Best Translations of Qur'an
-
All translations lack consistency, cross-reference study, etc., best is literal choosing closest meaning...
21
22 that the book not doubt in it guidance to the mindful
23 the ones who they believe in the unseen and establish the prayer and from what we provided them they spend
24 and the ones who they believe in what descended to you and what descended from before you and in the afterlife they firmly believe
25 those on guidance from their Lord and those who they the successfulis there such a literal word by word translation?
-
Maybe he too is tall, dark and.....
http//3.bp.blogspot.com/-MB8tq6mDxpk/T3QbkzQdJtI/AAAAAAAAAVA/CQSS9waef4s/s1600/Magnum-464x261_tcm25-263467.jpg
.... cool.
LOL! I actually thought about the 80's show "Magnum P.I." with Tom Selleck...but I like the Magnum Ice Cream bar much better!
-
Quote from Noon waalqalami on Today at 104138 AM
All translations lack consistency, cross-reference study, etc., best is literal choosing closest meaning...21
22 that the book not doubt in it guidance to the mindful
23 the ones who they believe in the unseen and establish the prayer and from what we provided them they spend
24 and the ones who they believe in what descended to you and what descended from before you and in the afterlife they firmly believe
25 those on guidance from their Lord and those who they the successfulis there such a literal word by word translation?
Word by Word analysis and then comes the translation of text
-
Word by Word analysis and then comes the translation of text
appreciated it, thank you for sharing )
Also, one can look at various side-by-side translations by using this site
http//www.islamawakened.com/quran/default.htm -
Sahih International.
-
Peace All.
Who is able to translate Qoran better than the Author Himself?
Yes the Lord is the best translator of Qoran
" Al-Rahman, Allama Al Qoran".
Just pick up any copy of Qoran, whatever language it happens to written/ translated in, and
Ask your Creator for help , with conviction and honesty.Peace.
-
Peace
Are there any English translations that don't insert the authors interpretation notes in the body of the Quran? I would like to read an English translation of Quran which includes the transliterated Arabic beside it, that is as close as possible to the most original Arabic Quran that exists- so it won't have chapter headings or verse numbers - from my understanding these were added in at the time of Uthman when the Quran was standardised.
-
Shalom Aleikhem,
I don't think I ever discussed this issue before on this forum. Now people, please don't point fingers at me and start laughing as I confess the truth. My journey of learning Islam was based on the following translations
- Ahmed Raza Khan Mohammed Aqib Qadri (digital)
- Yusuf Ali (digital + hard copy )
- Pickthal (digital)
- Sahih International (hard copy)
The first one in the list, I found that so ridiculous that sometimes I used to read that just to see what not to make of the verse that I wish to understand. May be the translation isnt that bad, but for some reason, the ayaats I read from that translation was translated using the PSOUA method . ( Pulling stuff out of your a** method)
I don't know why, but I trusted Pickthal a bit more than the others, still to this day, I wonder why. But here is an example
Chapter 17 verse 1
Ahmed Raza Khan Mohammed Aqib Qadri
Purity is to Him Who took His bondman in a part of the night from the Sacred Mosque to the Aqsa Mosque around which We have placed blessings, in order that We may show him Our great signs; indeed he is the listener, the beholder. (This verse refers to the physical journey of Prophet Mohammed - peace and blessings be upon him - to Al Aqsa Mosque and from there to the heavens and beyond. The entire journey back to Mecca was completed within a small part of the night.)Yusuf Ali
Glory to (Allah) Who did take His servant for a Journey by night from the Sacred Mosque to the farthest Mosque, whose precincts We did bless,- in order that We might show him some of Our Signs for He is the One Who heareth and seeth (all things).Pickthal
Glorified be He Who carried His servant by night from the Inviolable Place of Worship to the Far distant place of worship the neighbourhood whereof We have blessed, that We might show him of Our tokens! Lo! He, only He, is the Hearer, the Seer.I think the above excerpt demonstrates well what I am talking about.
Anyways, the reason I am talking about this is to point out something important. I did not have to depend on the FM translation or Sublime Qur'an or any other monotheist translations. I wanted to know the truth, I started with what was available to me. I reasoned, I questioned. Eventually, I was using these translations translated by traditional muslims to refute traditions of the traditional muslims.
Qur'an is just words and narratives. The translations are people's efforts of sharing these words and narratives with people who speak a different tongue. Without sincerity and the will to know the truth and the honesty to accept truth wholeheartedly, no matter which way the truth may point, one will remain in the dark forever despite whatever translation he/she may be reading.
