Why abandon rituals?
-
The answer is pretty simple. 4102 destroys the argument that Salat is not a ritual prayer. As some poster said before, it is subjective. I suspect those who deny ritual aspect of Salat harbour preconceived notions and twist quranic arabic to suit their preconception.
detruction not confirmed.
I don't see there any instruction regarding showing Butt to God while prosternating towards the cubic stone.Peace
-
The answer is pretty simple. 4102 destroys the argument that Salat is not a ritual prayer. As some poster said before, it is subjective. I suspect those who deny ritual aspect of Salat harbour preconceived notions and twist quranic arabic to suit their preconception.
Solomon, sadly, it's language like this which prevents meaningful diaologue. I reject the interpretation that 4/101-103 refer to a ritual prayer but I have done my best to understand it according to context. I could easily say the same about you, that your harbour prconcieved notions but I prefer to say , if that's how you see it, practice it and may Allah reward you.
Reject these pretensions of authority. These come from EGO, nothing more. Be brave enough to say 'this is my best understanding, I respect your right to disagree' and leave it at that.
-
Bigmo, I can see you're a very respectful and tolerant guy even though you've sometimes not been treated in way in return. So I hope I won't offend you with my following comment
Language is not like mathematics. Mathematics functions in a created system of axioms in which people agree to when they participate. It is therefore systemically objective. Language isn't like that. It bends and shapes according to USAGE. This is an observable phenomenon today. Why should classical Arabic be any different?
The Quran does not have the categories of literal (haqiqi) or metaphorical (majazi). I think its because the term 'ayat' (signs) fits on both a physical/phenomenological level (fil ufq - 41/53) and psychological (fin nafs - also 41/53). So words must have the respective effect for you on those levels.
So for you, the ritual prayer works on those levels. That's brilliant. Don't let anyone tell you it's invalid or try to coerce you into proving it. Your experience IS proof. However, to say those who disagree 'change' the meanings of words is unwise and biased. For them, those words may have the same effect as for you. Words are sounds, what you attach TO those sounds is subjective and can only affect people subjectively. No one really speaks the same language when you think about it
TIMTINS handshake
What i noticed about those who have the linguism way of interpretating verses is that they all reject the previous scriptures and never look into it for any elaboration on the topics they pursue. They simply distance themselves from any Abrahamic traditions. Mostly they distance themselves from the previous scriptures.
I see it as a handicap where a person is trying his best but has a handicap where he can only go so far.
Too much time has been spent going in circles about what salat means and what zakat means and what qibla is and what haJ means and what saum means and mulk al yameen means and what sujood means and what zikr means and what etc etc. There is a growing awareness that this methodology is a dead end. This methadology may serve individuals but the movement as a whole will have to move on. Many times those who choose to follow this methodology see their arguments as convincing however that conviction is not shared by anyone but themselves. Another person uses that same methodology and reaches a different conclusion. It then goes in circles.
-
Very well put. The only problem is when ppl think they have objective knowledge and impose it on others. Subjectivity is part of the human condition.
Thank you for your words
-
Salaam Scribbler,
This doesn't sound like a statement a quranist would make, if you'll pardon me for saying so. The idea is to find the truth for yourself, not care who says what about which.If you're satisfied with your interpretation WHO CARES what other people think? You could be the only one in the world who thinks like you do if you feel the connection with Allah with your practice, no one can take that away from you.
As for other 'scholars', I think you're being quite generous with the term. In the majority of translations, we have Sunni scholars interpreting verses to suit the norms already present in hadith. And we do not escape the influence of hadith by simply dropping hadith. Remember, the lexicons you read today came AFTER the orthodoxification of Sunnism (500 YEARS after hijrah). So why on earth reject hadith if you accept meanings by those who believe in them?
Cut and paste readings of dictionaries don't make scholarship, bro. Quranists are in actually in a worse position than Sunnis. Most of us don't even READ Arabic and have to rely on people who TRANSLATE for us. We don't even know the historicity and historiography of Arabic which is very rich in detail. When we read our English dictionaries, how do we know they're not censored?
