Is Quran Really Compatible with Science????

FearGod

Peace Bro FearGod,

The Sun DOES Move along......

But it is extremely clear that the Swimmimg of Sun described in the Quran is the Swimmimg as appearing to us...the swimmimg that converts night into day and vice versa......

I am sure that Muhammad and People of that time did THOUGHT of this meaning only...

Hope things are clear....

With Peace
Harun

Brother Harun,

i think it should be did think and not THOUGHT, anyway

May i ask you how did you know that the quran meant to say the sun revolves around the earth.

My other question is, are you a muslim ?

Harun

Peace Fear God,

Yeah it should be "did think"....by the way

May i ask you how did you know that the quran meant to say the sun revolves around the earth.

This is the problem Bro. I DO NOT THINK OR SAY THAT QURAN SAYS THAT THE SUN REVOLVES AROUND THE EARTH.......almost all of them misunderstand.....

Brother, Quran is not an encyclopedia. If it is said that the Sun swims, it indeed appears to us as swimming in the sky (frame of reference), it indeed refers to the glory of the phenomenon (here the rotation of earth) that makes Sun constantly swim in the Orbit and cause day and night.

So, SUN SWIMS is a RHETORIC.....i hope u know what it means.....it enhances literary beauty...has nothing to do with actual state of the sun.....the moon also Swims....

It appears to us as Swimming..........thats why it Swims......

Secondly, I am a Rational Monotheist. I am surely a "muslim", maybe there is less probability of me being a "Muslim". It also depends on how u define that word.

With greetings of Peace and Love,
Harun.

P.S. Wheren do u live bro?

FearGod

Why?
Why should the Koran be correct about scientific topics?
There is nothing scientifically accurate or of scientific interest in the Koran. Even though people in Greece and Egypt discovered some 2000 years ago that Earth is a sphere and rotates around the sun this was not commonly accepted for some time.
I know that in the 70s some dishonest people tried to fool everyone by using a Canadian anatomist and a French doctor to believe there was some scientific facts on embryology buried somewhere in the book, but this was quickly shown to be false, especially since nowadays we have the internet available to show the information that was previously only available to scholars and specialists.

A great example illustrating this and showing the dangers of such an endeavour at the same time is the so-called "scientific miracle" of the expanding Universe.
Some people changed the meaning of musioona in 5147 from the descriptor "vast" to the verb "expand" and it then said "We have built the heaven with might, and We it is who are steadily expanding it".
Then along came Nobel laureates Saul Perlmutter, Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt in 1998 and expanded the Big Bang model by introducing the accelerating expansion and the word "steadily" had to be removed again. Yet even today, some sites still carry the old attempt at reading science into the Koran and making themselves look a bit foolish.

You are saying that it was known before 2000 years ago and even back to the greece era that the earth was sphere and that earth revolves around the sun.

My question to you is.

Why such information wasn't mentioned in the bible about a sphere earth revolving around the sun ?

You aren't telling the truth regarding the verse (5147) or you should first study arabic in college before making your conclusion.

Many copies of the quran have been translated in wrong way one time by a mistake and the other time to fool people about the beauty
of the quran by distorting it's wonderful meaning exactly as you are trying to do now.

But here is the evidence by using the internet to find the exact meaning of the expanding universe as shown in arabic / english dictionaries.

AND IT IS We who have built the universe with power; and, verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it. (5147)

Reference http//www.wordreference.com/enar/expanded
http//pictat.com/i/2013/1/31/11433expand.png

http//pictat.com/i/2013/1/31/19021htmltoimag.png

FearGod

Peace Fear God,

Yeah it should be "did think"....by the way

This is the problem Bro. I DO NOT THINK OR SAY THAT QURAN SAYS THAT THE SUN REVOLVES AROUND THE EARTH.......almost all of them misunderstand.....

Brother, Quran is not an encyclopedia. If it is said that the Sun swims, it indeed appears to us as swimming in the sky (frame of reference), it indeed refers to the glory of the phenomenon (here the rotation of earth) that makes Sun constantly swim in the Orbit and cause day and night.

So, SUN SWIMS is a RHETORIC.....i hope u know what it means.....it enhances literary beauty...has nothing to do with actual state of the sun.....the moon also Swims....

It appears to us as Swimming..........thats why it Swims......

Secondly, I am a Rational Monotheist. I am surely a "muslim", maybe there is less probability of me being a "Muslim". It also depends on how u define that word.

