Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Shahr/month in the light of the quran

Shahr/month in the light of the quran

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
163 Posts 16 Posters 4.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    shuaib
    wrote on last edited by
    #61

    Salam Br. Ayman,

    Thanks for your response. You know, through this discussions bits and pieces of who you are come through and you do seem to be a very interesting person. Hopefully the fact that we are on opposite sides of the fence on this particular issue does not sour you. And hopefully the touch of arrogance I am perceiving is only in my mind.


    Our discussion has taken several fronts so I will respond in separate sections on those fronts.

    SCIENTIFIC

    Up to this point, we both assumed a linear progression and the discussion was whether or not we could pick up a 7% difference in the full moon or 85% symmetry (50% on one side and 43% on the other side).

    However, if you examine br David's link, not just the pretty pictures but the data of PERCENTAGE illumination, you will find that the day before and after full illumination there is at most a 3% different (94 % symmetry) and very often only a 1% difference (99% symmetry). Surely you don't claim that you can tell if something is 99% versus 100% symmetric?


    LINGUISTIC - SHAHR, HILAAL

    Now in your last post you said

    The word "hilal" doesn't occur in 2185. Had the verse said "man shahid minkum al-hilal falyasumh", then you would have a point. Therefore, you are bringing a word that is not in the verse to try to force your preconceived understanding.

    Well I didn't refer to the Quran though did i? The discussion was whether or not the hilaal began the month.

    Now, as I said and as you agreed to, it does not specifically say in the lexicographal entry on shahr, that shahr refers to full moon. You do claim that the nuances suggest full moon.

    However, in the SAME lexicon, if you check under the heading of hilaal, you find that the Arabs themselves felt that the HILAAL denotes the beginning of the shahr, and that was the purpose of my reference. That is why the hilaal is called the hilaal. It's linguistic evidence of what the month begins with.


    Linguistic - WARKH/SABAIC

    As far as the lexicographal meanings go, bro I think we have a slight miscommunication. I now understand what your intention was to say, but it was different from what I was trying to say.

    In the Arabic language, roots are a cornerstone of understanding words but WORDS are what is spoken/written, not roots. The meaning of the word warkh is provided, and it does not mean month. And in the entire description of the root, there is no mention of timing or month.

    BUT, as you underline and now I understand what you meant to imply, taareekh is the common word for history BUT very uncommonly (according to the lexicons) the word used is tAWreekh, with waw instead of hamza.. from this obviously you can also get the word warrakha instead of arrakha.

    The lexicons claim that this is a peculiarity in the language that arises from a small minority changing the hamza for a waw when it comes to those particular words.

    For you to pretend that it's a common sense conclusion and that this means warkh simply refers to month and is totally interchangeable to arkh is a gross oversimplification at best and misleading at worst. I did not comprehend that THIS is what you were trying to use to justify your meanings, and frankly it is a great stretch to claim that this implies warkh is used in Arabic to denote month. The meaning of warkh is clearly completely different and tawreekh is mentioned as a peculiarity of the language.

    As far as the Sabaic language, it seems that I underestimated your knowledge on the field but that is only because you so grossly oversimplify things. You COULD have mentioned that there are some people that do consider OSA and ONA to be different languages as I was initially suspecting, but then provided the info you did in your last post. I dont know enough about the topic to refute anything you said, but your claim that saying 2 languages are closely related but definitely separate is not necessarily an oxymoron. But then I guess it depends where exactly to draw the line between dialect and separate language. I have heard languages that are considered to be dialects of Urdu, and they were very difficult to make out though I could understand some of it. Anyway, it is still true that in dialects there MAY be some words that are not used in the other dialect. Also, the use of the word warkh for month, if this TRULY was a commonly used term throughout Arabia for month then it would be mentioned in the lexicons in that regard, JUST as shahr has been described as also meaning month. As I described above, it would not be mentioned as a peculiarity of the language in the word tawreekh/warrakha only.

    Hence, Rahmanan is Al-Rahman. This archaic feature may have been the precursor of "tanween" in later Arabic.

    Well, in my grammar book nahwa-al-wafi it describes this noon so apparently it's already established, but obviously in opposite usage compared to OSA.

    Rahman means Almighty but from the Arabic dictionaries it is explained wrongly as merciful/compassionate.

    Rahman doesn't mean almighty, and merciful/compassionate meanings are completely unwarranted if you look at the lexicons, and as far as i can tell was taken from christians.

    Very interesting point though about 17110.


    Ok well finally, I do have ask if you take shahr to strictly mean full moon, then do you take 2185 to mean to only fast on the night of the full moon? Obviously you must intend by full-moon the month indicated by the moon.

