Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Discussion on 4:3 and meaning of nisa

Discussion on 4:3 and meaning of nisa

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
514 Posts 28 Posters 40.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mazhar
    wrote on last edited by
    #108

    Hoppean is correct and 5/17 is a GREAT EXAMPLE of the grammatical rule that we see in 4/3 where a masculine singular verb is acted out by a plural noun. This too is a well known grammar rule of Arabic where if the subject pronoun is a group of people, the verb will be SINGULAR if the verb comes BEFORE the subject in an Arabic sentence. And if the subject pronoun is a mixed group of male and female, this singular verb will be 3rd person masculine.

    Whoever Hoppean is, I must say that person has a good eye and understands the grammar rule these two verses (4/3 and 5/17) exemplify. It would be beyond ridiculous to say that Allaadheena Qaaloo Allah Huwa Al Maseehu in 5/17 are only males.

    He has referred to the most elementary rule of Arabic. In Nominal Sentences the Verb will always match in gender and plurality with the Subject mentioned before the Verb. In Verbal sentences, where sequence is Verb-Subject-Object, the verb will always be thrid person singular masculine or feminine according to the gender of the following subject. However, for broken plurals the Verb can be either feminine or masculine, even if the subject is certainly biologically masculine plural.

    It is also the most elementary rule that Prepositional Phrase is neither the Subject nor Predicate of a Nominal Sentence; nor is the Subject of a Verb.

    It is also the most elementry lesson of Arabic that the Subject of a Verb will ALWAYS be in NOMINATIVE case and NOT in genitive or accusative case.

    Ignoring these rules, one will talk only rubbish while interpreting the text of Arabic.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Offline
      D Offline
      dawngorgeous
      wrote on last edited by
      #109

      Peace Uq,

      Grammar aside, how does marrying up to four women make you fair to the orphans?

      Dawn

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Shirley
        wrote on last edited by
        #110

        The first part of this post is directed to the person named Mazhar and the last part is addressing Wakas.

        Mazhar,

        From the beginning of this thread as I was trying to have my one on one with Wakas, you kept throwing comments at me and trying your best to engage me while I am dealing with Wakas. I'll address you just this once. After that, if Wakas wishes to present your arguments in addition to his own, I'll respond to him. That way I will be killing two birds with one stone.

        You want to believe so badly that "Ma Taaba Lakum Min An-Nisaa' " is a prepositional phrase and for you to insist on this lets me know that you either did not read what I posted (along with a links) about the Ma - Min Clause in an Arabic sentence or you're ignoring and possibly reject it.

        Ma Taaba Lakum Min An-Nisaa' IS NOT a prepositional phrase. A prepositional phrase (rather it be Arabic or English) indicates LOCATION or POSITION (and in the case of Min (when it IS used as a preposition to mean from) it indicates DIRECTION. This too is ELEMENTARY and BASIC Arabic.

        A prepositional phrase (as I said) shows the location of the subject. The phrases underlined below are actual prepositional phrases.

        1). Fatima fil Bayt - Fatima is in the house.

        2). Ayna al kutub? Hiyya 'alal ma'ida - Where are the books? They are on the table.

        The only prepositional or positional words I am aware of are Bi, m'a, 'ala, fee, tahta, aamaama, wara', bijanib, bayna, ila and (when it is indicating direction or location) min.

        HOWEVER, I am under the impression that you should be aware that Min is ALSO USED to mean THAT WHICH or HE WHO is part of a whole, some, from among. I capitalized the words That Which because this term is the First Half of the clause that I had pointed out to you all. MA Taaba Lakum MIN An-Nisaa' - THAT WHICH/HE WHO has expressed an attitude of agreement and pleasantness to you.

        So, that's TWO ELEMENTS of this phrase in 4/3 which make this phrase NOT a prepositional phrase. The FACT that it is not used as preposition in 4/3 (to indicate position, direction or location) but instead is used as indicator of someone who belongs to a group of people. 10/83 is JUST ONE of MANY verses in The Quran where the word Min is used in this manner. And also the FACT that the word "min" in 4/3 is used in the second half of the Ma-Min Clause. So NO "Ma Taaba Lakum Min An-Nisaa' " in 4/3 is not a prepositional phrase.

        By the way, ignoring the message of The Quran and the meanings of the Arabic words, one will talk only rubbish while interpreting the text of Arabic.

        DEAR WAKAS,

        I know my last reply to you is quite lengthy, so I am not going to ask you to reply to everything in that post. But I would still like an answer to my question which I am going to repeat here

        We agree that the masculine plural is used for two different groups of people. A group consisting of all males and a group consisting of males and females.

