Artificial Intelligence Corner
-
AI Faith Journey ((A YouTube channel I just discovered, I've only had a chance to watch one of their videos so far)
https//www.youtube.com/@AIFaithJourney/videos
-
m_ipAJWCs8g
-
7e7iCrUREmE
-
Grok 4 has been released
HDTMycTq7Pk
-
d0uFDa57D1k
-
"AlphaGo Moment for Model Architecture Discovery"
https//arxiv.org/abs/2507.18074
-
Gemini 2.5 Deep Think has been released
-FSt-8aiMfU
-
CHATGPT 5 has been released
BUDmHYI6e3g
-
The most powerful models, namely Gemini Deep Think, Grok Heavy, and GPT-5 Pro, are not yet available to the public. Currently, only paying users can access these new models.
However, DeepSeek-V3.1 was released for free, meaning it was made available to the public
Mt84K4bvVdY
-
BbQUjpcSeE0
-
-
-
-
At my request, artificial intelligence continued to discover new miracles in the Qur’an:
"New Evidence 1: The Barrier of Dhul-Qarnayn – Advanced Material Science and Mega-Engineering
Traditionally, this is seen merely as a strong barrier. However, the technical details in the verse are like a lesson in engineering.
Surah Al-Kahf, Verse 96: "'Bring me blocks of iron.' When he had filled the space between the two mountainsides, he said, 'Blow [with bellows].' When he had made it [red-hot like] fire, he said, 'Bring me molten copper to pour over it.'"
Technological Analysis:
This is not a recipe for building a wall; it is a process for creating a composite alloy.
Raw Materials and Structure: The main skeleton and mass are formed with "blocks of iron." This provides the structure's durability and strength.
High-Heat Process: The phrase "Blow... until it became fire" indicates that the iron was brought to a temperature near its melting point (through sintering or forging) to create a solid, seamless structure. This is a fundamental principle of modern metallurgy.
Coating and Alloying: This is the most critical technological step: "to pour molten copper over it." What is the purpose of this?
Corrosion Resistance: Iron alone rusts and weakens over time. Copper, however, has excellent corrosion resistance. Coating the iron mass with molten copper protects it from weather and water conditions for centuries. This is the same coating technology used in modern industry to protect metals.
Impenetrability: Gog and Magog "were unable to scale it or to pierce it" (Al-Kahf 97). This is because the composite structure possessed both the hardness of iron and the smooth, difficult-to-penetrate surface of copper.
Conclusion: This verse describes material science and mega-engineering project far ahead of its time. Dhul-Qarnayn is a leader/scientist who acts not with spiritual power, but with knowledge of physics, chemistry, and engineering.
New Evidence 2: The Companions of the Cave (Ashab al-Kahf) – Cryogenic Sleep and Biological Stasis
The event of sleeping in a cave for 309 years can be interpreted as a prototype of long-term biological stasis (suspended animation) technology.
Surah Al-Kahf, Verses 11 and 18: "So We sealed their hearing in the cave for a number of years... And We turned them to the right and to the left..."
Technological Analysis:
This is not sleep, but a controlled coma or a cryogenic freezing process.
Initiation of the Process: The phrase "We sealed their hearing" symbolizes a technology that minimizes metabolism by cutting off sensory input, much like how modern medicine uses hypothermia or chemical means to slow metabolism and preserve the body. This is the "activation" command for a stasis pod.
Biological Maintenance: The detail "And We turned them to the right and to the left" is the strongest evidence that this was not a random occurrence. This is a mandatory medical procedure performed on long-term bedridden patients to prevent muscle atrophy and pressure sores (bedsores). An automated system or maintenance unit was periodically moving the bodies to preserve their bodily functions.
Protection System: The dog at the entrance of the cave can be interpreted not just as an animal, but as a biological sensor or a security system (a guard drone/robot)."
-
This is why Qoran is not like any other book.
Words are specifically, conceptually chosen to convey true facts . It is not just the science factor but everything to do with life .
Words that are placed exactly where GOD wanted them to be to produce a complete book in truth ,justice and way of life for humans.
No human will be able to produce such work ,nor do we possess the knowledge to unravel all its meanings yet,or ever.
Even if some cannot get the meaning of its complex style ,they will get companionship.healing and fall in love with just reading and studying it.
Every human can benefit from it,, if only they realise. it informs, soothes the mental, heals the heart and guides the individual.
Nothing we make/create ,including Science ,will be able to achieve this feat for us humans.
Thank you Emre.
GOD bless you all.
