

            What if we apply the same logic to 1712?

            And We made the night and the day as two signs, so We erased the sign of night and We made the sign of day to see-in, that you may seek bounty from your Lord, and that you may know the number of the years and the count. And everything We have detailed completely.

            Wouldn't that mean the sign of the night would be used to know the number of years and the sign of the day be used to know the count?

            Peace and thank you all for indulging me.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              farida
              wrote on last edited by
              #1197

              Dear sister farida. salam

              Yes! because the country is plagued with 180 million (minus a few) sunni sectarians, siki

              Roman Salute Siki,

              yuck Your style is not much different from the white supremacists or illuminates who are eager to cleanse the world of ?the plague?.
              I guess you are too consumed with hatred to be reminded of the language when referring to

              But how come you ignored when I told you all the roots...

              Just- like- YOU

              from sh ha ra, in urdu, like shoharat, Mashhoor, ishtihar etc, all originating and meaning "advertisement" , "something obvious" , " kind of some thing which makes its presence known even if you are not interested in it"?

              hmm In that case could you provide me with your source beside wiki to confirm that the Hellenic calendars, the Hebrew Lunisolar calendar and the Islamic Lunar calendar did not consider the first appearance of the thin crescent of the new moon as shoharat, Mashhoor, ishtihar, for a new month

              I am shocked to see that you prefer to understand divine message through a man made book,

              And be even more shocked o that I refuse to count ?AAiddata alshshuhoori? with a manmade sundial or a gnomon or any tall vertical object. nope

              If you have to stick with ?passed on" practices, which in all likelihood have been morphed/ corrupted,

              ) Let me share with you which ?passed on? practice I follow Every day at dawn I read Qur?an for the signs and this morning I witnessed today?s lesson in Surah 33
              66 On the Day when their faces will be turned over in the Fire, they will say "Oh, we wish we had obeyed God, and obeyed the messenger
              67- And they will say "Our Lord, we have obeyed our leaders and our learned ones, but they misled us from the path."
              68- Our Lord, give them double the retribution, and curse them with a mighty curse
              69-O you who believe, do not be like those who harmed Moses, but then God cleared him of all they said, and he was honorable before God.
              70-O you who believe, be aware of God and speak only the truth
              71- He will then direct your works, and forgive your sins. And whosoever obeys God and His messenger has triumphed a great triumph
              72 -We have offered the trust to the heavens and the Earth, and the mountains, but they refused to bear it, and were fearful of it. But the human being accepted it; he was transgressing, ignorant
              73- So that God may punish the hypocrite men and the hypocrite women, and the men who set up partners and the women who set up partners. And God redeems the believing men and the believing women. And God is Forgiver, Merciful

              Scope of this forum is to re-study and purify the understanding of divine message, disregarding all existing baggage, purely on logic and evidence.

              You may take this forum to be your leader for restudying, re-doing and disregarding the system established by the honourable messengers, but I, purely on logic and evidence see this forum very differently from you.

              ," You have not understood the spirit behind this forum, and in my opinion

              Sir you are an old established original member of Ayman club so you obviously have better insight of the spirit behind this forum.

              your time spent here probably has been thoroughly wasted.
              Or maybe, my time here is thoroughly wasting your efforts
              peace

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                farida
                wrote on last edited by
                #1198

                105 He is the One who made the sun an illuminator, and the moon a light, and He measured its phases so that you would know the number of the years and the calculation. God has not created this except for truth. He details the signs for a people who know.

                Not sure if the verse says the sun has stages, but that could just mean for calculating the day. Tell me, ayman, is the thing about phases for the moon or the sun?

                Salaam Progressive,
                Do you really expect Ayman's club members to pay attention to anything which would negate their theory nope
                618 Their intention is to extinguish Allah's Light with their mouths But Allah will complete His Light, even though the Unbelievers may detest (it).
                peace
                ps I may be banned soon as I have offended the Moderators & pr

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Offline
                  T Offline
                  truthseeker11
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #1199

                  Peace everyone,

                  Br. Sharp, before leaving, one final comment. Ayman's theory pinpoints the time of laylat al-qadr but your theory leaves one guessing as to which night of the lunar cycle is laylat al-qadr. The great reading has all the details concerning our guidance, remember? So one more point for Ayman's theory. So final score 3-0 with four draws in favor of Ayman theory.

