Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. Community Needs
  3. Salat & Zakat
  4. Support for a Middle Prayer?

Support for a Middle Prayer?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Salat & Zakat
50 Posts 9 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • E Offline
    E Offline
    Eikonoklastes
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    I always view "Shalawat" to be "Blessings" and not "Ritualized Prayer"..

    The context around 2238 is treatment to wife or women..
    "Guard the blessings (to your wife/family), and the middle/average shalat and uphold for God devoutly"

    And 2239 to me is an instruction to walk away or ride away towards a place of security (migrate out) when your life or your family (or wife) life are being threatened.. there are no 'pray' in the verse..

    I don't have the Quran in front of me now but..
    There are other verse in the Quran which commanded people to do "Shalawat" to the prophet and also description that God and the Angel are "Shalawat"-ing to him. Which gave a strong meaning of "Shalawat" = "Blessing" / "Give Blessing" and not "Praying" or "Worshipping".

    Salam / Peace

    Peace Jafar,

    I actually agree with you for the most part. I also find it odd that an outline for ritual salat would just be tossed into an outline about marriage, and have come to find that in context it seems to mean something a bit different. But I haven't entirely settled on the correct translation as of yet and how to clearly explain it.

    For now, if the leading ideology is that it's ritual salat, then I'll attempt to unite on that first and then explore further possible interpretations when I can.

    We have a LONG way to go as a community. -\

    May peace be with you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      KDC501
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Peace youssef4342,

      Let's take a look at the verse, as if it said "middle contact prayer", and fit in your interpretation.

      2238 Preserve the contact prayers, and the middle contact prayer, and stand devoutly for God.
      2239 But if you are in a state of worry, then you may do so while walking or riding. If you become secure, then remember God as He has taught you what you did not know.

      By YOUR interpretation, 2238 would imply

      Preserve the 3 contact prayers, and the middle prayer, and stand devoutly for God.

      Does that make sense to you? That's like me saying, "cover your eyes, and also cover your left eye". It's redundant. Allah would not say to preserve your 3 salat, and also preserve the middle of that 3. The fact that all the salat must be preserved, already covers the middle of those salat, if there were one.

      This is 2238 in transliteration, with the part in question underlined

      Hafithoo AAalaalssalawati waalssalatialwusta waqoomoo lillahi qaniteena

      Sura 2238 Can has also been translated as

      2238 You shall consistently observe the Contact Prayers, especially the middle prayer (salat al wusta) , and devote yourselves totally to GOD.

      Regrading the rest of your post I won't bother to argue with you since this topic and this verse has been argued many times on this forum. Personally I believe those who follow 2 daily pray and 5 daily pray or none at all are ALL misguided and are not aware of previous scripture and history. Again it is not uncommon for there to be a middle prayer since this is well established prayer in history for thousands of year long before the Quran even existed!!!

      Peace,

      Wouldn't the Children of Israel have to believe in the Quran first, in order to follow it? And if it says only 2 salat, then they must do that if they believe it. If they don't believe it, then they can be doing whatever else.

      May peace be with you.

      What sort of question is this??? How long have you been reading the Quran brother??? Don't you know that this is the religion of Abraham??? The Salat, Zakat, fasting (with a few minor changes) is roughly the SAME religion that has been in practiced for hundreds of years! I see a middle pray in 2238 because I know it has to exist because I read the Bible and I know that it is common pray among the Jews and Christians long before the 21st Century 2 daily pray theory dreamt to exist!!!
      Also the causally way God mentions the pray in the Quran doesn't bother me at all because it is not a foreign practice that suddenly came into existence(unlike the two daily theory) but it is a KNOWN practice since the pyramids. So why should I or anyone else (among the students of the Bible) see otherwise????

      How many times did God say that People of Book know the truth???

      370 O people of the book, why do you reject God's signs while you are bearing witness?
      371 O people of the book, why do you dress the truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you know?

      447 O you who have received the book(Jews and the Christians), acknowledge what We have sent down authenticating what is with you, before We cast down faces and turn them on their backs or curse them as the people of the Sabbath were cursed. God's will is always done.

      2947 Similarly, We have sent down to you the Book. Thus, those whom We have given the book will acknowledge it.(Jews and the Christians) Also, some of your people will acknowledge it. The only ones who mock Our signs are the ingrates.

      The first time I heard of the two daily theory i knew right then that it wouldn't make any sense to me since I know (as well as others who have studied the previous scriptures) that there are only three prays. Not five, not two, just three. It has been so long before the Quran existed and it did not change after it except by those who posses no knowledge or by those who twist the scripture to make a religion of convenience and laziness.

      Now i know that people will say "How can you trust the Bible since it has many contradictions??? " . For those who don't know, the Quran says that the Jews and the Christians posses the truth in there scriptures....

      543 How can they make you their judge when they have the Torah, containing God's judgment; then they turn away after that. They do not acknowledge.

      544 We have sent down the Torah, in it is guidance and a light; the prophets who have peacefully surrendered judged with it for those who are Jews, as well as the Rabbis, and the Priests, for what they were entrusted of God's book, and they were witness over it. So do not revere the people but revere Me; and do not purchase with My signs a cheap price. Whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the ingrates.

      547 Let the people of the Injeel judge with what God has sent down in it. Whoever does not judge by what God has sent down, then these are the vile ones.

      548 We have sent down to you the book with truth, authenticating what is present of the book and superseding it. So judge between them by what God has sent down, and do not follow their desires from what has come to you of the truth. For each of you We have made laws, a structure. Had God willed, He would have made you all one nation, but He tests you with what He has given you, so advance the good deeds. To God you will return all of you, and He will inform you regarding that in which you dispute.