    The only way I am aware of that Allah has indicated months or amount of time shorter than a year is by shahr (warkh is not in the Quran in any form). Whether it was ramadan/fasting, the sacred months not to fight, or 936 where Allah explains there are 12 shahr in one year, and even 3412 where to translate shahr strictly as full-moon would lead to an absurd meaning (it's stride was a full-moon).

    Anyway, I don't mean to try your patience by this reply and I do respect your beliefs/thoughts. Hopefully we will be on the same side of the fence more often on other topics.

    wassalam

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      marie
      wrote on last edited by
      #62

      Peace all,

      If we believe that the month of ramadhan is one of the four restricted month, then the verse 2189 is clear, the new moons are a timing mechanism for the people and not full moon.

      Here the occurences of the word alqamara/the moon 677, 96, 754, 124, 132, 1433, 1612, 2133, 2218, 2961, 3129, 3513, 3639.

      Allah often speaks about the sun and the moon at the same time. I think the word 'alqamar' represents the full moon which appears in stages until it returns to being like an old curved sheath/date-stalk;it is a logical evolution

      1. Full moon----> 2)manazil (stages)----> 3)crescent like an old curved sheath.
      1. And the moon We have measured it to appear in stages, until it returns to being like an old curved sheath.

      Allah knows best

      Marie

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #63

        Peace be upon you all,

        Does anyone think the following reminder gives us any further clues?

        (251) And remember We appointed forty nights for Moses...

        What are these forthy nights?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • U Offline
          U Offline
          unknownuser
          wrote on last edited by
          #64

          Salaams all,
          if the translation is up to scratch then just see how allah mentions the "FULL MOON"

          Waalqamari itha ittasaqa
          And the Moon in her fullness

          Salaam.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #65

            Peace be upon you MZ,

            Transliteration Waalqamari itha ittasaqa
            Y.Ali And the Moon in her fullness
            R.Khalifa And the moon and its phases.
            Pickthal And by the moon when she is at the full,
            Shakir And the moon when it grows full,
            Literal And the moon when/if it organized/evened/gathered.

            I am not sure what this verse is saying about the moon, but I am leaning further and further towards Aymans understanding.

            EVERYTHING in life is cyclical, everything goes by cycles.

            It is beginnig to make prefect sense to me that the phases of the moon tell us about debating(hajj) while the full moon suggests time for us to abstain (it seems from sexual contact) during the days.

            When we add the full moon of the hot time, I think about the play by Shakespeare which is called 'MIDSUMMER NIGHTS DREAM'. This play is just another teaching about the Summer Solstice, where people would meditate for those days.

            Here is a quote I found on a website

            ""Full Moons that occur close to the summer solstice are special because they follow the lowest path across the sky of all of the year's full Moons." explains Dr. George Lebo, a NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center Summer Faculty Fellow. "Moons seen just above the horizon look much larger than normal. It's an optical illusion, of course, but it's still a pretty sight."

            Just brainstorming out loud hoping someone will make sense of all this.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #66

              Salams idol,

              you said
              "Does anyone think the following reminder gives us any further clues?

              (251) And remember We appointed forty nights for Moses...

              What are these forthy nights?"

              We appointed for Moses thirty nights, and completed (the period) with ten (more)...........(e.t.c)
              145.

              And We ordained laws for him in the tablets in all matters, both commanding and explaining all things, (and said) "Take and hold these with firmness, and enjoin thy people to hold fast by the best in the precepts soon shall I show you the homes of the wicked,- (How they lie desolate)."

              Isn't that when moses prepared the tablets ,i believe making and writing laws -hatched in stone couldn't be easy and requires a lot of time.

              Salaams.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                marie
                wrote on last edited by
                #67

                Salam MZ, all,

                Salaams all,
                if the translation is up to scratch then just see how allah mentions the "FULL MOON"

                Waalqamari itha ittasaqa
                And the Moon in her fullness

                Salaam.

                Another verses which can bring an additional information

                7116 And made the moon a light therein, and made the sun a radiant lamp.

                1. Moon/Full moon through stages becomes ---->2)Crescent-------->3) Full moon invisible------->4) First new moon (hilal, singular form of ahilat 2189)------>1-----2)--------3)-----4) Second new moon.

                We know Alhajj is in the months (ashhurun ) which have been appointed (2197) and the new moons are a timing mechanism for the people as well as for Alhajj (2189); we witness the four restricted months while witnessing the new moons. We witness the first restricted month at its beginning and no at its end. There is not any mention of full moon in these verses.

                One cyle is between two new moons in the light of 2189

                ....................Full moon...................... Full moon........................

                New moon....................... New moon..................... New moon

                .....................Cycle 1.............................Cycle 2.......................

                Marie

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • U Offline
                  U Offline
                  unknownuser
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #68

                  Salaams marie,
                  i don't know if you have seen the deity of hindues ,i think shiva, where the moon is inscripted on the forhead of the deity.