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sharp001
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #1200

                    Br. TS,

                    As for the Laylat Al-Qadar, I wanted to ask, what would you different on that night, than any other Ramadan night and for what purpose? You can pm me, if you don't want to or are allowed to post.

                    Peace

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #1201

                      Peace Ayman,

                      Peace Rex/Nun/Pseudo/Eid/whatever future reincarnation,

                      Who cares about nom de plumes or pseudonyms and purposely change my email and password to something unrecoverable to focus on work. Although the nonsense being posted keeps me coming back to respond, first it was the nineteen ignorant and now this absurdity. Don't worry almost done here.

                      How after you had witnessed a month you then go back in time and fast it?

                      This has been answered many times on this thread.

                      Topic is about hot moon and proves you don?t have an answer so you keep responding with questions.

                      AGAIN, HOW DO YOU FAST A FULL MOON?

                      Also read what I was answering, the 95% full moon therefore 5 to 6 day window.
                      http//www.almanac.com/astronomy/moon/calendar/index.php

                      It is the one after the solstice that is the scorching full-moon.

                      No it is not. All full-moons are ordinary once they rise up enough in the sky. Please post the elevation of this full-moon where you live and compare it to the elevation of the next full-moon over the same time interval. You will see that it rises slower and to a lower altitude than the other full-moons.

                      First you were on the full moon illusion. Then it was proven to you it is not applicable.
                      Tell your cult that the FULL MOON ILLUSION has ZERO to do with it.

                      Also was it slower, lower, bigger, or redder than last year?s full moon before the solstice?
                      http//science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/16jun_moonillusion.htm

                      Why according to your arbitrary manmade nonsensical calendar you can kill an animal at anytime in blatant violation of the god's command? You have basically abrogated the restriction on hunting and proposed some nonsense about the words in 51-2 only applying during "hajj" and not at any other time.

                      Correct it is a local restriction during Hajj.

                      Topic is about hot moon and proves you don?t have an answer so you keep asking questions.

                      Again, why forbidden on June 22 one year and OK to kill the animal until July 20 in a different year?

                      Same when she is counting menstruation events. This has been answered many times. Next time try to reincarnate into someone who can read properly and patiently.

                      No it has not.
                      Again, why a widow whose husband died one day after full-moon waits 29 days longer than whose husband died two days earlier?

                      This is talking about the period between consecutive full-moons.

                      You are making up your own sorry scripture. This is not what 2185 says. This is what you fantacise that it says.

                      The only fantasy in this thread is hot moon nonsense.

                      If happened today, the clock starts immediately not the next full moon.

                      583-4
                      And those who declare their wives as forbidden for them as their mothers
                      so freeing a neck from before that they touch each other
                      And he who finds not must fast two successive months before they both touch each other
                      And he who is unable to do so should feed sixty poor

                      Of course, we know you?ll skip over this as well and continue to post questions not provide answers.

                      This was the point of initial diversion. So the only thing that we can deduce is that the prior correct marker of the start of the year was the summer solstice. This will probably go over your head.

                      Right, the hot moon fantasy is all in your head. When was this solstice again, during Dhu al-Hijjah?

                      New Moon Date
                      1/17/622 7. Rajab
                      16-Feb 8. Sha'aban
                      18-Mar 9. Ramadan
                      16-Apr 10. Shawwal
                      16-May 11. Dhu al-Qi'dah
                      14-Jun 12. Dhu al-Hijjah
                      14-Jul 1. Muharram
                      12-Aug 2. Safar Sept 9 (26 Safar) Hijra
                      11-Sep 3. Rabi' al-awwal
                      10-Oct 4. Rabi' al-thani
                      8-Nov 5. Jumada al-awwal
                      8-Dec 6. Jumada al-thani

                      We are still waiting on Eid to provide the picture that you were boasting that you will take of the NEW MOON crescent.