      566 If they had upheld the Torah, the Injeel, and what was sent down to them from their Lord, they would have been rewarded from above them and below their feet. From among them is a pious nation, but many of them commit evil.

      Conclusion If the truth isn't in the Torah and the Injeel (The Bible) then why would God ask them to judge with there books if they isn't any truth in them? ??? And yes the Bible contains contradictions but "under the false parts of the Bible" there is the truth. The Truth is there.

      Peace,

      Kevin.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • LaythL Offline
        LaythL Offline
        Layth
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Salam,

        I'm probably comming at the tail end of this discussion, but just wanted to point out a couple of things

        1. It makes perfect sence that God asks the believers to preserve the "middle" salat as that is the one that is most likely to be neglected. The reason I say this is because the Fajr and Isha are carried out within a narrow timeframe, making it difficult for a person to miss by getting preoccupied. Whie the "middle", because it is open from noon-dusk, has a much higher probability of being missed as a person will put it off till the last minute (see the example of Solomon who missied the "middle" salat by being preoccupied until the sun was completeley gone).

        2. The salat during the "Juma/gathering/assembly" is the biggest affirmation of a "middle" salat as this gathering could not reasonable take place at dawn or in the night.

        Regards,

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Y Offline
          Y Offline
          youssef4342
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          Peace everyone!
          May the lord God resolve our disputes!
          I have to mention about Solomon's example! This is because i was going to cite it long before this topic but i thought it meant that he missed the evening prayer, i wasn't sure.
          If this indeed is speaking about the middle prayer, then 2238 would really mean
          "Guard the prayers; especially the middle prayer..."
          (Can anyone find an example where God repeats the words, as in 2238 with salat?)

          Also another note, about the previous scriptures, is that God tells us to believe in them, (not neccesarily follow them, because to "each his own" laws/commandments), you cannot believe in something that you deem as corrupt!. God never states that the Torah is corrupted, nor the previous books, instead he states that Jews have "twisted" the words.
          The only Jewish book i Know that "TWISTS" the words of God is the "Talmud", which consists of the "sayings" and "Traditions" (Mishna/Gemarrah) (*Mirroring the Hadith & Sunna of the Mohammedans (evidence of Devils system/Scheming?).
          *Jesus Warned of these Laws of the traditions of the rabbis because they Went against God's laws, yet the religious chiefs held them as "Divinely inspired". God later affirms of these Jews' Idol worship when he stated that they took their Rabbis/religious leaders as lords beside God in the Quran.
          (God even commandeded the Children of Israel to not Add/subtract anything from the law, but they did!)
          (There is however, a minority of Jews today who only follow the Tanakh/Hebrew bible, called the Karaites , who follow the Torah by explaining it in context)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Offline
            J Offline
            Jafar
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            God never states that the Torah is corrupted, nor the previous books, instead he states that Jews have "twisted" the words.

            He did, through prophet Jeremiah...

            "How do ye say, We are wise!, We have TORAH YHVH! Surely, lo, falsely it hath wrought, The false pen of scribes"
            Jeremiah 88

            Furthermore.. from the same book by the same prophet..

            "For I SPEAK NOT unto your forefathers, NOR COMMANDED THEM in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning BURNT OFFERINGS OR SACRIFICES, But this thing commanded I them, saying, OBEY MY VOICE, and I will be your God, and ye shall be my people and WALK YE IN ALL THE WAYS THAT I HAVE COMMANDED YOU, that it may be well unto you. "
            Jeremiah 722-23

            Read on especially through the following books (Numbers, Leviticus, Deutoronomy, Joshua, Samuel, Judges) and you shall find many 'atrocities' were being performed in the name of God.

            Oddly enough, the 'characteristics of the atrocities' within those books are pretty much similar to the 'atrocities' we find in the hadith and sirah, allegedly performed by Muhammad and his friends. such as

            • Slaughtering of all women and children.
            • Slaughtering of all adult men, boy children and non-virgin female while spare the life of virgin female to keep them as slave..
              "Now kill all the boys and all the women who have slept with a man. Only the young girls who are virgins may live; you may keep them for yourselves." -Numbers 3118
            • Assassination
            • Rape
            • Stoning
            • Burning people to death
              And many more.. just read on...

            I found the "Nevim" part within the Tanakh to be in 'good quality' (such as the book of Jeremiah, Isaiah, Jonah and Daniel)

            Salam / Peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Y Offline
              Y Offline
              youssef4342
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              Peace!

              I think you misinterpreted!

              God states that thwe Torah is Guidance and light in the Quran! Not corrupt as people claim!

              Stoning was a punishment back in the OT times!
              It is reasonable to think that it was reasonable for God to be harsh amongst the earlier generations to make a point!!! which is to follow his commands! (e.g stoning a man for picking sticks on the sabbath!)

              Also, there is justification for the killing and burning and basically the"wiping out" of the inhabitants of the Land that God was going to Give the Children of Israel.
              God was punishing/wiping out the native peoples because of their own transgression, by the hands of the children of Israel .

              (e.g The Canaanites and other tribes in the land widely practiced Idol worship, child sacrifice(e.g child fire sacrifice to the idol Molech), incest, sodomy, bestiality, prostitution

              "...but for the wickedness of these nations that YAHUWAH thy God doth drive them out from before thee.." (Deuteronomy 94-6)
              God thus wiped them out, again, because of their own sinful nature, through the Hands of the Children of Israel.

              http//www.inplainsite.org/html/was_joshuas_conquest_justified.html

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Offline
                J Offline
                Jafar
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                Peace!

                I think you misinterpreted!

                God states that thwe Torah is Guidance and light in the Quran! Not corrupt as people claim!

