The Search for Muhammad has Ended
-
Well, Mr. Mazhar, would you care to tell us where the Children of Israel are right now? Can you identify them?
If you think that the Ashkinazi Jews ( the Europeans and Khazars who are occupying Palestine right now) are the Children of Israel, then I weep for you. You are marketting Zionist propaganda without even being aware of yourself.
Take a look at the following photo
http//i1203.photobucket.com/albums/bb386/Gorefiendel/Netanyahu.jpg
Now tell me. Does that man, whose parents imigrated to Palestine from POLAND, look Semitic to you?
Does he bear any relation whatsoever to the Children of Israel?The truth is that this man is of European descent. And if you trace his ancestry back deep enough, you will find them to be KHAZAR JEWS. Claiming that this man is Semitic is an insult to Semitism and an insult to humanity itself. To claim that he is from Bani Israel is a vile corruption of history itself.
Now look at this next photo
http//i1203.photobucket.com/albums/bb386/Gorefiendel/Cute.jpg
That little fellow (a Yemeni Jew), has more Israeli blood coursing through his veins than all the Jews of occupied Palestine put together. And reading about him and the plight of his people will make your heart ache.
The Children of Israel do not exist anymore. They have scattered and mixed with the other races and peoples of the world.
Please wake up.
The Children of Israel are defined as those who follow the Torah and the old scriptures of the Bible and it is not based on blood lines!!!!!! It is based on the fact that they followed the same creed of Israel , Issac and Abraham (monotheism) !
What sort of nonsense are you propagating on this forum brother. Anyone who tries to claim that they know who is related to Abraham and who isn't is surely a deluded person!!!! No one has proof of such evidence!!! And if you say you have proof then bring your proof and don't make assumptions. This is what happens you stray from the Quran.
616 When Jesus, son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, I am God's messenger to you, authenticating what is present with me of the Torah and bringing good news of a messenger to come after me whose name will be ?most acclaimed.'" But when he showed them the clear proofs, they said, ?This is clearly magic.'
393 All the food used to be lawful to the Children of Israel except what Israel forbade for himself before the Torah was sent down. Say, "Bring the Torah and recite it if you are truthful."
3223 We have given Moses the book. So do not be in any doubt about his encounter. We made it a guide for the Children of Israel.
The Children of Israel were those who followed the previous scriptures of the Book and the creed of Israel/Jacob and his fathers and not based on blood lines!
Peace,
Kevin
-
You're welcome. They are both almost the same. The first video is higher reolution, contains speech, and is slower to download. The second is lower resolution, and is just images and music, without speech, and downloads faster.
I serioulsy doubt I can contribute anymore to this subject than what has already been written on it.
LIES.
This is no different than the Shia Muslims' claim that their imams were born before the universe. That the names Ali, Hassan, Fatima, and Hussein were the names Allah gave to Adam, and that those "Infallibles" were the light from which teh Universe was created.
Can you see the pattern here? Same kind of corruption, with the same motive POLITICAL MANIPULATION.
What if I proved to you that there was never such thing as a "Hebrew" language? What if I proved to you that the language being spoken by the Jews in so-called "Israel" today, was invented by the Zionists in the late 19th Century, and is nothing more than a perverted version of Aramaic, mixed with an old German dialect?
What will your reaction be?
Traditional Islamic history is 90% garbage and only 10% truth.
The thing that annoys me about some FM members is how they are always so eager to disprove the historicity of Mecca. They will go to any length to prove that "Mecca didn't exist before so and so period" or that "It wasn't on any trade toute".
However, when they are presented with evidence concerning Palestine and Jerusalem; when they are shown solid archeoligical proof that the Jerusalem of Palestine didn't even exist before 600 BC, and that there is no trace of Solomon's temple there, they turn a deaf ear and a blind eye to it.
Why is that so? Why the double standard?
Pelase think and reflect on this...
I will continue this thread on the week-end.
Peace...
Pazuzu, please do continue!
There are serious people like myself who do care about knowledge and information.
I am extremely interested in your opinion about Hebrew Language because I feel what you say might be the truth.
I also agree that the majority of nowadays Jews are Europeans and Khazars... -
Peace Pazuzu peace
Yes, there are proselyt "non-israelit" Jews out there, but the stipulation was put on those who Followed the Children of Israel's foot steps.Genesis 1712 He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised, every male child in your generations, he who is born in your house or bought with money from any foreigner who is not your descendant. 13 He who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money must be circumcised, and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. NKJV
Circumcision was Abraham's Covenent, and to his descendents (i.e be circumcised and you will have inherited the land. BUT if you are not, then you are not entiteled the promised land, even if you're descended from Abraham Himself!)
