Existence is necessarily All-existing, Almighty, Alknowing, Infinite and eternal
-
Peace Jafar.
When you say, quote
In this universe anything that is exist can go and eventually go into non existence.. and vice versa.Please give an example.
I thought once something exist ,then either is lost /hidden from us or changed into something else /different if we do not see/feel its existence anymore? This does not mean it went into inexistence?
If something does not exist, how can it change into existence? Logically impossible. Nothing is nothing!
If by some cause/power something was created/made and it exists . Then existence is the cause.
If there was only non existence, then things cannot exist and will never exist. The cause is needed!
GOD bless you.
Peace. -
So I back up what I think brother nimnimak_11 is saying by
Existence always existed otherwise nothing will exist.
If there was only non existence at the start, then nothing would exist.
Non existence always needs existence for things to exist.
GOD bless.
Peace. -
I think somebody is confusing here the existence of anything in particular woth existence of anything at all.
While the zero concept goes for 0 existence of something, I do not kno of any such a thing as 0 existence of anything at all. I said that is unconceivable, at least for us.
Salaam
-
According to quantum physics... They can..
No, they can't. Everything (including scientific observations) require reason. You make scientific theories by applying reason to the observations made. When reason is clearly stating that it is paradoxical for something to into non-existence, any scientific observation made would have to avoid this paradox otherwise it would be entirely meaningless. Think about it, is it more plausible that things go into somewhere else that we can't see or that they go into non-existence?
ut clearly non-existence is not an absurd concept anymore.
Non-existence has always been and absurd concept and will always be an absurd concept.
Due to non-existence, existence exist.. and vice versa
No Existence exists. That is all. It is the first item of knowledge as requires Existence. Reason dictates non-existence is absurd. Saying something like due to non-existence existence exist is paradoxical/irrational.
-
I think somebody is confusing here the existence of anything in particular woth existence of anything at all.
While the zero concept goes for 0 existence of something, I do not kno of any such a thing as 0 existence of anything at all. I said that is unconceivable, at least for us.
Salaam
I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Do you disagree with the definition Existence = that which is all-existing/omnipresent? Non-existence is meaningless. It's absurd/contradictory/paradoxical like a a square-circle because...it can never exist.
-
No I do not know what you mean by all-existing that would b different from existing.
omnipresent, I can imagine what you mean, but I do not see how it is part of existing, present yes omnipresent, cna't see what you means.Salaam
Salam Huruf
If you understand omnipresence, can you make sense of Existence without it? Can you have a non-contradictory, non-paradoxical definition of Existence without it being omnipresent, infinite and eternal?
-
No, they can't. Everything (including scientific observations) require reason. You make scientific theories by applying reason to the observations made. When reason is clearly stating that it is paradoxical for something to into non-existence, any scientific observation made would have to avoid this paradox otherwise it would be entirely meaningless. Think about it, is it more plausible that things go into somewhere else that we can't see or that they go into non-existence?
Non-existence has always been and absurd concept and will always be an absurd concept.That is why CONTEXT is needed.
Define the context before defining exist or non exist.No Existence exists. That is all. It is the first item of knowledge as requires Existence. Reason dictates non-existence is absurd. Saying something like due to non-existence existence exist is paradoxical/irrational.
Yes no existence does exist. Non existent is not absurd at all.
Just because it is paradoxical doesn't mean that it is irrational.Let's give context now, the phenomenon of non existent in this universe does exist in this universe.
A particle can change state from exist in this universe to become non-existence in/from this universe.
And vice versa. -
Peace Jafar.
How can this be possible? QuoteA particle can change state from exist in this universe to become non-existence in/from this universe.
And vice versa.Where did the particle go? The particle still exist in another domain out of this universe. Or does only this universe exist?
If only this universe exist, then the particle could be somewhere else in this universe.Or give an example of a particle that becomes nothing. i.e not a particle or changed particle but nothing(transferred from exist to non-exist).
GOD bless you.
Peace -
That is why CONTEXT is needed.
Define the context before defining exist or non exist.How is Existence = that which is omnipresent. You give me any other definition and I'll show you that it's paradoxical. Use any kind of context you want.
Yes no existence does exist. Non existent is not absurd at all.
Just because it is paradoxical doesn't mean that it is irrational.Non-existence is absurd. Always has been, always will be.
Let's give context now, the phenomenon of non existent in this universe does exist in this universe.
A particle can change state from exist in this universe to become non-existence in/from this universe.
And vice versa.For something to become non-existent in this universe is fine because that is not the same as it went from this universe into non-existence. It essentially means it went to some other existing place or that it changed to something else.
You can put words, sentences and theories together in the wrong way (this is possible, this is a phenomenon) I am not in disagreement with this. So for example
A) You can have someone say square-circle (putting words together in the wrong way)
B) You can have someone say a square within a circle (putting words together in the right way)What A says can never exist whilst what B says can exist. A is being irrational, whilst B is being rational.