        When you use come across the masculine plural that is referring to one of these two groups of people through reading a text How Do You Know which group of people the masculine plural is referring to? If it is used for PEOPLE/HUMAN BEINGS it will be referring to one of those two groups. So how DO YOU ascertain WHICH GROUP the masculine plural is referring to?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          Mazhar
          wrote on last edited by
          #111

          You want to believe so badly that "Ma Taaba Lakum Min An-Nisaa' " is a prepositional phrase

          I never said this. I only said that is a prepositional phrase. In Arabic this is . Open any book of Syntactic Analysis, one will find it so.
          And a primary class student of Arabic will say that it is rubbish to presume that an object noun of a Preposition could be subject of a preceding third person perfect verb. I don't know why people do not let simple things enter in minds only to stick what was stated earlier.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Offline
            M Offline
            Mazhar
            wrote on last edited by
            #112

            So, that's TWO ELEMENTS of this phrase in 4/3 which make this phrase NOT a prepositional phrase. The FACT that it is not used as preposition in 4/3 (to indicate position, direction or location) but instead is used as indicator of someone who belongs to a group of people. 10/83 is JUST ONE of MANY verses in The Quran where the word Min is used in this manner. And also the FACT that the word "min" in 4/3 is used in the second half of the Ma-Min Clause. So NO "Ma Taaba Lakum Min An-Nisaa' " in 4/3 is not a prepositional phrase.

            This is now something more than rubbish. In 10/83 the subject of Verb is which is in nominative case and absolute state. The prepositional phrase that follows it relates to elided adjectival for the subject. The Subject of Verb is never in genitive case as in 4/3 is .

            Preposition "Min" is used in Qur'aan perhaps more than 1500 times, just search, one will never find its object noun as subject of a verb.

            Semantic Properties of Prepositions
            In semantic terms, the preposition functions to illustrate a logical, temporal, or spatial relationship between the object of the prepositional phrase and the other components of the sentence.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Mazhar
              wrote on last edited by
              #113

              Etymologically, (woman) is derived from (man).

              Morphologically, (women) is formed from (woman).

              The fact that shares no radical letters with is due to the formation of a plural noun from a singular using none of the latter's radical letters. This is not the only example in the Classical language, nor is it an infrequent phenomenon.

              How are you.

              This I have found about it
              The standard word for "a man" in Arabic is

              rajul(un)

              A man

              This is an agent noun of the structure fa"ul(un); it literally means "a walker."

              Other words for "a man" in Standard Arabic include

              /

              'imru'(un) / mar'(un)
              A man
              Etymology mra'un
              In modern spoken Arabic, words of the root R J L are used standardly
              Man

              ("walker," active participle)

              Used in Egypt and southern Levant with variable pronunciations

              (e.g. "raagil" in Lower Egyptian )
              raajil

              Man

              ("very walker very man" emphatic active participle)

              Used in Arabia, Levant, Iraq, etc. with variable pronunciations

              (e.g. "rejjaal" in Urban Syrian )
              rajjaal

              The standard classical word rajul(un) can still be heard today in some rare dialects with varying pronunciations (e.g. "rajil" in Palestinian Arabic).

              The feminine form of this word, rajula(tun) = "a woman" was uncommon in Classical Arabic and it is not a standard word.

              Rather, the standard word for "a woman" in formal Arabic is the feminine of 'imru'(un)/ mar'(un)

              /
              'imra'a(tun) / mar'a(tun)

              A woman
              Etymology mra'atun
              This word is used in many modern dialects (e.g. Arabia, Northern Levant, Iraq) with variable pronunciations (most commonly, "mara&quot. Another word that is common in modern Arabia is "hurma" (plural "hareem" &#1605.
              Dialects that are derived mostly from classical Yemeni Arabic (Egyptian and South Levantine) use a non-Arabic word for "a woman"

              sitt
              A woman

              This is not an Arabic word but a word that is commonly found in South Semitic languages (e.g. Ethiopian languages). It appears that this word was also used in Old South Arabian languages (ancient Yemeni languages spoken before Arabic).

              Anyway, this word has found its way into modern Egyptian, Palestinian, and Lebanese Arabic. The plural is sittaat . This word is used in other modern dialects as a word for a "grandmother." This is found in dialects that started out as Yemeni-based dialects but deviated later (North Levantine).

              The plural of rajul(un) is

              rijaal(un)

              Men

              Note that rajul(un) cannot be regularly pluralized (cannot take -oona).

              However, the words 'imru'(un), mar'(un), 'imra'a(tun), and mar'a(tun) cannot be pluralized at all.

              This leaves the word for "a woman" without a plural. The plural word for "a woman" in Standard Arabic is

              nisaa'(un)

              Women

              Another less common variant

              niswa(tun)

              Women

              Both words do not have singulars (plurale tantum). These words are related to the following words

              A male human being
              'ins(un)

              'insaan(un)

              The roots ' N S and N S are apparently cognates and they mean "man, human."