-
Pazuzu please respond to my last post (Who was the pharaoh of Moses) since you seem to alluded all of the points I made.
Brother let me say this again since you seem not to understand my last post.
The Egyptians built bricks/stones out of mud(clay) and reeds baked in the sun (or heated). The same thing which is said in the Quran
http//www.reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/building/
"Built of sun baked bricks made of Nile mud and straw, houses, palaces and city walls crumbled when they stopped being looked after"
This fact can be found on other websites. So the fact that you say the Egyptians built there temples, and pyramids out of solid rock and say nothing of how they were made says to me that you're trying to hide the truth.
This same fact is found in the Quran.....
2838 Pharaoh said, "O commanders, I have not known of any god for you other than me. Therefore, O Haman, fire up(fa-awqid) the bricks (l-ni means clay) and build me a platform, so perhaps I may take a look at the god of Moses! I am certain he is a liar."
So again I say WHERE IS THE INCONSISTENCY
"The earliest instance where pr-`3 is used specifically to address the ruler is in a letter to Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten), who reigned c. 1353 - 1336 BC, which is addressed to 'Pharaoh, all life, prosperity, and health!. During the eighteenth dynasty (sixteenth to fourteenth centuries BC) the title pharaoh was employed as a reverential designation of the ruler. About the late twenty-first dynasty (tenth century BC), however, instead of being used alone as before, it began to be added to the other titles before the ruler's name, and from the twenty-fifth dynasty (eighth to seventh centuries BC) it was, at least in ordinary usage, the only epithet prefixed to the royal appellative."
http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharaoh
I feel sorry for those who listen to this nonsense. It is quite clear to me that they don't read enough. People have to understand that they were other civilizations that existed during the rule of the Egyptians. To say that Arabs did have the word "Pharaoh" (Fir'awn in arabic) which sounds similar is clear twisting/distortion of the truth.
Also Egyptian history is consistent with the Quran...The term 'Pharaoh' was only used for kings that existed during the New Kingdom. During the old kingdom they were called Kings as can be seen in the story of Joseph.
1243 The King said, "I continue to dream of seven fat cows which are being eaten by seven thin ones, and seven green pods and others which are dry. O you chiefs, tell me what my vision means if you are able to interpret the visions."
Brother why are you bringing up the Bible in this? I'm taking about the proofs in the Quran to prove that Fir'awn was from Egypt. Also again why are you surprised that there is no records of the exodus in Egypt. If I was Pharaoh of Egypt I personally would have gotten rid of any trace of the Children of Israel history since it's a shameful history to remember or record for an empire. A single man with a walking stick with no weapons , no artillery defeats a great Egyptian army!!! Wouldn't you call that brother a shameful piece of history???
Peace,
Kevin
Peace,Kevin.
In one of your post you said that the Children of Israel inherited the lands of the Pharaoh. When I showed you the proof that it wasn't so you didn't say anything
7137 We let the people who were oppressed inherit the east and the west of the land which We have blessed, and good word of your Lord was completed towards the Children of Israel. For they were patient, and We destroyed what Pharaoh and his people were doing, and what they contrived.
The Children of Israel never inherited the lands of the Pharaohs (or as you call it the land of there oppressors). They went to another land or area to worship God. The land of there forefathers (Abraham , Issac and Jacob) This is implied in the story in Sura 5
520 Moses said to his people, "My people, remember God's favor upon you that he made amongst you prophets, and made you sovereigns, and he gave you what He had not given any from the worlds."
521 "O my people, enter the holy land that God Has decreed for you, and do not turn your backs, or you will become losers."
522 They said, "O Moses, in it are a mighty people, and we will not enter it until they leave. So when they leave, then we will enter it."
523 Among those who were afraid, two men whom God had blessed, said, "Enter upon them through the gate; when you enter it then you will be the victors. You shall put your trust in God if you had acknowledged."
524 They said, "O Moses, we will never enter it as long as they are in it, so go you and your Lord and fight, we will stay right here!" ( The land which they eventually inherited had MIGHTY PEOPLE. Which would imply that they may have to fight in order to obtain the land)
525 He said, "My Lord, I do not control except myself and my brother, so separate between us and between the wicked people."
526 He said, "Then it has become forbidden for them for forty years, and they will be lost in the land." Do not be sorrowful over the wicked people.
The proofs are there in the Quran.
-
Peace Pazuzu peace
Yes, there are proselyt "non-israelit" Jews out there, but the stipulation was put on those who Followed the Children of Israel's foot steps.Genesis 1712 He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised, every male child in your generations, he who is born in your house or bought with money from any foreigner who is not your descendant. 13 He who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money must be circumcised, and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. NKJV
Circumcision was Abraham's Covenent, and to his descendents (i.e be circumcised and you will have inherited the land. BUT if you are not, then you are not entiteled the promised land, even if you're descended from Abraham Himself!)
