Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. :: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

:: Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!! ::

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
123 Posts 18 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #46

    Salaam,

    I totally agree. It always costs me a lot of time just to translate his posts (the ones which are full of grammar terms) let alone understanding them. Even translators have trouble with some of those terms. When he explains normally it's more refreshing.

    Perhaps, I have to bring in the grammar with those posts where some friends of the forum handle Ayah at their own assigning them meanings by seeing similar looking words at some other places. I will try to make terms simpler by defining or giving their meanings and connotations they add to the sentences.

    But you just see that there are 58 pages discussion where our sister moderator is very active, discussion is going on and on without firt determining the meanings of words which is neither a noun nor an idiom but a complete sentence. Even for English word used making it the premises of the thread none cares to see whether it is abstract or a substantive noun.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • S Offline
      S Offline
      savage_carrot
      wrote on last edited by
      #47

      Perhaps, I have to bring in the grammar with those posts where some friends of the forum handle Ayah at their own assigning them meanings by seeing similar looking words at some other places. I will try to make terms simpler by defining or giving their meanings and connotations they add to the sentences.

      But you just see that there are 58 pages discussion where our sister moderator is very active, discussion is going on and on without firt determining the meanings of words which is neither a noun nor an idiom but a complete sentence. Even for English word used making it the premises of the thread none cares to see whether it is abstract or a substantive noun.

      You wound me Mazhar, deeply p Discussion goes on for different reasons...in the case of that thread in particular I already have notes regarding the subject 'grammatically'; (neither did I read most of your posts or most of the other posters on that thread) I like discussing from different angles. Not only does it broaden my understanding, but it also helps me tear it down to basics via reasoning as opposed to myopic examinations when confronted with another pov regardless of it being 'crazy talk'. It's more rigid for you, I can appreciate that (mmkhan, this time I finally might be appreciating the right thing)...but don't think that other people should always discuss in ways that you'd heartily approve of.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Offline
        M Offline
        mmkhan
        wrote on last edited by
        #48

        Well, I will try to give you some others aayaats to see how they are constructed.

        4028
        4028 And a believing man said who was from the family of Pharaoh who concealed his faith, "Do you kill a man because he says, 'My Lord is Allah ' while he has brought you clear proofs from your Lord? And if he should be lying, then upon him is his lie; but if he should be truthful, there will strike you some of what he promises you. Indeed, Allah does not guide one who is a transgressor and a liar.

        4029
        4029 O my people, sovereignty is yours today, dominant in the land. But who would protect us from the punishment of Allah if it came to us?" Pharaoh said, "I do not show you except what I see, and I do not guide you except to the way of right conduct."

        4030
        4030 And he who believed said, "O my people, indeed I fear for you like the day of the companies

        4031
        4031 Like the custom of the people of Nooh and of 'Aad and Thamud and those after them. And Allah wants no injustice for servants.

        4032
        4032 And O my people, indeed I fear for you the Day of Calling

        When it is mentioned that the one who believed started saying in 4028, then what is use of repeating it by saying "the one who believed said" in 4030? Why no subject pronoun is used?

        When already it is said in "yaa qaumi" in 4029, why is it necessary to use the same word in 4030 and 4032, where we already know whom this person is addressing.

        What your grammar says on this?

        Another example

        3330
        3330 O wives of the Prophet, whoever of you should commit a clear immorality - for her the punishment would be doubled two fold, and ever is that, for Allah , easy.

        3331
        3331 And whoever of you devoutly obeys Allah and His Messenger and does righteousness - We will give her her reward twice; and We have prepared for her a noble provision.

        3332
        3332 O wives of the Prophet, you are not like anyone among women. If you fear Allah , then do not be soft in speech , lest he in whose heart is disease should covet, but speak with appropriate speech.

        Now, please educate me Mazhar with you grammar.

        1- Who is mentioned in 3331, if you say, they are referring to wives of the prophet, then why 3332 again used "O wives of the prophet"?

        2- If you say, they are referring not to wives of the prophet, but it is general for all, then why you are mixing up 255 and 267?

        Other points we will discuss later after clarifying this first, inshaAllah. Other points also includes Bani Israel is different than Musa's qaum.

        May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
        mmKhan

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #49

          Well, I will try to give you some others aayaats to see how they are constructed.

          4028
          4028 And a believing man said who was from the family of Pharaoh who concealed his faith, "Do you kill a man because he says, 'My Lord is Allah ' while he has brought you clear proofs from your Lord? And if he should be lying, then upon him is his lie; but if he should be truthful, there will strike you some of what he promises you. Indeed, Allah does not guide one who is a transgressor and a liar.

          4029
          4029 O my people, sovereignty is yours today, dominant in the land. But who would protect us from the punishment of Allah if it came to us?" Pharaoh said, "I do not show you except what I see, and I do not guide you except to the way of right conduct."

