The Paris massacre - Silence as always
-
I used the line 'arguably staged' because i have not reached full certainty, i don't want to draw conclusions based on only conspiracy theories, i require witnesses or testimonies to reach full certainty
Of course, and I'm confident once you've looked through all the information at hand you will come to a similar conlcusion. These may help
https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=lLHVQUTrgvM
http//www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167
And finally, for all those 'skeptics' 53 ADMITTED staged terrorist false flag attacks
http//www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/02/x-admitted-false-flag-attacks.html
All the best in your investigation Neptin.
-
True words, i am not in any way downplaying the role of the Islamists in this. Rather, i just believe the root of the attack is not as simple as most people read it.
However if we want to look at root causes, it all goes back to Jewish radicalism aka Zionism.
96% of the world's media is controlled by 6 Zionist companies. All of these wars can be traced back to creating mayhem to keep the Northern European colony in the Middle East in tact.
Israel will fall, it may take 20 years, it may take 50 years, but it will fall. Even the CIA predicts it.
-
"Terrorism hijacked my religion" LMAO!!!!!!!!
Religion hijacks and terrorism are the symptoms of the hijacking.I'd love to know which verse in the Quran GOD orders that woman to wrap a piece of cloth around her head. This cannot be Bukhari and Co's laws, can it? Muslims are having an identity crisis. Their good side tells them that this is wrong but their brainwashed minds keeps them in the herded sheep they're in.
The days of the Bukharian filth known as "Islam" are numbered. They hijacked the Quran, the last revelation. They're cursed.lol, you said what I wanted to say. That pic of woman is the irony.
Hijab hijacked my religion.
More in line
Arrogance and politics hijacked the Muslims forcing them to hijack others to turn them into shia and sunni who then hijacked peace and love followed by the minds of zionists who then hijacked both the sects to hijack the liberty of all humans for the sake of New World Order. -
Religion hijacks and terrorism are the symptoms of the hijacking.I'd love to know which verse in the Quran GOD orders that woman to wrap a piece of cloth around her head. This cannot be Bukhari and Co's laws, can it? Muslims are having an identity crisis. Their good side tells them that this is wrong but their brainwashed minds keeps them in the herded sheep they're in.
I think you're looking for 2431
-
I think you're looking for 2431
No, "draw your khimar over your bosom" is different from "draw your khimar over your head". Khimar is not headcovering, it is a scarf or muffler which may cover the hair or expose the hair depending on the choice of the wearer.
I also don't like when beardos or hijabis are repeatedly chosen as cover person when the media discuss Islam like in the above article but i have to deal with it because these doctrines are too mainstream within Muslim community and any divertion from it may offend the mainstream Muslims who may feel their faith is not adequately represented. The media plays by political correctness.
-
I think you're looking for 2431
WITHOUT mental gymnastics, provide a verse from the Quran where Allah commands women to wrap a cover AROUND their HEADS and NOT show their HAIR.
The Quran is a guide and Allah does not beat around the bush when he commands something. Approaching the Quran with a sectarian mindset is as useless as reading hadith books. -
but i have to deal with it because these doctrines are too mainstream within Muslim community and any divertion from it may offend the mainstream Muslims who may feel their faith is not adequately represented.
The reason why they get offended and upset is because it destroys their false world of monotheism and righteousness. Beards, Middle Eastern clothing, 5 daily rituals, wudhu, kissing a black stone to get sins forgiven in hajj, worship a stone cube, wear burqa and cover their hair gives them the illusion righteousness. It is this illusion of righteousness that keeps them in the herd of sheep they're in.
They'd rather follow Bukhari and Co than what Allah has revealed to them. Deaf, dumb and blind. They have hijacked the Quran.When they are told, "Follow what Allah has revealed herein," they say, "We follow only what we found our parents doing." Even though their parents had no sense,nor were they guided?
"They are like cattle,- nay more misguided for they are heedless."
Muslims are lost. Their false world won't exist forever though. It is pulled down at death and they realise the illusion they were in. At that time, it'll be too late to make a difference. The very Quran they recite at least 5 times a day and have hijacked speaks of them.
In Falsehood will they be Until, when death comes to one of them, he says "O my Lord! send me back (to life),-
(And if you only could see when the criminals shall hang their heads before their Lord (saying) "Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back, that we will do righteous good deeds. Verily, we now believe with certainty.'' (3212), However, they will get no response. Then when they see the Fire and they are held over it and they look at the punishments therein, they will ask even more fervently than before to go back, but they will get no response.
-
lol, you said what I wanted to say. That pic of woman is the irony.
Hijab hijacked my religion.
More in line
Arrogance and politics hijacked the Muslims forcing them to hijack others to turn them into shia and sunni who then hijacked peace and love followed by the minds of zionists who then hijacked both the sects to hijack the liberty of all humans for the sake of New World Order.bravo
-
WITHOUT mental gymnastics, provide a verse from the Quran where Allah commands women to wrap a cover AROUND their HEADS and NOT show their HAIR.