              Etymologies

              nsun 'insun (man/human)

              nsaatun nisaa'un (women)

              The root N S / N SH is common in Semitic languages (e.g. Akkadian nishoo (people), Aramaic 'anaash / 'eesh (man), Hebrew 'ansh / 'eesh (man)).

              In modern spoken Arabic, the following words are used for "men"

              Used in Arabia, Levant, Iraq, North Africa etc. with variable pronunciations
              rjaal

              Used mostly in Egypt

              ("riggaala" in Lower Egypt )
              rajjaala

              http//arabic.tripod.com/Nouns4.htm

              This entry seems incorrect
              A male human being
              'ins(un)

              Qur'aan shows it otherwise---7206 has both Rijaal who are from Ins.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • N Offline
                N Offline
                Noon_waalqalami
                wrote on last edited by
                #114

                In other words, this verse says that if you are intoxicated, ill, on a journey or hit by forgetfulness than dont approach salah.

                Same goes for this verse as the verse above.

                Peace Maha, cross-reference and insert your new interpretation to see if it makes sense?

                2223 nisukum forgetfulness yours a tillage for you so approach your tilt how you like ?
                2236 not blame over you if you divorce nisaa/the forgetfulness what not you touched them...

                411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (f) so if are (f. pl) nisaa/forgetfulness above two (f) falahunna/so to them (f. pl) third dual (2/3) what left and if kanat/is (f) whidatan one/single (f) so to her the half

                423 prohibited over you your mothers ? and mothers nisakum/forgetfulness yours

                56 O you the ones who believe when you stand up to the prayer so wash your faces and your hands to the elbow and wipe your heads and your feet to the ankles and if you are impure so purify yourselves and if you are sick or on journey or comes one from among you from the toilet or you touched the forgetfulness?

                3330 O forgetfulness the prophet from commits from you in immorality
                3332 O forgetfulness the prophet you are not as one from the forgetfulness
                3352 not lawful to you the forgetfulness from after and not that replace in them from spouses and if/had pleased you their beauty

                651 O you the prophet when you divorce the forgetfulness so divorce them to their waiting period and count the count

                The verse isnt talking about menstruation please refer to Bobs post.

                2222 and they ask you about the time or place of war say it ailment so abandon al-nisaa/the forgetfulness in the time or place of war and not approach them until they are clean so when they are purified so come to them from wherever directive The God indeed The God loves the ones who turn in repentance and loves the ones who purify themselves

                654 and the ones (f) who despaired from the time or place of war from nisakum/forgetfulness yours if you doubt so their waiting period three ashr/cycles and the ones (f) not yaid'na menstruate? and those the pregnant their term that they put aside their loads (i.e. give birth) and from fears The God He makes for him from His directive easier

                http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                y d = To have her courses, menstruate; Her blood flowed from her womb, to attain the age of menstruation, to make a thing flow.
                hada vb. (1) impf. act. 654
                mahid n.m. 2222
                Lane's Lexicon, Volume 2, page 322, 323

                An Arabic-English Lexicon. London. Williams and Norgate. 1863. Edward William Lane.

                1 , (S, A, Msb, K,) aor. , inf. n. and (S, Msb, K) and , (Aboo-Is-h?k, K,) said of a woman, (S, A, Msb, K,) She menstruated; i. e. her blood flowed; (A or blood came forth from her womb; (Mgh as also or this latter signifies she likened herself to the . (TA.) -b2- Also She attained the age of menstruation. (TA.) -b3- , (S, A, Msb,) aor. as above, (Msb,) inf. n. , (S, Msb,) The flowed with, (S,) or emitted, (A,) a matter resembling blood; (S, A flowed with its gum (Msb) the matter which it emits is called ; and is applied to the head of a new-born infant to scare away the j?nn, or genii. (A, TA ) -b4- The torrent overflowed; or poured out, or forth, from fullness; or ran; syn. . (TA.) 2 He attributed to the woman. (Msb.) -b2- , (TK,) inf. n., (Sgh, K,) Tempore men- struorum inivit ancillam suam. (Sgh, K, TK.) -b3- , (TK,) inf. n. as above, (K,) He made the water to flow. (K, TA.)