With greetings of Peace and Love,
Harun.

P.S. Wheren do u live bro?

Thanks Brother for your reply.

i live in Jordan.

Please read my thread about the verses showing how god caused the night and day to rotate around our earth.

http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604790.0

StopS

You are saying that it was known before 2000 years ago and even back to the greece era that the earth was sphere and that earth revolves around the sun.

My question to you is.

Why such information wasn't mentioned in the bible about a sphere earth revolving around the sun ?

the Bibles are not scientific encyclopaediae
it was not common knowledge
it was not accepted and did not fit into their worldview where Earth was required to be the centre and mankind the highest in creation

What would it change if the Bible did mention it? Nothing. What does the contents of the Bible have to do with the contents of the Koran?

You aren't telling the truth regarding the verse (5147) or you should first study arabic in college before making your conclusion.

Here the Bible DOES say in Isaiah 425 "Thus says God, the Lord, who created the heavens and stretched them out..."

Well, let's just say I am telling the truth as far as most Arabic speakers and professional translators go. The way I understand it, musioon is a word describing a state, not an action word or verb! A garden can be "musioon", vast or extensive, but that does not mean it expands.

What is strange is that to my knowledge it was translated as "vast" until someone discovered that the Universe was expanding and when Bucailleism spread, the meaning was changed. As I showed, it was wrong because they didn't know that the expansion of the Universe was accelerating, so the "steadily" is factually wrong and has thus been removed in some versions.

M. M. Pickthall We it is Who make the vast extent (thereof).
Shakir We are the makers of things ample.
Yusuf Ali (Saudi Rev. 1985) it is We Who create the vastness of space.
Wahiduddin Khan We built the universe with Our might, giving it its vast expanse.
Abdel Haleem We built the heavens with Our power and made them vast,
Abdul Majid Daryabadi And the heaven! We have built it with might, and verily We are powerful.
Ahmed Ali We built the heavens by Our authority; and We are the Lord of power and expanse.
Aisha Bewley As for heaven ? We built it with great power and gave it its vast expanse.
Amatul Rahman Omar As for the heaven, We have built it with (Our) Mighty power, and verily We are Makers of the vast extent.
Hamid S. Aziz it is We that expand the vastness of space
Muhammad Mahmoud Ghali We are indeed extending (it) wide.
Syed Vickar Ahamed We are Who create the vastness of space with it.
Farook Malik We have built the heavens with Our hands, for We have the power to do so.
Dr. Kamal Omar We are indeed those Who make expansion and create vastness.
Bilal Muhammad We construct the firmament, for it is We Who create the vastness of space.
Maududi And heaven ? We made it with Our Own Power and We have the Power to do so.

So, yes, it is theoretically possible that all these professional translators, who studied classic Arabic, were wrong and a French doctor, a Christian who did not speak Arabic, was right.

Let me show you what an Arabic speaking Muslim says about this

"Wassamaa banaynahabi-aydin wa-inna lamoosiAAoon"

Sahih International "And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are expander."
Muhsin Khan "With power did We construct the heaven. Verily, We are Able to extend the vastness of space thereof."
Pickthall "We have built the heaven with might, and We it is Who make the vast extent (thereof)."
Yusuf Ali "With power and skill did We construct the Firmament for it is We Who create the vastness of pace."
Shakir "And the heaven, We raised it high with power, and most surely We are the makers of things ample."
Dr. Ghali "And the heaven (is also a sign). We have built it with (Our) Hands (i.e., Capability) and surely We are indeed extending (it) wide."

The word in question here is 'moosiAAoon', which means 'the ones who make things vast/expand' (it is a noun, not a verb). The verse does not specify that the universe is still expanding, only that Allah is the one who makes things vast/expand, including the 'heavens'. Only recently have some people such as Dr. Ghali translated 'moosiAAoon' as a verb in the present tense, meaning 'extending/expanding it'. This is incorrect, as can be seen by someone with knowledge of Arabic grammar, and as evidenced by the fact that this is a departure from the majority of previous translations.

Now, even if we suspend our disbelief, ignore all other translations, and assume that Dr. Ghali is correct, what is so miraculous about such a vague description? What 'heaven' is the Quran referring to? The word used is 'samaa', which also means 'sky'. What does 'god' mean when he speaks of how he 'built' the sky? Also, what is so grand about such a description? Anyone could look up at the sky and come to the conclusion, for whatever reason, that the 'heavens' are expanding. Add a few details and maybe then you have something worth bragging about.