                  I think we are going too far simerlarly with the moon in the quran as it ,to me,doesn't appear in so many ayats as you people are making out.

                  New moon = AL-HILAAL QAMAR and its not AHAL THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT WORDS.
                  AHAL=family,family member,household,people belonging to a community
                  or locality.
                  AHILA = to get accustomed to, to welcome anyone.
                  AHALA = to marry

                  The one used in the ayat 2188 is a two eye H ,and therefore that it appears actualy comes from the usual word AHAL(used all over the quran) which has the two eye H

                  and this signifies a family,and slight changes in the word denotes people
                  and in the case of our ayat 2188 the word is actualy denoting/talking about the previous ayat (people in the previous ayat 2187)

                  (Mind you this word is mistranslated in a number of other ayats as well-i think,2173,53,6145 BUT STILL NEEDS CHECKING)

                  2187

                  it is talking about property owners ,usurping properties of others by bribing officials/authorities....

                  2188

                  Allah says "They ask you about such people"(about the property owners ,who cheat,in the previose ayat,AlAhlate),"Say arrange /or has been arranged a fixed time for them and the Haj.........." (Use lanes and qd)

                  And to me the Haj is when they will have to swear to uphold the quranic laws,and if they don't the prophet was ordered to saught them out ,obviously for very hienous crimes they would even be killed (sura 9)when found.

                  Full moons description in the quran.
                  084.018
                  YUSUFALI And the Moon in her fullness
                  PICKTHAL And by the moon when she is at the full,
                  SHAKIR And the moon when it grows full,

                  New moons description in the quran.
                  036.039
                  YUSUFALI And the Moon,- We have measured for her mansions (to traverse) till she returns like the old (and withered) lower part of a date-stalk.
                  PICKTHAL And for the moon We have appointed mansions till she return like an old shrivelled palm-leaf.
                  SHAKIR And (as for) the moon, We have ordained for it stages till it becomes again as an old dry palm branch.

                  Haj hasn't any connection to the moon,sorry but keep researching DON'T IMAGINE.

                  Salaams.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Grourself
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #69

                    Peace mz357

                    My research has led me to understand exactly as you say. The translations are corrupt and smack of pagan traditionalism. Just as ?white thread from black thread? has nothing to do with looking to the sky.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      shuaib
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #70

                      105 It is He Who made the sun to be a shining glory and the moon to be a light (of beauty), and measured out stages for her; that ye might know the number of years and the count (of time). Nowise did Allah create this but in truth and righteousness. (Thus) doth He explain His Signs in detail, for those who understand.

                      2189 They ask thee concerning the New Moons. Say They are but signs to mark fixed PERIODS OF TIME in (the affairs of) men, and for Pilgrimage. It is no virtue if ye enter your houses from the back It is virtue if ye fear Allah. Enter houses through the proper doors And fear Allah That ye may prosper.

                      696 He it is that cleaveth the day-break (from the dark) He makes the night for rest and tranquillity, and the sun and moon for the reckoning (of time) Such is the judgment and ordering of (Him), the Exalted in Power, the Omniscient.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #71

                        Peace be upon you all,

                        In my area we have a full moon tommorrow night. I will try to make an effort to stay up and study and REFLECT, as the moon reflects the light of the sun.

                        I am thinking right now that there must have been a reason that many people began worshipping the sun and moon. Like most tools, people take them too far sometimes, but in our process to remove idols, I don't think we should totally disacrd thier purpose. Shuiab brought forth some verses which are relevant. One of them is disputed by MZ but the other two i don't think I have heard any dispute about.

                        I ask that if anyone else is getting the full moon soon, to do some observing and see if any information becomes more clear or not, just as a simple experiment.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          marie
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #72

                          salam mz

                          I think we are going too far simerlarly with the moon in the quran as it ,to me,doesn't appear in so many ayats as you people are making out.

                          New moon = AL-HILAAL QAMAR and its not AHAL THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT WORDS.
                          AHAL=family,family member,household,people belonging to a community
                          or locality.
                          AHILA = to get accustomed to, to welcome anyone.
                          AHALA = to marry

                          Sorry, you confuse "Ahillat/hilaal 2189" and "Ahaalin(n)/Ahloona/Ahl 2105, 2126, 2196, 2217, 3121, 425"
                          The two words (ahillat and Ahla) are well explained in the light of the quran.

                          The one used in the ayat 2188 is a two eye H ,and therefore that it appears actualy comes from the usual word AHAL(used all over the quran) which has the two eye H

                          There is no "AHL" in 2188, we read the word "alhukkami" which means the judges

                          No offence intended, you need to revise seriously your courses of arabic language.