                Stoning was a punishment back in the OT times!
                It is reasonable to think that it was reasonable for God to be harsh amongst the earlier generations to make a point!!! which is to follow his commands! (e.g stoning a man for picking sticks on the sabbath!)

                Also, there is justification for the killing and burning and basically the"wiping out" of the inhabitants of the Land that God was going to Give the Children of Israel.
                God was punishing/wiping out the native peoples because of their own transgression, by the hands of the children of Israel .

                (e.g The Canaanites and other tribes in the land widely practiced Idol worship, child sacrifice(e.g child fire sacrifice to the idol Molech), incest, sodomy, bestiality, prostitution

                "...but for the wickedness of these nations that YAHUWAH thy God doth drive them out from before thee.." (Deuteronomy 94-6)
                God thus wiped them out, again, because of their own sinful nature, through the Hands of the Children of Israel.

                http//www.inplainsite.org/html/was_joshuas_conquest_justified.html

                Following your way of thinking, the native palestinians has made another 'transgressions' which justify the 'wiping out' from their land by the jews..
                Luckily for them; the jews this time around are 'relatively more civilized' than their 'forefathers'; they didn't kill all of surrendered soldiers , the palestinian children, the palestinian women and they didn't put palestinian virgin to be their slave.. Much thanks to of the Geneva convention, international pressure and universal abolishment of slavery practice..

                I can see now why the jews and the sunnis are quite similar.... brickwall

                For you is your dien to me mine...

                Salam / Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Y Offline
                  Y Offline
                  youssef4342
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  Pease Jafar!
                  Please do not be saddened by the injustice, This is all included in God's plans!
                  God promises the children of Israel's return to their land in the Quran and the bible!

                  In Joel 32 God states
                  "I will gather all nations and bring them down to the Valley of Jehoshaphat. There I will enter into judgment against them concerning my inheritance, my people Israel, for they scattered my people among the nations and divided up my land." (Divided meaning inhabited the land)

                  Justice will not go down the drain However!
                  God Warns the Children of Israel "Do not pollute the land where you are. Bloodshed pollutes the land, and atonement cannot be made for the land on which blood has been shed, except by the blood of the one who shed it.

                  *Thus all these atrocities and blood shed that the Jews/Arabs have cause because of the Land inheritance, God will require it from them (Karma)
                  *Therefore do not be saddened because this is God's plan! God Prophecies in the Quran that the Children of Israel will be defeated, and the things that they built will be demolished (Quran 177)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    GODsubmitter
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    handshake

                    http//www.youtube.com/user/WhereIsTruth?gl=CA&hl=en#p/u/200/bRYLX_OrwQ0

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E Offline
                      E Offline
                      Eikonoklastes
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      Peace Kevin,

                      Sura 2238 Can has also been translated as

                      2238 You shall consistently observe the Contact Prayers, especially the middle prayer (salat al wusta) , and devote yourselves totally to GOD.

                      1. Can you show me the word/phrase in Arabic meaning something along the lines of "especially"?
                      2. This still does not solve the problem I explained earlier about locating this "middle contact prayer" in all the prayers of your life.
                      3. Furthermore, as Jafar pointed out, it is most likely that this verse is not even referring to salat, therefore "middle" wouldn't make sense in 2 instances. But for now even if we entertain that it is prayer, it still doesn't work in light of the evidence presented.

                      Regrading the rest of your post I won't bother to argue with you since this topic and this verse has been argued many times on this forum. Personally I believe those who follow 2 daily pray and 5 daily pray or none at all are ALL misguided and are not aware of previous scripture and history. Again it is not uncommon for there to be a middle prayer since this is well established prayer in history for thousands of year long before the Quran even existed!!!

                      So then you mean to say that the Quran is not fully detailed and sufficient because it relies on external sources outlining the history of the religion?

                      And those who use the Quran alone to prove that there are only 2 daily salat, are misguided because we do not associate other corrupt books with Allah's preserved Quran?

                      Please reconsider if you are firm in your belief as a Quran-alone Muslim.

                      What sort of question is this??? How long have you been reading the Quran brother??? Don't you know that this is the religion of Abraham??? The Salat, Zakat, fasting (with a few minor changes) is roughly the SAME religion that has been in practiced for hundreds of years! I see a middle pray in 2238 because I know it has to exist because I read the Bible and I know that it is common pray among the Jews and Christians long before the 21st Century 2 daily pray theory dreamt to exist!!!
                      Also the causally way God mentions the pray in the Quran doesn't bother me at all because it is not a foreign practice that suddenly came into existence(unlike the two daily theory) but it is a KNOWN practice since the pyramids. So why should I or anyone else (among the students of the Bible) see otherwise????

                      I may not have been reading the Quran as long as you, or many others, however I am a firm believer in quality over quantity. You can read the Quran 1000 times and still not see what it is saying if you constantly associate other fallible sources claiming divine guidance with Allah's complete divine Quran.

                      Let me ask you something. If someone comes up to you and says, "I want to learn about the religion of Abraham!". Where will you point them? Is the Quran not sufficient? The Quran is the religion of Abraham is it's most complete and fully detailed way! Why bring up the corrupted books that have faulty translation and clear corruption/contradiction in trying to explain it. The Quran is fully detailed. Do you not believe this?

                      Basically, you are saying that the past corrupt books have been saying 3 contact prayers, therefore you must use this to influence any bit of the Quran that MAY have a possibility of leaning towards that explanation. Not to mention ignore clear proof that it is only 2 daily salat when using the Quran alone.