Good response brother Youssef. This is what i was trying to point out. The definition of the Children of Israel is not based on bloodlines it is based on beliefs.
Peace,
Kevin
-
KDC501
I feel sorry for those who listen to this nonsense. It is quite clear to me that they don't read enough. People have to understand that they were other civilizations that existed during the rule of the Egyptians. To say that Arabs did have the word "Pharaoh" (Fir'awn in arabic) which sounds similar is clear twisting/distortion of the truth.
Thanks. It is great to have a saviour, but do not over do it, one doesn't have to be dumb ALL the time.
Also Egyptian history is consistent with the Quran...The term 'Pharaoh' was only used for kings that existed during the New Kingdom. During the old kingdom they were called Kings as can be seen in the story of Joseph.
You pretend to use as proof the very thing that is being contested.
Brother why are you bringing up the Bible in this? I'm taking about the proofs in the Quran to prove that Fir'awn was from Egypt. Also again why are you surprised that there is no records of the exodus in Egypt. If I was Pharaoh of Egypt I personally would have gotten rid of any trace of the Children of Israel history since it's a shameful history to remember or record for an empire. A single man with a walking stick with no weapons , no artillery defeats a great Egyptian army!!! Wouldn't you call that brother a shameful piece of history???
That is pure conjecture of the undiluted kind and no proof of anything whatsoever, except that you do not indeed have any real proof, because if you did have it, you would not resort to YOUR OWN conjecture.
In one of your post you said that the Children of Israel inherited the lands of the Pharaoh. When I showed you the proof that it wasn't so you didn't say anything
Again you are using as proof the very question that is being contested.
Salaam
-
Salaam
I also agree that the majority of nowadays Jews are Europeans and Khazars. The reason for this is that during the Holocaust Zionist Jews had an understanding with the Nazis that they would be saved and they were given the posts as 'Kapos' (sub guards) in the concentration camps and were the last to be selected for "treatment" (killing), if at all later using that propoganda in return they wanted safe place/Jerusalem.
peace -
KDC501
Thanks. It is great to have a saviour, but do not over do it, one doesn't have to be dumb ALL the time.You pretend to use as proof the very thing that is being contested.
That is pure conjecture of the undiluted kind and no proof of anything whatsoever, except that you do not indeed have any real proof, because if you did have it, you would not resort to YOUR OWN conjecture.
Again you are using as proof the very question that is being contested.
Salaam
My proof is from the previous scriptures and the Quran . Are you blatantly going to deny the Quran and what it says?
370 O people of the book, why do you reject God's signs while you are bearing witness?
371 O people of the book, why do you dress the truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you know?
447 O you who have received the book(Jews and the Christians), acknowledge what We have sent down authenticating what is with you, before We cast down faces and turn them on their backs or curse them as the people of the Sabbath were cursed. God's will is always done.
2947 Similarly, We have sent down to you the Book. Thus, those whom We have given the book will acknowledge it.(Jews and the Christians) Also, some of your people will acknowledge it. The only ones who mock Our signs are the ingrates.
If you believe that every part of the Bible is false then it is quite clear to me that you don?t read the Quran carefully. How can any group of people bear witness to something they do not know?
Even God told Muhammad that if he was unsure of anything that was sent down to ask the people of book!
1094 If you are in doubt regarding what We have sent down to you, then ask those who have been studying the book from before you. The truth has come to you from your Lord, so do not be of those who doubt.
If there wasn't any truth in the Bible then why would God ask the Jews and the Christians to judge by was sent them. Doesn't this imply that the Bible has the truth in it. Common sense.
543 How can they make you their judge when they have the Torah, containing God's judgment; then they turn away after that. They do not acknowledge.
544 We have sent down the Torah, in it is guidance and a light; the prophets who have peacefully surrendered judged with it for those who are Jews, as well as the Rabbis, and the Priests, for what they were entrusted of God's book, and they were witness over it. So do not revere the people but revere Me; and do not purchase with My signs a cheap price. Whoever does not judge with what God has sent down, then these are the ingrates.
547 Let the people of the Injeel judge with what God has sent down in it. Whoever does not judge by what God has sent down, then these are the vile ones.
