Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Sins (or not) of the Prophet Muhammad in 48:2 ?

Sins (or not) of the Prophet Muhammad in 48:2 ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
8 Posts 4 Posters 59 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    jawad_mugniya
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    What do you think about the explanation of the shiite scholar Allamah at- Tabatabai ?
    Lo! We have given thee (O Muhammad) a signal victory,
    That Allah may forgive thee of thy sin that which is past and that which is to come, and may perfect His favour unto thee, and may guide thee on a right path,
    And that Allah may help thee with strong help

    In other words any explanation of the second verse not consistent with the first must be disregarded. In light of this, if the Pickthal translation is believed to be correct, then we are required to assume that the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah was a Divine victory so that Allah (swt) could now forgive the Prophet (s) of his past and future sins. This explanation however is clearly nonsensical for two reasons. Firstly, forgiveness of sins is not granted for one?s achievements but rather it is granted upon one?s sincere repentance. Secondly the implication of this explanation means that if Prophet Muhammad (s) were not successful in negotiating a favourable outcome from the treaty, than it would mean the Prophet?s (s) alleged sins would not be forgiven.

    The correct interpretation of the verse rests in the examination of the word dhanb. Allamah Tabatab?i explains that although the term incorporates the meaning of sin, it also carries a wider meaning. He establishes this conclusion since dhanb comes from the verb form dhanaba, meaning ?to follow? and the noun form, dhanab meaning ?tail; something that follows?. In other words, dhanb can be interpreted to mean consequence, which is why it is often referred to as sin, since every sin involves an evil consequence. In this case however, the consequence being referred to is the consequence of Prophet Muhammad?s (s) treaty with the Meccans. This would mean the verse will read as follows

    ?Verily We granted thee (in the treaty of Hudaybiyya) a manifest victory; so that God may protect you from the past and future consequences of your (policy with the Meccans).?

    This explanation not only squashes any claim the Quran contradicts itself, but it has also made coherent sense of the continuation between the first and second verses.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mazhar
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      This has also been used for slandering and false allegation in 1229. People slandered and levelled false allegations before conquest of Mecca and afterwards, also till today, by derailed minds.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Offline
        J Offline
        jawad_mugniya
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        This has also been used for slandering and false allegation in 1229. People slandered and levelled false allegations before conquest of Mecca and afterwards, also till today, by derailed minds.

        Sorry I haven't unterstood your message.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          "the word dhanb" has also been used in 4055 and 4719 in same context.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            confused

            let me help;

            048.001
            YUSUFALI Verily We have granted thee a manifest Victory
            048.002
            YUSUFALI That Allah may forgive thee thy faults of the past and those to follow; fulfil His favour to thee; and guide thee on the Straight Way;
            048.003
            YUSUFALI And that Allah may help thee with powerful help.
            048.004
            YUSUFALI It is He Who sent down tranquillity into the hearts of the Believers, that they may add faith to their faith;- for to Allah belong the Forces of the heavens and the earth; and Allah is Full of Knowledge and Wisdom;-
            048.005
            YUSUFALI That He may admit the men and women who believe, to Gardens beneath which rivers flow, to dwell therein for aye, and remove their ills from them;- and that is, in the sight of Allah, the highest achievement (for man),-

            See it isn't talking to a Muhammad but to the believers, still confused ?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B Offline
              B Offline
              Bigmo
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              This has also been used for slandering and false allegation in 1229. People slandered and levelled false allegations before conquest of Mecca and afterwards, also till today, by derailed minds.

              The Quran never used the word conquest. Its fath, which is opening. They returned after being forced into exile.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                jawad_mugniya
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                a

                According to Wikipedia

                Ali was born in Bombay, India to a wealthy merchant family with a Dawoodi Bohra father.

                A Shia translation but nothing else.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  The Quran never used the word conquest. Its fath, which is opening. They returned after being forced into exile.

                  Thanks. They returned after winning the battle, overpowering the enemy. When this word is used for warring groups what gets opened and evident is the victory or conquest/the process of taking control of a place or people by force of arms. War was allowed against those people who forced them out.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Users