Peace
Are there any English translations that don't insert the authors interpretation notes in the body of the Quran? I would like to read an English translation of Quran which includes the transliterated Arabic beside it, that is as close as possible to the most original Arabic Quran that exists- so it won't have chapter headings or verse numbers - from my understanding these were added in at the time of Uthman when the Quran was standardised.
Did you try the Qur'an hosted on this site ? I guess you are looking for a neat translation that displays transliteration along with the translations itself. Try this website http//www.quranix.net/ . That site should let you see many many translations along with transliteration. You also have to option to not view any particular translation, so simply pick the one you like along with transliteration. ) I hope that helps.
Peace
------------ Student of Allah -
Peace
Are there any English translations that don't insert the authors interpretation notes in the body of the Quran? I would like to read an English translation of Quran which includes the transliterated Arabic beside it, that is as close as possible to the most original Arabic Quran that exists- so it won't have chapter headings or verse numbers - from my understanding these were added in at the time of Uthman when the Quran was standardised.
Perhaps This Quran Translation Search Tool would be to your liking. With this you can choose any one or all seven of the translations included along with transliteration and Arabic Text.
-
Perhaps This Quran Translation Search Tool would be to your liking. With this you can choose any one or all seven of the translations included along with transliteration and Arabic Text.
Thank you for the link
-
I came to be convinced of Quran's miraculous structure with Reformist Translation, like the Authorized English version it is accurate yet nice to read as it employs modern English, however both translations are heavy on the footnote side and even though I m convinced of RKs messengership and the 19 structure, some of the calculations in several footnotes to be arbitrary or weak in support with the math used and wished he didn't include them.
MAS Haleem's translation is very minimal in footnotes and brackets and appears very accurate. The paperback is a nice travel size. and of course the monotheist group translation is nice with having no footnotes and brackets yet still provides accuracy and resembles AEV and Reformist Translation in the words chosen. -
Did you try the Qur'an hosted on this site ? I guess you are looking for a neat translation that displays transliteration along with the translations itself. Try this website http//www.quranix.net/ . That site should let you see many many translations along with transliteration. You also have to option to not view any particular translation, so simply pick the one you like along with transliteration. I hope that helps.
Peace
------------ Student of AllahThanks Student of Allah for the very helpful website reference.
-
As I don't speak ancient Arabic I am someone who relies completely on translations. The problem is that due to the nature of Arabic, many different variations are possible and some are straight interpretations as diacritical marks were added only very late in the game, so words like "they defeated" and "the defeated" are impossible to distinguish without markings.
302 The Byzantines have been defeated
= Defeated
= VictoriousThen we have weird structures, such as 43, which is translated by Khalifa as
If you deem it best for the orphans, you may marry their mothers - you may marry two, three, or four.Wiki's definition
An orphan is a child permanently bereaved of or abandoned by his or her parents. In common usage, only a child who has lost both parents is called an orphan. When referring to animals, only the mother's condition is usually relevant.So how can anyone marry an orphan's mother when parents don't exist?
Looking at the translation by Shakir, he thinks it means
And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four;He bypasses the problem with the orphans and sticks to the Koran literally in 2nd half, where he says "two and three and four", unlike Khalifa who changes the words to mean "two, three, or four".
As anyone who has studied ancient Arabic will confirm, the Koran says
which is "and", not "or". So literally it's 2s and 3s and 4s.So we see that different translations have a personal flavour, which makes the sites with multiple translations better.
Personally, I use http//islam.thetruecall.com with multiple options and http//www.islamawakened.com/Quran/4/3/default.htm which consists of 42 different translations. A searchable version is here http//www.searchtruth.com
-
So how can anyone marry an orphan's mother when parents don't exist?
Are you aware that in classical Arabic yatim/orphan can and does mean fatherless?
And if you are actually interested in some background reading, I recommend
http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/muhammad-married-young-girl.htm -
Are you aware that in classical Arabic yatim/orphan can and does mean fatherless?
No, I am not. Does it make it better in any way? No!
And if you are actually interested in some background reading, I recommend
http//misconceptions-about-islam.com/muhammad-married-young-girl.htmThis I know and find it utterly dishonest and tasteless.
-
This I know and find it utterly dishonest and tasteless.
"To conclude, it is proven beyond doubt by The Quran that one must be physically mature and be of sound judgement in order to get married."