Regarding the rest of my previous post you and no one else has answered my questions. There is more than sufficient proof in the Quran to proof to everyone that Egypt was the place were the Children of Israel resided and that Pharaoh was the Pharaoh of Egypt. So you show to me your proof using the Quran and I will show you mines. Your belief's and Pazuzu are the ones that hold no weight since there is ZERO proof of it in the previous scriptures. Plus the Pharaoh of Egypt story is completely consistent with the Quran!!!!Please tell me which person among the Children of Israel would bear witness to your assumptions???? The answer Absolutely none.
Peace,
Kevin
-
In one of your post you said that the Children of Israel inherited the lands of the Pharaoh. When I showed you the proof that it wasn't so you didn't say anything
Yes I did. I remember very well that I answered member Mazhar, who was making the very same allegations as you are now.
You think I'm afraid of you?
Despite that this thread is not talking about "misr", and this is off-topic, I will answer it here. I want everyone to see the extent of the corruption and twisting of Allah's word, and the lengths some of you people are willing to go to to prove the "Holliness" of Palestine.
{Moses said to his people "Seek help with God, and be patient; the earth is for God, He will inherit it to whom He pleases of His servants; and the ending will be for the righteous * They said "We were being harmed before you came to us and since you have come to us." He said "Perhaps your Rabb will destroy your enemy, and make you successors in the land, so He sees how you work?"}...
Moses tells them to be patient. Patient with what? Answer With the oppression of Far3oun.
He tells them of the possibilty that Allah will destroy their enemy and make them successors in the land. Which enemy is he talking about? Answer Far3oun and his goons. Which land will they be successors in? Answer The same land that Far3oun's "misr" was located in. This is the essence of teh word "Successor". You seucced someone in the same place he was in. This "misr", which was a trade citadel under the control of Far3oun, and was the center, or hub of the land that Allah blessed.
If you read on, a few verses further down in that same chapter, it tells you how Far3oun and his followers incurred the wrath of Allah, so their land was plagued with locusts, flood, frogs, etc... They asked Moses to lift the punishment. And when Allah did lift it, they remained arrogant.
{And when the plague befell them, they said "O Moses, call on your Rabb for what He has pledged with you, that if you remove this plague from us, then we will believe in you and we will send with you the Children of Israel. * So when We removed from them the plague until a future time; they broke their pledge} ...
So what was the consequence? They were drowned, and GONE from the picture. No more "Far3oun". Now the stage was set for the Israelites to inherit the WHOLE land that was blessed "Mubaraka".
{We thus took vengeance upon them by drowning them in the yamm, for their denial of Our signs, and their disregard of them * And We let the people who were weak inherit the east of the land and the west of it which We have blessed. And the good word of your Lord was completed towards the Children of Israel for their patience; and We destroyed what Pharaoh and his people were doing, and what they contrived}...
Which land was it? Answer The same land that Far3oun was in.
Let's jump forward to chapter 28
{We recite to you from the news of Moses and Pharaoh with fact, for a people who believe * Pharaoh became mighty in the land, and he turned its people into factions; he oppressed a group of them by killing their children and raping their women. He was of those who corrupted * And We wanted to help those who were oppressed in the land, and to make them leaders, and to make them the inheritors}...
Who were opressed in the land? Answer Ban Israel.
Allah made them inheritors of which land? Palestine?Are you blind?
Let every member here decide for himself who is twisting the meaning Allah destroys everything that Far3oun built, so the Israelites can INHERIT Palestine? Do you have any idea how absurd that sounds?
You are letting your pre-conceived dogma cloud your thinking. Instead of letting the Quran be the judge of your ideas, you are doing the opposite. Because the idea that Palestine is the Holy and Promised Land is rooted so deep into your mind, that you can't liberate yourself from it, you are twisting the meaning of the Quranic verses to let them support your pre-conceptions, instead of the other way around.
Palestine was a peripheral region, devoid of any riches and natural resources. It was not even the terminus of any trade route.
Where are the blessings that you speak of?These events took place in Arabia. The "misr" of Far3oun was a walled trade citadel along the caravan routes of Arabia. This is the very same Arabia which later saw the rise of the kingdom of David and Solomon. The very same kingdom that the Zionist archelogists have been turning Palestine upside down for 80 years in search for, and have failed to even produce a clay pot from its time.
As for your other point (concerning the title "Pharoah", I have already showed you that this word doesn't exist in Egyptian culture. The only word that even remotely resembles it is "Pr-aa", which means "Great House". And the poems dedicated to Horus-Ra, which were written on the walls of the temples and pyramids, clearly show that Horus-Re was called "Head of the Great House". So the word was used in reference to their prime deity, not their kings.
I will not say anymore about this subject, because frankly, I'm sick and tired of it. There are much more important things that are coming up on this thread, and I am wasting my time and my energy arguing the same points over and over again.
