Evolution for beginners
-
Hi!
I want to recommend this interesting article about the theory of evolution to those who support this theory and want to know more about it.
http//www.abengnews.com/2010/01/07/evolution-for-beginners/
-
Peace, Mario.
That's a very good link. Thanks for posting it up. Michael Shermer's book, "Why Darwin Matters", is a great research book on this subject, and anyone who's curious about evolution (via natural selection) should check it out.
Peace,
Ahmad
-
Shalom Aleikhem,
I know a better site which shows the serious shortcomings and limits of the theory;
http//www.evolutionnews.org/
Awesome, why don't you gather all those critical information from that site and publish your paper on the refutation on evolution in a peer reviewed scientific journal and win a Nobel prize. ) I envy you, you're so lucky. I always wanted to win a Nobel prize
Peace
------------- Student of Allah -
Shalom Aleikhem,
Awesome, why don't you gather all those critical information from that site and publish your paper on the refutation on evolution in a peer reviewed scientific journal and win a Nobel prize. I envy you, you're so lucky. I always wanted to win a Nobel prize (
Peace
------------- Student of AllahBecause unlike me, the owner of that site is a scientist
Science is overrated by the way, science is partly philosophy, speculation and guess work. "Scientists" are simple human beings like you and me who have their own ideologies, belief systems and bias which heavily influence their opinions. They often make tall claims that have little to do with science.
Peace
-
Shalom Aleikhem,
Because unlike me, the owner of that site is a scientist )
Doesn't matter. As long as you have the material that refutes the current scientific knowledge that we have. You can try and get them published. And then, just like Albert Einstein the clerk, you will become one of the greatest scientist ever. It is about evidence to back your claim, not opinions.
Science is overrated by the way, science is partly philosophy, speculation and guess work. "Scientists" are simple human beings like you and me who have their own ideologies, belief systems and bias which heavily influence their opinions. They often make tall claims that have little to do with science.
Of course they may or may not have their own ideologies. This is why I focus on claims that are backed by evidence instead of opinions. A scientist may make any claim that he/she likes, I don't care. The mere fact that a scientist made a claim does not make the claim itself true/false. It all boils down to evidence. Without evidence supporting your conclusions, you are only guessing. This is why the minimum requirement is to get published in a peer reviewed scientific journal. And I don't know if science is overrated. If you ask me, there is no other alternative that has ever been able to accomplish and be this consistent in producing results throughout history of mankind. And in short, if it wasn't for science, we would have been just another species living in caves or somewhere like that. But I guess you know all that already, so I should stop with my ranting .
Peace
----------------------- Student of Allah -
Shalom Aleikhem,
This is why the minimum requirement is to get published in a peer reviewed scientific journal.
Peace
----------------------- Student of AllahAs-salamu alaykum )
The proponents of Intelligent Design do have their works published in peer reviewed scientific journals.
Please have a look at this, really interesting information;
http//www.discovery.org/a/2640
http//www.evolutionnews.org/2012/02/intelligent_des056221.html
Peace )