Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. forgiveness

forgiveness

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
62 Posts 10 Posters 873 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    thegod
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    alen wrote
    The person B must therefore run away or simply go some place where person A will not be able to bother him or harm him in any way.
    Person B can change continents.

    by the way bro...that's indeed very good advice...(to) move away from those who are unjust to u...if possible! -)

    peace! salam! -)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      rraza
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      wat im confused abt is that God gives us the right to take revenge according to Quranm yet at the same time says its better if we forgive...so is this a test to determine the levels of piety a muslim can reach? with the more pious one having the strength to forgive more?
      also with respect to murder, the murderers family has the right to take another life or to forgive or to ask fr blood money..am i correct? if yes then wudnt this not break the cycle of violence?
      also the quran mentions to kill those ppl who opressed muslims and to turn them out of their homes,just as they turned you out of your homes..isnt that contrary to establishing a system of peace which is based on forgiveness?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • WakasW Offline
        WakasW Offline
        Wakas
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        The system is not based on forgiveness, forgiveness is an option in some cases.

        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          rraza
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          but how is retaliating harshness with equal harshness going to solve the problem of violence..isnt forgiveness required in order to maintain peace and break this cycle? what good will come out of killing a man for a man, woman for a woman etc. why even give the option of killing as revenge.

          in a war situation its different if its self defence, but why purposely take someones life in retaliation..its not going to bring the dead person back, and not going to help make peace.
          please help me understand this in light of quran.
          thankyou.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            afridi220
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            but how is retaliating harshness with equal harshness going to solve the problem of violence..isnt forgiveness required in order to maintain peace and break this cycle? what good will come out of killing a man for a man, woman for a woman etc. why even give the option of killing as revenge.

            in a war situation its different if its self defence, but why purposely take someones life in retaliation..its not going to bring the dead person back, and not going to help make peace.
            please help me understand this in light of quran.
            thankyou.

            It is called justice Madam hail

            Gross as it is for the state to put murderers (and in this instance the prime conspirator in the double murder) to death, there has to be an ultimate penalty for the cold-blooded planning and brutal murder of a citizen, or citizens.

            No-one would pretend that the ultimate sanction prevents such murders, but such is the state of law enforcement and the sentencing policy in the UK that even the most gruesome of murders realistically go unpunished.

            Hanging should be brought back for what might be termed first-degree murder, where the evidence is incontrovertible, and where, as in the case of the American woman, it has been proven to have been pre-planned, or has been the result of exceptional and horrifying violence. And let juries decide upon that.

            And were hanging to be brought back, one would hope that Albert Pierrepoint's diaries and notes are still available, for he perfected the art.

            http//www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/woman-executed-for-double-killing-2088351.html
            Read this news along with comments. peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • WakasW Offline
              WakasW Offline
              Wakas
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              peace rraza, all,

              Some murderers are "cold-blooded" and forgiving them or taking blood-money in exchange may let them go free and kill again. A system which allows options is the way to go. For someone who is genuinely repentant and/or made a mistake etc then forgiveness can be an option. The Quran, once again, shows its practicality and forethought when dealing with real life situations.

              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Peace Wakas, all

                Good point. I can understand if a person who kills once or twice, accidentally, or out of ignorance, can be forgiven. If the person repents, he or she should also be forgiven. But if a person kills 10 persons, then is forgiven, and kills 10 more persons, then death penalthy is the way to stop him or her from killing more people. However, you can put the person in jail (isolation) for the rest of his/her life and then he/she will not be able to kill more people. But the problem with this solution is that is is not justice. And it costs to much for the society. Prison costs are expensive. Besides, maybe prison is unnatural. As far as I know, there are no verses in the Quran that tells us that people who are criminals should be put in jail. If prison was a good solution, perhaps the concept of prison would be in the Quran. But it isn't.

                By death penalty, other people will see the consequences of killing innocent people, and then other people will not commit the same acts. They will learn a lesson from the punishment of death penalthy. The Quran is the book of justice.

                Quran 545
                And We have decreed for them in it that a life for a life, and an eye for an eye, and a nose for a nose, and an ear for an ear, and a tooth for a tooth, and wounds to be similar; and whoever remits anything of it, then it will cancel sins for him. And whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the wicked.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  It is called justice Madam hail

                  Exactly.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Offline
                    R Offline
                    rraza
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    thankyou all for your replies..i agree killing people who are mentally sick or enjoy killing just for the sake of it is sadly the only way to go about it. killing in self defense, or by mistake should be forgiven as was the case with moses.

                    "And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- ?aram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers."

                    i find this verse a bit....harsh.true its got to do with self defense..but it indicates that death is the ultimate punishment for disbelief, why focus on death, which is a wordly punishment, why not use preventative measures to avoid conflict in the first place, how is violence supposed to make people believe that a group is on the Truth?....surely people who disbelief are Gods creation too, why does He want us to be so harsh to them?... wat about those verses which talk about repel evil with good, why not follow those?..killing disbelievers is not really a good strategy to make them believe, or to make peace.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • U Offline
                      U Offline
                      unknownuser
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      ....surely people who disbelief are Gods creation too, why does He want us to be so harsh to them?...