The truth of the matter has always been there, under our noses, but we have been too blind to see it. The prophets were all a continuation of one bloodline. From Abraham down to Muhamad. They were all one line, and all of them lived in one geographical region. Allah was relating to Muhamad the story of his own ancestors; teh story of events that happened in the SAME region were he was preaching the Quran. But the evil hands of corruption saw it more convenient to scatter the prophets out over the lands of the ancient world, from Egypt, to Palestine-Jordan, to Iraq, and to divide between father and son! And the Muslims have also fallen victim to this great delusion. Like for instance, they believe that Isaac, one of Abraham's sons, was originally in Palestine with his mother Sara, while Ismael, his other son, was in the heart of Arabia with his mother Hagar! And they make the ridiculous claim that Isaac became the father of the Israelites, while Ismael was father of the Arabs! (As if the Israelites were not in Arabia!!). They just could never find an explanation for this strange story of dividing Abraham's familly like that. What's the point behind it?
The more you look into the rampant version of this story, about who we are, and where we came from, and what our history is, the more you begin to see LIES everywhere. They reduced the history of Arabia to NOTHING but ragheads riding camels and eating dates, and claimed that the real civilizations and the prophets came from elsewhere. But the real truth of the matter is that they have hijacked our history and turned it upside down. The real truth that the Evil Hands have been hiding is that Arabia is the source and origin of ALL and everything, as I will soon prove to you.
What sort of nonsense are you propagating on this forum brother.
By the time this thread is finished, we will see who has been propagating the nonsense.
Peace...
-
Yes I did. I remember very well that I answered member Mazhar, who was making the very same allegations as you are now.
You think I'm afraid of you?
Despite that this thread is not talking about "misr", and this is off-topic, I will answer it here. I want everyone to see the extent of the corruption and twisting of Allah's word, and the lengths some of you people are willing to go to to prove the "Holliness" of Palestine.
{Moses said to his people "Seek help with God, and be patient; the earth is for God, He will inherit it to whom He pleases of His servants; and the ending will be for the righteous * They said "We were being harmed before you came to us and since you have come to us." He said "Perhaps your Rabb will destroy your enemy, and make you successors in the land, so He sees how you work?"}...
Moses tells them to be patient. Patient with what? Answer With the oppression of Far3oun.
He tells them of the possibilty that Allah will destroy their enemy and make them successors in the land. Which enemy is he talking about? Answer Far3oun and his goons. Which land will they be successors in? Answer The same land that Far3oun's "misr" was located in. This "misr", which was a trade citadel under the control of Far3oun, and was the center, or hub of the land that Allah blessed.
If you read on, a few verses further down in that same chapter, it tells you how Far3oun and his followers incurred the wrath of Allah, so their land was plagued with locusts, flood, frogs, etc... They asked Moses to lift the punishment. And when Allah did lift it, they remained arrogant.
{And when the plague befell them, they said "O Moses, call on your Rabb for what He has pledged with you, that if you remove this plague from us, then we will believe in you and we will send with you the Children of Israel. * So when We removed from them the plague until a future time; they broke their pledge} ...
So what was the consequence? They were drowned, and GONE from the picture. No more "Far3oun". Now the stage was set for the Israelites to inherit the WHOLE land that was blessed "Mubaraka".
{We thus took vengeance upon them by drowning them in the sea, for their denial of Our signs, and their disregard of them * And We let the people who were weak inherit the east of the land and the west of it which We have blessed. And the good word of your Lord was completed towards the Children of Israel for their patience; and We destroyed what Pharaoh and his people were doing, and what they contrived}...
Which land was it? Answer The same land that Far3oun was in.
Let's jump forward to chapter 28
{We recite to you from the news of Moses and Pharaoh with fact, for a people who believe * Pharaoh became mighty in the land, and he turned its people into factions; he oppressed a group of them by killing their children and raping their women. He was of those who corrupted * And We wanted to help those who were oppressed in the land, and to make them leaders, and to make them the inheritors}...
Wrong.
And here is what I have been showing to you in my post and up till now you don't see it.
7137 We let the people who were oppressed inherit the east and the west of the land which We have blessed, and good word of your Lord was completed towards the Children of Israel. For they were patient, and We destroyed what Pharaoh and his people were doing, and what they contrived.
The land that was inherited by the Children of Israel is a blessed land. This is not the land of the Pharaoh . In addition if these people inherited/occupy the land of the Pharaoh as you claim then why would they need to wander forty years settling NOWHERE. Wouldn't they stay in the land of the Pharaohs. Common sense brother!!!