                5 see 1. -b2- Also She abstained form prayer (&#1577 during the days of her ; (S, Msb, K, TA waiting for the stopping of the blood(TA) or she abstained, and did as the does (A, * Mgh) or she reckoned herself , and did as the does. (TA.) 10 , (S, Mgh, Msb,) in the pass. form, (Msb,) with damm to the , (Mgh,) found in the handwriting of Aboo-Zekereey? , (TA,) She continued to have a flow of blood (S, Mgh) after her days (S) or she had an exuberance of blood ; not what is termed (Msb) or her blood flowed without stopping, not on certain days, nor from the vein of menstruation, but from a vein called . (TA.) . -b2- A thing which flows from the , resembling . (Mgh.) A single time, or turn, of menstruation, or of the flow of the menstrual blood (S, * A, * Mgh, Msb *) pl. ; (A, Msb like as is pl. of , and of , and of , and of ; though by rule it should be . (Msb.) You say, and and . (A.) -b2- As used by the professors of practical law, The accustomed days thereof. (Mgh.) -b3- Also A single flow pl. . (TA.) the subst. from (S, K, TA) or a mode, or manner, or state, of (Msb) or the state (Mgh, TA) of the , (TA,) which is one of avoidance (Mgh, TA) of prayer and fasting and the like (Mgh) pl.. (S, Msb.) -b2- Also The menstrual blood; the blood of menstruation; and so and . (TA.) -b3- Also The piece of rag which the binds over her vulva; (S, Mgh, * Msb, * K and so (S) which latter also signifies a piece of rag thrown away (TA) pl. of the latter, . (S, TA.) see . , applied to a woman, act. part. n. from ; (S, Mgh, Msb, K thus, because it is an epithet of particular application ; (Msb and with ', being like and &c.; (TA and in like manner also, (S, Mgh, Msb, K,) on the authority of Fr (S) pl. (of the former, Msb) , (S, Mgh, Msb, K,) like as is pl. of , (Msb,) and , like as is pl. of , (TA,) and of the latter, , (Msb,) or . (S, Mgh, K.) -b2- In a certain trad., in which it is said that God will not accept the prayer of a unless she be with a , this does not mean one who is menstruating while actually occupied by prayer, (Msb, TA, *) but One who has attained to the age of menstruation; (TA or one who has attained to womanhood (Mgh) or it has not this meaning; for if it had, one would understand that a girl not arrived at puberty might pray with her head uncovered, which is not the case; but it means the menstruating kind, whether she have attained to puberty or not; as though the term female had been used in its place. (Msb.) is a simple subst. as well as an inf. n. (Zj, K) as the former, it is a n. of place; and as such it is used in the Kur ii. 222; meaning A woman's ; (Zj her ; (Mgh because it is the place of . (Zj, Mgh.) Some say that is hence derived; because the water flows to the (Az, K) for the Arabs put in the place of , and in that of. (Az, TA.) -b2- It is also a n. of time . (TA.) -b3- See also . -b4- When it is a simple subst., it has a pl., namely . (TA.) see . A woman continuing to have a flow of blood after her days (S) or having an exuberance of blood ; not what is termed (Msb) or having her blood flowing without stopping, not on certain days, nor from the vein of menstruation, but from a vein called . (K, * TA.)

                and and A woman who is supposed to be pregnant; (K as also (A, K) and (A) or in whom pregnancy has appeared (K) or, (K) and , (TA,) as also , accord. to J and IM, but this is rejected by F, (TA,) a woman whose menstrual discharge is later than its usual time, and who is therefore hoped to be pregnant (S, K) pl. and and is also said; and sometimes the sing. (&#1612, being originally an inf. n., is used as a pl. (TA.)

                One who mixes, or converses, with others ex. He is one who mixes, or converses, with women. (K.)

                The Fakeeh of the Arabs says, (S, * TA)

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  Maha
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #115

                  Peace Maha, cross-reference and insert your new interpretation to see if it makes sense?

                  2223 nisukum forgetfulness yours a tillage for you so approach your tilt how you like ?
                  2236 not blame over you if you divorce nisaa/the forgetfulness what not you touched them...

                  411 directs you The God in your children to the male like share the two (f) so if are (f. pl) nisaa/forgetfulness above two (f) falahunna/so to them (f. pl) third dual (2/3) what left and if kanat/is (f) whidatan one/single (f) so to her the half

                  423 prohibited over you your mothers ? and mothers nisakum/forgetfulness yours

                  56 O you the ones who believe when you stand up to the prayer so wash your faces and your hands to the elbow and wipe your heads and your feet to the ankles and if you are impure so purify yourselves and if you are sick or on journey or comes one from among you from the toilet or you touched the forgetfulness?

                  3330 O forgetfulness the prophet from commits from you in immorality
                  3332 O forgetfulness the prophet you are not as one from the forgetfulness
                  3352 not lawful to you the forgetfulness from after and not that replace in them from spouses and if/had pleased you their beauty

                  651 O you the prophet when you divorce the forgetfulness so divorce them to their waiting period and count the count

                  2222 and they ask you about the time or place of war say it ailment so abandon al-nisaa/the forgetfulness in the time or place of war and not approach them until they are clean so when they are purified so come to them from wherever directive The God indeed The God loves the ones who turn in repentance and loves the ones who purify themselves

                  654 and the ones (f) who despaired from the time or place of war from nisakum/forgetfulness yours if you doubt so their waiting period three ashr/cycles and the ones (f) not yaid'na menstruate? and those the pregnant their term that they put aside their loads (i.e. give birth) and from fears The God He makes for him from His directive easier

                  http//www.studyquran.co.uk/PRLonline.htm

                  y d = To have her courses, menstruate; Her blood flowed from her womb, to attain the age of menstruation, to make a thing flow.
                  hada vb. (1) impf. act. 654
                  mahid n.m. 2222
                  Lane's Lexicon, Volume 2, page 322, 323

                  An Arabic-English Lexicon. London. Williams and Norgate. 1863. Edward William Lane.

