Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Science / History / Prophecy
  3. Science
  4. Video:Einstein's Relativity is Wrong

Video:Einstein's Relativity is Wrong

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Science
12 Posts 5 Posters 272 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    ChanRasjid
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Einstein's Relativity is Wrong (14,900 views)
    By Run Ze Cao,
    https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=5_tig3NaTjI
    By an undergraduate physics student.

    Today, not a single physicist ever write any article trying to repudiate the mechanics of Isaac Newton. As for Einstein's special relativity which was introduced more than a hundred years back in 1905, there have been non-stopped unabated controversies by many physicists over the theory' validity, but their work were never given exposure to the general public.

    So, why the non-stopped controversies with special relativity but non with the physics of Newton?

    E=mc? and Einstein's Relativity Wrong
    http//www.emc2fails.com
    Chan Rasjid

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      huruf
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      But there is the general realtivity theory and the special relativity, right? It is this special relativity that is in question since a long time ago, may since its inception.

      Also they were developped at different times too, wern't they?

      Salaam

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • I Offline
        I Offline
        imrankhawaja
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        with the help of modern collective minds and advance tools lot of things are getting clear
        better understanding of one theory supercede another theory with some data conatin in new theory still the mystery of time is only fully known by the one who create that time

        every theory started from the beggining of time at this universe not the creation of time before bigbangs we think if time was there what was before bigbang ? ( A time of different kind) nothing but time. we programmed in a way that past is always there because we dnt know the law behind time creation and even if we have been told by someone we still not able to understand the law

        There was always a Time before Time ( thats how we percieve)

        space acts in a same way how hard hard we try to understand the end limit of space we start wondering. let say a point come where its written a note (end of space) still there is a space behind that Note .it could be any thing but not end. so how the space will end ?

        @ OP
        the link you posted this person is already registered here the chinese one is this you?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • The_SardarT Offline
          The_SardarT Offline
          The_Sardar
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          with the help of modern collective minds and advance tools lot of things are getting clear
          better understanding of one theory supercede another theory with some data conatin in new theory still the mystery of time is only fully known by the one who create that time

          every theory started from the beggining of time at this universe not the creation of time before bigbangs we think if time was there what was before bigbang ? ( A time of different kind) nothing but time. we programmed in a way that past is always there because we dnt know the law behind time creation and even if we have been told by someone we still not able to understand the law

          There was always a Time before Time ( thats how we percieve)

          space acts in a same way how hard hard we try to understand the end limit of space we start wondering. let say a point come where its written a note (end of space) still there is a space behind that Note .it could be any thing but not end. so how the space will end ?

          @ OP
          the link you posted this person is already registered here the chinese one is this you?

          This whole thing about modern science is some people think it's always correct and sadly many follow blindly, not saying science is wrong by the way.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            ChanRasjid
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            with the help of modern collective minds and advance tools lot of things are getting clear
            better understanding of one theory supercede another theory with some data conatin in new theory still the mystery of time is only fully known by the one who create that time

            every theory started from the beggining of time at this universe not the creation of time before bigbangs we think if time was there what was before bigbang ? ( A time of different kind) nothing but time. we programmed in a way that past is always there because we dnt know the law behind time creation and even if we have been told by someone we still not able to understand the law

            There was always a Time before Time ( thats how we percieve)

            space acts in a same way how hard hard we try to understand the end limit of space we start wondering. let say a point come where its written a note (end of space) still there is a space behind that Note .it could be any thing but not end. so how the space will end ?

            @ OP
            the link you posted this person is already registered here the chinese one is this you?

            The video is by Run Ze Cao, not me. I posted the video as it was done rather professionally and had many responses, some for and some against.

            I have 7 original articles myself repudiating Einstein's relativity theory.
            http//www.emc2fails.com
            Chan Rasjid.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              huruf
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              The video is by Run Ze Cao, not me. I posted the video as it was done rather professionally and had many responses, some for and some against.

              I have 7 original articles myself repudiating Einstein's relativity theory.
              http//www.emc2fails.com
              Chan Rasjid.

              Which one the general relativity or the special relativity?

              Salaam

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Offline
                C Offline
                ChanRasjid
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Which one the general relativity or the special relativity?

                Salaam

                The video is about special relativity. There is an argument that general relativity too is based on special relativity; as such, general relativity too would be invalidated if special relativity is invalidated.

                Chan Rasjid.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Offline
                  C Offline
                  ChanRasjid
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  My real intention is to bring attention to the the great corruption that has overcome the world in many ways. It is not just in politics that we all know about, but it even extends to other rather innocent academic fields like in the pure science of physics.

