Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Is Jerusalem the Qibla?

Is Jerusalem the Qibla?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
267 Posts 33 Posters 24.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • WakasW Online
    WakasW Online
    Wakas
    wrote on last edited by
    #255

    peace hicham9,

    If you did not read it, then there is no need for me to convince you.

    peace almarh0m,

    I considered such a view but it has several issues that just dont fit. For example, in order for this view to work I assume you consider 2142-150 to NOT refer to a change in qiblah?

    All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Offline
      H Offline
      hicham9
      wrote on last edited by
      #256

      peace hicham9,

      Have you read the analysis of qiblah on the link given in my post?

      Truth be told, I didn't assess your analysis/understanding of qblh ... but, I did take a brief look at this write-up (yesterday)!

      The Quranic evidence points to qiblah meaning focal-point - focus of interest/attention or activity, i.e. something that receives one's attention/focus

      You know I agree with you on several (qurnic) denotations, but qblh primarily denoting a "focal-point" just doesn't sink in for me!
      ~ You'll have to convince me with reason and linguistics.

      If you did not read it, then there is no need for me to convince you.

      Ok, Wakas!

      I respect your opinion/view,
      even though I retain the right to disagree with it.

      ~ Be sound (-_-)

      Based on the above, usage of the root QBL in AQ, CAD meanings, and the only other occurrence of "qiblah" in 1087, in terms of likelihood for the meaning of "qiblah", in my view, are

      1. focal-point - focus of interest/attention or activity
      2. direction - general aim or purpose; a general way in which someone/something is developing
      3. point-of-approach - a way in which to approaching something
      4. counteraction - to oppose and mitigate the effects of by contrary action
        ...
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Offline
        R Offline
        runninglikezebras
        wrote on last edited by
        #257

        Then, good for you!

        To you be your judgment, and to me mine (1096).

        SLM

        Wow.. so now I'm close minded, a sunni and what not?

        I don't know what makes you trigger like that. But to me the FACT there is a qiblah, as can be demonstrated with the orientation of early mosques does NOT imply one has to personify God or worship a place.

        You don't seem to understand this Qiblah is of great symbolic value. All these historical mosques pointing to "the sanctuary" in Jerusalem. The Dome of the Rock being octagonal at the center of all these mosques.

        The "Al-Aqsa" mosque is totally irrelevant when talking about qiblah. When Quran speaks about "al aqsa" it's litterally referring to the most far mosque. It never referred to the al aqsa mosque as it didn't even exist.

        I think you are jumping to conclusions, the existence of a factual qiblah should imply we all need to pray in that direction and worship a geographical place. I know I'm not doing that.

        If there is one virtue to this qiblah today, that you will find hard to deny this qiblah today is exposing the hadith fabricated lies about mecca, al aqsa mosque and many other sectarian interpretations. On top of this, the sectarian reversed interpretation of al aqsa being in jerusalem and l-masjidi l-armi being in mecca is giving the zionist forces in Israel a very strong case to say there is no valid islamic claim to Jerusalem, based on their own failed hadith understanding of Quran. If the sectarian interpretation is right, Islam has no claim whatsoever to Jerusalem.

        The false interpretation of qiblah by the sectarians is so easy to expose, not only by the orientation of the early mosques but also by language. The sectarians claim, jerusalem traiditonally was known as al-aqsa - in the sense of the most far removed sanctuary. Of course this is a blatant lie. When Quran speaks about the battle between muhammads forces and the byzantine forces in palestine it is referred to as the "most nearby place". Even before Islam, jerusalem has always been known as the "sanctuary".

        Peace

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Offline
          H Offline
          hicham9
          wrote on last edited by
          #258

          Wow.. so now I'm close minded, a sunni and what not?

          If you adhere to a (fixed) so-called "prayer direction" then YES,
          I deem you close-minded! ... Happy now?

          ~ G-D is Omnipresent (2115,177).

          I don't know what makes you trigger like that. But to me the FACT there is a qiblah, as can be demonstrated with the orientation of early mosques does NOT imply one has to personify God or worship a place.

          You don't seem to understand this Qiblah is of great symbolic value. All these historical mosques pointing to "the sanctuary" in Jerusalem. The Dome of the Rock being octagonal at the center of all these mosques.

          The "Al-Aqsa" mosque is totally irrelevant when talking about qiblah. When Quran speaks about "al aqsa" it's litterally referring to the most far mosque. It never referred to the al aqsa mosque as it didn't even exist.

          I think you are jumping to conclusions, the existence of a factual qiblah should imply we all need to pray in that direction and worship a geographical place. I know I'm not doing that.