What is dishonest and tasteless about it?StopS, I am a fairly new member here but I have seen many of your posts. If there's anything remarkable about this forum it's the level of tolerance members have. This is coming from a background of posting on Sunni forums where I'd get "warnings" for respectfully expressing disagreement. Of course free-minds would not be what it is without debate, so your presence is valuable but I can't help but wonder You do not affiliate with any religion thus do not care for "converting" us. If I recall correctly, you live in a Muslim majority country but your purpose cannot be to understand the faith as believed and practiced by whom you're surrounded with as most here are non-mainstream. You are not looking for personal enrichment based on (what I deem) the large amounts of dissent asserted by you.
Not to sound rude, but what are you here for? This is not an invitation to leave at all , but I'm genuinely curious.
Sorry if I sounded offensiveAlso, Yusuf Ali is the best physical translation I can get my hands on.
-
"To conclude, it is proven beyond doubt by The Quran that one must be physically mature and be of sound judgement in order to get married."
What is dishonest and tasteless about it?StopS, I am a fairly new member here but I have seen many of your posts. If there's anything remarkable about this forum it's the level of tolerance members have. This is coming from a background of posting on Sunni forums where I'd get "warnings" for respectfully expressing disagreement. Of course free-minds would not be what it is without debate, so your presence is valuable but I can't help but wonder You do not affiliate with any religion thus do not care for "converting" us. If I recall correctly, you live in a Muslim majority country but your purpose cannot be to understand the faith as believed and practiced by whom you're surrounded with as most here are non-mainstream. You are not looking for personal enrichment based on (what I deem) the large amounts of dissent asserted by you.
Not to sound rude, but what are you here for? This is not an invitation to leave at all , but I'm genuinely curious.
Sorry if I sounded offensiveAlso, Yusuf Ali is the best physical translation I can get my hands on.
It is remarkable how many times I need to justify my existence. If I think back and try and remember what I have written, I have the impression that most of the time I have come across supportive and informative attitudes here. I have asked, received an answer, verified, got corrected and have learned. At other times I was given information which in my eyes was wrong. It is true that I then voice my dissatisfaction instead of just leaving it and moving on. So I am doing 2 things
- learning what kind of different approaches Muslims have towards their religion
- testing my own knowledge and interpretation against that of people here who have had a lot more exposure to the Koran than me
Yes, I react quite emotionally if I get treated with the condescending attitude displayed so often. Yes, I understand that Muslims have a built in inferiority complex when it comes to Islam being criticised. Yes, I could be less confrontational and politically correct, but that does not help either party in the long run. Because I challenge someone if I find something which I find erroneous, some people think I like arguing and dissonance, while the opposite is true. I actually find the approach of Free-Minds the most straight, uncompromising and honest of all groups I have come across. I have rarely used the hadith and have usually argued only the Koran. Because I am still inexperienced in this view I have made mistakes and have admitted those - I hope.
In this case, I immediately want to scream at people, when I read sentences like "it is proven beyond doubt" when it comes to the Koran. There is precious little which can be proven beyond a doubt and especially when it comes to the Koran, where vague semantics are used allowing for multiple interpretations. This leads to multiple translations, which vary depending on what the author perceives as context. I don't think I need to go into the construction of the Koran and the Arabic language, where meanings are arbitrary at times. In English it's difficult enough, where one comma can make a huge difference to the contents
? Woman, without her, man is lost.
? Woman, without her man, is lost.and in Arabic this becomes a nightmare when words like defeated and defeat vary only in a tiny diacritical mark.
The topic of an ageing man marrying a young girl is prevalent in practised Islam. Whether rightly or not is a different question. The essay Wakas is referring to uses the typical re-interpretation route, declaring all scholars for the last 1000 years who have come to different conclusions as being wrong. I have seen this done so many times and find it dishonest. The essay leaves out sentences such as the one in 654, which says that when a women gets divorced there is a waiting period before re-marrying "and that also applies to those who have not yet menstruated". This makes me doubt that it is indeed clearly and irrefutable decreed that a girl must be physically mature and of sound judgement in order to get married.
I find the entire topic distasteful because I maintain that I should face the music and not try and retrospectively change meanings around. Which is why I would have a lot more respect if the article would have said something about cultural evolution and left it at that. I hope I have been successful in explaining my opinion.