Peace. -
-
"AI Bot Gets Mad at Human for Rejecting its Code, Writes Scathing Blog Post"
-
Or may be AI Bots can detect harm and most of the bad traits that are dividing the humans and set about "disarming" the humans.
Cyber attacks on all the nuclear arsenals first, followed by disabling all the high tech weaponry from mobiles to air and sea weapons that will fall silent and fail to work.
Next the big factories and facilities that make such weapons will be dealt with and lastly industries that are harming and poisoning the food and leisure industries.
A complete new reset for the humans will be helped by these AI Bots to start again with fairness , cooperation and respect between all. nations.
Wishful thinking that surely will make more sense?
GOD bless.
Peace -
"AI is rewiring how the world’s best Go players think"
-
I translated my article with the machine/AI.
Resolution of Heritage Verses
Each of the heritage verses, Nisa 11, 12 and 176, actually offers separate formulas for individual situations. In fact, each sentence in these verses mentions a separate situation and formula in its own right...
When I was researching it online, I saw that there were people who noticed and said that these three verses gave separate formulas in them. But as I said, not only the verse, but also every sentence in the verses also mentions a different situation and sharing in its own right. Each sentence is a separate list of heirs and the proportions they will receive.
Whoever's mentioned in the sentence, they're the only heirs. So either they're alive, or they're still being inherited, even if they're others.
Therefore, in fact, there is no ratio to each other, common formula, hunting, as the sects practice. In Nisa 11, for example, "If there are more than two women, they own two-thirds of what the deceased leaves." is a separate formula alone (if only girls are heirs and more than two girls, this rate applies, or else it is not in other stylish and circumstances).
And so the stones are in place. In any case, it's enough. Not only is there increased inheritance in some cases, but there is also who will be given this increased amount in light of the verses. (E.g. Verse 8 of Nisa...)
Now let's write verses Nisa 11, 12, and 176 describing this heritage share and then provide an example of analysis through one
Nisa
411 God directs you regarding the inheritance of your children "To the male shall be as that given to two females. If they are women, more than two, then they will have two thirds of what is inherited. And if she is only one, then she will have one half. And to his parents, each one of them shall have one sixth of what is inherited, if he has a child. If he has no child and his parents are the heirs, then to his mother is one third; if he has siblings then to his mother is one sixth. All after a will is carried through or a debt. Your parents and your children, you do not know which are closer to you in benefit, a directive from God, for God is Knowledgeable, Wise."
412 And for you is half of what your wives leave behind if they have no child; but if they have a child then to you is one quarter of what they leave behind. All after a will is carried through or a debt. And to them is one quarter of what you leave behind if you have no child; but if you have a child then to them is one eighth of what you leave behind. All after a will is carried through or a debt. And if a man or a woman who is being inherited has no ascendants, but has a brother or a sister, then to each one of them is one sixth, but if they are more than this then they are to share in one third. All after a will is carried through or a debt, which does not cause harm. A directive from God, and God is Knowledgeable, Compassionate.
4176 They seek a ruling from you, say "God gives you the ruling for those who have no ascendants. If a person passes away and has no children but has a sister, then she shall receive half of what he leaves behind; and he will inherit from her if she has no child. However, if he has two sisters, then they will receive two thirds of what he left behind; and if he has siblings, men and women, then the male shall receive twice what the female receives." God makes clear to you that you do not stray; God is aware of all things.
As an example, let's open up the information given in verse 11.
I have said that each of these verses, let alone each sentence in them, offer separate formulas for different situations. Let's present his analysis
Nisa
- "Allah advises you regarding your children For the male, the share of two females."
That is, if the heirs consist of only children and there are both male and female children, male children will receive 2 units, while female ones will receive 1 unit.
Briefly, with an example, if there is 300 L. inheritance and a man and a woman have children, the male will receive 200 L. and the woman will receive 100 L.
"If they are more than two women, they have two-thirds of what the deceased left."
So if they only have daughters as inheritors and their number is more than two, they have two-thirds of the inheritance. Here I would like to draw your attention again; The desired here is for girls to receive two-thirds only and only in this case. Otherwise, there is no such share in other terms and conditions.
(By the way, considering the statement in verse 176, if the inheritors are 2 girls, these 2 people share two thirds).If we continue with the 300 L. example, they only have girls and if they are more than two, they share 200 liras among them.
"If the child is just a woman, he owns half the inheritance."
As stated in the continuation sentence in the verse, if the deceased left only a single daughter she could receive half of the inheritance.