                      Why don't you also argue that we must degrade females? The OT and NT have degradation of females and it has been done all throughout history as well, and verse 434 in Quran has some type of twisted possibility in meaning "beat women" in it's translation, therefore, since we've been degrading females all throughout history, let's influence the Quran's translation to continue degrading women! See the faulty logic? The whole point of the Quran was to CORRECT the mistakes of the previous people (verse provided below), and to uplift humankind.

                      The Quran warns us against using preconceived notions and following the steps of our forefathers, yet here you are admitting that you do this.

                      How many times did God say that People of Book know the truth???

                      ...

                      Conclusion If the truth isn't in the Torah and the Injeel (The Bible) then why would God ask them to judge with there books if they isn't any truth in them? ??? And yes the Bible contains contradictions but "under the false parts of the Bible" there is the truth. The Truth is there.

                      I'm not sure what you meant with that last sentence regarding "under the false parts of the Bible". I also don't understand how you can admit there are contradictions in it, yet still feel it is important enough to use in influencing what the Quran should mean. This is the exact same problem hadithists have.

                      Though the OT and NT are corrupted, if one reads it with an open mind, they will still come to find that there is 1 God, and a hereafter. This is the biggest truth, and most important, and is still apparent in previous books. Therefore, those who follow it can still be Muslims. They can still be monotheists. Though of course they don't have the best guidance in it.

                      This doesn't mean that every single thing in the previous books is true. The only way you can know what is true in it, is to compare it to what is said in the Quran. Any thing that contradicts or cannot be proven in light of the Quran is false, anything that is true, is already in the complete and fully detailed Quran. Therefore, it eliminates any need to judge with these previous books at all.

                      548 And unto thee have We vouchsafed this divine writ, setting forth the truth, confirming the truth of whatever there still remains of earlier revelations and determining what is true therein. Judge, then, between the followers of earlier revelation in accordance with what God has bestowed from on high, and do not follow their errant views, forsaking the truth that has come unto thee. Unto every one of you have We appointed a law and way of life. And if God had so willed, He could surely have made you all one single community but in order to test you by means of what He has vouchsafed unto, you. Vie, then, with one another in doing good works! Unto God you all must return; and then He will make you truly understand all that on which you were wont to differ.

                      Here I am using the Quran alone and showing the many points of how it is only 2 daily salat, and majority of the points are being ignored and instead others are arguing against because of what the corrupt OT and NT say. Unless one decides to opt for the Quran alone and realize that there is no point in associating other corrupt books with Allah's preserved text, then this discussion will be fruitless.

                      May peace be with you.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • E Offline
                        E Offline
                        Eikonoklastes
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        Peace youssef4342,

                        Peace everyone!
                        May the lord God resolve our disputes!
                        I have to mention about Solomon's example! This is because i was going to cite it long before this topic but i thought it meant that he missed the evening prayer, i wasn't sure.
                        If this indeed is speaking about the middle prayer, then 2238 would really mean
                        "Guard the prayers; especially the middle prayer..."
                        (Can anyone find an example where God repeats the words, as in 2238 with salat?)

                        Also another note, about the previous scriptures, is that God tells us to believe in them, (not neccesarily follow them, because to "each his own" laws/commandments), you cannot believe in something that you deem as corrupt!. God never states that the Torah is corrupted, nor the previous books, instead he states that Jews have "twisted" the words.
                        The only Jewish book i Know that "TWISTS" the words of God is the "Talmud", which consists of the "sayings" and "Traditions" (Mishna/Gemarrah) (*Mirroring the Hadith & Sunna of the Mohammedans (evidence of Devils system/Scheming?).
                        *Jesus Warned of these Laws of the traditions of the rabbis because they Went against God's laws, yet the religious chiefs held them as "Divinely inspired". God later affirms of these Jews' Idol worship when he stated that they took their Rabbis/religious leaders as lords beside God in the Quran.
                        (God even commandeded the Children of Israel to not Add/subtract anything from the law, but they did!)
                        (There is however, a minority of Jews today who only follow the Tanakh/Hebrew bible, called the Karaites , who follow the Torah by explaining it in context)

                        So do you believe that Allah once ordered stoning to death, burning at the stake, circumcision, rape, etc. for all Muslims?

                        On one hand you say that the religion has been the same since the start, then on the other you say that the OT is still... to be honest I don't even know... preserved? True?

                        548 And unto thee have We vouchsafed this divine writ, setting forth the truth, confirming the truth of whatever there still remains of earlier revelations and determining what is true therein. Judge, then, between the followers of earlier revelation in accordance with what God has bestowed from on high, and do not follow their errant views, forsaking the truth that has come unto thee. Unto every one of you have We appointed a law and way of life. And if God had so willed, He could surely have made you all one single community but in order to test you by means of what He has vouchsafed unto, you. Vie, then, with one another in doing good works! Unto God you all must return; and then He will make you truly understand all that on which you were wont to differ.

                        If you believe the OT is 100% preserved and true, then you are in GREAT contradiction with the Quran. I really hope I don't have to show you all of the contradictions...

                        If you do not believe it is 100% true, then you are merely picking what you like/what you think is in line with the Quran, therefore falling into the possibility of being misguided and also undermining Allah's claim that the Quran is sufficient and fully detailed. This is much like what the hadithists are doing.

                        It's really only one or the other. Here I have used the Quran alone to prove my belief, and majority of the points were simply overlooked because of your attachment to the OT.

                        It's up to you. Read my response to KDC501 as well. You will never see the truth if you keep associating other words with the sufficient and fully detailed Quran!