                      Was traveling, perhaps at Eid or any other "D" at the beginning of a new month.
                      People take pictures of the new moon crescent all the time.

                      http//images.google.com/images?hl=en&resnum=0&q=new%20moon%20crescent&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

                      You still don't understand the difference between "inzal" (decending by the spirit which happened in one night) and "tanzil" (bringing it down to the heart of the prophet which happened over a long time). "Inzal" is one night and not 29-30 days. "Tanzil" is over a long period and not specifically 29-30 days. So your 29-30 days month is completely irrelevant as far as this issue.

                      How many times already. Quran started in a night, in the month of Ramadan. The rest came later in stages could be years.

                      2532-33 And those who disbelieve say "Why is not the Qur'?n revealed to him all at once?" Thus, that We may strengthen your heart thereby. And We have revealed it to you gradually, in stages. And no example or similitude do they bring, but We reveal to you the truth, and the better explanation thereof.

                      80 He frowned and turned away that the blind came to him?

                      Again, do the blind fast?
                      Again, do those in cloudy weather fast?

                      We know, you?ll avoid answering come back with more questions.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Offline
                        A Offline
                        anthonywallace
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #1202

                        Peace all,
                        Here is my latest understanding for 105
                        It is He Who appointed the sun to give radiance, and the moon to give light, assigning it in phases so you would know the number of years and the Calculation. Allah did not create these things except with truth. We make the Signs clear for people who know.

                        For me, God Appointed TWO things for TWO purposes. The sun to know the number of years AND the moon to know how to calculate. TWO things for TWO purposes.

                        example in the restaurant, the waiter gives you a knife AND a fork , to be able to cut AND pick the meat.

                        So in my point of view, the sun is for knowing the number of years (the year is solar) and the moon for calculating (waiting periods, fasting, interim,etc...)

                        I hope this is clear , and in accordance with other verses that you already know as well.

                        salam

                        105

                        105 clearly says God measured the phases of the moon so that you might know the number of years and the calculation; while the sun is only mentioned as a shinning brightness and the moon was made to reflect it. 2185,2189, and 105 leave no doubt that the year is lunar.

                        From 105, it can be seen that the learning of the number of years and calculation are helped by the moon.

                        jedi

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          farida
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #1203

                          Peace Ayman,

                          Who cares about nom de plumes or pseudonyms and purposely change my email and password to something unrecoverable to focus on work. Although the nonsense being posted keeps me coming back to respond, first it was the nineteen ignorant and now this absurdity. Don't worry almost done here.

                          Salaam Brother

                          It would be a shame if you stopped posting here as your contribution is greatly appreciated at least by me.
                          You have never dual posted right? Whenever you came with a new ID you made it very obvious that it?s from you. Ayman is making fuss about it since I mentioned you in my reply below #1070

                          Salaam

                          Your questions are answered in detail in this link http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9188.msg213934#msg213934
                          Since we are suppose to do our own research and not follow others blindly I would suggest you study all posts by EId , Pseudo, Nun and Rex in response to Ayman?s claim.
                          peace

                          Best regards

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • E Offline
                            E Offline
                            No longer a Sunna-rejecter
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #1204

                            Going back to the topic

                            Peace Ayman,

                            Who cares about nom de plumes or pseudonyms and purposely change my email and password to something unrecoverable to focus on work. Although the nonsense being posted keeps me coming back to respond, first it was the nineteen ignorant and now this absurdity. Don't worry almost done here.

                            Topic is about hot moon and proves you don?t have an answer so you keep responding with questions.

                            AGAIN, HOW DO YOU FAST A FULL MOON?

                            Also read what I was answering, the 95% full moon therefore 5 to 6 day window.
                            http//www.almanac.com/astronomy/moon/calendar/index.php

                            First you were on the full moon illusion. Then it was proven to you it is not applicable.
                            Tell your cult that the FULL MOON ILLUSION has ZERO to do with it.

                            Also was it slower, lower, bigger, or redder than last year?s full moon before the solstice?
                            http//science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/16jun_moonillusion.htm

                            Correct it is a local restriction during Hajj.

                            Topic is about hot moon and proves you don?t have an answer so you keep asking questions.

                            Again, why forbidden on June 22 one year and OK to kill the animal until July 20 in a different year?