          4030
          4030 And he who believed said, "O my people, indeed I fear for you like the day of the companies

          4031
          4031 Like the custom of the people of Nooh and of 'Aad and Thamud and those after them. And Allah wants no injustice for servants.

          4032
          4032 And O my people, indeed I fear for you the Day of Calling

          When it is mentioned that the one who believed started saying in 4028, then what is use of repeating it by saying "the one who believed said" in 4030? Why no subject pronoun is used?

          When already it is said in "yaa qaumi" in 4029, why is it necessary to use the same word in 4030 and 4032, where we already know whom this person is addressing.

          What your grammar says on this?

          Another example

          3330
          3330 O wives of the Prophet, whoever of you should commit a clear immorality - for her the punishment would be doubled two fold, and ever is that, for Allah , easy.

          3331
          3331 And whoever of you devoutly obeys Allah and His Messenger and does righteousness - We will give her her reward twice; and We have prepared for her a noble provision.

          3332
          3332 O wives of the Prophet, you are not like anyone among women. If you fear Allah , then do not be soft in speech , lest he in whose heart is disease should covet, but speak with appropriate speech.

          Now, please educate me Mazhar with you grammar.

          1- Who is mentioned in 3331, if you say, they are referring to wives of the prophet, then why 3332 again used "O wives of the prophet"?

          2- If you say, they are referring not to wives of the prophet, but it is general for all, then why you are mixing up 255 and 267?

          Other points we will discuss later after clarifying this first, inshaAllah. Other points also includes Bani Israel is different than Musa's qaum.

          May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
          mmKhan

          Please let me know what are you presuming from all these quotes that they refer to.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #50

            You wound me Mazhar, deeply p Discussion goes on for different reasons...in the case of that thread in particular I already have notes regarding the subject 'grammatically'; (neither did I read most of your posts or most of the other posters on that thread) I like discussing from different angles. Not only does it broaden my understanding, but it also helps me tear it down to basics via reasoning as opposed to myopic examinations when confronted with another pov regardless of it being 'crazy talk'. It's more rigid for you, I can appreciate that (mmkhan, this time I finally might be appreciating the right thing)...but don't think that other people should always discuss in ways that you'd heartily approve of.

            Sorry, you took it in that direction, it was just informative--prompt to read you there--- argumentative--away from baseless thread issue. I know you were busy on specific issues ignoring other posts. Never feel wound, even negative propaganda earns attention for the rightful person.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • S Offline
              S Offline
              savage_carrot
              wrote on last edited by
              #51

              Sorry, you took it in that direction, it was just informative--prompt to read you there--- argumentative--away from baseless thread issue. I know you were busy on specific issues ignoring other posts. Never feel wound, even negative propaganda earns attention for the rightful person.

              I was kidding with the wounding, no worries... and point well understood and completely agreed, I mentioned it on the thread a few times myself

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                mmkhan
                wrote on last edited by
                #52

                Please let me know what are you presuming from all these quotes that they refer to.

                After aayaats quoted, there are some questions asked about your understanding. Didn't you read them? Please check again and get back with you answers.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Mazhar
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #53

                  After aayaats quoted, there are some questions asked about your understanding. Didn't you read them? Please check again and get back with you answers.

                  I have seen those. I want what you intend to interpret finding those reiteration. It is the speakers choice to reiterate the qualitative trait of a person through relative pronouns or personal pronouns. Read about emphasis, rhetoric etc.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Offline
                    M Offline
                    mmkhan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #54

                    I have seen those. I want what you intend to interpret finding those reiteration. It is the speakers choice to reiterate the qualitative trait of a person through relative pronouns or personal pronouns. Read about emphasis, rhetoric etc.

                    But AlQuraan is not about speakers choice, it is The Book of guidance. Every letter/word has been specifically added.

                    OK, please tell me who is mentioned in 3331?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mazhar
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #55

                      I have seen those. I want what you intend to interpret finding those reiteration. It is the speakers choice to reiterate the qualitative trait of a person through relative pronouns or personal pronouns. Read about emphasis, rhetoric etc.

                      But AlQuraan is not about speakers choice, it is The Book of guidance. Every letter/word has been specifically added.

                      OK, please tell me who is mentioned in 3331?

                      Dear, what is wrong with you, you do not let even simple things enter your mind and keep circling around what thoughts have veiled your intellect about a certain issue like pronouns here.

                      Every book, including Qur'aan is a spoken word of a speaker. It was His choice how he selected relative pronouns or personal pronouns. For that you need to know minimum emphasis aspect, rhetoric.

                      In 3331 are solely and exclusively the honourable wives of the Elevated Messenger of Allah the Exalted.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        mmkhan
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #56

                        Dear, what is wrong with you, you do not let even simple things enter your mind and keep circling around what thoughts have veiled your intellect about a certain issue like pronouns here.