                        May peace be with you.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • K Offline
                          K Offline
                          KDC501
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Peace Kevin,

                          1. Can you show me the word/phrase in Arabic meaning something along the lines of "especially"?
                          2. This still does not solve the problem I explained earlier about locating this "middle contact prayer" in all the prayers of your life.
                          3. Furthermore, as Jafar pointed out, it is most likely that this verse is not even referring to salat, therefore "middle" wouldn't make sense in 2 instances. But for now even if we entertain that it is prayer, it still doesn't work in light of the evidence presented.

                          So then you mean to say that the Quran is not fully detailed and sufficient because it relies on external sources outlining the history of the religion?

                          And those who use the Quran alone to prove that there are only 2 daily salat, are misguided because we do not associate other corrupt books with Allah's preserved Quran?

                          Please reconsider if you are firm in your belief as a Quran-alone Muslim.

                          I may not have been reading the Quran as long as you, or many others, however I am a firm believer in quality over quantity. You can read the Quran 1000 times and still not see what it is saying if you constantly associate other fallible sources claiming divine guidance with Allah's complete divine Quran.

                          Let me ask you something. If someone comes up to you and says, "I want to learn about the religion of Abraham!". Where will you point them? Is the Quran not sufficient? The Quran is the religion of Abraham is it's most complete and fully detailed way! Why bring up the corrupted books that have faulty translation and clear corruption/contradiction in trying to explain it. The Quran is fully detailed. Do you not believe this?

                          Basically, you are saying that the past corrupt books have been saying 3 contact prayers, therefore you must use this to influence any bit of the Quran that MAY have a possibility of leaning towards that explanation. Not to mention ignore clear proof that it is only 2 daily salat when using the Quran alone.

                          Why don't you also argue that we must degrade females? The OT and NT have degradation of females and it has been done all throughout history as well, and verse 434 in Quran has some type of twisted possibility in meaning "beat women" in it's translation, therefore, since we've been degrading females all throughout history, let's influence the Quran's translation to continue degrading women! See the faulty logic? The whole point of the Quran was to CORRECT the mistakes of the previous people (verse provided below), and to uplift humankind.

                          The Quran warns us against using preconceived notions and following the steps of our forefathers, yet here you are admitting that you do this.

                          I'm not sure what you meant with that last sentence regarding "under the false parts of the Bible". I also don't understand how you can admit there are contradictions in it, yet still feel it is important enough to use in influencing what the Quran should mean. This is the exact same problem hadithists have.

                          Though the OT and NT are corrupted, if one reads it with an open mind, they will still come to find that there is 1 God, and a hereafter. This is the biggest truth, and most important, and is still apparent in previous books. Therefore, those who follow it can still be Muslims. They can still be monotheists. Though of course they don't have the best guidance in it.

                          This doesn't mean that every single thing in the previous books is true. The only way you can know what is true in it, is to compare it to what is said in the Quran. Any thing that contradicts or cannot be proven in light of the Quran is false, anything that is true, is already in the complete and fully detailed Quran. Therefore, it eliminates any need to judge with these previous books at all.

                          548 And unto thee have We vouchsafed this divine writ, setting forth the truth, confirming the truth of whatever there still remains of earlier revelations and determining what is true therein. Judge, then, between the followers of earlier revelation in accordance with what God has bestowed from on high, and do not follow their errant views, forsaking the truth that has come unto thee. Unto every one of you have We appointed a law and way of life. And if God had so willed, He could surely have made you all one single community but in order to test you by means of what He has vouchsafed unto, you. Vie, then, with one another in doing good works! Unto God you all must return; and then He will make you truly understand all that on which you were wont to differ.

                          Here I am using the Quran alone and showing the many points of how it is only 2 daily salat, and majority of the points are being ignored and instead others are arguing against because of what the corrupt OT and NT say. Unless one decides to opt for the Quran alone and realize that there is no point in associating other corrupt books with Allah's preserved text, then this discussion will be fruitless.

                          May peace be with you.

                          For the second time read these verses SLOWLY

                          370 O people of the book, why do you reject God's signs while you are bearing witness?
                          371 O people of the book, why do you dress the truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you know?

                          447 O you who have received the book(Jews and the Christians), acknowledge what We have sent down authenticating what is with you, before We cast down faces and turn them on their backs or curse them as the people of the Sabbath were cursed. God's will is always done.

                          Doesn't the above verse imply that the Jews and Christians are more knowledgeable in the Scripture than those you are new to the teachings of the Quran???Read it again several times and maybe you'll see my point

                          1094 If you are in doubt regarding what We have sent down to you, then ask those who have been studying the book from before you. The truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be of those who doubt.

                          If the Jews and the Christians are not aware of the truth then why would God say "ask those who have been studying the book from before you " ??? ???

                          And this idea about me not being a Quran alone muslim stems from what ....my translating the verse 'salat al wusta' as middle prayer!? The reason why I believe that it is a correct translation is because I KNOW THE PREVIOUS SCRIPTURES! This is not a new religion but an old one. The same that was practiced by Abraham, Moses and Jesus( who was a JEW if didn't know!!!!) Three daily prays is not a new practice. Where have I strayed from the Quran??? It is you who lacks knowledge. Ask a Jew or Christian how many prays are taught in the previous scriptures and 95% (if not all ) will tell you that they're three, so how am I straying if I translate 'salat al wusta' as middle prayer? rotfl Hmmm, maybe 'wusta' only means 'balanced'...... What a basless argument!

                          Peace,

                          Kevin.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B Offline
                            B Offline
                            Bender
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Salaam brothers en sisters,

                            I have searched for the word wusta in The Quran and I agree with those who think ?wusta? doesn?t mean ?middle?.
                            Let?s examine the verses where the root of this word is used.

                            The first verse
                            2143 ...
                            Pickthall Thus We have appointed you a WASATAN nation, that ye may be witnesses against mankind, and that the messenger may be a witness against you?.