The Quran is a guide and Allah does not beat around the bush when he commands something. Approaching the Quran with a sectarian mindset is as useless as reading hadith books.
I agree with the second sentence. I will not say it is ordered just because I'm not sure of the translation etc. but I never got an answer from the people from this forum and I am honestly asking please let me know what adornment you will show to your father and brother that you cannot show to your neighbour?
-
In fact what that aya tells women is for the benefit of women, not for any other's benefit. And there is a DIFFERENCE between "showing", "exhibiting" and merely wearing. It does not say dress so that such and suchh part are not seen, nothing laike that, it says "do not show" (la yubdina) do not make a show of your atractions, whaever they may be, because it is not said, but the point is that it is not an isntruction as to what you can wear or not but as to HOW you shold behave. That is why later on in the aya exlains saying somethig about striking the legs or certain ways of walking, because it is no t a matter of aparell or clothes but of behaviour. As sustained in other ayas in the Qur'an, clothes are for comfort and good appearance. Not for selling oneself.
It is a fact that women have for a long time been traded and been trading based on their good looks, that was their main venue of attaining to better standing in life. Beauty has been the main asset, at least the recognized main asset up till now to get ahead in life. Obviously that is not the kind of socity that the Qur'an promotes, where women are for show. Please notice that in the aya women are told amongs those in front of whom they should notmake a show of their attractiveness, women who are not of their family or close circle. So it is not a matter of not attracting men, but something else. So it says also cover your breasts, which upto now are also an element of standing for women, if not officially, most certainlly unofficially.
That part of aya 24.31 is there to protect women from falling into the trap of their own physical apearance as a matter of "moral duty" (you must be beautiful or desirable) for them and as an asset of asserting themselves socially.
So look good and in your clothes or apparell yes, show them off, no. If God meant somethign else, as has already been pointed out, He does not strain for words.
Salaam
-
The reason why they get offended and upset is because it destroys their false world of monotheism and righteousness. Beards, Middle Eastern clothing, 5 daily rituals, wudhu, kissing a black stone to get sins forgiven in hajj, worship a stone cube, wear burqa and cover their hair gives them the illusion righteousness. It is this illusion of righteousness that keeps them in the herd of sheep they're in.
They'd rather follow Bukhari and Co than what Allah has revealed to them. Deaf, dumb and blind. They have hijacked the Quran.When they are told, "Follow what Allah has revealed herein," they say, "We follow only what we found our parents doing." Even though their parents had no sense,nor were they guided?
"They are like cattle,- nay more misguided for they are heedless."
Muslims are lost. Their false world won't exist forever though. It is pulled down at death and they realise the illusion they were in. At that time, it'll be too late to make a difference. The very Quran they recite at least 5 times a day and have hijacked speaks of them.
In Falsehood will they be Until, when death comes to one of them, he says "O my Lord! send me back (to life),-
(And if you only could see when the criminals shall hang their heads before their Lord (saying) "Our Lord! We have now seen and heard, so send us back, that we will do righteous good deeds. Verily, we now believe with certainty.'' (3212), However, they will get no response. Then when they see the Fire and they are held over it and they look at the punishments therein, they will ask even more fervently than before to go back, but they will get no response.
What do you have against 5 daily ritual prayers?
-
What do you have against 5 daily ritual prayers?
Provide a verse in the Quran where Allah orders you to perform 5 daily rituals. Remember, Quran is a guide and not a puzzle game and Allah doesn't beat around the bush. Would it really make any sense for Allah to not be explicit in such important matters regarding salat? Would it make sense for Allah to not be clear about Mecca instead of calling it Bakkah? Would it make any sense for Allah not to be clear about and let alone mention the so called stone cube in Mecca? The forgiving black stone that is kissed in hajj for forgiveness? The magical holy zamzam water?
If this stone cube is holy and five daily rituals are to be performed, please provide a verse in the Quran telling you it is. Please provide these verses without performing mental gymnastics.Muslims are cursed. They have placed creation(a stone cube) between them and the Creator during their worship. They mention dead people and greet invisible beings in their worship. You do not need sticks, stones or humans to worship your Creator. You do not need 5 daily pagan rituals to worship your Creator. Allah is closer to you than your jugular vein. Allah is always there for you. Allah is all you need because there is nothing but Allah. Allah is he, whom all knowledge originates from. The Source of Knowledge. It makes no sense for the Creator to require the assistance of his own creation, Bukhari and Co or a stone cube.
-
In fact what that aya tells women is for the benefit of women, not for any other's benefit. And there is a DIFFERENCE between "showing", "exhibiting" and merely wearing. It does not say dress so that such and suchh part are not seen, nothing laike that, it says "do not show" (la yubdina) do not make a show of your atractions, whaever they may be, because it is not said, but the point is that it is not an isntruction as to what you can wear or not but as to HOW you shold behave. That is why later on in the aya exlains saying somethig about striking the legs or certain ways of walking, because it is no t a matter of aparell or clothes but of behaviour. As sustained in other ayas in the Qur'an, clothes are for comfort and good appearance. Not for selling oneself.
