Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. verse 2:178 ? "the free for the free the slave for the

verse 2:178 ? "the free for the free the slave for the

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
22 Posts 9 Posters 188 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    mquran
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    Salaamun alaikum Saladin, all,

    2/178 applies to believers. It is not for outside the group of believers. If we accept this, we need to take a look at 4/92, which explains 2/178

    Never should a believer kill a believer; but (If it so happens) by mistake, (Compensation is due) If one (so) kills a believer, it is ordained that he should free a believing slave, and pay compensation to the deceased's family, unless they remit it freely. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with you, and he was a believer, the freeing of a believing slave (Is enough). If he belonged
    to a people with whom ye have treaty of Mutual alliance, compensation should be paid to his family, and a believing slave be freed. For those who find this beyond their means, (is prescribed) a fast for two months running by way of repentance to God for God hath all knowledge and all wisdom.

    it is clear that 2/178 isn't speaking about a LIFE compensation but a wealth compensation.

    thanks and peace.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      peace mq, all,

      Also, there is another sign which discusses compensation for a similar event, to provide for dependents for 1yr or something, I cant rememeber the reference off-hand. I remember coming across it after discussing it with bro. Zlatan. Just thought I'd mention it.

      Wakas

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Offline
        S Offline
        Someone
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        As in the example above, i will try to present a situation where 2 groups of people (groupA and groupB) are in war.

        is this verse about war ?

        Peace Saladin,

        From the context of the verse, it's not about war specifically but can be applied to the case of war. I think that the scripture contains many ways to make peace justly in different situations, people have to "only" want it.

        --

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • I Offline
          I Offline
          ichephren
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          2178 talks about murder while 492 talks about mistaken killings, so the punishment is not the same. 2178 PICKTHAL "O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female. And for him who is forgiven somewhat by his (injured) brother, prosecution according to usage and payment unto him in kindness. This is an alleviation and a mercy from your Lord. He who transgresseth after this will have a painful doom." The language of "a slave for a slave" is clearly about life, not wealth. There is no insinuation of money being exchanged in that verse, until it talks about the forgiving of the killing by the brother of the slain. So, the actual punishment could not have been monetary compensation. It is interesting that 4240 states that "an eye for an eye" is wrong, but it is still allowed. Maybe that is the best way of doing things, though it is clearly wrong, and those who chose to acknowledege the innocence of the other party are given a reward.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ali_Omar
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            Dear icephren,

            I think we should pay more attention to Allah?s words that says it is wrong to take another human life.

            As long as we interpret 2.178 and 42.40 as a free pass to take another life if and when we decide it is justified, the continuous ?just? killings of human beings will go on.

            Imagine a situation where one party think the verdict of ?guilty?, and the subsequent killing of the one who was sentenced, was wrong.

            Does this then justify another party to take the life of the one who he/she claims gave a wrong verdict in the first case?

            This reminds me of a ?mafia?-style of justice, or ?balancing the accounts?. This makes the value of a life cheap, contradicting the words of God, and we see the effects of this kind of ?justice?.

            Recently, the London-bombings are justified in some people?s minds, maybe, because the British armed forces killed people calling themselves ?Muslims?. So, one murder ?justifies? another.
            And this was just one tragic incident amongst many.

            To understand these verses literally has caused much suffering, and will continue to do so, as long as we do not pay proper attention to Allah?s basic prohibition in the case of taking another humans life.

            Regards

            Ali Omar

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mquran
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              Ichripren 2178 talks about murder while 492 talks about mistaken killings, so the punishment is not the same

              Can you please provide evidence for this? The same words are used for both so 'al-qatla'and 'yuqtalu'. To add to this, the word 'khathaa' is used to denote an accident. Further, 2/178 speaks about believers and not to others. Please put these 2 verses together.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Offline
                M Offline
                mquran
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                WakasAlso, there is another sign which discusses compensation for a similar event, to provide for dependents for 1yr or something, I cant rememeber the reference off-hand. I remember coming across it after discussing it with bro. Zlatan. Just thought I'd mention it.

                Thanks, man. I cant seem to find it though. I looked up sineen and wahid. Any suggestion for a word ?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  Fahad1
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  The language of "a slave for a slave" is clearly about life, not wealth. There is no insinuation of money being exchanged in that verse, until it talks about the forgiving of the killing by the brother of the slain. So, the actual punishment could not have been monetary compensation.

                  salam .
                  i agree with ichephren here .

                  mquran wrote

                  2/178 applies to believers. It is not for outside the group of believers. If we accept this, we need to take a look at 4/92, which explains 2/178

                  Never should a believer kill a believer; but (If it so happens) by mistake,

                  2178 does not only apply to believers . here God is addressing the believers , that they should apply the law of equality (against anyone and everyone , not only against believers) . so there is hardly any such link between 492 and 2178 , i believe .

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    Fahad1
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    what do u guys think about this understanding from RK's translation

                    In dealing with murder, the Quran definitely discourages capital punishment (2179).
                    "The free for the free, the slave for the slave,and the female for the female" (217.

                    Due to human meanness and injustice, many people cannot even imagine what this Quranic law says.

                    They refuse to accept the clear injunctions that strict equivalence must be observed - if a woman kills a man, or a man kills a woman, or a slave kills a free person, or a free person kills a slave, capital punishment cannot be applied.
                    The Quran prefers that the murderer compensate the victim's family. Killing the murderer does not bring the victim back, nor does the family of the victim benefit from executing the murderer. The compensation, however, must be sufficient to be a deterrent for others. In Islam (Submission), the victim and/or the victim's family are the judges for all crimes; they decide what the punishment shall be under the supervision of a person who knows the Quran.

                    but i once asked Muhammad Asadi( www.members.aol.com/silence004 ) the same question about 2178 , he said that 2178 is about warring groups or parties . and the "free for the free , slave for slave " thing is to control bloodshed during battle or conflicts between groups . if a freeman killed a slave or a slave killed a freeman , he(the murderer) cannot be killed in retaliation . he said this verse is not about individual crime .

                    but how is this verse only about groups ?
                    i emailed Asadi again , but he has not replied yet .
                    salam.
                    fahad.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • A Offline
                      A Offline
                      Aladin_Azra
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      I think we misunderstood word qiSaaS. It's a verbal noun form III and for it to mean "recompense" it should be in form VI (reciprocal verb). Its root is talking about cutting unnecessarily pieces from something, so we have it as qaSaS for a story w/o details, just what is most important, it's "a short story". We have same meaning of the verb, as well as "going by shorter path" (taking a shortcut), as in 1864 or in 2811. There's no more word forms, besides qiSaaS, from this root. If we look at its passive maqSooS or a noun of tool meqaSS, we can see that they talk about trimming, clipping, for example hair. In my language hair is called "kosa" from the same root, and scissors are "makaze" from meqaSS, and "kus" is a shorten animal tail (or no tail). Slightly different root q-S-b gives qaSSaab for a butcher, who cuts pieces of flesh.

                      I understood that qiSaaS means "(the) exception" from a civil norm of a society where Qur'an came. I understood that they had a rule "free man by free man, slave by slave, woman by woman" (I think a proposition bi- matches English by in most cases). So, believers were ordered to leave this norm and to forgive (or better "to pardon&quot instead.

                      Those who understand the essence/heart/core (oolu-l-elbaab) can take care of themselves and qiSaaS will give them life.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Users