                  When I say Einstein's theory is wrong, many people react with disbelief. How could such a well known theory of physics like Einstein's theory and the formula E=mc? be wrong. That's exactly the issue. When what have been popularly promoted through the mass media have been invalid physics, so much so that such invalid physics have crept into the regular curriculum of physics undergraduate courses in almost all universities in the world. The invalidity of special relativity has been debated non-stopped for a hundred years, but the mass media has all along been muted concerning the dissenting voices.

                  I know Muslims like to quote the hadith about seeking knowledge - "...go even as far as China to seek knowledge". From what I see, Muslims do not seem to be very different from the "disbelievers" as far as "seeking" knowledge is concern, especially in the field of science and technology. The western universities take the lead and all the rest of the world follows suit happily. Even the top Chinese universities are also echoing what the top universities in the Western world are promoting - about gravitational waves, quarks, Higgs boson,etc; these are all fakes.

                  Muslims should be able to - if they are indeed enlightened through faith in God - make independent studies in science and not just accept words without critical examinations.

                  Chan Rasjid

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    huruf
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Well swe have been introduced into the world of stardom. Science has its own stars which on top of it, since it is science, not cinema, are sacred and undisputable.

                    Einstein is one of them
                    Darwin is another.

                    Had they been canonized (as in Catholic Church), they would not have got more unquestionable.

                    INdeed we may be going back into ignorance and savage state.

                    Salaam

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jafar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      My real intention is to bring attention to the the great corruption that has overcome the world in many ways. It is not just in politics that we all know about, but it even extends to other rather innocent academic fields like in the pure science of physics.

                      When I say Einstein's theory is wrong, many people react with disbelief. How could such a well known theory of physics like Einstein's theory and the formula E=mc? be wrong. That's exactly the issue. When what have been popularly promoted through the mass media have been invalid physics, so much so that such invalid physics have crept into the regular curriculum of physics undergraduate courses in almost all universities in the world. The invalidity of special relativity has been debated non-stopped for a hundred years, but the mass media has all along been muted concerning the dissenting voices.

                      Einstein even during his lifetime has many debates with his 'nemesis' named Bohr
                      https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohr%E2%80%93Einstein_debates

                      Thus it's ok and recommendable to prove anything that he has said to be a 'mistake' AND PROPOSE A BETTER ONE.

                      It has been done many times.. there are instances where Bohr actually provide a better theory..
                      The most infamous one is Einstein disbelief in the existence of Black Hole.. which later proved to be exist after his death..

                      Luckily nobody has ever invented the "Cult / Religion of Einsteinism" and waging war to those who dare to disbelieve in any of the sayings from Einstein.

                      I know Muslims like to quote the hadith about seeking knowledge - "...go even as far as China to seek knowledge". From what I see, Muslims do not seem to be very different from the "disbelievers" as far as "seeking" knowledge is concern, especially in the field of science and technology. The western universities take the lead and all the rest of the world follows suit happily. Even the top Chinese universities are also echoing what the top universities in the Western world are promoting - about gravitational waves, quarks, Higgs boson,etc; these are all fakes.

                      Muslims should be able to - if they are indeed enlightened through faith in God - make independent studies in science and not just accept words without critical examinations.

                      Accepting any words without critical examinations is a fallacy, especially from sources claimed to be from God with threat of eternal torture to those who disbelief in any of it.

                      And that goes to all individuals, regardless of their social identity...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        imrankhawaja
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        interesting thing about E=mc? 98% people have no idea what is it , so its only 2% left who knows whats he been saying..

                        when i was in 9th standard of school first time i get to know about E=mc?

                        where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum, in thirty students of class 25 dnt know what symbol stand for what , how funny.. obviously if one understand it with care and eventually he can observe the work of human is the understanding of human through experiments so it can be wrong or right its not a big deal..

                        btw @ mr cahn rasjid you should post it to higher bodies of education and tell them about your findings , and if you already tell them what was their response ? becuase the physicists are expert in understanding these terms and i think they can also test it we are in much more ADVANCE ERA then einstien so it wouldnt be a problem for them..

                        atleast it will help the students in their long courses (and they will rejoice) ) its a redemption type thing for them hmm

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • I Offline
                          I Offline
                          imrankhawaja
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #12

                          Accepting any words without critical examinations is a fallacy, especially from sources claimed to be from God with threat of eternal torture to those who disbelief in any of it.

                          And that goes to all individuals, regardless of their social identity...

                          exactly i m fully agree with you..
                          i dnt know about other let me tell you about myself ..

                          there are lot of things in holy books which does not make sense , but as soon we think we start getting scared from the punishment and eternal torture .. so we make our mind forcefully to accpet it without asking more questions..

                          becoz the author of book is not in contact with us to show either its from him or from human..

                          there is no way to check so loop of internal afraid get stuck and we just beleive it on the factor of fear.. if fear of punishment never exist i bet you no body will gona buy any religious stuff in their lives...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Users