                            No it has not.
                            Again, why a widow whose husband died one day after full-moon waits 29 days longer than whose husband died two days earlier?

                            The only fantasy in this thread is hot moon nonsense.

                            If happened today, the clock starts immediately not the next full moon.

                            583-4
                            And those who declare their wives as forbidden for them as their mothers
                            so freeing a neck from before that they touch each other
                            And he who finds not must fast two successive months before they both touch each other
                            And he who is unable to do so should feed sixty poor

                            Of course, we know you?ll skip over this as well and continue to post questions not provide answers.

                            Right, the hot moon fantasy is all in your head. When was this solstice again, during Dhu al-Hijjah?

                            New Moon Date
                            1/17/622 7. Rajab
                            16-Feb 8. Sha'aban
                            18-Mar 9. Ramadan
                            16-Apr 10. Shawwal
                            16-May 11. Dhu al-Qi'dah
                            14-Jun 12. Dhu al-Hijjah
                            14-Jul 1. Muharram
                            12-Aug 2. Safar Sept 9 (26 Safar) Hijra
                            11-Sep 3. Rabi' al-awwal
                            10-Oct 4. Rabi' al-thani
                            8-Nov 5. Jumada al-awwal
                            8-Dec 6. Jumada al-thani

                            Was traveling, perhaps at Eid or any other "D" at the beginning of a new month.
                            People take pictures of the new moon crescent all the time.

                            http//images.google.com/images?hl=en&resnum=0&q=new%20moon%20crescent&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi

                            How many times already. Quran started in a night, in the month of Ramadan. The rest came later in stages could be years.

                            2532-33 And those who disbelieve say "Why is not the Qur'?n revealed to him all at once?" Thus, that We may strengthen your heart thereby. And We have revealed it to you gradually, in stages. And no example or similitude do they bring, but We reveal to you the truth, and the better explanation thereof.

                            80 He frowned and turned away that the blind came to him?

                            Again, do the blind fast?
                            Again, do those in cloudy weather fast?

                            We know, you?ll avoid answering come back with more questions.

                            bravo bravo bravo

                            Also, another question for ayman

                            How can the Quran have been sent down IN a moon?
                            Just to recap, it actually says "in".. too bad, eh?

                            2185 The month of Ramadan, is the month in which the Quran was sent down as a guide to the people and a clarification of the guidance and the criterion...

                            2185 Shahru ramadana allatheeonzila feehi alqur-anu hudan lilnnasiwabayyinatin mina alhuda waalfurqan

                            And how about fasting in a moon... is that part of your wishful thinking as well?

                            Therefore, those of you who witness (shahida) the month (al shahr) shall fast therein (minkum).
                            (correct me if there is a mistake in the above verse)

                            I am no longer a Sunna-rejecter. See 4:59-65, 62:2-4, 3:31, 4:156, 7:157 Messenger teaches and is to be followed and obeyed. Examples of revelation received which is not in the Qur'an: 3:123-126, 33:37, 2:187, 66:3, 62:9.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              ayman
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #1205

                              Peace AW,

                              Ramadan depends on the sighting of the moon and not a myriad of other factors other than thin sighting.

                              It does depend on when year 0 month 1 was made to start. It also depends on the order of the months. For example, had the first month been in the new calendar been the prior new moon crescent then your so-called Ramadhan would be one month earlier. Also, had the arbitrary order of the months been such that Ramadhan is the 10th month then you would be fasting one month later. This is indisputable truth.

                              Peace,

                              Ayman

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • A Offline
                                A Offline
                                ayman
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #1206

                                Peace Sharp001,

                                Like I said to TS, I may have started off on the wrong foot. My line of thinking appears to be based on the fact that the "year" starts on the day after the "Shahar Ramadan" and ends on the night of the next "Shahar Ramadan", but your thinking is that a Solar Year (which is the period between one Summer/Winter Solistice to the next Summer/Winter Solistice) would contain either 12 or 13 Full Moons. Am I correct in this assumption?

                                Yes.

                                Hmm... I see where you're coming from, and it seems logical. But come to think of it, the current practice is the same in theory, even though the marker and the time of year may be wrong. Around the world, as soon as the New Moon is sighted/witnessed, the month and the fasting begins the next day. Again, I'm not justifying or validating the practice, just making an observation.