Do you not see how all these 'miracles' are just vague descriptions, and are often simply invented by people who deliberately mistranslate the Quran to insert their own 'miracles' into the text? Now if God wanted to include clear scientific miracles, why didn't he include something concrete and completely unknowable at the time? Why didn't he say something like

'verily we have created all things with energy equal to it's mass multiplied by the speed of light multiplied unto itself; and God is the creator of all things'

There, completely clear and not in the least bit vague; and had it been in the Quran, not one person would be able to refute the fact that this is completely correct and completely unknowable at the time.

Now please tell me what is the truth? Is only your version the truth?

You are showing me once again that I am right in demanding not to mix science and religion. It leads to futile discussions and simply does not work!

FearGod

the Bibles are not scientific encyclopaediae
it was not common knowledge
it was not accepted and did not fit into their worldview where Earth was required to be the centre and mankind the highest in creation

What would it change if the Bible did mention it? Nothing. What does the contents of the Bible have to do with the contents of the Koran?

Here the Bible DOES say in Isaiah 425 "Thus says God, the Lord, who created the heavens and stretched them out..."

You have changed our subject where you have said about the sphere earth and its revolution around the sun which you claimed it to be known since the time of pharaoh and greece era and now you shifted the subject to the expanding universe to show it mentioned in the bible whereas we were discussing earth ,day and night

I SAID,

You are saying that it was known before 2000 years ago and even back to the greece era that the earth was sphere and that earth revolves around the sun.

My question to you is.

Why such information wasn't mentioned in the bible about a sphere earth revolving around the sun ?

You are only eluding and even not smart on it but only showing your hypocrisy and dishonesty on debating this thread.

Well, let's just say I am telling the truth as far as most Arabic speakers and professional translators go. The way I understand it, musioon is a word describing a state, not an action word or verb! A garden can be "musioon", vast or extensive, but that does not mean it expands.

The garden can't be musioon except if the one saying it a baby child or a lunatic boy
rotfl

the correct one is

What is strange is that to my knowledge it was translated as "vast" until someone discovered that the Universe was expanding and when Bucailleism spread, the meaning was changed. As I showed, it was wrong because they didn't know that the expansion of the Universe was accelerating, so the "steadily" is factually wrong and has thus been removed in some versions.

M. M. Pickthall We it is Who make the vast extent (thereof).
Shakir We are the makers of things ample.
Yusuf Ali (Saudi Rev. 1985) it is We Who create the vastness of space.
Wahiduddin Khan We built the universe with Our might, giving it its vast expanse.
Abdel Haleem We built the heavens with Our power and made them vast,
Abdul Majid Daryabadi And the heaven! We have built it with might, and verily We are powerful.
Ahmed Ali We built the heavens by Our authority; and We are the Lord of power and expanse.
Aisha Bewley As for heaven ? We built it with great power and gave it its vast expanse.
Amatul Rahman Omar As for the heaven, We have built it with (Our) Mighty power, and verily We are Makers of the vast extent.
Hamid S. Aziz it is We that expand the vastness of space
Muhammad Mahmoud Ghali We are indeed extending (it) wide.
Syed Vickar Ahamed We are Who create the vastness of space with it.
Farook Malik We have built the heavens with Our hands, for We have the power to do so.
Dr. Kamal Omar We are indeed those Who make expansion and create vastness.
Bilal Muhammad We construct the firmament, for it is We Who create the vastness of space.
Maududi And heaven ? We made it with Our Own Power and We have the Power to do so.

So, yes, it is theoretically possible that all these professional translators, who studied classic Arabic, were wrong and a French doctor, a Christian who did not speak Arabic, was right.

Let me show you what an Arabic speaking Muslim says about this

Now please tell me what is the truth? Is only your version the truth?

You are showing me once again that I am right in demanding not to mix science and religion. It leads to futile discussions and simply does not work!

What you did here, copy...paste ,,,, copy...paste ,,, copy...paste.

But i am sorry to say that you unserstand nothing because you have no knowledge in the complexity of the Arabic language which i have spent more than 12 years studying it in school and still not perfect on its grammers even though it is my native language.

So you are discussing something which you don't know and refuting without any knowledge of what you are talking about.

The word is different than and different than
we have also , , , , , , , , ,

i don't know if there is still else words for the arabic grammer which you know nothing about it.