It is a fact that women have for a long time been traded and been trading based on their good looks, that was their main venue of attaining to better standing in life. Beauty has been the main asset, at least the recognized main asset up till now to get ahead in life. Obviously that is not the kind of socity that the Qur'an promotes, where women are for show. Please notice that in the aya women are told amongs those in front of whom they should notmake a show of their attractiveness, women who are not of their family or close circle. So it is not a matter of not attracting men, but something else. So it says also cover your breasts, which upto now are also an element of standing for women, if not officially, most certainlly unofficially.
That part of aya 24.31 is there to protect women from falling into the trap of their own physical apearance as a matter of "moral duty" (you must be beautiful or desirable) for them and as an asset of asserting themselves socially.
So look good and in your clothes or apparell yes, show them off, no. If God meant somethign else, as has already been pointed out, He does not strain for words.
Salaam
Thanks for the answer, I will think about it.
Selam. -
Muslims shouldn't be pushed to condemn anything. It is also a disgrace and shame that Muslims tend to condemn terrorist attacks in Europe more than in Iraq and Syria when Iraq and Syria are the number one countries that are being attacked by ISIS terrorists
http//s13.postimg.org/eqj6owijr/12248237_1721046121450040_7360779878370662356_o.jpg
What happened in France is happening everyday in Iraq and Syria.
It becomes clear that many Muslims who condemn the terrorist attack in Europe are not doing this because they sympthatize with the victims but rather because they want to protect their terrible ideologies. Hell even Saudi-Arabia condemned what recently happened in France despite the fact that Saudi-Arabia and ISIS share the same ideology. Now figure out why. Let's not forget the amount of 'Muslims' (even on this forum) who are supporting the same terrorist groups in Syria. They are probaly pretending to 'condemn' what happened in France too. Maajid Nawaz is a great example of a worthless 'Muslim' who pretends to condemn things just to promote his 'moderate Islam'. If you are a Muslim who condemn things for the sake of your ideologies rather than condeming things for the sake of the victims then you are honestly a loser and do not really oppose Islamist groups and in my eyes you are not even a Muslim.
Suicide bombers takes place everyday in Iraq. The Gulf-countries recently waved the French flags but where was the Iraqi flags when +1000 Iraqis (air force cadets and civilians) were massacred by ISIS terrorists in Speicher base (also known as Speicher massacre)? https//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Speicher_massacre The Gulf-countries are doing the same terrorism in Yemen too.
Massgraves were recently found in Iraq containing mostly Yezidi women who were executed by ISIS/Daesh. -
Muslims shouldn't be pushed to condemn anything. It is also a disgrace and shame that Muslims tend to condemn terrorist attacks in Europe more than in Iraq and Syria when Iraq and Syria are the number one countries that are being attacked by ISIS terrorists
Absolutely, Muslims shouldn't be apologetic, they should be more outraged. All this fabricated outrage is a result of mainstream media whipping up hysteria.
You got these idiots in the West and they have nothing to be outraged about.
-
What happened in France was not fake but infact very real and it is time for the European countries to stop their relations with the Gulf countries because the Gulf countries have the same ideology as the terrorists who went on a shooting spree in Paris. However I don't want to talk as If the European countries are somehow unaware, many European countries are very aware of the ideology in Saudi-Arabia and they will still cooperate with the country. Check this video out of David Cameron who can't answer a simple question. He is asked why Britain has relations with Saudi-Arabia that lacks human rights
https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMh7RG6_Tp4
-
What happened in France was not fake but infact very real and it is time for the European countries to stop their relations with the Gulf countries because the Gulf countries have the same ideology as the terrorists who went on a shooting spree in Paris. However I don't want to talk as If the European countries are somehow unaware, many European countries are very aware of the ideology in Saudi-Arabia and they will still cooperate with the country. Check this video out of David Cameron who can't answer a simple question. He is asked why Britain has relations with Saudi-Arabia that lacks human rights
https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMh7RG6_Tp4
Please, refute the claim that what happened in France was fake. What is your idea on the conspiracy theories discussed in the videos above?
-
Well what's the point of faking the recent attack in Paris? ISIS has for long threatned to attack Europe and it has done so several times and will probaly do it in the future too.
The Attackers/Terrorists shouted 'Allahu Akbar' and the brain (who was recently killed during a police raid) behind the France attack was an ISIS supporter
http//www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1903266-brain-of-paris-attacks-confirmed-killed-female-suicide-bomber-was-cousin/
http//europe.newsweek.com/french-pm-announces-brain-paris-attacks-killed-saint-denis-raid-396195?rm=euHere is the recent video posted by RT on one of his cousin blowing herself up (She was Daesh too)
https//twitter.com/RT_com/status/667676673438035968
Good riddance terrorist scumbag.