                                The current practice has nothing to do with what 2185 is saying. If one understands that "shahr" means "month" then according to 2185 one should first witness the month (past tense) and then go back in time and abstain. It is therefore a physical impossibility for "shahr" to mean "month".

                                I totally overlooked that verse. Your claim of redunduncy has merit.

                                Yes.

                                I agree that Mestruations are events. I think I may have misunderstood the verses as I took the Period to mean the Menstrual Cycle, whereas I think it indicates the Menstruation Phase of the cycle. Please correct me, if I'm mistaken.

                                You are now correct.

                                I think you and TS may have misunderstood what I meant. I'll try to illustrate it.
                                If I tell you today that I was born in March, and tomorrow I tell you that on the night I was born there was a Full Moon, (A) Would you take the first statement to mean that I was born through-out the month? (B) Would the statements be contradictory to each other?

                                Birth is not a good example because it is known that birth happens in an instant at a specific time. A better example would be something that can span a long time like if you were "taveling". If you say that you were traveling in March and you were traveling on the night of the full-moon, then your statement becomes at best ambiguous since now it is not clear whether you traveled the entire month or just the night of the full-moon and at worst outright contraditory. On the other hand, the god's words are very precise.

                                So basically what I was trying to say is if] the time frame of "Ramadan" started from witnessing of the "Scorching Full Moon" and ended at the witnessing of the next "Full Moon", and the Book was sent down on the night of the 'Scorching Full Moon", which falls into that time frame, then the verse mentioning that the Book being sent down in the "month" of Ramadan doesn't automatically imply that it was sent down throughout the "month".
                                This is talking about the period between consecutive full-moons.

                                But then you will be violating 936 because in most years you will only have 11 integer lunar cycles. If you start counting fractions of cycles, then you will get 12.3 cycles per year, again violating 936.

                                Sorry about being off-topic, but I have a question about this verse. The period between two full-moons would/can be 29-30 days, but the feeding is to 60 poorest. It seems kind of odd and non-symmetrical (for lack of a better word). 30 days or 60 feedings? I expected, 30 days and 30 feeding, or 60 days and 60 feedings, for equality, I guess.

                                Please see 589 where feeding 10 poorest is equivalent to abstaining for 3 days.

                                So here we have 1 day of abstinence = 3.33 poorest!

                                Hence, feeding the poorest and days of abstinence are certainly not 11 and their ratio depends on what it is we are compensating for.

                                Peace,

                                Ayman

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • A Offline
                                  A Offline
                                  ayman
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #1207

                                  Peace Progressive1993,

                                  105 He is the One who made the sun an illuminator, and the moon a light, and He measured its phases so that you would know the number of the years and the calculation. God has not created this except for truth. He details the signs for a people who know.
                                  Not sure if the verse says the sun has stages, but that could just mean for calculating the day. Tell me, ayman, is the thing about phases for the moon or the sun?

                                  Please read the original Arabic. Knowing the number of years and the calculation is the result of BOTH the sun and the moon (the whole underlined clause) and not just the second part. The fact that the sun is used is confirmed by 1712, which you completely ignore as if it didn't exist.

                                  Peace,

                                  Ayman

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • A Offline
                                    A Offline
                                    ayman
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #1208

                                    Peace Truthseeker,

                                    This theory will pass the 936 test with flying colors !! One always counts 12 lunar cycles from one shahr ramadhan to start of the next. Once every 3 years there will be thirteen shahrs (lunar cycles) from the start of the first cycle (shahr ramadhan) until the end of the last shahr before shahr ramadhan but the thirteenth shahr is then skipped. INGENIOUS theory but it has some problems as I will discuss later.

                                    No it won't pass the test. As soon as you start to count integer cycles then most years you will only get 11 cycles. If you start counting fractions then you will get 12.3 between solstices, again violating 936. The only way 936 is not violated is if "shahr" meant full-moon because you can then count exactly 12 every single year (whether the year has 12 or 13). You see one can count 12 out of 12 or 13 but not out of 11.