          If there is one virtue to this qiblah today, that you will find hard to deny this qiblah today is exposing the hadith fabricated lies about mecca, al aqsa mosque and many other sectarian interpretations. On top of this, the sectarian reversed interpretation of al aqsa being in jerusalem and l-masjidi l-armi being in mecca is giving the zionist forces in Israel a very strong case to say there is no valid islamic claim to Jerusalem, based on their own failed hadith understanding of Quran. If the sectarian interpretation is right, Islam has no claim whatsoever to Jerusalem.

          Good for you!

          ~ yawn

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Offline
            R Offline
            runninglikezebras
            wrote on last edited by
            #259

            If you adhere to a (fixed) so-called "prayer direction" then YES, I deem you close-minded!

            Happy now?

            ~ G-D is Omnipresent (2115,177)

            Good for you!

            ~ yawn

            I'll disregard the insults and reply regardless.

            ~ G-D is Omnipresent (2115,177) => How is this better illustrated then with a Qiblah that is still visible today? The early mosque in china (east) and the early mosques in the west all have the same qiblah pointing to jerusalem. Symbolizing Gods omnipresence.

            This seems hard for you to understand, but masjids having a qiblah DOES NOT IMPLY it's a mandatory prayer direction.

            ps I understand you have been traumatized by sunni doctrine in the past but I'm nowhere defending sunni doctrine. Find me one sunni cleric that agrees with what I'm saying here. So please keep those projections to yourself. It's unnecessary and a flawed analogy.

            Peace

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • H Offline
              H Offline
              hicham9
              wrote on last edited by
              #260

              Insults!? -\

              As an ex-sunni, I used to adhere to "the prayer direction" myself = I was naive, ... and close-minded.

              ~ Once G-D unseals, ... things change.

              & he who knows/sees is not like he who knows/sees not !

              All praise, thanks and glory be to the one and only Ruler & Owner of us; The Supreme Assigner.

              SLM

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Offline
                R Offline
                runninglikezebras
                wrote on last edited by
                #261

                To summarize my point of view condensed

                • There never was a change in Qibla ordered by God

                • The sectarians reversed the understanding of the places named as masjid in Quran. Reversing it so they could establish a pagan ritual place in mecca.

                • The early mosques all point to jerusalem.

                • The nightly travel of muhammad was one from jerusalem to the most far removed mosque. Not the other way around.

                • The significance of qiblah is of symbolical value valid for places of worship. It is not a rule for your personal salat.

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Offline
                  R Offline
                  runninglikezebras
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #262

                  Insults!? -\

                  As an ex-sunni, I used to adhere to "the prayer direction" myself = I was naive, ... and close-minded.

                  ~ Once G-D unseals, ... things change.

                  All praise, thanks and glory be to the one and only Ruler & Owner of us; The Supreme Assigner.

                  SLM

                  Can't you read? I'm not even disputing it is not a direction for personal prayer it's a direction for the prayer in masjids. Their orientation pointing to jerusalem as is proven by architectural historical evidence.

                  Peace

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H Offline
                    H Offline
                    hicham9
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #263

                    To summarize my point of view condensed

                    • There never was a change in Qibla ordered by God

                    • The sectarians reversed the understanding of the places named as masjid in Quran. Reversing it so they could establish a pagan ritual place in mecca.

                    • The early mosques all point to jerusalem.

                    • The nightly travel of muhammad was one from jerusalem to the most far removed mosque. Not the other way around.

                    • The significance of qiblah is of symbolical value valid for places of worship. It is not a rule for your personal salat.

                    Can't you read? I'm not even disputing it is not a direction for personal prayer it's a direction for the prayer in masjids. Their orientation pointing to jerusalem as is proven by architectural historical evidence.

                    ~ For the 3rd time Good for you!

                    To you be your judgment, and to me mine (1096).

                    SLM

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Offline
                      R Offline
                      runninglikezebras
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #264

                      Let's hear your understanding. How do you explain these early mosques all having a bearing to jerusalem? How do you call this in quranic terms if not qibla?

                      Peace

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • H Offline
                        H Offline
                        hicham9
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #265

                        Temple Mount was probably the first qblh/site of reception.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • R Offline
                          R Offline
                          runninglikezebras
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #266

                          This does not answer my question. How do you explain the historical and architectural evidence these early mosques all have a bearing towards jerusalem?

                          Coincidence?

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • H Offline
                            H Offline
                            hicham9
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #267

                            I shouldn't have answered your question.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Users