                  Peace noon. Read my post again please before jumping to conclusions. NISA share roots with N-S-I N-s (people, to forget) y3ni when talking about people then it talks about the forgotten people e.g weak people in society when directed towards yourself it points out to your own weakness... Btw who said Quran is not for NISA?hm confused

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Bender
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #116

                    Very intresting. I do agree with all what you said. Please share more of your discoveries.

                    I somehow suspect that 'qawameen' is standing above and maintaining while 'Nisa' are the weaker part of NAS (people) and Rejaal are people in leader roles, standing on their feets (from rijl - leg).

                    So REJAAL (the leaders) qawameen (Stand above/maintain) NISA (the weaker among people NAS) because God has bestowed upon them over one another and for what they spend of their money.

                    From that verse its clear that God has bestowed Rejaal with leadership and to financially provide for the weaker part of the society, one of the ways is through charity of course.

                    Because of the vulnerability of NISA, there are special rules for them regarding divorces and so on. In return, they are expected to be dutiful and obedient to their maintainers/leaders/rulers (4,34)

                    Anyway, thats just my thoughts. Please let me know if you disagree.

                    Peace

                    Salaam,

                    Thank you handshake
                    At the moment I can not disagree with your understading, but I think it needs more research.
                    InshaAllah if I have something usefull to share then I will share.

                    Salaam,
                    Bender

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Noon_waalqalami
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #117

                      Peace noon. Read my post again please before jumping to conclusions. NISA share roots with N-S-I N-s (people, to forget) y3ni when talking about people then it talks about the forgotten people e.g weak people in society when directed towards yourself it points out to your own weakness... Btw who said Quran is not for NISA?hm confused

                      Peace Maha, I'm really not sure what it is you are trying to say?

                      244 do you order al-nas/the humankind righteousness and you forget yourselves and you recite the book do they not use reason

                      Nun-Siin-Ya = to forsake/forget/neglect, pretend to forget.
                      nasiya vb. (1)
                      perf. act. 2286, 513, 514, 644, 751, 753, 7165, 967, 967, 1824, 1857, 1861, 1863, 1873, 2088, 20115, 20126, 2518, 3214, 3214, 3678, 3826, 398, 4534, 586, 5919
                      impf. act. 244, 2237, 641, 751, 2052, 2877, 4534, 876
                      impf. pass. 20126
                      pcple. pass. 1923
                      nasiy n.m. 1964
                      nasy n.m. 1923
                      ansa vb. (4)
                      perf. act. 1242, 1863, 23110, 5819, 5919
                      impf. act. 2106, 668

                      Nun-Siin-Waw = feminine/women.
                      nisa n.f. 249, 2187, 2222, 2223, 2226, 2231, 2232, 2235, 2236, 314, 342, 361, 361, 41, 43, 44, 47, 411, 415, 419, 422, 423, 423, 424, 432, 434, 443, 475, 498, 4127, 4127, 4129, 4176, 56, 781, 7127, 7141, 146, 2431, 2431, 2460, 2755, 284, 3330, 3332, 3332, 3352, 3355, 3359, 4025, 4825, 4911, 4911, 582, 583, 651, 654
                      niswah n.f. 1230, 1250

                      ? different word which cannot be used nor does it make any sense?

                      43 and if you fear that not do justice in the orphans so for marrying what aba/agreeable to you from the forgetful/scatterbrained paired/twos and three and four so if you fear that not do justice so one/single (f) or what possess your right hands that minimum that not you oppress
                      44 and give the forgetful/scatterbrained their handouts graciously?

                      411 so if kunna/are (f. pl) forgetful/scatterbrained above two (f) falahunna/so to them (f. pl) third dual (2/3) what left and if kanat/is (f) widatan one/single (f) so to her the half

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Maha
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #118

                        Peace Maha, I'm really not sure what it is you are trying to say?