                        Every book, including Qur'aan is a spoken word of a speaker. It was His choice how he selected relative pronouns or personal pronouns. For that you need to know minimum emphasis aspect, rhetoric.

                        In 3331 are solely and exclusively the honourable wives of the Elevated Messenger of Allah the Exalted.

                        I think you always forget that AlQuraan is a guidance for MANKIND, not only for scholars or the ones having good command on language. How is it a guidance for the naas? All aayaats are set on patterns and designs for lay man to compare and understand the usage of different aayaats.

                        It is not a choice simply to fill the Book, but it has been purposely set in that pattern to show you something and guide you, etc.

                        Now, if 3331 is about Messenger's wives, then why again 3332 used "yaa nisaa alnabiyyi" when it is already in context as per your understanding? There is surely a reason for such usage. When you make your mind blank , inshaAllah, you will see what I am trying to say.

                        May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                        mmKhan

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Mazhar
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #57

                          I think you always forget that AlQuraan is a guidance for MANKIND, not only for scholars or the ones having good command on language. How is it a guidance for the naas? All aayaats are set on patterns and designs for lay man to compare and understand the usage of different aayaats.

                          It is not a choice simply to fill the Book, but it has been purposely set in that pattern to show you something and guide you, etc.

                          Now, if 3331 is about Messenger's wives, then why again 3332 used "yaa nisaa alnabiyyi" when it is already in context as per your understanding? There is surely a reason for such usage. When you make your mind blank , inshaAllah, you will see what I am trying to say.

                          May Allah increase me in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                          mmKhan

                          Dear, the day you understand how the text of Arabic of Qur'aan flows, where the discourse ends, and where a new discourse starts not to be linked with the earlier statements, you might know the beauty of Ayah 3232 starting with a fresh call seeking attention of them and then breaking the news about their status and position amongst the woman folk of all times.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Offline
                            M Offline
                            Maha
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #58

                            Did you try to explain me your point? NO!
                            Did you try to give me an example? NO!
                            Did you try to show me an aayat to explain your point? NO!
                            Then what you were doing? You know exactly what you were doing already.

                            Anyways, as per my understanding

                            Mazher always try to convince mmKhan without bringing forward any proof. He always do that to me.

                            As per the above sentence, "Mazher" is Subject and "mmKhan" is Object. And "He" is subject pronoun and "me" is object pronoun.

                            Am I correct sir? If not, please correct me and then put forward your point. If I am right, then what is your point?

                            May Allah increase us in knowledge and guide us to His true path pr
                            mmKhan

                            Just want to thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought. I never really considered this issue before reading your post, but i will now definately check your references up and make up my mind, because you have discussed some very important things. It really seems like either that it wasnt muhammed who came with the quran as per the traditional islamic belief, and/or muhammed is a title and not a name.

                            And please dont limit yourself due to Mazhars (sunni) agenda. Please keep posting about the issue.

                            Peace

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mazhar
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #59

                              Just want to thank you for giving me a lot of food for thought.

                              Kindly share that food with us so that we could also benefit intake

                              (1)
                              (2)..., if more
                              (3)

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Offline
                                M Offline
                                Maha
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #60

                                Kindly share that food with us so that we could also benefit intake

                                (1)
                                (2)..., if more
                                (3)

                                Read my whole post, and you will see that I explained it further. I dont have time enough to repeat myself.

                                Peace

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Mazhar
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #61

                                  We have experience of many members who kept posting meaningless talks or clapping but never to substantiate. And then went away. Obviously rubbish cant be substantiated.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Maha
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #62

                                    We have experience of many members who kept posting meaningless talks or clapping but never to substantiate. And then went away. Obviously rubbish cant be substantiated.

                                    Frankly Mazhar, I find it VERY difficult to understand what you are talking about. And I just never get your point. And I know that others here also find it difficult to understand you as well. In any case, I was waiting for brother mmkhan to share more of his thoughts. If you could kindly stop posting, you would save everyones time.

                                    Peace

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #63

                                      I know self adopted stupidity is deep rooted in all cells of the brain. But there is no harm trying.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G Offline
                                        G Offline
                                        GODsubmitter
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #64

                                        "His Qaum" denotes none else but Bani Israel. And the entire discourse is about reminding the Bani Israel of their past history.

                                        I agree

                                        The whole Qur'an is but the reminder for the Bani Israel and followers of Jesus, and it doesn't bring anything new which is not already in the Torah! Present Islam is but an invention of men as a new innovation, same as Christianity.
                                        Jesus was the most perfect Jew, same as Moses who is the greatest prophet of them all.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          GODsubmitter
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #65

                                          So, could we keep up the subject gentlemen , and do try to answer the question

                                          Who brought AlQuraan/AlKitaab? Muhammed? NO!!!

                                          (do try to answer without old or new hadiths),

                                          thank you

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users