As for the Yusuf Ali translation I find it relatively weak because it interprets too much. A huge amount is in brackets, ie words don't exist and he just writes what he thinks it should mean, instead of leaving the interpreting to the reader. On the other hand he is the only one I know of who only mentions Muhammad 4 times and without any further attempt of idolising him.
As I have stated elsewhere the best would be to have the wishes and instructions hard-wired into our brains, just like a smile, which everyone understands regardless of race or belief, instead of having to rely on translations.
-
StopS
The essay Wakas is referring to uses the typical re-interpretation route, declaring all scholars for the last 1000 years who have come to different conclusions as being wrong.
All scholars eh? I have not researched this topic but I know even in Traditional sources there is variance on this subject, e.g. in the orphans and marriageable age verses they say one thing, then in other places say another. And I know Parwez came to the same conclusion I did.
But in any case, do you realise what you said is a logical fallacy known as "appeal to authority/popularity"? It amuses me how you seemingly promote logic/evidence except when it goes against your own view.
Further, feel free to bring evidence to refute what the article states. If the best evidence you have is 654 then you should know it has been discussed on this forum before, in detail.
Re-quote of article
Since the orphans can only receive their wealth once "shudud", and from 46 we know they become eligible for it after having reached marriageable age, this can only mean marriageable age begins from adolescence onwards. There is no other possibility.
Please provide another possibility to the above. ;D
-
It is remarkable how many times I need to justify my existence.
It's not remarkable at all. I've been on a few Christian and Sunni forums to learn and provide feedback that has been met with visceral hostility requiring me to justify myself. It is human nature when one penetrates a religious sphere, those from within will question one's motives. Not saying it's reasonable, but to be expected.
*Just to clear this up, I'm not asking for justification. Who am I to do that? I'm not important at all; you and anybody else has a right to say whatever they will. But it was puzzling to me that someone would keep contributing despite a clear frustration.
Many members here have gotten dissatisfied of certain things in previous communities, and even argued up to a certain point but things let up after a while.
You say you are here to learn about Islam and its adherents how they believe and practice it differently, yes? But to challenge them as well I suspect. No one here has more exposure to the Qur'an than anyone else. Some people have more understanding, but not more exposure, and its only because they have immersed themselves in its study, which you can do too. The reality is it is your interpretation vs. another interpretation. You are not an unlearned non-Muslim asking for clarification. You have come to conclusions that differ from the majority on here. If the majority disagree, it is does not threaten the moral caliber of the Qur'an. However, your judgments do. You are not incorrect per se, but the framework of your mind is not of a typical muslim (obviously). There is a huge disparity and I cannot explain it easily. If the Qur'an does not on some level resonate with you the moment you read it, never will your interpretation parallel ours.
For example
..."and that also applies to those who have not yet menstruated". This makes me doubt that it is indeed clearly and irrefutable decreed that a girl must be physically mature and of sound judgement in order to get married.
The verse makes you doubt the maturity threshold of a bride in accordance to the Qur'an. What I see is preventative measures a woman must take so that her potential child knows who his or her father is. Of course no dna testing back in the days...
Let's say marrying children was allowed, it makes absolutely no sense to me why would there be a clause specifically to confirm that female children should wait too? Explanation is not proof, but it damn well makes sense to me.If you hope that muslims admit that there is no "irrefutable" proof in the Book, well, you have my admittance. But the explanation that is sensible and plausible to me is not yours. When you read the Qur'an or its translation, you see arbitrary symbols that can hold a multitude of meanings that may even be in direct opposition. When I read the Qur'an, the Truth and Message is clear as day. It just hits me, I don't work for a meaning.
I thought describing the article as dishonest and tasteless was a tad sensationalist, but I can see now that someone like yourself, who's heartstrings are not wrapped into it, may find its writing style too shoddy. It's not a peer-reviewed journal, but I like it and is satisfactory.
This is not just a message to you, but to all people who interpret the Qur'an every which way; wanting to spread the seed of doubt and criticize those who are impervious to it. I'm sorry if it sounds harsh; I respect your straightforwardness and political incorrectness therefore with the same vigor I respond back.Concerning my comment on the Yusuf Ali trans. , that was a reply to the topic. There are no better translation at my local mosque. Really. They are filled to the brim with brackets. Yusuf Ali is the best *physical copy I have. I like to read out of books. Also why I refuse to buy a kindle.
But in any case, do you realise what you said is a logical fallacy known as "appeal to authority/popularity"?
I concur. I hate these scholars looming over us, in the shadows, wherever we go they appear. Scholars, scholars, scholars...
