=[ Difference between Al-Kitaab and Al-Quraan ]=

progod

Peace,

This is the point where you started to go wrong

The Koran "is merely a ?Collection? of previous scriptures (Mainly OT and NT Gospels), that have been collected and pulled together in an attempt to imitate the Holy Bible. "

That is a big jump from the definitiont that you gave that all that the word Koran means is 'collection, recitation, chanting.' Let me note that it also has the meanings of 'study and reading.' Those meanings can be seen in other dictionaries. I wasn't even arguing about the Koran's link to the Old Testament and New Testament. But pointing to the fact that Qur'an(un) mainly means 'a collection' and Al-Qur'an 'the collection' or generally 'Collection(s)' does not create a link to the Bible even if you want it to.

As for Al-Kitaab

You have

Lane references sura 22 in his definition

Thalika alkitabu la rayba feehi hudan lilmuttaqeena

That The Book no doubt/suspicion in it, (it is) guidance to the fearing and obeying. (22)

?That is the book, or scripture?; as though combining in itself the excellences of all other books or scriptures; or meaning that is preeminently the book, or scripture. The Pentateuch or Mosaic Law; and the Gospel, or Book of the Gospels; the Scriptures of the Jews and Christians. Divine prescript, appointment, or ordinance; judgment, or sentence; fatal decree or predestination."

I don't see why you think that you are making a point here. Christians and Jews still refer to their books as 'The Scripture' or 'Scripture.' Being that Saudi Arabia during Muhammad's time (God bless him) was full of Christians and Jews it would make sense that this meaning would have penetrated the Arabic language of the time. But that does not mean that the word doesn't have other meanings, just as you put them book, scripture (which we would refer to as 'script or text' nowadays when speaking about a non-religious scripture), appointment, divine prescript
(I would say authoritative prescript which I've read in other dictionaries), appointment, ordinance, judgement, sentence, fatal decree or predestination.

What you should also consider (which you wouldn't get completely from any dictionary) is that the form fi&aal, which would be the equivalent of fa&l, in the case of kataba that would mean that kitaab is also a synonym of katb. It is also a synonym of kitaabat (a word that started being used because kitaab had taken a more religious sense in Arabic, despite its non-religious meaning of 'book'). Kitaab can mean 'any writing' as well as law, decree and prescription. These meanings derive from the other meanings of kataba which have to do with 'decreeing, prescribing and setting as law.'

So your statement

Thus?it is quite clear, even at this point, and even without performing any scriptural comparison(s) whatsoever, that ?the collection? that comprises the Koran, is basically the Jewish and Christian scriptures.

This is beyond any reasonable doubt.

That is a big, big jump, brother. . . A big jump.

Godbless,
ProGod

unknownuser

Greetings anwar,

Thanks for your reply?

This is the point where you started to go wrong

The Koran "is merely a ?Collection? of previous scriptures (Mainly OT and NT Gospels), that have been collected and pulled together in an attempt to imitate the Holy Bible. "

That is a big jump from the definitiont that you gave that all that the word Koran means is 'collection, recitation, chanting.' Let me note that it also has the meanings of 'study and reading.'

Actually, my position follows the original meanings of the words.

Furthermore?.the original definitions are indeed proven-out by a study of the Koran as a whole - which is indeed 99% Biblical material.

Those meanings can be seen in other dictionaries.

Please bring forth your references?

I wasn't even arguing about the Koran's link to the Old Testament and New Testament. But pointing to the fact that Qur'an(un) mainly means 'a collection' and Al-Qur'an 'the collection' or generally 'Collection(s)' does not create a link to the Bible even if you want it to.

The classic definition for ?alkitabu? was also given as pertaining to the Holy Bible.

This word is unimpeachably juxtaposed with ?alqur-ana? as shown in the brief examples demonstrated in 15.1 & 27.1 ?..showing beyond any reasonable doubt that the ?collection? called the Koran is no more than an Arabic Bible?

As for Al-Kitaab

You have
Quote
Lane references sura 22 in his definition

Thalika alkitabu la rayba feehi hudan lilmuttaqeena

That The Book no doubt/suspicion in it, (it is) guidance to the fearing and obeying. (22)

?That is the book, or scripture?; as though combining in itself the excellences of all other books or scriptures; or meaning that is preeminently the book, or scripture. The Pentateuch or Mosaic Law; and the Gospel, or Book of the Gospels; the Scriptures of the Jews and Christians. Divine prescript, appointment, or ordinance; judgment, or sentence; fatal decree or predestination."

