Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Consolidated discussion on 4:34 on this forum

Consolidated discussion on 4:34 on this forum

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
3 Posts 2 Posters 43 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kangzosa
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello, I was wanting to contribute to the discussion surrounding 434 especially after reading the article on this site, and did a quick search on this forum for threads, I saw quite a few.

    Is there an ongoing or central thread for discussion on the matter? because I would rather add to that discussion than make yet another thread explaining my point of view, but I don't see any such sticky.

    I plan to delete this and either join the discussion on another thread, or create a new thread outlining the problems I see with the interpretations offered.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • WakasW Offline
      WakasW Offline
      Wakas
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      peace,

      There are many threads, not one consolidated/summarised thread. In my view the most cogent Quranic understanding is https//www.quran434.com/wife-beating-islam.html (of which I am the author)

      The above article was discussed over 30 pages here and no-one brought any provable flaws
      https//free-minds.org/forum/index.php?topic=9599954.0
      I even posted it on an anti-Islam forum and offered a large reward to anyone who could refute it. They couldn't.

      All information is correct to the best of my knowledge only and thus should not be taken as a fact. One should always seek knowledge and verify for themselves when possible: 17:36, 20:114, 35:28, 49:6, 58:11.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • K Offline
        K Offline
        Kangzosa
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Okay great, I'm happy for this thread to be removed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Users