I've seen deliberate censorship of meanings dozens of times now.Can you imagine the layers of subjectivity which buffer us from the real meanings. Lets not act as if it's all so cut and dried. It's really not as simple as cutting and pasting meanings or reading translations which is essentially the same thing. Simplicity is usually a clever move to pass off some biased conclusion so lets not do that.
I hear what you're saying about asking for details though and I agree with you. I would ask those who metaphorise 5/6 what aspects of the self need cleaning or how do we establish the system since they also ask you for details. I think reason should answer that as you do.
I prefer to ask something else though, why is 5/6 where it is? I don't like to ignore context because to me, that's the ONLY objective proof we have. While dictionaries and grammar books are written by people and are never consistent , the Quran is objectively there. Why would God talk about washing JUST there. Why right after deen al-kameel and the yawms (5/3 and 5/4-5)? When you read these in context, you will find that your mind is already loaded with ideas. As such, I find it impossible to read it literally.
I wouldn't worry about these dead linguistic sources, they are at best only attempts at semanticisation. I would read in context and ask, what is the purpose of the Quran? Does a ritual washing fit in there? To me, it doesn't. If it does to you, np. WATDIP handshake
Peace be with you.
Red Yes, I agree with you. I shouldn't have said that. It happened cause of my hastiness, so I apologize. And I do believe that scholars are just simply human beings, and it is totally possible that scholars can interpret things wrongly as there exists many verses for examples.
Now brother, I understand where you're coming from, but my thinking is a little bit different. You believe in the Quran, which is the exact word of God, and I also believe the same thing. But when it comes to interpretations, what I can understand from you is that, you believe that of course God has protected His revelations (Quran in Arabic) from altering like the previous scriptures, cause God simply said in the Quran that he will protect it. I also believe in all these, but my difference in belief from you arises when I think that God has not only protected the Arabic revelations, but has also protected it's MEANINGS and He won't just let all the meanings of certain terms WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL FOR OUR SALVATION AND FOR ACHIEVING PARADISE to simply disappear from the face of this earth, cause then I think that it will be really unfair and unjust. And God CANNOT be unfair or unjust, not even in the least degree which amounts to a speck of dust.
I don't know why some Quranists find it really difficult to accept rituals, for e.g. salat as prayer, cause for me, just as everyone needs water to live and to quench their thirst, I need to have prayer to find peace in my heart and life. And I believe that Quran is the confirmation of previous scriptures cause my interpretation of the Quran says so. I don't know what your interpretation says.
And if I am to agree with you, then I can see that only ONE out of a MILLION Muslims in the world is guided by God, cause only one out of a million Muslims would believe that disregarding ablution before prayer is the right way, or disregarding the prayer entirely is the right way, or that God doesn't want us to pray. Can only one out of a million of all the Muslims be guided in God's path? Really? So little people are guided? Well, I'm sorry, cause I find it terribly hard to believe.
But I totally respect your opinions which you've shared, so no hard feelings handshake And may Allah guide us to His straight path (if we are not on it yet).
peace
-
That's fair enough, Scribbler. To me, this is all a theoretical discuss anyway. It's up to us to practice what we know! I wish you all the best in your path handshake
-
Did God say that YOU will decide if you are on a journey (as an example) to skip salat?
In verse 4101-104, did God leave it to the individual believer to decide for himself/herself to skip salat if on a journey and then to ask for forgiveness later?
God said in verse 56, when you qumtum for the salat and if you are on a journey and can't find water to do tayammum. God did not say it is up to the individual to decide if s/he wants to skip it.
God said to Muhammed in verse 4101-104 when he travels and fears the unbelievers to SHORTEN the salat but not to skip it. Even in conditions where there was not security, God did not say to skip salat. He said to shorten it.
God did not say in verse 2237-238 to skip salat when you are in fear.
God did not say you can skip the salat and later on ask for forgiveness.
Scribbler Can you back up what your saying with evidence from the Koran?