                        244 do you order al-nas/the humankind righteousness and you forget yourselves and you recite the book do they not use reason

                        Nun-Siin-Ya = to forsake/forget/neglect, pretend to forget.
                        nasiya vb. (1)
                        perf. act. 2286, 513, 514, 644, 751, 753, 7165, 967, 967, 1824, 1857, 1861, 1863, 1873, 2088, 20115, 20126, 2518, 3214, 3214, 3678, 3826, 398, 4534, 586, 5919
                        impf. act. 244, 2237, 641, 751, 2052, 2877, 4534, 876
                        impf. pass. 20126
                        pcple. pass. 1923
                        nasiy n.m. 1964
                        nasy n.m. 1923
                        ansa vb. (4)
                        perf. act. 1242, 1863, 23110, 5819, 5919
                        impf. act. 2106, 668

                        Nun-Siin-Waw = feminine/women.
                        nisa n.f. 249, 2187, 2222, 2223, 2226, 2231, 2232, 2235, 2236, 314, 342, 361, 361, 41, 43, 44, 47, 411, 415, 419, 422, 423, 423, 424, 432, 434, 443, 475, 498, 4127, 4127, 4129, 4176, 56, 781, 7127, 7141, 146, 2431, 2431, 2460, 2755, 284, 3330, 3332, 3332, 3352, 3355, 3359, 4025, 4825, 4911, 4911, 582, 583, 651, 654
                        niswah n.f. 1230, 1250

                        ? different word which cannot be used nor does it make any sense?

                        43 and if you fear that not do justice in the orphans so for marrying what aba/agreeable to you from the forgetful/scatterbrained paired/twos and three and four so if you fear that not do justice so one/single (f) or what possess your right hands that minimum that not you oppress
                        44 and give the forgetful/scatterbrained their handouts graciously?

                        411 so if kunna/are (f. pl) forgetful/scatterbrained above two (f) falahunna/so to them (f. pl) third dual (2/3) what left and if kanat/is (f) widatan one/single (f) so to her the half

                        Either you arent reading my post or you are playing stupid with purpose in order to make me repeat myself over and over again. And I am not going to play that game with you.

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Maha
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #119

                          Salaam,

                          Thank you handshake
                          At the moment I can not disagree with your understading, but I think it needs more research.
                          InshaAllah if I have something usefull to share then I will share.

                          Salaam,
                          Bender

                          I hundred procent agree with you. On the whole, the whole quran need a lot of research as the sectarians had 1400 years to twist its meaning and the meaning of the words. There are some other words beside Nisa which meanings also need to be clearified in order to know their orginal meanings. Inshallah we take it step by step and may God increase our knowledge.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Noon_waalqalami
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #120

                            Either you arent reading my post or you are playing stupid with purpose in order to make me repeat myself over and over again. And I am not going to play that game with you.

                            Peace

                            I did read what you posted and repeat myself ask you to translate what you propose -- Nisaa is forgetfulness?

                            inquisitivetrini

                            Sorry for my late reply, as I wasnt online for a couple of days. This verse is not talking about being physical dirty but about the state of the mind. The verse starts by telling us not to approach SALAH fi we are S-K-R- intoxicated, ill or on a journey. Common for all three is that its your state of mind which is deemed inappropriate to approach Salah, not your physical condition. Now the word 'intercourse' in your translation is purely an interpretation as its assumed that NISA means women, and hence refers to intercourse with them which is not true. It has been explained here earlier, but let me just repeat, NISA share root letters N-S which is simmilar to both people (NAS) and WHICH MEANS to forget. The reason for why arabs considered Women to be NISA was because they deemed women to forget a lot, and indeed there are hadith which claim the same hence NISA could only mean women. Arabs had a bunch of other myths about women as well, which can also be seen from the hadith like women giving bad luck, women being the cause behind men leading astray and so on (which is one of the reasons behind headscarf and niqab).
                            But of course, in our modern society today we know the fallacy of these claims.
                            In other words, this verse says that if you are intoxicated, ill, on a journey or hit by forgetfulness than dont approach salah.

                            Same goes for this verse as the verse above.

                            The verse isnt talking about menstruation please refer to Bobs post.

                            2236 not blame on you if you divorce the forgetfulness what not you touched them (f)?

                            443 O you the ones who believe not go near the prayer and you intoxicated until you know what you are saying and not impure only passing path until you bathed and if you are sick or on journey or comes one from among you from the toilet or you touched the forgetfulness so not you find water so do dry ablution ground clean so wipe with your faces and your hands indeed The God is Pardoning Forgiving

                            Peace

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • WakasW Offline
                              WakasW Offline
                              Wakas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #121

                              Damon,

                              I think your following ambiguous statement needs clarification, so as not to give forum members a wrong impression

                              I said once already in this thread, Wakas and I have A HISTORY.

                              To clarify for all, Damon and I have known each other for a long time and there is no history other than amicable discussion between us (public and private).

                              Now, back to our discussion...

                              A grammar book, like any other source is not immune to error. If I am unsure of something, I refer to others/books/Quran/resources/etc for information. Sometimes others will have more knowledge in certain fields than I, so I see no problem in getting their input. I do not take them as an authority or what they say as a fact, but simply to weigh and consider extra info.

