Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. God's other book by Mohammad Salama

God's other book by Mohammad Salama

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
4 Posts 2 Posters 192 Views 2 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Offline
    R Offline
    Ronin
    wrote on last edited by Ronin
    #1

    Peace everyone,

    I came across "God's Other Book" by Mohammad Salama just a few days ago and have already read quite a bit about it in several different articles. I have had the chance to go through a few pages of the book itself, and I think it's a thought-provoking work. I wanted to share some information about it with everyone here because it offers a fresh perspective on Quranic interpretation. His book is really good, in my opinion.

    In "God's Other Book", Mohammad Salama critiques traditional Quranic interpretation, particularly the heavy reliance on grammar, tafsir, and classical dictionaries. He argues that these methods can limit the text's deeper meanings. He shows the Qur'an's literary nature and points out its rhetoric, symbolism, and narrative structures as essential tools to unlock its message.

    He also proposes a self-interpreting approach, where the Qur'an's internal coherence and literary qualities, shaped by its deep roots in classical Arabic poetry and the oral traditions of pre-Islamic Arabia, serve as the primary means for understanding its message. Furthermore, he advocates for a Qur'an that illuminates itself, where one verse sheds light on another, which eliminates the need for rigid, external commentaries. By rejecting a literalist approach, he promotes a more dynamic method of interpretation that embraces metaphors and symbolism, and encourages individuals to engage directly with the Qur'an's language and context. In doing so, Salama's approach allows individuals to derive evolving meanings from the text, making it relevant to changing times. It frees individuals from centuries of dogmatic interpretations and offers a deeper, more nuanced connection to the scripture.

    I think Salama's approach marks a revolutionary shift in Qur'anic studies. It challenges long-established methods, and invites a more direct, personal engagement with the Qur'an, which makes his book a pivotal contribution to modern Islamic thought, in my opinion.

    You can download the book in the following link.

    https://www.ucpress.edu/books/gods-other-book/paper

    You can read more about the contents of the book in the following link.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1my1nsi/gods_other_book_the_quran_between_history_and/?rdt=38084

    LaythL 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • R Offline
      R Offline
      Ronin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      BTW I recommend always checking PDFs before downloading to ensure they are safe. Always use VirusTotal, a free service that scans files and URLs with multiple antivirus engines to detect suspicious content.

      You can scan URLs or files in the following link.

      https://www.virustotal.com/gui/home/upload

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Ronin

        Peace everyone,

        I came across "God's Other Book" by Mohammad Salama just a few days ago and have already read quite a bit about it in several different articles. I have had the chance to go through a few pages of the book itself, and I think it's a thought-provoking work. I wanted to share some information about it with everyone here because it offers a fresh perspective on Quranic interpretation. His book is really good, in my opinion.

        In "God's Other Book", Mohammad Salama critiques traditional Quranic interpretation, particularly the heavy reliance on grammar, tafsir, and classical dictionaries. He argues that these methods can limit the text's deeper meanings. He shows the Qur'an's literary nature and points out its rhetoric, symbolism, and narrative structures as essential tools to unlock its message.

        He also proposes a self-interpreting approach, where the Qur'an's internal coherence and literary qualities, shaped by its deep roots in classical Arabic poetry and the oral traditions of pre-Islamic Arabia, serve as the primary means for understanding its message. Furthermore, he advocates for a Qur'an that illuminates itself, where one verse sheds light on another, which eliminates the need for rigid, external commentaries. By rejecting a literalist approach, he promotes a more dynamic method of interpretation that embraces metaphors and symbolism, and encourages individuals to engage directly with the Qur'an's language and context. In doing so, Salama's approach allows individuals to derive evolving meanings from the text, making it relevant to changing times. It frees individuals from centuries of dogmatic interpretations and offers a deeper, more nuanced connection to the scripture.

        I think Salama's approach marks a revolutionary shift in Qur'anic studies. It challenges long-established methods, and invites a more direct, personal engagement with the Qur'an, which makes his book a pivotal contribution to modern Islamic thought, in my opinion.

        You can download the book in the following link.

        https://www.ucpress.edu/books/gods-other-book/paper

        You can read more about the contents of the book in the following link.

        https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1my1nsi/gods_other_book_the_quran_between_history_and/?rdt=38084

        LaythL Offline
        LaythL Offline
        Layth
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Ronin Thanks for sharing. I tried my best to skim through it but it was one of the worst written works to read (clearly written by an academic for academics). I gave up after a while and took "zero" knowledge away from it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • R Offline
          R Offline
          Ronin
          wrote on last edited by Ronin
          #4

          @Layth Thanks for your thoughts. You are right. The book is written in an abstract way and geared toward academics, which makes it hard to follow. This isn't just an academic problem. Many authors share content without focusing on their delivery, often because it's faster and easier, which can make their content unclear, inaccessible, disengaging, and hard to understand. Still, despite the dense style of the book, I think it contains some valuable insights. Perhaps Ayman might find it useful and interesting, given that his research appears to be similar to Salama.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Users