Inheritance according to Qur?an
-
This is Possessive Phrase, therefore following the rule the Noon- of dual noun is dropped as is dropped the Noon of plural in such construction. This is same word -two third. It is Nominative indicated by alif. When it is genitive you see it since it is preceded by Preposition. is the sign of genitive. Here too Noon of dual is dropped because of Possessive construct.
is singular in Possessive Phrase.
I hope it clarifies.
Salaam,
nope
If I would give this sentence (wich is not Quran) to an arab scholar would he then know that I am talking here about 2/6 instead of 1/6?
"... ..."Also do you have another ayaat for reference?
Salaam and thanks,
Bender -
Peace Bender and thank you for the question and Mazhar for the clarification which to put in simple speech/practice ...
411 so if are nis above two so for them 2/3
4176 so if knat/they were (feminine dual) two so to them the third each (1/3 + 1/3)
7320 third twice (1/3 x 2) the night and half of it (1/2 x 1) and third of it (1/3 x 1)
Salaam Noon,
Next thing what I found hmm
why only this part (thulathaa) is without AL in 411, thus undefined?
all the other parts have AL. -
Salaam,
nope
If I would give this sentence (wich is not Quran) to an arab scholar would he then know that I am talking here about 2/6 instead of 1/6?
"... ..."Also do you have another ayaat for reference?
Salaam and thanks,
BenderIt is okay to say it to me. Don't say it to a mathematician like Noon. Give it a second thought what you have said and laugh it out. Thanks.
-
It is okay to say it to me. Don't say it to a mathematician like Noon. Give it a second thought what you have said and laugh it out. Thanks.
Salaam,
I know exactly what I said. And I believe you also know what my point is. We are not talking about the math.
So can you please tell me what you read there? -
Salaam Noon,
Next thing what I found hmm
why only this part (thulathaa) is without AL in 411, thus undefined?
all the other parts have AL.Salaam Bender,
the eight
the sixth
the fourth
the third
the halfNo such word as the two third more like third parts; see history of fractions...
http//www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/lffract.pdf
It could be that since they are incapable of managing they do not inherit. What I was after was an example, that would disprove the theory. One or two will suffice.
Peace Wakas,
923 and Who created the male wal-unth and the female
Example husband, two sons ages 10, 21 and three daughters ages 2, 14, 19
411 to the male like share the two (feminine)
412 so if kna is for them walad/son so for you the fourthObviously husband gets 1/4 and children remainder regardless of age 2, 10, 14 etc.
1 - 1/4 husband (fixed) = 3/4 children (variable) 21 ratio male to femaleWhat if husband and three daughters ages 2, 14, 19 ? why cannot all inherit as before?
411 so if are nisan above two so for them two thirds
1 ? 2/3 (three daughters, 2/9 each) = 1/3 husband (variable) no son and there is child/bornWhat if husband and later the oldest son died brother age 10 and three sisters ages 2, 14, 19
4176 ... and if they were ikh'watun rijalan wanis so to the male like share the two (feminine)21 ratio male to female same as when they were under the children category.
-
Salaam Bender,
the eight
the sixth
the fourth
the third
the halfNo such word as the two third more like third parts; see history of fractions...
http//www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/lffract.pdf
Salaam Noon,
The Quran has it's own rules.
"... ..."see also that 412 and 4176 begin with NISF without AL, but the parts after that are with AL.
Salaam,
Bender -
Salaam Noon,
The Quran has it's own rules.
"... ..."see also that 412 and 4176 begin with NISF without AL, but the parts after that are with AL.
Salaam,
BenderSalaam Bender,
Yes we know there is half or the half or third or the third or kalala or the kalala, etc.
What I'm relaying to you is that there is no such word as two third or the two third.Have you read the article? http//www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/lffract.pdf
See prior examples; it's third two or the third each or third parts which add to 2/3 we translate as such.
411 so if are nis above two so for them 2/3
4176 so if knat/they were (feminine dual) two so to them the third each (1/3 + 1/3)
7320 third twice (1/3 x 2) the night and half of it (1/2 x 1) and third of it (1/3 x 1)
-
Salaam,
I know exactly what I said. And I believe you also know what my point is. We are not talking about the math.
So can you please tell me what you read there?How naive. You did not give a second thought to realize your simplicity in having asked such question. You say 1/6 + 1/6= 2/6. Thereby you coined a dual word for it.
Qur'aan also deals with people when they are so simple. Note carefully how Qur'aan is teaching you simple mathematics alongwith Arabic
Again see your proposition
1/6 + 1/6= 2/6-------it is
1/3 one third. -
How naive. You did not give a second thought to realize your simplicity in having asked such question. You say 1/6 + 1/6= 2/6. Thereby you coined a dual word for it.
Qur'aan also deals with people when they are so simple. Note carefully how Qur'aan is teaching you simple mathematics alongwith Arabic
Again see your proposition
1/6 + 1/6= 2/6-------it is
1/3 one third.At the risk of being called naive and simple
Is this what the Arabic in the Koran says
= 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 = 1/3?
Google translate says Every one of them gets one-sixth
-[ giveup -
Salaam Bender,
Yes we know there is half or the half or third or the third or kalala or the kalala, etc.