                            To my understanding verse 2143 is referring to the Umma mentioned in 2136 Please read verse 2136 till 2143 why I think 2143 is referring to the Umma of 2136.
                            The translation of verse 2136 according to Pickthall Say We believe in Allah and that which is revealed unto us and that which was revealed unto Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the tribes, and that which Moses and Jesus received, and that which the prophets received from their Lord. We make no distinction between any of them, and unto Him we have surrendered.The Umma mentioned in 2136 are thus in my opinion the Muslims. Aren?t they supposed to be the best umma instead of the middle umma? See also that these Muslims according to 2143 have to be witnesses against mankind. If I had to pick a trustworthy witness then I certainly pick the best among mankind and not a middle/average person.

                            The next verse is 589
                            589
                            Pickthall Allah will not take you to task for that which is unintentional in your oaths, but He will take you to task for the oaths which ye swear in earnest. The expiation thereof is the feeding of ten of the needy with AWSATIN of that wherewith ye feed your own folk, or the clothing of them, or the liberation of a slave, and for him who findeth not then a three days' fast. This is the expiation of your oaths when ye have sworn; and keep your oaths. Thus Allah expoundeth unto you His revelations in order that ye may give thanks.

                            Here also I don?t understand why it should be translated as ?middle/average?.
                            Why I think so is because according to this verse you can choose between the 3 given options (3 days fasting is only if you are not able to do one of the 3 options). I don?t know how much freeing a slave costs, but I know that clothing someone is more expensive then feeding someone with average you feed your own people. Thus feeding someone with the price of cloth doesn?t look equal. I think feeding someone with the price of cloth, the food must be of the best not average.

                            Next verse
                            6828
                            Pickthall The AWSATUHUM among them said Said I not unto you Why glorify ye not?

                            Please read the whole story 6817 and further, to understand the context of verse 6828.
                            If wusta here meant middle then what was the best one among them thinking/doing?

                            Next verse
                            1005
                            Pickthall Cleaving, as one, the centre,

                            For this verse I?m sorry, I find this a very hard chapter to understand. Need to study it more.

                            So in my view sallaat Al Wusta is talking about the best sallaat not the middle sallaat according to the meaning of the word in the above mentioned verses.
                            What is this ?best sallaat?? The only sallaat I can think of is sallaat al jumu3a 629-11
                            But I have a problem with this because I don?t know at which time this sallaat al jumu3a is. I know it must be done when the call is heard. BUT who is this one who gives this call? And how does this one know at what time he must do the call to the sallaat Al Jumu3a?

                            One interesting note, I did research for the word YAUM in The Quran. I?m not yet finished with my researches, but till now every time YAUM AL? is mentioned it?s never a given day in a week as we know. Thus I think (for now) that Yaum Al Juma3a can?t be a name of a day. As far as I know, no name of a day is given in The Quran. Even Sabbath as in 265, 447, 4154, 7163 is in my view not a name of a day, actually 7163 is I think clear that Sabbath is not a name of a day.

                            Here are some examples of ?yaum al?? which are mentioned in The Quran.

                            May Allah increase our knowledge

                            salaam

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Y Offline
                              Y Offline
                              youssef4342
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Peace everyone!
                              I think the argument by Layth(?) of Solomon missing his "wusta" prayer is an evidence for a middle prayer. It would make it more understandable for His Majesty to advice us to guard our prayers, and especially the middle prayer. As stated by the argument that some people might delay this middle prayer until it's too late, because there is a bigger open-window duration for the middle prayer verses the other two prayers.

                              May His Majesty Resolve our disputes pr
                              ~ Most Blessed is YAHUWAH, in His Supreme, Holy, Majesty ~

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                mmkhan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                So in my view sallaat Al Wusta is talking about the best sallaat not the middle sallaat according to the meaning of the word in the above mentioned verses.
                                What is this ?best sallaat?? The only sallaat I can think of is sallaat al jumu3a 629-11
                                But I have a problem with this because I don?t know at which time this sallaat al jumu3a is. I know it must be done when the call is heard. BUT who is this one who gives this call? And how does this one know at what time he must do the call to the sallaat Al Jumu3a?

                                Salaaman Bender,

                                Please check when you have time.

                                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597144.msg178646#msg178646

                                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9601815.msg269776#msg269776

                                http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9601629.msg267955#msg267955

                                May Allah guide us all to His true path pr
                                Mohammed M. Khan

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Bender
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  Salaaman Bender,

                                  Please check when you have time.

                                  http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9597144.msg178646#msg178646

                                  http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9601815.msg269776#msg269776

                                  http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9601629.msg267955#msg267955

                                  May Allah guide us all to His true path pr
                                  Mohammed M. Khan

                                  Salaam Mohammed,

                                  thanks for the links
                                  If I have questions then I know where to find you

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    mmkhan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    thanks for the links )
                                    If I have questions then I know where to find you

                                    Salaaman Bender,

                                    You are welcome

                                    May Allah open our hearts to understand the Truth pr
                                    Mohammed M. Khan

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • E Offline
                                      E Offline
                                      Eikonoklastes
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      Peace Kevin,

                                      For the second time read these verses SLOWLY

                                      370 O people of the book, why do you reject God's signs while you are bearing witness?
                                      371 O people of the book, why do you dress the truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you know?

                                      447 O you who have received the book(Jews and the Christians), acknowledge what We have sent down authenticating what is with you, before We cast down faces and turn them on their backs or curse them as the people of the Sabbath were cursed. God's will is always done.

