Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Zina is zina only if done in open

Zina is zina only if done in open

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
23 Posts 7 Posters 486 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Man_of_Faith
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Peace,

    I still think it would be hard to judge in a case of adultery. But I am not more knowing now and I will research on this topic when I have a time to study the Arabic myself.

    God bless you

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      marifhaq
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      Dear all,
      Quran mentions many old stories,history etc.and then tells us that what is right and what is evil.But Quran does not tell us all the stories and history,most of these stories were well known at the time of Great Revelations,so if you study Arab history of JAHILYA period and history of middle east , where most Prophets were posted,you will find, that when a man finds a woman,usually his wife or dependent,guilty of some serious crime,he will drag her to an open place,and do the zina in open ,telling bystanders,that she did such and such violations,so she is now being punished by me.

      Allah in quran wanted to stop this henious crime,that is why He came up with 4 witnesses,to stop it.Doing zina this way was not a common practice,but was done only by influentials.One of the Prophets wives,Ayesha,was blamed by some notorious people,of having received this punishment,Quran mentions 17 ayays about this incident and said,if so then why dont you bring around 4 witnesses,if you are correct?
      This is all about to stop the ignorant periods practices,which are against Islamic ethics.May Allah help us all to increase our knowledge,try do it now.As said in 37 Raskhoon fil elm,get firm knowledge of all things.thanks.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Offline
        N Offline
        noshirk
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        Salam bro

        My qualified guess without having come to the verses in question is that they talk about treason.

        zina, for me is defaming someone. Making false accusations. i wrote all what i have to say in this thread
        http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9605270.0

        And I would like a copy of your translation of the "ants" of Solomon because I deem yours to be how it is supposed to be understood by the Author.

        confused I didn't understand what you want. I haven't a copy. I wrote only this http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604930.msg319427

        in arabic, ant is naml and there is a meaning in dictionnaries also of lies and bad hearsays (namima).

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          huruf
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          Salam bro

          zina, for me is defaming someone. Making false accusations. i wrote all what i have to say in this thread
          http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9605270.0
          confused I didn't understand what you want. I haven't a copy. I wrote only this http//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9604930.msg319427

          in arabic, ant is naml and there is a meaning in dictionnaries also of lies and bad hearsays (namima).

          Peace

          I will read the ayas to see how zina = slander fits. At face value does not seem to me unconceivable, because if one thing is clear it is that the rage in that first part if sura nur is clearly directed to the slanderers, particularly the slanderers of women. I intend to look into it for sure. As I said, even with zina=adultery, it clear that the Qur'an is not after adulterers but after slanderers.

          Salaam

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            huruf
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            I also can imagine from where that zina might have become adultery if it wasn't with the zealots craving for stoning, this flogging might have offered a way out upheld by nothing less than the Qur'an, it might have been at a time a lesser evil.

            Salaam

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              Man_of_Faith
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Peace,

              No worries, noshirk. I just thought if you had recorded your works in pdf or word file. It's okay. I will take a look in that thread. I find that you have the best translation available of what I have seen.

              God bless you

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Offline
                D Offline
                diamantinehoneybunch
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                I understand why when husband/wife has intimacy with other person who is not his/her spouse, that act should be condemned severely.

                But what about unmarried love couples doing it? To those who hold the view that Qur'an commands to flog people who have sex outside of marriage even if the people are just unmarried love couples 100 times, can you answer this?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • H Offline
                  H Offline
                  hawk99
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  Peace,

                  The context is about (1) illicit sex (unacceptable by prevailing social standards considered wrong or unacceptable
                  by prevailing social customs or religious standards) and (2) a burden of proof that requires four "trustworthy" witnesses
                  which makes the illicit behavior so obvious that "everyone" knows and if not obvious, there is to be the avoidance
                  of suspicious (3) , slander.

                  But what about unmarried love couples doing it? To those who hold the view that Qur'an commands to flog people who have sex outside of marriage even if the people are just unmarried love couples 100 times, can you answer this?

                  This depends on the parameters of accepted behavior by any given society be it religious or non religious.
                  For instance, in many non religious or social environments, sex between friends is acceptable. In a Southern Baptist
                  environment it is not.

                  God bless

                  peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S Offline
                    S Offline
                    Sonny
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    But what about unmarried love couples doing it?

                    Whats difference is between married people who commit adultery and unmarried ones? -Same s***. According to your question, adultery is only when married people have sexual intercourse. Do you wanna say that unmarried people can have sex with hundreds of people but when they got married its suddenly forbidden? I dont think so.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Offline
                      D Offline
                      diamantinehoneybunch
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      Whats difference is between married people who commit adultery and unmarried ones? -Same s***. According to your question, adultery is only when married people have sexual intercourse. Do you wanna say that unmarried people can have sex with hundreds of people but when they got married its suddenly forbidden? I dont think so.

                      I did not say having sex with hundreds of people. I said LOVE COUPLES, not one-night stands. Love couples mean partners who have committed relationship to each other, the difference is they are just not paperly married.
                      I am not saying I support it. But even these people must be flogged too?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sonny
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        I did not say having sex with hundreds of people. I said LOVE COUPLES, not one-night stands. Love couples mean partners who have committed relationship to each other, the difference is they are just not paperly married.
                        I am not saying I support it. But even these people must be flogged too?

                        If two people truly like each other and planing to be together until death seperates them than I have nothing against it, but this is only my opinion and does not mean it is written in the Quran. I also think that you should define "LOVE COUPLES"? -Which type of love you think of and how do you define love? -Love is a word that can have many meanings, love because of money, power, physical attraction or these things combined.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Users