How you refute something which you actually have no knowledge on it,if you have even a litlle knowledge then
i can help you to understand,but you have nill.

How can you discuss something in english if i don't know one english word.

that complexity of language in the quran had challenged the experts in the Arabic language at that
era and then you are saying musioon .

StopS

You have changed our subject where you have said about the sphere earth and its revolution around the sun which you claimed it to be known since the time of pharaoh and greece era and now you shifted the subject to the expanding universe to show it mentioned in the bible whereas we were discussing earth ,day and night

It would be so easy if you would first check and then make accusations! I hate all this "I said" "you said" nonsense, but if you insist....

The topic of this thread is "Is Quran Really Compatible with Science????"
In reply #2 I pointed out that "Earth is a sphere and rotates around the sun" was known long before Islam started, if we can agree that it started in the 7th century CE.

You say I have changed "your" subject. Based on what?

In my reply I show how pseudo-science is introduced and how this was done.

In reply #14 you first ask me why "the bible" doesn't mention this and accuse me of lying about the translation of a sentence.

In reply #16 I give you the reasons why I think the Bibles did not mention this and demonstrate that your translation of 5147 can be just as wrong/off/misunderstood as the one I have taken from reputable translators.

In the same reply I also showed you why I believe the claim in the example I provided was indeed dishonest, misleading and wrong. I also demonstrated that the Jewish Bible uses the same idea.

So, pray tell, how exactly am I changing what topic from what to what?

I SAID,

You are only eluding and even not smart on it but only showing your hypocrisy and dishonesty on debating this thread.

The garden can't be musioon except if the one saying it a baby child or a lunatic boy
rotfl

the correct one is

What you did here, copy...paste ,,,, copy...paste ,,, copy...paste.

But i am sorry to say that you unserstand nothing because you have no knowledge in the complexity of the Arabic language which i have spent more than 12 years studying it in school and still not perfect on its grammers even though it is my native language.

So you are discussing something which you don't know and refuting without any knowledge of what you are talking about.

The word is different than and different than
we have also , , , , , , , , ,

i don't know if there is still else words for the arabic grammer which you know nothing about it.

How you refute something which you actually have no knowledge on it,if you have even a litlle knowledge then i can help you to understand,but you have nill.

How can you discuss something in english if i don't know one english word.

that complexity of language in the quran had challenged the experts in the Arabic language at that era and then you are saying musioon .

Ok, so according to you, I am a dishonest hypocrite. I have no idea what "even not smart on it" means. It seems that you are not aware that "eluding" actually means "escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill". You don't sound as though you are intentionally paying me a compliment.

Maybe your ancient Arabic is better than you English.

Languages are made by humans. And because there are so many, we humans have invented something called translations. People who are better in one language and learn another, help create translations from one language into another. That is why I can talk about a word used in a language I don't speak myself.

But, you see, because I get this weak and futile argument a lot, I included the position of a native Arab speaker, who does not agree with you but agrees with me.

Now what?
Now I have one native Arabic speaker who tells me he studied ancient or classic Arabic and I have you, admitting you don't really know the language.

Are you saying that the word musioon in 5147 "Waalssamaa banaynaha biaydin wainna lamoosiAAoona" is really not an adjective, but a verb?

So I suggest that instead of calling me names using words you obviously don't understand, why don't you prove something, using, you know, facts and real arguments the way adults do?

FearGod

It would be so easy if you would first check and then make accusations! I hate all this "I said" "you said" nonsense, but if you insist....

The topic of this thread is "Is Quran Really Compatible with Science????"
In reply #2 I pointed out that "Earth is a sphere and rotates around the sun" was known long before Islam started, if we can agree that it started in the 7th century CE.

Yes i agree that you mentioned that the earth was known to be a sphere and rotate around the sun since the era of ancient egypt and greece

You say I have changed "your" subject. Based on what?

Based on your discussion about the sphere earth and its rotation around the sun

In my reply I show how pseudo-science is introduced and how this was done.

In reply #14 you first ask me why "the bible" doesn't mention this and accuse me of lying about the translation of a sentence.

Yes that was my point since you claimed that the earth was known to be a sphere and rotates around the sun then why it wasn't mentioned in the bible since the bible had mentioned the creation of day and night,sun..etc

But instead of replying my question you had moved to the expanding universe .

In reply #16 I give you the reasons why I think the Bibles did not mention this and demonstrate that your translation of 5147 can be just as wrong/off/misunderstood as the one I have taken from reputable translators.