Read Sura 5 for proof
520 Moses said to his people, "My people, remember God's favor upon you that he made amongst you prophets, and made you sovereigns, and he gave you what He had not given any from the worlds."
521 "O my people, enter the holy land that God Has decreed for you, and do not turn your backs, or you will become losers."
522 They said, "O Moses, in it are a mighty people, and we will not enter it until they leave. So when they leave, then we will enter it."
523 Among those who were afraid, two men whom God had blessed, said, "Enter upon them through the gate; when you enter it then you will be the victors. You shall put your trust in God if you had acknowledged."
524 They said, "O Moses, we will never enter it as long as they are in it, so go you and your Lord and fight, we will stay right here!" ( The land which they eventually inherited had MIGHTY PEOPLE. Which would imply that they may have to fight in order to obtain the land)
525 He said, "My Lord, I do not control except myself and my brother, so separate between us and between the wicked people."
526 He said, "Then it has become forbidden for them for forty years,and they will be lost in the land." Do not be sorrowful over the wicked people.
So are trying to tell me that these people inherited/occupy the lands of Pharaoh and suddenly had an epiphany to wander forty years lost in the land???? Also if they live and stayed in the land of there oppressors then why the need to settle elsewhere???
7128 Moses said to his people "Seek help with God, and be patient; for the land is God's. He will inherit it to whom He pleases of His servants; and the victory belongs to the righteous."
7129 They said, "We were being harmed before you came to us and since you have come to us." He said, "Perhaps your Lord will destroy your enemy, and make you successors in the land, so He sees how you behave."
7130 We then afflicted the people of Pharaoh with years of drought, a shortage in crops, so that they might take heed.These verses are taking about the the Children of Israel victory over Pharaoh and his servants and not about them occupying any land of theres. Yes they became successors over pharaoh and his people but surely this doesn't mean they occupied the land as you claim!!!! Again the land that they intended to occupy was the land of there forefathers. Hence the fact that they wandered forty years without occupying the land should be proof.
261 You said, "O Moses, we will not be patient to one type of food, so call for us your Lord that He may bring forth what the earth grows of its beans, cucumbers, garlic, lentils, and onions." He said, "Would you trade what is lowly with what is good?" Descend to (misra), you will have in it what you have asked for. They were thus stricken with humiliation and disgrace, and they remained under God's wrath for they were not appreciating God's signs, and killing the prophets with no justification. This is for what they have disobeyed and transgressed.
If they had occupied the land of the pharaohs then why the above statement in red????
You are saying that the children of Israel lived and occupied the land of pharaoh after they were defeated. I'm saying that they didn't occupy the land at all. These people wandered for forty years! Why the need to wander if all they could have done was occupy the land of the pharaoh?
Also why this....
261 You said, "O Moses, we will not be patient to one type of food, so call for us your Lord that He may bring forth what the earth grows of its beans, cucumbers, garlic, lentils, and onions." He said, "Would you trade what is lowly with what is good?" Descend to (misra), you will have in it what you have asked for. They were thus stricken with humiliation and disgrace, and they remained under God's wrath for they were not appreciating God's signs, and killing the prophets with no justification. This is for what they have disobeyed and transgressed.
If these people occupied the land of misra then why is there problem of food??? Why would they need to go back to misra ( which is implied here as an shameful act)
Are you getting what I'm trying to say now.
Peace,
Kevin
-
But the evil hands of corruption saw it more convenient to scatter the prophets out over the lands of the ancient world, from Egypt, to Palestine-Jordan, to Iraq, and to divide between father and son! And the Muslims have also fallen victim to this great delusion. Like for instance, they believe that Isaac, one of Abraham's sons, was originally in Palestine with his mother Sara, while Ismael, his other son, was in the heart of Arabia with his mother Hagar! And they make the ridiculous claim that Isaac became the father of the Israelites, while Ismael was father of the Arabs! (As if the Israelites were not in Arabia!!). They just could never find an explanation for this strange story of dividing Abraham's familly like that. What's the point behind it?
Whose hands are corrupt? Who is denying the statement of the Father of both Ismail and Ishaque alahimsalam.
If his both the sons and their familes were settled at one point why did he say "Min" and not all of them?
-
Salam Pazuzu, all...
No problem for me, I will drop the current Jerusalem and Judeah/Palestine in a heartbeat as areas of focus of Islamic interest, if indeed it can be proven that these are not the areas referred to in the Bible and The Quran...
However and despite very intriguing and valuable arguments, Bro Pazuzu, you do not have me fully convinced as of yet...