What I'm relaying to you is that there is no such word as two third or the two third.Have you read the article? http//www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/lffract.pdf
See prior examples; it's third two or the third each or third parts which add to 2/3 we translate as such.
Salaam Noon,
I took a quick look at the article. But that was not my point.
InshaAllah I will study this a bit better and come back to you.Salaam,
Bender -
How naive. You did not give a second thought to realize your simplicity in having asked such question. You say 1/6 + 1/6= 2/6. Thereby you coined a dual word for it.
Qur'aan also deals with people when they are so simple. Note carefully how Qur'aan is teaching you simple mathematics alongwith Arabic
Again see your proposition
1/6 + 1/6= 2/6-------it is
1/3 one third.Salaam,
What you don't understand or refuse to understand is that I am not intrested in the math.
I took 6 because that was the first number I saw in 411Let's try it again now with a prime, inshaAllah you will now focus on my question instead of the math.
"... ..."
If an arab reads this, what does he read here
1/5 or 2/5 or n/5 where 2<n<5 or does he read parts of 1/5 where parts is any number >1 thus it could also be 17 x 1/5InshaAllah you will now focus on what I am asking instead of being the smart guy.
And I will appreciate it if you can give me a verse from The Quran where this concept is supported.Salaam,
Bender -
At the risk of being called naive and simple
Is this what the Arabic in the Koran says
= 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 = 1/3?
Google translate says Every one of them gets one-sixth
-[ giveupYes 1/6 and 1/6 of a quanity becomes collectively 1/3. In case the brother and sister each of whom gets one sixth are more than two the share will remain the same measuring 1/3 for all of them.
-
Yes 1/6 and 1/6 of a quanity becomes collectively 1/3. In case the brother and sister each of whom gets one sixth are more than two the share will remain the same measuring 1/3 for all of them.
Am I that unclear? I am NOT talking about the veracity of mathematics. Every schoolboy knows that.
I asked
"Is this what the Arabic in the Koran says"?
I asked this because you claimed that "Qur'aan is teaching you simple mathematics" and then said "1/6 + 1/6= 2/6-------it is 1/3 one third" along with Arabic script.
Does the Koran really say 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 = 1/3?
I can't find this in the Koran. When entering the sentence you quoted it does not mention that, so I was asking for clarification.I do not understand how what you are saying and what I find in the Koran fit together.
-
Am I that unclear? I am NOT talking about the veracity of mathematics. Every schoolboy knows that.
I asked
"Is this what the Arabic in the Koran says"?
I asked this because you claimed that "Qur'aan is teaching you simple mathematics" and then said "1/6 + 1/6= 2/6-------it is 1/3 one third" along with Arabic script.
Does the Koran really say 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 = 1/3?
I can't find this in the Koran. When entering the sentence you quoted it does not mention that, so I was asking for clarification.I do not understand how what you are saying and what I find in the Koran fit together.
Mathematics is represented by digits. And mathematics is verbally partrayed by words. When we do not write 2/6 in mathematics since it is divisible yielding 1/3 which is verbally described by a single word. This was also quoted in the part of Ayah
I just repeated the quote of another member who said 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6
-
It might help if gone through entirely
No, this does not help at all.
How can explaining numbers and mathematics help when I am asking a question relating to words used in the Koran?
Do you also want to explain how a car wash works in time cycles or the sink rate of a 747 in m/sec? None of these have anything to do with my question. Is it possible to answer a straight question with a straight answer?
If I ask a question about a sentence and the representation, I am not asking about the origins of the representation.
You claimed that "1/6 + 1/6= 2/6-------it is 1/3 one third" along with Arabic script.
I don't care whether this was in reply to anyone.The following expects and answer in the form yes/no
Does the Koran really say 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6 = 1/3?If you answer yes, I will ask where, please show me.
and if you answer no, then I will ask why do you bring it up then?So, do you care to qualify and rephrase what you actually want to say?
-
The One sixth is for each of those two, thereby if they are more than two, thereat they all are sharers in the one third.
Thank you. You have clarified it for me. This is what I understood. All I need to do now is irrefutably clarify when and under what conditions this applies.
-
Thank you. You have clarified it for me. This is what I understood. All I need to do now is irrefutably clarify when and under what conditions this applies.
Yes, I clarified it for you. Perhaps I bothered you as I gathered from your earlier post. To tell you the truth when I quoted you I had taken it as Bender post, not yours. Thanks.
-
I just repeated the quote of another member who said 1/6 + 1/6 = 2/6
Salaam,
I think you are referring to me.
I didn't say that, and even if I said it, is 1/6 + 1/6 not 2/6?And for the record
The part of the ayaat that you quoted that teaches 1/6 + 1/6 =1/3 for someone simple like me does not teach that.
It says if there are more then 2 then only 1/3 for all of them. Do you understand the difference.If not take al look at 476
"...If a person passes away and has no children but has a sister, then she shall receive half of what he leaves behind. And he will inherit from her if she has no child. However, if he has two sisters, then they will receive two thirds of what he left behind;..."
is 1/2 + 1/2 = 2/3 hmm