                                      Doesn't the above verse imply that the Jews and Christians are more knowledgeable in the Scripture than those you are new to the teachings of the Quran???Read it again several times and maybe you'll see my point

                                      1094 If you are in doubt regarding what We have sent down to you, then ask those who have been studying the book from before you. The truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be of those who doubt.

                                      If the Jews and the Christians are not aware of the truth then why would God say "ask those who have been studying the book from before you " ??? ???

                                      I've read the verses carefully, in context, and I do not disagree with them. The People of the Book will see the truth. But it's referring to the truth about the Abrahamic God and that the Quran is from Him, not every fine detail, as even you yourself said that there are changes regarding salat, zakat, etc.

                                      In light of 548, there are portions of truth remaining in the previous books, however the Quran was presented to correct any differences, hence why it says the religion is completed with it. Moses and Jesus were for Israel/the lost sheep of Israel, and Muhammad was to bring the message to the whole world. Even Jesus says this.

                                      But honestly, this argument regarding the authenticity of previous books can go on forever. It's pretty much why Jews and Christians and Muslims exist in separate denominations anyway. So let us put that aspect to rest regarding this matter, and perhaps we can debate about it in it's appropriate section another time.

                                      And this idea about me not being a Quran alone muslim stems from what ....my translating the verse 'salat al wusta' as middle prayer!? The reason why I believe that it is a correct translation is because I KNOW THE PREVIOUS SCRIPTURES! This is not a new religion but an old one. The same that was practiced by Abraham, Moses and Jesus( who was a JEW if didn't know!!!!) Three daily prays is not a new practice. Where have I strayed from the Quran??? It is you who lacks knowledge. Ask a Jew or Christian how many prays are taught in the previous scriptures and 95% (if not all ) will tell you that they're three, so how am I straying if I translate 'salat al wusta' as middle prayer? rotfl Hmmm, maybe 'wusta' only means 'balanced'...... What a basless argument!

                                      This is what it boils down to. You and I both claim to believe in the Quran. The Quran claims to be fully detailed and sufficient regarding the religion of Abraham.

                                      Correct?

                                      Therefore, all I'm asking is for those who believe in the 3 daily salat to present their evidence using the Quran alone, which is sufficient as far as we are concerned. Brother youssef4342 listed some points with the Quran and a few regarding the OT. I rebutted against the arguments presented, all the ones regarding the grammar and logic of the Quran were conveniently disregarded, and any hint of a 3 daily salat from non-Quranic sources were clung to. So far from your points it seems to just be what the previous books say, and that therefore 'wusta' should hold the definition which would put it in line with the previous books, disregarding any errors it might cause within the Quran.

                                      What else am I to make of this? I'm not debating to try to be right and just call your arguments "baseless" without showing sufficient evidence. I've gone through all the reasons as to why I don't believe there are 3 daily salat and they are undeniable at this point. If there are any valid points in opposition, I want to hear them as I would like to know the truth.

                                      Anyone who looks through this entire thread can see for the 2 daily salat, there are dictionary definitions, there are several examples of where MAJOR errors occur if 'wusta' is translated as 'middle', there is evidence from other areas in the Quran where 'wusta' is 'most balanced/moderate'...

                                      So far the only argument for 3 daily salat presented is that the Quran says there is truth in the previous books, and the previous books say 3 daily salat. The Quran isn't an index for other books. It must sufficiently explain itself. If one cannot prove there are 3 daily salat using the Quran alone, then they must 1) Admit there is great contradiction in the entire religion if they believe all the holy books to be infallible (and not only with salat, with countless other matters as well), 2) Perhaps just realize that it was once 3 and it's now 2, if you believe the previous books are infallible, or 3) Realize that the Quran supersedes and corrects the previous books, which it claims to in 548, therefore meaning there are corruptions in the previous books.

                                      But whether one wants to believe in the previous books or not, is a different issue. Either way, the Quran should be able to explain itself on it's own if we believe in it and believe it is sufficient. Please provide proof of 3 daily salat using the Quran alone if you would like to convince followers of the Quran that it is so. Otherwise, to you is your system, and to me is mine.

                                      May peace be with you.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • K Offline
                                        K Offline
                                        KDC501
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        Peace Kevin,

                                        I've read the verses carefully, in context, and I do not disagree with them. The People of the Book will see the truth. But it's referring to the truth about the Abrahamic God and that the Quran is from Him, not every fine detail, as even you yourself said that there are changes regarding salat, zakat, etc.

                                        In light of 548, there are portions of truth remaining in the previous books, however the Quran was presented to correct any differences, hence why it says the religion is completed with it. Moses and Jesus were for Israel/the lost sheep of Israel, and Muhammad was to bring the message to the whole world. Even Jesus says this.

                                        But honestly, this argument regarding the authenticity of previous books can go on forever. It's pretty much why Jews and Christians and Muslims exist in separate denominations anyway. So let us put that aspect to rest regarding this matter, and perhaps we can debate about it in it's appropriate section another time.

                                        This is what it boils down to. You and I both claim to believe in the Quran. The Quran claims to be fully detailed and sufficient regarding the religion of Abraham.

                                        Correct?

                                        Therefore, all I'm asking is for those who believe in the 3 daily salat to present their evidence using the Quran alone, which is sufficient as far as we are concerned. Brother youssef4342 listed some points with the Quran and a few regarding the OT. I rebutted against the arguments presented, all the ones regarding the grammar and logic of the Quran were conveniently disregarded, and any hint of a 3 daily salat from non-Quranic sources were clung to. So far from your points it seems to just be what the previous books say, and that therefore 'wusta' should hold the definition which would put it in line with the previous books, disregarding any errors it might cause within the Quran.