That there are discrepancies, and seemingly narrative and factual issues that question what the current status quo is, i.e. Jerusalem and surrounding areas being the land referred to in The Quran as being where Jesus preached the Gospel, and the other controversial matters you put forward...In fact I have one single concern... since you ascribe all the woes of this misinformation and manipulation to the Jews and Zionists, could it be possible that what is advocated here by you, and those historians/geographers you refer to themselves, being the object of a manipulation whereby what they are saying is in fact a result of a delusion of which they fell victims, so as to make the current Jerusalem insignificant to the Muslims, who then will focus on this other place that is Holy in Yemen and that they lose interest in liberating Jerusalem which then becomes of spurious importance to them?
In other words, it is a two edge sword problem, and only very accurate and reliable data could separate between the two options.
As for now, the Zionists have a serious problem if the Muslims decide that Jerusalem is their holiest place and that Pilgrimage referred to by The Quran should be to there and not Mekkah... Since Mekkah could be seen initially as distraction from Jerusalem..., maybe South West Arabia will offer the same ...
-
Salam Pazuzu, all...
No problem for me, I will drop the current Jerusalem and Judeah/Palestine in a heartbeat as areas of focus of Islamic interest, if indeed it can be proven that these are not the areas referred to in the Bible and The Quran...
In fact I have one single concern... since you ascribe all the woes of this misinformation and manipulation to the Jews and Zionists, could it be possible that what is advocated here by you, and those historians/geographers you refer to themselves, being the object of a manipulation whereby what they are saying is in fact a result of a delusion of which they fell victims, so as to make the current Jerusalem , who then will focus on this other place that is Holy in Yemen and that they lose interest in liberating Jerusalem which then becomes of spurious importance to them?In other words, it is a two edge sword problem, and only very accurate and reliable data could separate between the two options.
As for now, the Zionists have a serious problem if the Muslims decide that Jerusalem is their holiest place and that Pilgrimage referred to by The Quran should be to there and not Mekkah... Since Mekkah could be seen initially as distraction from Jerusalem..., maybe South West Arabia will offer the same ...
Salaam
Its good to be vigilant but I do not think that Zionists have a serious problem so long as their agents are successfully working to divide those who call themselves Muslims, and working hard to make Proohet Mohamad insignificant whilst calling themselves Qur'anist.
In fact I won't be surprised if Pazuzu is stopped from putting his evidence on this forum, as he is talking about the exsistance of the prophet whereas this forum is working to deny that.
peace -
Salaam
Its good to be vigilant but I do not think that Zionists have a serious problem so long as their agents are successfully working to divide those who call themselves Muslims, and working hard to make Proohet Mohamad insignificant whilst calling themselves Qur'anist.
In fact I won't be surprised if Pazuzu is stopped from putting his evidence on this forum, as he is talking about the exsistance of the prophet whereas this forum is working to deny that.
peaceI have asked some very strong questions and so far no one has been able to give me a satisfying answer. One of the cruxes of Pazuzu's argument is the fact that he claims that the children of Israel occupied "the land of the Firaun " after his death. I have shown clear evidence from the Quran that this is not the case. Since you seem to be a bit more knowledgeable then rest of us please answer my questions since Pazuzu it looks like went awol on us.
Peace,
Kevin
-
I have asked some very strong questions and so far no one has been able to give me a satisfying answer. One of the cruxes of Pazuzu's argument is the fact that he claims that the children of Israel occupied "the land of the Firaun " after his death. I have shown clear evidence from the Quran that this is not the case. Since you seem to be a bit more knowledgeable then rest of us please answer my questions since Pazuzu it looks like went awol on us.
Peace,
Kevin
Salaam
What Pazuzu is pointing out is that Egypt is not what the Qur'an refers to as Misr, and as for inheriting the land of pharoah this was something that he used to support his study. I did not agree with him that the children of Isreal did not exist but that does not mean I disregard his research, none of us can be 100 % sure, but this should not stop us from letting others speak and then draw our conclusions.
peace -
Peace IMHO,
If the interests of the State of Israel are threatened, of course they will deploy pundits/spooks to subvert the threat... it happens all the time... but no need to be too carried away with paranoia...To put your mind at ease, I have Jewish blood (Sephardim- more accurate Israelite, as Jew is Yahud, who Hadu, meaning were guided as a subset of the majority in 12 tribes descendants of Yakub who rebelled)
and Arabic (amazingly in the lineage of Prophet Mohamed (PSTH and the others))...I always get into colourful arguments with pro-zionists jews and pro-muslim sectarians (mainly sunnis) about many issues, including Palestine...
For me, ultimately it does not matter, you see unlike the Israelites with Moses, the Muslims (according to the Quranic definition), are not requested to enter a Town and make it their own, as the Israelites were asked...