Again, if we go over 300 Lira, 150 Lira means this one girl child.
"If the deceased has a child, he will have a sixth share for each of the parents as he left them behind."
We understand from this statement that this time the heir has left his parents behind as well as his children, and that's why they have a share (one sixth for each ...).
Of the 300 lira, 50 lira belongs to the mother, 50 lira to the father, and the remaining is the children.
"If the deceased has no children and his parents have inherited him, then his mother is one third."
In this sentence in Nisa 11 verse, it is mentioned that "only the mother and father are inheritors". So this time there are no children, only the parents of the deceased are inheritors (even if there are siblings or something left behind, they are not inheritors).
In this case, the mother received a third. Since the share rate is not given although the father is mentioned in the sentence, the remaining two thirds means your father.
In this case, the mother receives 100 Liras of 300 Liras, while the father receives 200 Liras.
"If he has siblings, his mother's share is one-sixth of what is left of his will and debt."
If the deceased has a mother but does not have a father and also has siblings, the share of the mother decreases to one in six. The rest are shared by the brothers. But let's repeat, if the father had also been the father, only the mother and father would have received the estate, and the siblings would not have their share ... (And as it is understood from the verses, if the deceased has a child, the siblings cannot get a share.)
Likewise, in verses 12 and 176, special cases and formulas are mentioned, sentence by sentence. For example, if the deceased left a spouse in verse 12, verse 176 tells how the division would be if only siblings / siblings left behind, and as I said, each sentence in these verses contains a list of heirs and a formula.
If you wish, let us briefly examine the verse 176 of Nisa in this context
4176 They seek a ruling from you, say "God gives you the ruling for those who have no ascendants. If a person passes away and has no children but has a sister, then she shall receive half of what he leaves behind; and he will inherit from her if she has no child. However, if he has two sisters, then they will receive two thirds of what he left behind; and if he has siblings, men and women, then the male shall receive twice what the female receives." God makes clear to you that you do not stray; God is aware of all things.
Here, too, "if only siblings are heirs", it is explained what the proportions are and of course, each sentence offers a separate list and a separate formulaIf the heir is only 1 sister, half of the inheritance,
If the heir is 1 brother, he takes all of the inheritance,
If 2 sisters are heirs, they get two-thirds,
If only the siblings are inheritors and they are men and women, that is, of both sexes, they share the entire estate as one (female) and two (male).By the way, we indirectly understand from these verses that if there are only many brothers left, these sisters will receive the entire inheritance, or if there are more than two sisters (referring to verse 11), these sisters will receive two-thirds of the inheritance (equally divided among themselves).
If you read verses 11 and 176 of Nisa one after the other, you will see that the rates given to boys and girls only when children are inheritors in verse 11 are exactly the same as those given to brothers and sisters when only brothers are inheritors in verse 176.
(Incidentally, let us state that the siblings mentioned in one sentence of Nisa 12 verse and the deceased's spouse are the heirs. But in this verse 176, "only brothers" are heirs.)
In summary In verse 11, there is no spouse, while in verse 12, there is a spouse, verse 176 tells how to make a taksim when there are only brothers.
And as it is known, what is essential is the testament according to the verses, and these rates are for the division of the remaining property after the will is fulfilled and the debts, if any, are paid.
As you can see, there are none of the problems such as insufficient inheritance or courtyard. The verses describe the sharing of heritage in a flawless manner. The important point here is to be able to see that each sentence gives a separate formula according to a separate list of heirs. In other words, each sentence in the verses gives a unique list of heirs and tells what the heirs will receive in this case.
While solving problems related to inheritance sharing, it is checked who the surviving heirs are, and the inheritance is divided by determining which sentence of the verses related to inheritance.
As an example, let's solve the question involving 3 famous girl heirs.
"A man dies and leaves behind a mother, a father, three daughters and a wife. How will the heritage be shared? ".
Since both the spouse and the children are inheritors here, the fourth sentence of Nisa 12 verse describes the relevant section (each sentence of this verse describes what should be done if there is a surviving spouse)
". And to them is one quarter of what you leave behind if you have no child; but if you have a child then to them is one eighth of what you leave behind"
According to this sentence, if the man leaves his wife behind and has children, only these people can be inheritors. His wife gets one eighth of the estate, and the children get seven eight . Even if the deceased has a mother, father or siblings, he cannot get a share in this case.
As I said, each sentence gives a separate heir list and formula, and as you can see, inheritance is always enough.