                          Peace
                          Marie

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • U Offline
                            U Offline
                            unknownuser
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #73

                            Salaams marie,
                            without any type od disrespect ,when a person is in mud he is so used to it he stops noticing it - dear you have to get out of it and look at it from the outside.

                            One thing i find confusing you here are trying to research but your minds are still closed to anything coming in from the ouitside and you still hold to your paganistic believes -and not just you but quit a few people here.

                            And no i havn't got it wrong if you have qd see page 36 and i think the AHAL is well explained and if thats not enough its explained even more in the lanes.

                            Salaams.

                            Thanks.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • U Offline
                              U Offline
                              unknownuser
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #74

                              Peace be upon you all,

                              I hope someone else will jump in on this dilemma between MZ and Marie. I need to know if 2189 deals with the phases of the moon or with people.

                              MZ, regarding the context, for a quite a few verses after that, the "messenger" is being asked several different questions. I do not see it to be contextually wrong to be asking about the phases of the moon. But I am awaiting the solid proof of what this word means.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                marie
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #75

                                mz,

                                Please express your self without calling name and verify your information in the light of the quran before spreading wrong information

                                Allah says "They ask you about such people"(about the property owners ,who cheat,in the previose ayat,AlAhlate),"Say arrange /or has been arranged a fixed time for them and the Haj.........." (Use lanes and qd)

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • U Offline
                                  U Offline
                                  unknownuser
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #76

                                  Salaams,
                                  i will add some info for anybody who has a lanes and qd could check something enlightening.

                                  page 121 lanes

                                  Inahum laahlo al-ahillati = verily they are sojourners ,or settlers,possessed of property.

                                  so al-ahillati=sojourners ,settlers,property owners.
                                  mawakeeto=time appointed for the performance.
                                  Hee=though may prepare/arrange/he/it.

                                  Now look at what the ayat 188 is talking about

                                  And you see shooting the moondown,in ayat 189 and using the said translation makes it clear Allah is talking about the people ,possessers of property who are bribing the judges in the ayat 188
                                  188.
                                  And do not eat up your property among yourselves for vanities, nor use it as bait for the judges, with intent that ye may eat up wrongfully and knowingly a little of (other) people's property.
                                  189.
                                  Yas-aloonaka AAani al-ahillati qul hiya mawaqeetulilnnasi waalhajji walaysa albirrubi-an ta/too albuyoota min thuhooriha walakinnaalbirra mani ittaqa wa/too albuyoota min abwabihawaittaqoo Allaha laAAallakum tuflihoona
                                  They ask thee concerning such people. Say It has been arranged/appointed for the people with the Haj,But it is no virtue that you enter the houses from their backs but It is virtue if ye fear Allah. Enter houses through the proper doors And fear Allah That ye may prosper.

                                  May Allah guide/you /me and everybody to his dominion.

                                  Salaams idolfree ,all.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    marie
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #77

                                    They ask thee concerning such people. Say It has been arranged/appointed for the people with the Haj,But it is no virtue that you enter the houses from their backs but It is virtue if ye fear Allah. Enter houses through the proper doors And fear Allah That ye may prosper.

                                    "Wa Alhajj" is translated as "as well as for alhajj" or "and for Alhajj", with is a wrong translation for the letter "Wa"

                                    You translate mawaqeet by "arrange, appoint", where is the notion of time (alwaqt) in your translation of the word "mawaaqeet?

                                    See also mawqoot (4103)

                                    The quran is its best commentary and dictionnary

                                    May Allah guide us

                                    I leave you with peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      unknownuser
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #78

                                      Salaams,
                                      sorry we have been to two different schools and me for one will never try to convince anybody be it a hindu or someone of another faith , as my time is not for wasting ,just assume i lost your argument as i don't have the your talents,

                                      to you be yours.

                                      Thanks.

                                      peace

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Offline
                                        M Offline
                                        marie
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #79

                                        Peace MZ,

                                        All what I can do, to show you your mistake, it is upon you to accept it or not.

                                        Only Allah will guide you.

                                        Peace

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          unknownuser
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #80

                                          Peace be upon you MZ,

                                          That does not help me to accept your position.

                                          You stated

                                          al-ahillati=sojourners ,settlers,property owners.

                                          But when you gave the translation you translated as "such people". Walk me through the process of going from "sojouners,settlers, property owners" to "such people"".

                                          Also, you continue to imply context as the basis to take 2188-189 as the same subject, but 2189 could EASILY be the beginning of the phase of questions which continue later in this chapter. Each time we see "and they ask you about..." it is the start of a new subject, why would this "and they ask you..." be any different?


                                          Regarding the symbolism of the woman and the moon, both with 28 day courses, we are told not to touch the women when they are menstuating. Perhaps this is being equalled to the full moon where we must abstain from something.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users