Theory of everything!
-
A breakthrough I call it but have problem incorporating WILL POWER. I call it UNIVERSAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM. Any idea?
Can you tell us a bit more about your theory. Two lines are not enough. ) peace
-
I would certainly be interested to hear it
bravo me too.
-
The universe is digital and 100% mathematical. Do you have problem with this?
Ten more lines!! D
-
I agree.
Check out "CTMU". The literature is very dense and it is heavily challenged but I think the dude is onto something. The first time I read this I couldn't understand a word but when you form the same perception of reality as him mentally, it all clicks into place and you understand what he's talking about via the implications, now I know what the words mean intuitively without having looked them up. The wording is thus very dense but elegantly specific in the quranic manner. The quran says a lot of things but what he takes paragraphs of dense wording to describe, the quran states in a single verse. For instance, I'll quote
Why, if there exists a spiritual metalanguage in which to establish the brotherhood of man through the unity of sentience, are men perpetually at each others' throats? Unfortunately, most human brains, which comprise a particular highly-evolved subset of the set of all reality-subsystems, do not fire in strict S-isomorphism much above the object level. Where we define one aspect of "intelligence" as the amount of global structure functionally represented by a given s?S, brains of low intelligence are generally out of accord with the global syntax D(S). This limits their capacity to form true representations of S (global reality) by syntactic autology and make rational ethical calculations. In this sense, the vast majority of men are not well-enough equipped, conceptually speaking, to form perfectly rational worldviews and societies; they are deficient in education and intellect, albeit remediably so in most cases. This is why force has ruled in the world of man?why might has always made right, despite its marked tendency to violate the optimization of global utility derived by summing over the sentient agents of S with respect to space and time.
And this of course, is very much like what the quran says, it all essentially sums up to the emboldened phrase
2.010 In their hearts is a disease; and Allah has increased their disease And grievous is the penalty they (incur), because they are false (to themselves).
What he states in that link is identical to my perception of the reality described in the quran and the reality we exist in.
Do not fire in strict S-isomorphism much above the object level.
I particularly like this snippet, if I was to write that I would merely say "do not work in tune with the Whole". But yes, our purpose as believers is to merely fire in strict S-isomorphism at all levels. Hehe.
1784 - Say "Everyone acts according to his own disposition But your Lord knows best who it is that is best guided on the Way."
Also
What does this say about God? First, if God is real, then God inheres in the comprehensive reality syntax, and this syntax inheres in matter. Ergo, God inheres in matter, and indeed in its spacetime substrate as defined on material and supramaterial levels. This amounts to pantheism, the thesis that God is omnipresent with respect to the material universe. Now, if the universe were pluralistic or reducible to its parts, this would make God, Who coincides with the universe itself, a pluralistic entity with no internal cohesion.
But because the mutual syntactic consistency of parts is enforced by a unitary holistic manifold with logical ascendancy over the parts themselves - because the universe is a dual-aspected monic entity consisting of essentially homogeneous, self-consistent infocognition - God retains monotheistic unity despite being distributed over reality at large. Thus, we have a new kind of theology that might be called monopantheism, or even more descriptively, holopantheism. Second, God is indeed real, for a coherent entity identified with a self-perceptual universe is self-perceptual in nature, and this endows it with various levels of self-awareness and sentience, or constructive, creative intelligence. Indeed, without a guiding Entity whose Self-awareness equates to the coherence of self-perceptual spacetime, a self-perceptual universe could not coherently self-configure. Holopantheism is the logical, metatheological umbrella beneath which the great religions of mankind are unknowingly situated.
Elsewhere on the site
In explaining this relationship, the CTMU shows that reality possesses a complex property akin to self-awareness. That is, just as the mind is real, reality is in some respects like a mind. But when we attempt to answer the obvious question "whose mind?", the answer turns out to be a mathematical and scientific definition of God. This implies that we all exist in what can be called "the Mind of God", and that our individual minds are parts of God's Mind. They are not as powerful as God's Mind, for they are only parts thereof; yet, they are directly connected to the greatest source of knowledge and power that exists. This connection of our minds to the Mind of God, which is like the connection of parts to a whole, is what we sometimes call the soul or spirit, and it is the most crucial and essential part of being human.
-
A breakthrough I call it but have problem incorporating WILL POWER. I call it UNIVERSAL THEORY OF EQUILIBRIUM. Any idea?
This might be up your alley somewhere...
http//video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2157824805736114591#docid=4907540922643918266
It's a kind of give and take thing, I think.