                                        What else am I to make of this? I'm not debating to try to be right and just call your arguments "baseless" without showing sufficient evidence. I've gone through all the reasons as to why I don't believe there are 3 daily salat and they are undeniable at this point. If there are any valid points in opposition, I want to hear them as I would like to know the truth.

                                        Anyone who looks through this entire thread can see for the 2 daily salat, there are dictionary definitions, there are several examples of where MAJOR errors occur if 'wusta' is translated as 'middle', there is evidence from other areas in the Quran where 'wusta' is 'most balanced/moderate'...

                                        So far the only argument for 3 daily salat presented is that the Quran says there is truth in the previous books, and the previous books say 3 daily salat. The Quran isn't an index for other books. It must sufficiently explain itself. If one cannot prove there are 3 daily salat using the Quran alone, then they must 1) Admit there is great contradiction in the entire religion if they believe all the holy books to be infallible (and not only with salat, with countless other matters as well), 2) Perhaps just realize that it was once 3 and it's now 2, if you believe the previous books are infallible, or 3) Realize that the Quran supersedes and corrects the previous books, which it claims to in 548, therefore meaning there are corruptions in the previous books.

                                        But whether one wants to believe in the previous books or not, is a different issue. Either way, the Quran should be able to explain itself on it's own if we believe in it and believe it is sufficient. Please provide proof of 3 daily salat using the Quran alone if you would like to convince followers of the Quran that it is so. Otherwise, to you is your system, and to me is mine.

                                        May peace be with you.

                                        You have a very interesting take on the ?Quran Alone? doctrine. I have been waiting to talk about this for a long time since there are a few members on this forum who cry ?Quran Alone !!!?, Quran Alone!!!!,? and don?t know what ?Quran Alone? means.

                                        Quran Alone Discussion?

                                        Some verses on Quran Alone Doctrine?.

                                        1746 We place shields over their hearts, that they should not understand it, and deafness in their ears. If you mention your Lord in the Quran alone, they run away turning their backs in aversion.

                                        6940 This is the utterance of an honorable messenger
                                        6941 It is not the utterance of a poet; rarely do you acknowledge.
                                        6942 Nor the utterance of a soothsayer; rarely do you take heed.
                                        6943 A revelation from the Lord of the worlds.
                                        6944 Had he uttered any other teachings.
                                        6945 We would have seized him by the right.
                                        6946 Then, We would have severed his life-line.
                                        6947 None of you would be able to prevent it.
                                        6948 This is a reminder for the righteous.

                                        THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT THE 'QURAN ALONE' DOCTRINE.....

                                        (1) Using outside sources to derive an interpretation from the Quran is NOT a violation of the 'Quran Alone' doctrine that is taught in Quran.
                                        The ONLY TIME when using outside sources becomes a problem is when they CONFLICT with the teachings of the Quran.

                                        Here are two examples....

                                        Look at the translation of Sura 962 by some translators
                                        962 He created the human being from an embryo.

                                        Obviously this is not classical translation of "alaqin" which means (1) blood clot; (2) hanging thing; (3) leech. But is Dr. Bucaille (the man responsible for this translation) wrong in combining the likeness of the three translations to come up with the translation of the word 'alaqin' in Sura 962 to mean embryo? No he is not wrong. But in your view Eikon he would be wrong since he used science(another source other than the Quran) to derive his interpretation.

                                        Second Example...
                                        What about God's constant (persistent) reminder in the Quran to investigate the signs in nature? Wouldn't to investigate the signs of nature be a source other than the Quran. Isn't Science a source other than the Quran???? Common Sense people.

                                        Obviously the 'Quran Alone' doctrine applies only to conflicting teachings of the Quran and not sources that are in harmony with the Quran!

                                        Thus using other sources to interpret the Quran is not a crime (sin) , but rather using sources that conflict with the Quran is.

                                        For example...here is a conflict

                                        The Quran says the earth is egg-shaped
                                        7930 The land after that, He made it like an egg.

                                        Now lets pretend that science says that the world of flat. In this case we must ignore science since it conflicts with the teachings of the Quran

                                        Example 2

                                        Fact #1 'salat al wusta' can be translated as 'middle prayer'. The Jews (who had 30x or more prophets than the arabs!!! And are followers of the Abrahamic religion ) and the Christians prayed three daily prayers for centuries! Using this and other signs in the Quran as the cornerstone of my preferred translation is not in violation of the "Quran Alone " doctrine since "SALAT AL WUSTA" CAN BE TRANSLATED AS MIDDLE PRAYER!!!. Salat al wusta is not outside the Quran, it is in the Quran! Your argument should be focused on why I prefer the middle prayer translation and not based on the illogical interpretation of on what you think Quran Alone doctrine means!

                                        "Quran Alone " simply means to follow the teachings(religious, scientific etc) that are not in conflict with the Quran. Using outside sources like Science, the Bible,Mathematics, and the Hadiths is not a crime!!!The sin lies when you use them when they conflict with the Quran! 95% of what is taught in the Hadiths and Sunna are in direct confliction with the Quran since Muhammad was banned from teaching any other teaching other than the Quran!!! Do you see where I coming from Eikon? You and others have to reevaluate your definition of the "Quran Alone" doctrine since it doesn't make any sense at all.

                                        Regarding the evidence that you seek for the middle prayer in the Quran I will not bother to get in argument with you on this since you have already been shown the evidence of them on other forum topics but chose not to acknowledge them. So why give my typing fingers the extra burden???

                                        Peace,

                                        Kevin.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          GODsubmitter
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Thank you KDC501 for your wonderful post!

                                          You are completely right, and I agree totally with you.

                                          By the way, GOD ALONE is much more important then Quran alone!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users