                                    Peace,

                                    Ayman

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      UmAlawi
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #1209

                                      Peace to all the forum

                                      I once read somewhere that the word "day" is in the Qur'an 365 times and the word "month" is in there 12 times (claimed proof of a solar calendar). Has anyone ever checked? I'm guessing you have to look for the words in arabic, cos I just tried checking in English and month came up 20 times but it included month, months and monthly and month's...

                                      just wonderin

                                      Peace )

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • A Offline
                                        A Offline
                                        ayman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #1210

                                        Peace Progressive1993, everyone,

                                        Also, another question for ayman
                                        How can the Quran have been sent down IN a moon?
                                        Just to recap, it actually says "in".. too bad, eh?
                                        2185 The month of Ramadan, is the month in which the Quran was sent down as a guide to the people and a clarification of the guidance and the criterion...
                                        2185 Shahru ramadana allatheeonzila feehi alqur-anu hudan lilnnasiwabayyinatin mina alhuda waalfurqan

                                        It is the same as when someone tells you I am sitting in the scorching full moon or in a bright sun or in a cloudy afternoon. This is perfectly normal in regular speech. It doesn't mean that they traveled to the sun and are sitting on its surface!

                                        And how about fasting in a moon... is that part of your wishful thinking as well?
                                        Therefore, those of you who witness (shahida) the month (al shahr) shall fast therein (minkum).
                                        (correct me if there is a mistake in the above verse)

                                        Please read the original Arabic of 2185. There is no "therein" (Arabic "fihi&quot. There is the Arabic third person masculine pronoun "hu" which consistently with the preceding "hu" refers back to "the abstinence"

                                        1. O you who believe, the abstinence has been decreed for you like it was decreed for those before you, perhaps you may be righteous.
                                        2. A few days and if any of you is ill or traveling, then a count of different days; and as for those who tolerate it (with difficulty), they may redeem by feeding the needy. And whoever does good voluntarily, then it is better for him. And if you abstain it is better for you if you knew.
                                        3. A scorching full-moon, is when the great reading was descended; as a guide to the people and a clarification from the guidance and the criterion. Therefore, whoever from you witnessed the full-moon, then he shall abstain it. And whoever is ill or traveling, then a count of different days. The god wants to bring you ease and not to bring you hardship; and complete the count, and glorify the god for what he has guided you, that you may be thankful.

                                        It is normal in the Arabic of the great reading that pronouns can refer to something which was mentioned in a prior verse. For example, (and Rex/Pseudo/Eid/Nun/whatever knows this very well), the pronoun "hiya" at the end of 7431 refers to "saqar" all the way back in 7426.

                                        On the other hand, taking "shahr" to mean "month" creates an insurmountable logical absurdity and physical impossibility since "witnessed" is in the perfect past tense. In other words, you would have to witness the month first and then go back in time and fast it. This false understanding of "shahr" as "month" of course reduces the passage to complete nonsense and hence even the staunchest Sunnis and defenders of "shahr" as "month" are forced to admit that 2185 must be talking about witnessing an event (they claim is the New Moon crescent) and not a "month". Even you inadvertently slipped here http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9188.msg216654#msg216654 and said "witnessed the moon" because deep inside you know that whether you like it or not "whoever witnessed the month shall fast it" is pure nonsense.

                                        Hopefully, this now has clarified the issue for everyone, including all reincarnations of Rex. )

                                        Peace,

                                        Ayman

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • A Offline
                                          A Offline
                                          anthonywallace
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #1211

                                          Peace AW,

                                          It does depend on when year 0 month 1 was made to start. It also depends on the order of the months. For example, had the first month been in the new calendar been the prior new moon crescent then your so-called Ramadhan would be one month earlier. Also, had the arbitrary order of the months been such that Ramadhan is the 10th month then you would be fasting one month later. This is indisputable truth.

                                          Peace,

                                          Ayman

                                          Peace,

                                          Well we know that the islam calender started when prophet made hijira in 622 ad. And what are we talkin about anyway, the islamic calender or lunar calender? And lets stick to the facts. You keep saying "had this happened" and "had that happened" ect..., but these things didnt happen. So what now? To my knowleadge we are not fasting one month earlier. And we are fasting now. peace

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users