                              Once again, you fail to answer this question

                              And there is absolutely nothing hard for The Quran to use the appropriate pronoun. For example, IF, as you seemingly claim, "nisa" is not "women" then please explain why Quran in 43 uses "fawidatan" or in 44 uses "aduqtihinna" etc etc.

                              But you finally answered what you take "an-nisa" to mean, thanks, quote "...I DO FIND this word listed under the entry for Nasiya which means to be forgetful, to forget and to be OBLIVIOUS. This is the defintion Hans Wehr gives. I'm sure you are aware what it means to be oblivious. It is to be unmindful OR unaware of what is happening to you or around you. To be ignorant of your own social or personal condition. Under this same entry, Hans Wehr gives Nasiy, Nasyan and NISAA' to all mean oblivious."

                              Hans Wehr is not a classical arabic dictionary (CAD), but for sake of argument let's assume these meanings are also in CAD.

                              You say "al-yataam" are "those who are left alone in society to fend for themselves and who can use a helping hand (Al Yatamaa)" but the verses clearly talk about their wealth, as in they have some. You never explained that. You also set a dangerous precedent if you imply when Quran uses "their" X, it may not actually be "theirs" as such but it means what they are entitled to justly speaking. This would require further investigation.

                              Also, you never explained how people are meant to practically determine whom falls under the category of "...a "Sub Group" of the overall group of Yatamaa. The Nisaa' are oblivious to the fact that they have been socio-economically manuevered into being left as sheep in a world of wolves. "

                              You never explained why leave out the non-nisa from al yataam when making bond/contract etc, i.e. why only help those who are oblivious/forgetful from those who could use a helping hand. So they need a helping hand, but dont help them?

                              Your understanding also causes issues in the verses which follow, e.g. those who are oblivious/forgetful can tibna part of saduqat, implying they can think/discern/determine this.
                              You also talk about mutual agreement, but having this from people who are deemed "oblivious/forgetful" seems odd.

                              Some information that may be important

                              I asked a simple question can you find another example wherein "an-nisa" are doing a masculine verb. Since "nisa" is used 59 times in Quran, finding an example shouldn't be too difficult.

                              The fact that shares no radical letters with is due to the formation of a plural noun from a singular using none of the latter's radical letters. This is not the only example in the Classical language, nor is it an infrequent phenomenon.

                              One example would suffice I think. If uq can share one, that would be handy.

                              In 43, (to be, or appear, pleasant) serves a stative function (i.e. it expresses a state, not an act).

                              This could explain the issue I raised when it comes to whom is doing the determining suitablity/agreeable/pleasing/etc.

                              In the Classical language, the pronoun is usually reserved for non-sentient beings, however, it can very occasionally be used for sentient beings also; a prominent example being its use in the phrase , which is equivalent to stating .

                              If this example is accepted by Damon, then this shows what uq said (in regard to 'ma taba&#039 is at least possible, theoretically.

                              The Subject of Verb is never in genitive case as in 4/3 is .

                              Preposition "Min" is used in Qur'aan perhaps more than 1500 times, just search, one will never find its object noun as subject of a verb.

                              The above two should be easy to disprove, IF Damon is correct, as this occurs hundreds of times in Quran.

                              However, the words 'imru'(un), mar'(un), 'imra'a(tun), and mar'a(tun) cannot be pluralized at all.

                              This leaves the word for "a woman" without a plural. The plural word for "a woman" in Standard Arabic is

                              nisaa'(un)

                              This could be a significant find.

                              When you use come across the masculine plural that is referring to one of these two groups of people through reading a text How Do You Know which group of people the masculine plural is referring to? If it is used for PEOPLE/HUMAN BEINGS it will be referring to one of those two groups. So how DO YOU ascertain WHICH GROUP the masculine plural is referring to?

                              I would use Quranic grammar, context, logic etc.

                              All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Shirley
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #122

                                Damon,

                                I think your following ambiguous statement needs clarification, so as not to give forum members a wrong impression
                                Quote

                                I said once already in this thread, Wakas and I have A HISTORY.

                                Your refusal to directly answer my question is another case of ambiguous from you bro. As far as the history that I speak of, I am referring to our last e-mail exchange where you employed THE SAME TACTICS in that debate as you are employing here. So to answer people's curiosity, from my perspective, the history I speak of is not one of hatred or animosity. It is one where your tactics you love to employ in your debates were used in our discussion and you ended our discussion by telling me my arguments have Logical fallacies (a favorite tactic) and your arguments have NO logical fallacies (another favorite tactic) and you NEVER pointed out, explained, anaylized or otherwise dissected either one of our arguments to substantiate my logical fallacies and your lack of logical fallacies. confused

                                This makes for a one sided exchange and the person who employs such tactics do so to tip the argumentative odds in his favor. This is a very bad tactic to use because even if it works and you run the other person away, you are still left with holding on to what is possibly misconceptions and wrong ideas that you did not give that other person the fair opportunity to establish because you dismiss everything that person says as a logical fallacy. You don't PROVE the logical fallacies, by simply making the statement itself is good enough in your mind.