Peace be with you.
Your arguments are flawed at the best.
God also didn't say that if during the time of your salat, if your father gets a heart attack, then you should take him to the hospital right at that moment. So does this mean you won't take him to the hospital even if you have to miss your salat?
Or
During the time of your salat, if you break your finger in half by an accident, just because God didn't say anything, will you not run to the hospital right away to fix it to stop the pain, or will you wait to finish your salat?
Or
God also didn't specifically say that you can't throw trash in the middle of the streets, but you can still do that out of your will, right?
Or
God also didn't specifically say that you can use the computer, but you can still avoid using it, right?
I don't understand why you don't get this simple thing. Depending on situations, YOU can do whatever YOU want to do. Not everything has to be written in the Quran.
-
Thank you @Scribbler for your excellent post.
What I learn from it, is a reminder that there is no universal religious "truth" or practice, since everything is quite subjective (as it should be) between "me" and God , and each and everyone of us should learn directly from the Qur'an, letting Allah alone teach us everything.
You are very much correct in your example about establishing what does it mean to be ill for oneself. I liked very much that illustration of yours and I agree.
Much of the confusions come from the conflict between man-made opinions and pristine message of the Qur'an.
One should progress slowly and gradually in knowledge, according to God's Will.
Thank you again.Praise be to God.
No problem, bro.
peace
-
peace Scribbler,
Bear in mind for some of the things you mentioned it is only a very small minority who actually believe those things, and further, very few, if any, comprehensive studies have been published by those advocating certain views.
Quran talks a lot about being wary of following whims/desires, well one way to minimise this pitfall is to go with the evidence. Evidence needs to be made public however, in order to weigh and consider it. See 3918.
Peace be unto you.
Red Yes, brother. I'm aware of this fact. And those who got brainwashed by people like Aidid Safar (no offense intended), I hope they stumble into this thread and think of the questions which I've asked. I mean, at least it may give them a chance to think more before accepting anything.
-
Wow...BRAINWASHED. At least you put the 'no offense'. You couldn't say 'keen on Aidid's ideas' but rather you had to say 'brainwashed'. Put the handshake smiley too to make it extra palatable
-
Wow...BRAINWASHED. At least you put the 'no offense'. You couldn't say 'keen on Aidid's ideas' but rather you had to say 'brainwashed'. Put the handshake smiley too to make it extra palatable P
Peace.
Well, they seemed pretty brainwashed to me cause I've seen their arguments. Despite the clear proofs, they were hard-headed and were blind to it. And no, they are not just "keen", but greatly influenced of such beliefs. I don't know what others think of Mr. Aidid, but i'm particularly addressing some users I've seen in the very old topics.
-
and of course you must be 100% correct, right?
I really love how you say 'clear proofs'. You made a BIG ASSUMPTION above about how certain things are protected besides the Quran
I also believe in all these, but my difference in belief from you arises when I think that God has not only protected the Arabic revelations, but has also protected it's MEANINGS and He won't just let all the meanings of certain terms WHICH ARE ESSENTIAL FOR OUR SALVATION AND FOR ACHIEVING PARADISE to simply disappear from the face of this earth, cause then I think that it will be really unfair and unjust. And God CANNOT be unfair or unjust, not even in the least degree which amounts to a speck of dust.
There is zero evidence for this )
-
Peace!
It is an interesting thred indeed. I've read Safar's book and it makes sense to me in many aspects. As many other brothers and sisters who don't know any arabic, I'm one of those who relies on translations and older Quranists' opinions and perspectives. Far from being "brainwashed", I necessarily need to pay attention, do I? Are we talking about DIY or a spiritual journey which strongly affects our lives (Here and There)
Well, what I understand (or misunderstand, depending on your politics) is
1)some people say arabic is not needed to understand the Quran but still bring forward quotes in arabic and when they try to translate there are different opinions anyway;
2)Some say that we don't need anybody else to understand the Quran but ourselves, other say you need to talk and share your point of view...Is it about to "join a club" (hey, I believe salat is ritual prayer! All right come with us then! Oh! wait a minute... do you guys also believe in hajj as pilgrimage? because I have doubts on that...) or what? Almost in every thred there are 3-4 ways of seeing things... let me tell you is a bit confusing.