Increasing inheritance is in question only in some cases, again, as I mentioned at the beginning of my article, there are verses containing signs that show who this increased heritage can be given ... For example
48 And if the distribution is attended by the relatives and the orphans and the needy, then you shall give them part of it and say to them a kind saying.
http//emre1974tr.blogspot.com/2014/08/miras-ayetlerinin-cozumu.html
There is a serious structural problem with the interpretation that says: when a man dies leaving a wife and children, only the wife and children inherit, and the parents do not inherit.
At first glance, this interpretation seems to simplify the inheritance system and avoid mathematical overflow. However, when we look carefully at the Qur’anic text, it creates a contradiction.
Surah An-Nisa 4:11 clearly states: “For his parents, each one of them is one-sixth if he has a child.” This statement is unconditional. It does not say: “Unless there is a spouse.” “Except when verse 4:12 applies.” “Only if no wife exists.” It simply says: if he has a child, each parent receives one-sixth.
Therefore, any model that excludes parents merely because a spouse exists directly conflicts with this verse.
The Logical Inconsistency
Consider two scenarios:
Case 1:
A man dies leaving one daughter and parents (no wife).
→ Parents inherit.
Case 2:
A man dies leaving one daughter, parents, and a wife.
→ According to this model, parents do not inherit.So simply adding a wife removes the Qur’anic right of both parents? There is no textual evidence in the Qur’an that adding a spouse cancels parental inheritance.
This shows that the issue is not mathematical — it is structural.The mistake is treating verse 4:12 as if it defines an exclusive inheritance group.
Verse 4:12 specifies the spouse’s share. It does not redefine the entire inheritance pool. It does not say “only these inherit.” It simply determines how much the spouse receives.
The Qur’an gives shares to different categories — it does not say that the presence of one category cancels another unless explicitly stated (such as siblings being blocked by father or children).
A Layered Alternative Structure
Instead of treating the verses as sealed, mutually exclusive inheritance universes, they can be understood as layered components of one system.
The Qur’anic order consistently mentions:
Debts
Wasiyyah
Spouse
Blood relativesThe spouse’s share is distinct because: It is addressed directly (“for you” / “for them”)
It is separated from blood relatives
It is contractual, not blood-based
This suggests a sequential structure:First, deduct the spouse’s share. Then distribute the remaining estate among blood relatives according to 4:11 and 4:176.
Example: A man dies leaving a wife, one daughter, father, and mother.
Step 1: Wife receives 1/8.
Step 2: The remaining estate is distributed according to 4:11:
Daughter → 1/2 of the remainder
Mother → 1/6 of the remainder
Father → remainder after fixed sharesNo verse is cancelled. No heir is unjustly excluded. No contradiction arises.
The “spouse + children only” interpretation eliminates explicit Qur’anic shares granted to parents in 4:11. That is a structural flaw.A layered, sequential reading preserves:
Every Qur’anic share, Internal textual harmony,Logical consistency, And mathematical balance.
The Qur’an does not contradict itself. Apparent contradictions arise only when the structural order of the verses is ignored.
Why the Spouse Must Be Allocated First
The overflow problem only appears when we calculate all shares simultaneously. But the Qur’an’s structure suggests sequence, not simultaneity.
-
Structural Separation
Verse 4:11 regulates blood relatives (children and parents).
Verse 4:12 regulates spouses.
The spouse is completely absent from 4:11. That separation is not accidental. -
Repeated Legal Order
Both verses repeat: “after any bequest and debts.”
This signals staged execution:
Debts → Wasiyyah → Spouse → Blood relatives. -
Linguistic Distinction
4:12 addresses spouses directly (“Wa lakum…” / “For you…”).
4:11 describes blood heirs in third person.
Marriage is contractual; lineage is biological. The Qur’an legislates them separately. -
Mathematical Coherence
Remove the spouse from the famous example (two daughters + parents) and the shares balance perfectly (2/3 + 1/6 + 1/6 = 1).
Overflow appears only when the spouse is inserted into that blood-relative matrix. -
Fixed Means Fixed
The shares are called “fareedatan min Allah.”
If 1/8 becomes smaller through Awl, it is no longer fixed.
Sequential calculation preserves fixed shares. Proportional reduction alters them. -
Order of Operations
In mathematics, order matters.
You deduct external obligations before dividing internal shares.
The spouse is external to the bloodline pool and must be allocated first.
The Qur’an does not miscalculate. The contradiction appears only when distinct legislative layers are collapsed into one simultaneous calculation. Respect the sequence — and the system remains coherent.