You have to rely on yourself to find the truth and not what you called the reputable translators but the problem you don't know anything about arabic language and one example is your funny statement garden musioon

In the same reply I also showed you why I believe the claim in the example I provided was indeed dishonest, misleading and wrong. I also demonstrated that the Jewish Bible uses the same idea.

informations in the bible have been corrupted

So, pray tell, how exactly am I changing what topic from what to what?

You didn't reply my question why the bible mentioned creation of day , night and the sun while not mentioning the sphere earth that rotates around the sun since it was known during ancient egyptians as you and some others claimed.

Ok, so according to you, I am a dishonest hypocrite. I have no idea what "even not smart on it" means. It seems that you are not aware that "eluding" actually means "escape from, as by daring, cleverness, or skill". You don't sound as though you are intentionally paying me a compliment.

Maybe your ancient Arabic is better than you English.

Yes of course,for that reason i said to you it is useless trying to explain it to you while you know nothing about the arabic language and you have noticed that i said something in english which was wrong such as "even not smart on it" and "eluding".

You don't have your thoughts but only just copy and paste what other had said and i think that is the big problem

Languages are made by humans. And because there are so many, we humans have invented something called translations. People who are better in one language and learn another, help create translations from one language into another. That is why I can talk about a word used in a language I don't speak myself.

Arabic language isn't as easy as english,try to translate the word

http//www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Y2Or0LlO6g

But, you see, because I get this weak and futile argument a lot, I included the position of a native Arab speaker, who does not agree with you but agrees with me.

if he agrees with you that doesn't mean that both of you are right.

Now what?
Now I have one native Arabic speaker who tells me he studied ancient or classic Arabic and I have you, admitting you don't really know the language.

Thats why i said its hard to explain it to you because you rely on the others and not yourself

Are you saying that the word musioon in 5147 "Waalssamaa banaynaha biaydin wainna lamoosiAAoona" is really not an adjective, but a verb?

AND IT IS We who have built the universe with power; and, verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it. (5147)

You can notice first how long is the english sentence to explain the short arabic verse, 5 arabic words explained by around 20 english words.

i can't explain it to you whiloe you don't know arabic but i'll try my best to show you something which is easy for you to realize.

What word do you think can be after it

it is we who are expand
it is we who are expanding it
it is we who are expanders

There is an action after "it is we who are",hope you can understand it even still in arabic much easier for you to understand

it is we who are do
it is we who are doing it
it is we who are doers

So I suggest that instead of calling me names using words you obviously don't understand, why don't you prove something, using, you know, facts and real arguments the way adults do?

Stubborn and ardent clinging to one's opinion is the best proof of stupidity.

StopS

Yes i agree that you mentioned that the earth was known to be a sphere and rotate around the sun since the era of ancient egypt and greece

So how is talking about a spherical Earth and the orbits in our solar system a change of topic, when that is what I mentioned right at the start?

Yes that was my point since you claimed that the earth was known to be a sphere and rotates around the sun then why it wasn't mentioned in the bible since the bible had mentioned the creation of day and night,sun..etc
But instead of replying my question you had moved to the expanding universe .

I replied and because I try and show why I think this is true I usually provide an example or the sources. Here I gave an example.

You have to rely on yourself to find the truth and not what you called the reputable translators but the problem you don't know anything about arabic language and one example is your funny statement garden musioon

ok

informations in the bible have been corrupted

And so what?

You didn't reply my question why the bible mentioned creation of day , night and the sun while not mentioning the sphere earth that rotates around the sun since it was known during ancient egyptians as you and some others claimed.

What does the Bible have to do with the contents of the Koran? Do I need to quote ALL creation myths around since Gilgamesh?

Yes of course,for that reason i said to you it is useless trying to explain it to you while you know nothing about the arabic language and you have noticed that i said something in english which was wrong such as "even not smart on it" and "eluding".

So then what are we doing here on an English speaking forum speaking English?

You don't have your thoughts but only just copy and paste what other had said and i think that is the big problem

Again jumping to conclusions. If you would have asked I would have explained that I copied this from my book I wrote after researching this myself.
You however, have nothing based on your own thoughts and research as you repeat only the Koran.

Arabic language isn't as easy as english,try to translate the word

if he agrees with you that doesn't mean that both of you are right.