In fact it is rather the opposite, if there is too much "fitna", and the Muslim/s cannot live in peace to obey Allah's guidance, they are encouraged to emigrate to a better place for their "deen"...
Now the only thing the Quran speaks about that is of concern for the Believers is the Place of Pilgrimage, is it a geographical place like Mekkah (the current status quo), or Jerusalem (New -pazuzu- according to our Bro Layth), any place the Muslims agree to (some argue this point), a virtual place (some others argue this), maybe in Yemen (Original Old Jerusalem still waiting for the continuation of pazuzu's arguments)...
For now, I have accepted it is Jerusalem...
Unlike pazuzu, it is not the Children of Israel who do not exist anymore, they are referred to in the Quran as a continuing grouping, with their offshoot those who Hadu, or the Yahoud (Jew in English)...
What is debatable (unlike the Israelites who are mentioned in the Quran in the present continuing tense) are the Palestinians, and Palestine... not once are these mentioned to be of interest or significance in the Quran.
Of course, this is very politically incorrect to say so in the Arab world, but nevertheless, if we take the Quran as our basis for our belief system, Palestine and the Palestinians are irrelevant... However what is of importance is the relationship with Allah and what is expected of the Believers to obtain salvation...
This is a stand I take as regards these matters and which I published in the past
excerpt 1
Palestine does indeed come from Philistines who were the people of the sea and lived in what is Gaza now... it is argued they originally come from Crete, and they are "famous" for the biblical account of their leader Goliath who was slain by David...
The Romans when they conquered Jerusalem, banished the Jews from Judea, destroyed the Temple and named the region Palestine as a punishment to the Jews...
being called a Palestinian is interesting as the word is not of arabic origin, and is a cynical deformation of Philistines...
excerpt 2
The Palestinians (not an arabic name, origin Philistines, people of the sea, famed for fighting Israelites from Gaza where they resided, and defeated when David killed the philistine Goliath - name Palestine given by the Romans to punish the Jews after they destroyed their temple and kicked them out of Jerusalem and Judea) have been used and abused by their Arab brethren who believe that Jerusalem (Holy Place) is theirs, and so having a group of Arabs fighting by proxy there will assuage their guilt, as their scholars tell them that it is a duty to fight to reclaim that holy town...
but that town is nobody's property but God's, and only the ones who fulfil God's Covenant will have blessings from looking after it...
At this moment in time, and from my reading of the scriptures, no one fits the bill...
So let them fight for rock and sand... and alas kill themselves in the process...
that is the sadness of religion... -
Sure, irrelevant. Most peoples in the world are irrelevant. Just the few chosen ones who had the business sense to get an exclusive with God to patent religion.
Why is it that this kind of questions are inexorably guided to end up toalking about peoples and nations and their favoritism or lack of it with God, and not about Humanity?
Nobody is irrelevant and nobody os more relevant than others. Only taqaw makes any difference.
Asto Nabster's historical analysis more of the same old garbage to guarantee the exclusivity of the religion business.
Salaam
-
hmm, I guess you are biased towards... let me guess... yes...
the Arabs and the Palestinians...
so long as they carry on as they are with the "sectarian muslims", the only thing they get from God is being chosen... to be punished!
now enjoy this wonderful bargain... bravo
Sure, irrelevant. Most peoples in the world are irrelevant. Just the few chosen ones who had the business sense to get an exclusive with God to patent religion.
Why is it that this kind of questions are inexorably guided to end up toalking about peoples and nations and their favoritism or lack of it with God, and not about Humanity?
Nobody is irrelevant and nobody os more relevant than others. Only taqaw makes any difference.
Asto Nabster's historical analysis more of the same old garbage to guarantee the exclusivity of the religion business.
Salaam
-
So, I guess , (I can guess too, you know, and congratulate you on you esplendorous future as insider in the busines of religion), that you consider the whole population of the world, except those few with the divine exclusive, to be irrelevant virtual Palestinians. Not surprising.
Hope that exclusive helps you out too when you die, though I am sorry I doubt it.
In the meantime, continue guessing, you can improve a lot. But of course you are not trying to guess you are just branding people to suit your own purpose and you don't give a damn whther you guess right or wrong provided you infuse prejudice in peoples minds. That will also helpt you out a lot when you die.
And don't bother making it look as if to sympathise with Palestinians were something to be ashamed of or that one looses standing for it. I don'tgive a damn about you standings and criteria and yes, I sympathize fully with Palestinians and trust that the whole of Palestine will be liberated sooner than all the decaying imperials might wish. I pray for it and do what I can. So keep your overbearing attitude for those who may be stinged by it. For me it is a medal. So please repeat it as muchas you feel like it.
Salaam