The Search for Muhammad has Ended

Noon_dhe_plume

No, he sent prophets everywhere

Well, with all this, I can add someting else, that might sound weird ; MEKA is MACEDONIA, Called in local dialect MAKE DONIA , in the quran BATNI MAKKA , same meaning, it is the place where alroum were defeated by one of the prophets

1889 furthermore he followed a means
1890 until when he reached rising the sun he found it rising on a community not We made to them from against it Siin-Ta-Ra = to cover/veil/conceal, modesty, covered one, hide oneself

Dhul-Qarnayn and the "naked philosophers"

http//www.utexas.edu/courses/classicalarch/images3/alexhead.jpg

While in India, Alexander took prisoner ten of the Brahmins gymnosophists or ?naked philosphers? who had done most to get Sabbas to revolt, and had made the most trouble for the Macedonians. These men had a great reputation for intelligence, so Alexander decided to give them a test. He announced that the one who gave the worst answer would be the first to die, and he made the oldest Brahmin the judge of the competition.

Which are more numerous, Alexander asked the first one, the living or the dead? "The living," said the Brahmin, "because the dead no longer count."

Which produces more creatures, the sea or the land? Alexander asked the second. "The land? was his answer, "because the sea is only a part of it."

The third was asked which animal was the smartest of all, and the Brahmin replied "The one we have not found yet."

Alexander asked the fourth what argument he had used to stir up the Indians to fight, and he answered "Only that one should either live nobly or die nobly."

Which is older day or night? Was Alexander's question to the fifth, and the answer he got was "Day is older, by one day at least." When he saw that Alexander was not satisfied with this answer, the Brahmin added "Strange questions get strange answers."

What should a man do to make himself loved? Asked Alexander and the sixth Brahmin replied "Be powerful without being frightening."

What does a man have to do to become a god? He asked the seventh, who responded "Do what is impossible for a man."

The question to the eighth was whether death or life was stronger, and his answer "Life is stronger than death, because it bears so many miseries."

The ninth Brahmin was asked how long it was proper for a man to live, and he said "Until it seems better to die."

Then Alexander turned to the judge, who decided that each one had answered worse than another. "You will die first, then, for giving such a decision," said Alexander. "Not so, mighty king," said the Brahmin, "if you want to remain a man of your word. You said that you would kill first the one who made the worst answer."

Alexander gave all of the Brahmins gifts and set them free ?Plutarch, Life of Alexander

unknownuser

And... I would suggest that you avoid the use of very unpleasant and subjective word such as 'insanity' or any 'ranting/derogatory type of words'

I hardly think labeling someone as "confused" or "insane" to be derogatory.

You were saying that there were nothing in Palestine/Levant and as such makes the place as a 'non strategic' /'non prestigious' place for external parties to invade. (Akkadian/Babylonian invasion)

I am not inventing this. The archeological evidence uncovered from the Palestinian earth has shown that it was a peripheral region. The "Israeli" archeologists themselves have reached this conclusion. Their dismal failure to find a single shred of proof that the Kingdom of Solomon was in Palestine has made them reach a state of total dispair. Did you even bother reading the first two posts of this thread?

Which I have proved to you that the Phoenician civilization which originated in the Levant region is THE main civilization who traveled far and colonize nearly all of the shore line within Mediterranean sea.

I am not denying that the so-called "Phoenicians" were sea-faring people. (I'm Lebanese, and I know what you're talking about). All I'm saying is that these people ORIGINATED from the Red Sea coast in Arabia, and migrated north to the Levant.

You maintain a double standard regarding your attitude to the "Torah", you regard some part of it as truth if it support your 'hypothesis' yet you cursed some other part if it doesn't ring well with your 'hypothesis'..

Let me tell you something about the Torah....

I firmly believe that the original text of the Torah contained a very accurate account of the trials and orgdeals of Bani Israel, an ancient Yemeni tribe. However, the text was tampered with many times.

1- THe first tampering took place during the Babylonian Exile, when certain myths were added to the text, which were not originally there. SOmeday I will point these additions out to you.

2- The second and most scandalous tampering took place in Egypt, and was perpetrated by the Septuagint priests, who, under the mandate of Ptolemy (the Greek ruler of Egypt), translated the Torah from Aramaic to Greek. I will show you, in detail, how they corrupted the text through their translations. I will put forth examples of Aramaic text right next to the Greek text, and we will analyze them together, so that you will see the blatant corruption with your own eyes.