                      First we have to know who the kafirs are. From my understanding the kafirs are not those who disbelieve in God. The kafirs are those who are evildoers, and do corruption. It is not about belief, it is about action. They are not kafirs because they disbelive in God or islam, but they are kafirs because they destroy the earth, and harm human beings. In my opinion, traditional understandings of the concept of kafir is wrong. Maybe some other brothers or sisters who are more knowledgeable than me on this topic can answer your question more comprehensively.

                      Peace rraza

                      wat about those verses which talk about repel evil with good, why not follow those?

                      If a group has harmed a group, and does not repent (want to continue harming the group), giving it's members gift or doing cute talk won't work. A perfect example is a dictator. No matter how much a person will repel the evil actions of the dictator with good, it won't work. This is reality.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • WakasW Offline
                        WakasW Offline
                        Wakas
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        peace rraza,

                        I recommend reading the context of verses. You imply it is about disbelief, or about making them believe, but that is not found in the verse.

                        The word "kafir" did not mean "disbeliever" in Classical Arabic pre-Quran. It came to mean this by a repeated association. In order to understand the word, one must study it and its development, e.g. see here
                        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=15870.0

                        All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          rraza
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          thankyou brother, i will check it out. also i have been discussing forgiveness with a couple of my friends who are christian, and there was one point that they brought up which confused me a bit. i have read up on forgiveness in quran..3 things are necessary according to my understanding Belief in Him, honest repentance and then altering your actions.
                          thats fair enough. whats stumping me atm is when they say that if God is just willing to forgive the sins, then isnt it reducing the sin. for example if a girl was raped and the rapist repented and reformed..it doesnt change the fact that the girls life is probably ruined after the event. same goes for sins in which other people apart from just yourself are hurt.
                          christians have a way out of this situation by saying that God himself took the burden of these sins, so in effect the gravity of the sin wasnt lowered. if i reply that punishing someone else for another persons crime isnt fair, thats when they say that God is so loving He did that for us.

                          my question is probably that how would God forgive sins that affect other people, and yet being fair to the person who was wronged. anything in the quran to suggest an answer?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            thankyou all for your replies..i agree killing people who are mentally sick or enjoy killing just for the sake of it is sadly the only way to go about it.

                            Razza, can you please elaborate a bit further by what you mean by killing people who are mentaly sick.

                            Thanks

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Offline
                              R Offline
                              rraza
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              i mean some psychopaths, those particular people who get satisfaction in killing/torturing others. they like to kill for the pleasure and thrill of watching people squirm and die.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • WakasW Offline
                                WakasW Offline
                                Wakas
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                christians have a way out of this situation by saying that God himself took the burden of these sins, so in effect the gravity of the sin wasnt lowered. if i reply that punishing someone else for another persons crime isnt fair, thats when they say that God is so loving He did that for us.

                                I assume by "God taking the burden" they are referring to Jesus dying on the cross? If so, what about sin after that event? I assume they will say he died for all sin past present and future. In any case, I fail to see how this resolves "it doesnt change the fact that the girls life is probably ruined after the event. same goes for sins in which other people apart from just yourself are hurt.".
                                Also, one could easily argue the Quranic God is willing to forgive that sin, thus is more loving than the Christian God. Not that I agree with such comparisons. Further, is what Jesus went through really equivalent for all the sin past/present/future? Unlikely.

                                my question is probably that how would God forgive sins that affect other people, and yet being fair to the person who was wronged. anything in the quran to suggest an answer?

                                Fairness can only be calculated when one has all the info and the story is over. See here. However, there is some suggestion in AQ that a person's circumstance can weight a sin differently, e.g. former slaves who have illicit sex, or prophet's wives if they do various wrongful acts, so there may be some element of this. Also, if God forgives, one would not know it in this life.

                                All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  rraza
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  very thought provoking answer brother. thankyou )

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    unknownuser
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    Razza, mentalli ill person doesn't equal a sociopath or a psychopath. Mental illness is more like mising a leg or something on those lines. It doesn't mean that that person enjoys inflicting pain. That would be like saying that disabled people are psychopaths or sociopaths, because mental illness is a disability, not a trait.

                                    And thank you for answering my question!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Offline
                                      R Offline
                                      rraza
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      Mental illness is more like mising a leg or something on those lines.
                                      ..i dont agree with you there brother..missing a leg or arm etc would fall into physical debilitation.

                                      mentalli ill person doesn't equal a sociopath or a psychopath
                                      i apologise for generalising the term. i meant sociopaths and psychopaths..however the two cases do fall into a small subclass of mental debilitation.
                                      some mental illnesses sadly do include a person enjoying killing and raping. there have been many cases of extreme psychopathy in which people target their victims, literally hunt them..torture them day in and day out and then kill them. there are people who enjoy killing animals and watching them bleed. some people get excited by the screaming and blood. thats why they kill, for the emotional rush they get from the action. most of them do not have the mechanism of guilt or feeling sorry. research also shows that some lack the ability to understand emotions and facial expressions. it is a disability i agree with you.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • U Offline
                                        U Offline
                                        unknownuser
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #56

                                        I have just checked out the sociopathy on wikileaks and since I have known a few criminals in my life I will tell you that they all sufer it ir have sufered it.

                                        And by the way its called mental disorder, not mentall illnes.

                                        Also one of the ways that a lot of these criminals would operate is by hurting other criminals because they don't feel bad or as bad then. I have gone to prison for hurting a criminal in the past.

                                        I think that the definitions provided overgeneralise certain behaviours.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          rraza
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #57

                                          thankyou for correcting me then brother. i apologise )

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users