Let us come together
-
The language expert of this forum for sake of understanding and knowledge and not to just defending held beliefs and opinions.
1071
Have you reflected about one who habitually gives untrue account whether intentionally or unintentionally regarding the state of ?submission? and ?obedience??
Syntactical Explanation
This is an interrogative verbal sentence with a relative sentence/clause.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
The red is letter of interrogation, it followed by in black verb and in green is suffixed second person pronoun. This as a whole is a verbal sentence. Its meanings ?Have you reflected?. The verb root is Ra-Alif-Ya, its meanings ?he saw, considered or reflected?.
This is a conjunctive/relative noun and used here substantively. It is relative sentence?s/clause?s subject or . Its meanings ?he who?
This is a third person imperfect verb (second form) in nominative case. It is predicate or of the relative sentence. The verb root is ?Ka-Thal-Ba?. It means ?he told untrue account whether intentionally or unintentionally?. Since it is the second form which would add meanings of repeatedly or frequently to the root. Hence, habitually is added in translation.
This is a combination of a preposition ?Ba? followed by a definite noun from root ?Dal-Ya-Noon? It is compound or phrase called . This in syntax constitute, about the predicate or . The root meanings ?he became lowly or submissive or obedient?.
1072
As a consequence of this action such an individual is driven into the isolation.
Syntactical Explanation
This is a copulative nominal sentence.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
The beginning is with copulative particle ?Fa?. This is followed by a demonstrative noun meaning ?this? which is the subject or of the sentence. The copulative particle ?Fa? usually connects two clauses, showing that the latter is immediately subsequent to the former in time, or that it is connected with it by some internal link, such as that of cause and effect. It may be rendered as ?consequently?. However, this demonstrative noun ?this? can only make sense, if bring forward the concept that ?fa? is connecting ?this? with. Hence, its translation was done ?as a consequence of this? This what? The clause before, The action of submission and obedience. Therefore, it is translated ?as consequence of this preceding action?.
This is a relative clause or sentence. It as a whole constitute as the predicate or of the nominal sentence. However, it has its own part being clause or sentence. is a conjunctive noun used substantively as subject or as of relative sentence. It is connecting/relating some concept from previous verse. Hence, it is translated as ?such an individual?.
This an imperfect verb in indicative case. It is predicate or of the relative sentence. It is root is ?Dal-Ayn-Ayn? meanings ?he pushed or repelled or drove?. Finally is which is definite noun. This in syntax constitute, about the predicate or of relative sentence. The root is ?Ya-Ta-Miim?, its root meanings, ?he became isolated or solitude?.
173
So, one doesn?t rise with passion against the subsistence of perpetual oppression and humiliation.
Syntactical Explanation
This is a copulative and negative sentence.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
?Waw? is a copulative particle. It is followed by a negative particle ?La?. ?waw? is translated as ?so? and ?La? as does not.
This is an imperfect third person singular verb in indicative case. Its root is ?Ha-Dad-Dad?. Its meaning is ?he instigated or rouse with ardor?. It has third person pronoun built in it as subject or agent of the sentence or .It is particle with several meanings, due context ?against? is used. It is
It is a phrase or .. It is combination of two nouns, first is from root ?Tay-Ayn-Miim?. It is an adjective at the measure of . Its root has several meanings, however due context ?subsistence? as used. The second noun is definite noun from root ?Siin=Kaf-Nun?. It is at measure of which is adjective meaning doing something like machine, mechanically or habitually. The root meaning is ?lowliness, humiliation, oppression or poverty of mind. The meaning of the perpetual is added in the translation from measure?s meaning. This is syntactically called ?about subject or verb/action? or
1074
Therefore, great sorrow is for such deluded individuals.
Syntactic Explanation
This is again a copulative sentence.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
The beginning is with copulative particle ?Fa? explained above. It followed by interjection meaning ?Alas, Woe or great sorrow?
There are three words in this apparently one word. At start, is a preposition with several meanings due context, ?for? is selected. It makes a phrase or compound as . It is followed by definite article ?Al?, although if preposition ?Lee? is prefixed the ?Alif? of ?Al? is dropped in spelling. This followed by an adjective from root ?Sad-Lam-Ya? verb form II. It is plural and in genitive case due preposition ?Lee?. Its root meaning is ?he deluded or deceived?
1075
These are neglectful and heedless about that which is conspicuous for them.
Syntactical Explanation
This is relative clause or sentence.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
This is relative noun plural used substantively. It is also subject or of relative sentence. Since it relates to antecedent which is in the previous verse and is definite noun i.e., . The predicate or of this relative sentence is . This is active participle in nominative case from root ?Siin-ha-Waw?. It?s root meanings is ?he was neglectful or heedless?.
This is third person plural noun. It is used as used ?separator? . It separates the from another relative clause .
It is a phrase or compound called as . This is a preposition with several meanings but due context ?about? is used in translation above. It is called in grammatical terms as . Whereas, is itself a phrase called . It has two parts. First is genitive noun from root ?Sad-Lam-Ta? followed by third person plural noun. The root ?Sad-Lam-Ta? means ?it was conspicuous or clear?. Together these two words form a as well of the . Since it is separated from antecedent and the antecedent is indefinite. The rule of language dictates that there will be no copulative or relative noun. However, when translated into English it will need one. Hence, words ?that which? are used in translation above.
1076
Those are ones who keep reflecting,
Syntactic Explanation
This again is a relative nominal sentence.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
Same explanation as previous verse. It as copulative or relative noun and is referring to ?ones to whom it is conspicuous? in the previous verse.
It is third person plural noun. It is used here for emphasis and hence word ?the? is used in translation.It is imperfect third person plural verb (form III). Its root ?Ra-Alif-Ya?. Its meanings ?he saw, considered or reflected?. It is syntactically the predicate or of the sentence.
1077
Therefore they shall keep guarding with the great attentiveness.
Syntactical Explanation
Since it has copulative particle at the start, practically it is part of previous verse.
Grammatical/Lexical Explanation
The copulative particle at the start ?Waw?, translated as ?therefore?. It is followed by a third person plural imperfect verb from root ?Miim-Nun-Ayn?. Its meanings ?he remained prevented or guarded?. This is followed by a definite noun from root ?Miim-Ayn-Nun?. Its root meaning is ?attentiveness?.