-
I personally find Aidid's conclusions unacceptable but the people I've met who read him are usually highly thoughtful individuals who ask some incisive question. To call them 'brainwashed' is simply false and used to create a particular reaction. It's a crying shame people can't be more discerning. Usually it's the people who demand evidence who are devoid of evidence themselves yet see their circular logic as 'evidence'. It's pathetic.
1)some people say arabic is not needed to understand the Quran but still bring forward quotes in arabic and when they try to translate there are different opinions anyway;
2)Some say that we don't need anybody else to understand the Quran but ourselves, other say you need to talk and share your point of view...A book in any language requires us to know the language to understand it. However, does it mean those who purport to use dictionaries and grammar books have the meaning? I highly doubt it. GREAT CENSORSHIP goes on in dictionary production.
I was just checking the word for 'half' (niSf) and it turns out there are MANY OTHER meanings. Yet in commonly used resources, only 'half' is mentioned. This is a deliberate attempt to control meanings. Just because some folks can't see other possibilities of meanings, they are left out of the entry. So no, I don't believe we should accept AUTHORITY of Arabic from those who claim it but still, knowing Arabic is a good thing. Just retain your right to interpret. Never swallow what is said just on basis of so-called 'evidence'.
Having said that, people who read even Saudi translations can see the truth of the Quran. So it's not just language but internal resonance.
-
and of course you must be 100% correct, right?
I really love how you say 'clear proofs'. You made a BIG ASSUMPTION above about how certain things are protected besides the Quran
There is zero evidence for this )
Agreed. I can't bring any evidence for what I said. But like I said before, I trust in God that He didn't just let all the meanings disappear from this earth which are essential for us to know. I trust in God that He didn't keep secret all those meanings from everyone except for a few people in this whole entire world.
And look at free-minds, I actually agreed when you said that Quranists are in a worse position than the Sunnis. Let's face it. You have proofs, and I have proofs. But which is the correct proof? We are so terribly varried from each other, that the person with the wrong proofs can end up in hell cause of his deeds? Do you believe this?
Honestly bro, instead of arguing, I think that Quraints should minimize their variances and come more in common terms with each other. Sadly, this isn't the case here.
Peace.
-
Scribbler, I appreciate your honesty, really I do. I just ask you to please use nicer language. Even if you do believe his followers are brainwashed, would it do much good to say it to their face? Isn't it better to pose the question 'are you sure you have been critical of his views'. At the very least, the guy may listen to you )
-
Salaam
Honestly bro, instead of arguing, I think that Quraints should minimize their variances and come more in common terms with each other.
Why ?
Are you asking for a kind of clergy at free-minds.org.
How can we understand what our teacher said if we don't discuss and argue freely about it ?
Here, violence is only intellectual.Peace
-
I sincerely apologize to everyone on this forum and to all the people who believe in Aidid Safar's work. I take my words back, cause they are NOT brainwashed, but simply seekers of the truth. And speaking of "brainwashed", I myself can be brainwashed and may not realize it.
In the end, judgement is with God, so I leave it to God to decide everything for us.
Peace.
-
Salaam everyone,
I clearly see the world needs another definite messenger. One to clarify the misconceptions and further purify the religion.
Anyway, until then, follow these basic principles first of all
Believe in God alone
Believe in the Hereafter
And be righteous, you know what it is, the Quran explains it perfectly.
May God bless us all
-
Salaam everyone,
I clearly see the world needs another definite messenger. One to clarify the misconceptions and further purify the religion.
Anyway, until then, follow these basic principles first of all
Believe in God alone
Believe in the Hereafter
And be righteous, you know what it is, the Quran explains it perfectly.
May God bless us all
They create problems for themselves. How can u say we need another messenger when there are all these scriptures in front of us. What you are searching is not there.