Thats why i said its hard to explain it to you because you rely on the others and not yourself

AND IT IS We who have built the universe with power; and, verily, it is We who are steadily expanding it. (5147)

You can notice first how long is the english sentence to explain the short arabic verse, 5 arabic words explained by around 20 english words.

i can't explain it to you whiloe you don't know arabic but i'll try my best to show you something which is easy for you to realize.

What word do you think can be after it

it is we who are expand
it is we who are expanding it
it is we who are expanders

There is an action after "it is we who are",hope you can understand it even still in arabic much easier for you to understand

it is we who are do
it is we who are doing it
it is we who are doers

Stubborn and ardent clinging to one's opinion is the best proof of stupidity.

Ok, then I am stupid and you are not. This action called eisegesis is futile and dishonest. But if that's what you need in your life, thanks for letting me know.

FearGod

So how is talking about a spherical Earth and the orbits in our solar system a change of topic, when that is what I mentioned right at the start?

i said since the earth was known to be a sphere and rotates around the sun then why not mentioned in older books and even if it
was mentioned in older books then their view was a speculation and philosophical one with no tangible evidence so to claim that the prophet used the philosophical views in the quran is a silly one.

I replied and because I try and show why I think this is true I usually provide an example or the sources. Here I gave an example.

you didn't about heliocentric but you moved to the expanding universe

And so what?

The bible is also a holy book and the information in Isaiah 425 "Thus says God, the Lord, who created the heavens and stretched them out" was corrupted or mistranslated.

What does the Bible have to do with the contents of the Koran? Do I need to quote ALL creation myths around since Gilgamesh?

Did you see,you have called them myths.
so how you claim that the quran got those scientific informations from those myths since Gigamesh and upward.

So then what are we doing here on an English speaking forum speaking English?

i meant to say i don't know english language as much as you know and conversely i know arabic language much than you know.

Again jumping to conclusions. If you would have asked I would have explained that I copied this from my book I wrote after researching this myself.
You however, have nothing based on your own thoughts and research as you repeat only the Koran.

Research what and you don't know anything about the arabic language.

Ok, then I am stupid and you are not. This action called eisegesis is futile and dishonest. But if that's what you need in your life, thanks for letting me know.

i didn't mean to insult and accept my apology if it is understood to be so.

That was a quote by Michel De Montagaine which can apply on me and you and any one in our world,
search and understand well than just to be programmed to refuse anything which is religious.

StopS

i said since the earth was known to be a sphere and rotates around the sun then why not mentioned in older books and even if it was mentioned in older books then their view was a speculation and philosophical one with no tangible evidence so to claim that the prophet used the philosophical views in the quran is a silly one.

What brings you to believe I can answer a question regarding what people were thinking 2000 years ago? I told you it was NOT commonly known and you turn my words around as "it was known". What tangible evidence for what? "the prophet" being which prophet? What view is a "philosophical views in the quran" and what would make it silly.

Why don't make a bit more sense by explaining what you are talking about? Putting riddles here does not help anyone. Thanks.

you didn't about heliocentric but you moved to the expanding universe

Correct. I am not in the habit of explaining the problem with the problem itself. That wouldn't make sense, would it?

The bible is also a holy book and the information in Isaiah 425 "Thus says God, the Lord, who created the heavens and stretched them out" was corrupted or mistranslated.

And the tangible evidence for this claim is ......

Look, repeating something is not an explanation or evidence. It does not matter how many times you repeat it.

Did you see,you have called them myths. so how you claim that the quran got those scientific informations from those myths since Gigamesh and upward.

Yes, I called them myths. That's what you call something which is repeated often, but is the product of emotion and imagination.
I did not claim anything about how something originated in the Koran. I don't know.

i meant to say i don't know english language as much as you know and conversely i know arabic language much than you know.

Research what and you don't know anything about the arabic language.

i didn't mean to insult and accept my apology if it is understood to be so.

That was a quote by Michel De Montagaine which can apply on me and you and any one in our world,
search and understand well than just to be programmed to refuse anything which is religious.

Tell me something does it really make much sense to ask me to translate something from Arabic to English when you know I don't speak Arabic?

You say you know Arabic but not whether you speak MSA or classic Arabic, whether you are a native speaker or whether you know just a few words. But regardless, it does not allow you to jump to conclusions when I write something.

How was I to know this was a quote from someone else? Anyway, I find it condescending, judgemental and wrong.

If you have any tangible evidence for anything of scientific interest in the Koran, which I consider to contain signs and not science, then please bring it up see if you can change my opinion.