                                Anyway, I will address the rest of your post but I INSIST that you directly answer my question instead of being ambiguous.

                                MY QUESTION When you use come across the masculine plural that is referring to one of these two groups of people through reading a text How Do You Know which group of people the masculine plural is referring to? If it is used for PEOPLE/HUMAN BEINGS it will be referring to one of those two groups. So how DO YOU ascertain WHICH GROUP the masculine plural is referring to?

                                AND YOUR REPLY I would use Quranic grammar, context, logic etc.

                                This small comment does not at all answer the question. You did not say how do you ASCERTAIN which group is being referred to. Now let's switch places for a second Wakas. How would you feel if YOU were the one asking this question and I gave you the reply that you just gave me?? Would you not tell me that my reply is ambiguous and isn't a straight answer?? Would you not use some of your favorite slogans such as lacks evidence, logical fallacy, try again?

                                So SINCE you want to pull this, I'm going to ask this question again while this time keeping in mind what you said above...

                                While reading Quran 4/3 how do you determine WHO the masculine plurals of this verse is referring to? And instead of the ambiguous/indirect comment you are using, can I PLEASE get a direct answer? I don't want to hear anything about Quranic grammar, context and logic. Please EXPLAIN the grammar, context and logic of 4/3 and how you use them to determine WHO the masculine plurals are referring to. Which Grammar Rule are you using to ascertain this?

                                Lastly, you said something very, very intriguing...

                                A grammar book, like any other source is not immune to error.

                                I would like for you and everyone else monitoring this conversation to keep these words of yours in mind as we start to get into the heart and soul of our discussion.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Released
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #123

                                  Peace Damon,

                                  Yup, I'm still reading through the discussion. Though, some of the heavy grammar rules and terminology, are very difficult to follow. I wish I had more time on my hands for some intense reading, but it's impossible at this point.

                                  So, to both you and Mazhar, if you could please try and break things down into layman's terms, I know that I will appreciate it greatly. I also think that it will help if we stay away from personal attacks, and focus exclusively on the issue on hand. I do understand that the topic is emotionally charged (trust me, I'm a woman), but it takes away from all the hard work you've all put into your analysis.

                                  I have no issue with rethinking my stance on 4.3, but I want to ensure that I have fully understood the alternative, before I choose to even consider it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • U Offline
                                    U Offline
                                    uq
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #124

                                    Examples of plural nouns being derived from other forms or roots than their corresponding singular form

                                    1. from (a mole)
                                    2. from (a goat)
                                    3. from (water)
                                    4. from (a woman)

                                    These are but a few examples.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • M Offline
                                      M Offline
                                      Mazhar
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #125

                                      So, to both you and Mazhar, if you could please try and break things down into layman's terms
                                      Released

                                      I have tried it and put it in seperate thread, each sentence of Ayah even if it apparently comprises a single word, is seperately discussed. Knowledge of Enlish grammar about Preposition, Prepositional Phrase and Relative Pronouns and its linkage clause would suffice. That can be applied for Arabic grammar.

                                      http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604734.0

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • H Offline
                                        H Offline
                                        huruf
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #126

                                        What I find more striking about this plural terminology and sometime the singular terminology is the relationship it keeps or does not keep with the meaning of the root from which it derives.

                                        Concerning the word rajul, it derives, not from a word that entails a sex, a sexual caracterization. ?how or why did it come to mean a sex? As I pointed out already doesn't it have a sociological content more than a personal content?

                                        The case of nisaa' I am more and more convinced that it is not derived from n-s-, but from -n-s, like "naas", and that would characterize it as a species meaning, and like ryjul or rijaal open to both sexes, even though sociologically it may be apportionned many times to one sex, basically also because of sociological considerations, and not fundamental, human considerations.

                                        I have the feeling that this vocabulary of the Qur'an should be appreciated from that point of view, not excluding any other point of view, but not discard the sociological point of view, because however it is, the Qur'an is well thought out, it is not haphazard, and means things and we should not put a stop or a stopper at what it may say and say it is this and we should not go beyond. If it makes sense, if it means something constructive or entlightening for us, for anybody, I do not think we have a right to discard it or be dirisive.

                                        Light is everywhere, alhamdulil-lah.

                                        Salaam

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • H Offline
                                          H Offline
                                          huruf
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #127

                                          Abounding on the morphology of "nisaa'".

                                          Could some of the well versed in that part make a list or exposition of the morphological possibilities of the word according to each of the three possible roots from which it might be derived? Also of the any other factor that might be of interest.

                                          Thanks and salaam

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Users