3- The third tampering was done by the Masorite priests, who, working from their mountain sanctuary in Turkey, decided to accentuate the originally silent Aramaic letters. And in doing so, they made some very serious mistakes, because they were not expertly fluent in the language. Most Jewish scholars today know very well that the Masoritic articulation contained many mistakes. Bernard Leeman pointed many of those out. So did Kamal Salibi in his book "The Torah Came from Arabia". For example, the original Aramaic text mentions that after the waters of the Deluge receded, Noah's Ark settled in a place called "rrt" (this is how it was spelled in the original, silent Aramaic text). So the Masorites articulated the word as "Ararat", because it was the name of a nearby mountain that they knew. In truth all experts in Aramaic will tell you that "rrt" is not a proper noun, and that it simply means "high place".

4- The fourth tampering was done in modern times, by the orientalist and imperialist Europeans (who established the Zionist movement). What these criminals did was that they projected the geography of the events described by the Torah, which took place in Yemen, onto the land of Palestine. THey hijacked the geography of the events and forged history as we know it.

However, despite all the tampering, many names of tribes and places remained as they are, and these alone are enough to expose the forgeries, as I will soon show you. We are not talking about 2,3, or 10 matching names...I will put , in front of your eyes, over 200 names of places and tribes mentioned in the Torah that match, TO THE LETTER, names of places and tribes in Yemen, and you will not believe your eyes when you see them.

Again I will repeat Bani Israel are ancient Yemeni tribes from the distant childhood of Arabia. The names of their prophets ( Abram - Samu'il - Nehmia - Yehoshua - etc...) are all mentioned in the old traditions and ballad songs of Yemen, as well as the old Arabian poetry, and their legends have been transmitted from generation to generation since forever.

By insisting that Ancient Israel was in Palestine, you are not only defying the archeological evidences that have been put forth by the "Israeli" scientists themselves, but you are also, unknowingly, supportung the Zionist version of history.

You seem to be obsessed to show that YEMEN is the place for ALL things.. starting from Adam, to Eden, to Noah to Abraham, to Sheba, to Israelite, to Muhammad etc..
I wonder what's your true objective in this matter?

I don't have an objective. I guess I am just INSANE and OBSSESSED with Yemen.
I guess I need psychiatric help.

Prepare yourself for the evidence that is coming....

Peace...

loxbox13

I respect your opinion, but I do not agree with you. I'm sorry, it's just too far-fetched for me to think the Quran was revealed in Rome. (But nice pics anyway )

No, the Quran wasn't hosted in Roma, But in North Africa, this is what I was saying, and , The whole mediteraneen used to speak the same language, or almost same, with diffferent accent, it is obbious when you find every single word in a language, the same in the other languages

You made your study based of facts made up to alter history in the first place, at least consider Rome, it is not innocent, and it wasn't KABALA or Christian , check out for yourself
than, I don't see the point on Allah telling us details, names and facts in the quran, while we go look for scholars who were enemies of humanity in the first place, I'm talking about those who manipulated books, by writting many versions

Magic, is like this, they leave something in front of your eyes, While you don't see it
I liked your research, but all these i read before

All messengers that existed are mentioned in the quran, some, Allah told their stories, some, not, we only know their names, Exemple, DHU NOON , DHU KIFL, IL YACINE
this is how i read it, I consider both ways, because, he said LAM NAKSSUS , and not LAM NATLOU or NAQULL

huruf

I never said that Allah sent messengers ONLY to Arabia. I think I was very clear and precise in this matter, so please don't put words into my mouth. What I said was that the messengers whom are mentioned in the Quran, were in Arabia. There are many messengers whom Allah did NOT tell Muhamad (P) about, and these were sent to lands outside Arabia.

I wrote that in answer to SiNoob's message

after reading this thread..i was wondering..why god only send down the book into middle east's populatuon..looks like god didn't care about other population?

Obviously not in answer to you or to any person who knows the Qur'an and therefore knows that God does not have an exclusive with anybody, but has attented to all peoles equally through the world nd through the ages. And that is a fact that indeed comes also very appropriately to destroy the enthronisation of Christian and Judeist sacred history, which seems to uphold some kind of monopoly concerning God's relationship with human kind.

Obviously the revelation of the Qur'an, bearing in mind that it was made to an Arab, must refer often to concepts that are current amongst the immediate population surrounding the messenger. And it also guarantees that that messenger will uphold that that history is just one of the many histories of revelation on earth, all of them the same, because God is God for everybody and therefore inconsistencies do not come from Him bur from the tampering of people.

On another aspect, I must say that I have always wondered how on earth did Bilqis and Suleyman get in touch if they were one in Palestine and the other one in Yemen, without also getting in touch with all the peopel in between.

So what you are narrating has plenty of interest.

Salaam

loxbox13