I don't see why you think that you are making a point here. Christians and Jews still refer to their books as 'The Scripture' or 'Scripture.' Being that Saudi Arabia during Muhammad's time (God bless him) was full of Christians and Jews it would make sense that this meaning would have penetrated the Arabic language of the time. But that does not mean that the word doesn't have other meanings, just as you put them book, scripture (which we would refer to as 'script or text' nowadays when speaking about a non-religious scripture), appointment, divine prescript
(I would say authoritative prescript which I've read in other dictionaries), appointment, ordinance, judgement, sentence, fatal decree or predestination.

What you should also consider (which you wouldn't get completely from any dictionary) is that the form fi&aal, which would be the equivalent of fa&l, in the case of kataba that would mean that kitaab is also a synonym of katb. It is also a synonym of kitaabat (a word that started being used because kitaab had taken a more religious sense in Arabic, despite its non-religious meaning of 'book'). Kitaab can mean 'any writing' as well as law, decree and prescription. These meanings derive from the other meanings of kataba which have to do with 'decreeing, prescribing and setting as law.'

So your statement
Quote
Thus?it is quite clear, even at this point, and even without performing any scriptural comparison(s) whatsoever, that ?the collection? that comprises the Koran, is basically the Jewish and Christian scriptures.

This is beyond any reasonable doubt.

That is a big, big jump, brother. . . A big jump.

Godbless,
ProGod

Here is what we can do to test the strength of my position...

I challenge you to pick any portion of your book of faith in which you feel is completely free of any Jewish and Christian influence whatsoever?.

This should demonstrate if the classic definitions are indeed accurate?

Your call?

progod

Who cares. I disagree with you but I really don't think it is worth arguing with you. Believe what you will believe. I already know that there is nothing that I can say to change your mind. May God guide you. The Koran is not Jewish or Chrisitian. It transcends both those religions. Whoever, wants to believe your logic let them. It will only be the fault of their own stupidity. Only a fool couldn't see through what you are saying.
I don't even know why you are arguing about it. Whatever you motives may be, follow your heart and your dreams.

Godbless,
Anwar

unknownuser

Greetings anwar,

Thanks for your reply?

Who cares.

We do?

I disagree with you but I really don't think it is worth arguing with you. Believe what you will believe. I already know that there is nothing that I can say to change your mind.

Thanks for declining our invitation. wink

We have yet to meet a true Muslim who is up for the challenge?

May God guide you.

Which God might that be?.?

The Koran is not Jewish or Chrisitian. It transcends both those religions.

Dead wrong.

The Koran copies both religions?

Just as the authors? told us?

The Koran can only copy.

Period.

Whoever, wants to believe your logic let them. It will only be the fault of their own stupidity. Only a fool couldn't see through what you are saying.

Only an unconfident fool would reject our offer?

I don't even know why you are arguing about it. Whatever you motives may be, follow your heart and your dreams.

You have just proved our position?and your lack of one?

Thanks for your time?

progod

Peace,

By the way, I'm not a Muslim.

And who said "The Koran can only copy"? What authors?

I don't really want to discuss it, because as I said I can tell you have your mind made up. But would you mind, just briefly, without any challenges for me to "prove" your point wrong, explain what you mean by the above.

Godbless,
ProGod

unknownuser

Peace be upon you,

challenge you to pick any portion of your book of faith in which you feel is completely free of any Jewish and Christian influence whatsoever?.

This reading(quran) is a confirmation of what came before it.

Likewise, the so called bible contains stories from long before Jesus. Virgin Births and ressurections are not new D

Why waste time cherishing what your sect has, why not focus on changing behavior, unifying. It is clear what the followers of the bible here choose to do, create division and war one against the other.

unknownuser

Greetings anwar,

Thanks for your reply?

Peace,

By the way, I'm not a Muslim.

What would you refer to your status as then?.?

And who said "The Koran can only copy"?

The authors of the Koran?

What authors?

The ones who penned the text?

I don't really want to discuss it, because as I said I can tell you have your mind made up.

My position is the result of years of research?

But would you mind, just briefly, without any challenges for me to "prove" your point wrong, explain what you mean by the above.

Which point?.?

The Koran copying Biblical scriptures?.or the authors who penned the text??

Thanks?

unknownuser

Greetings idolfree1,

Thanks for your reply?

Quote
challenge you to pick any portion of your book of faith in which you feel is completely free of any Jewish and Christian influence whatsoever?.

This reading(quran) is a confirmation of what came before it.

Then you acknowledge that the Koran is simply an Arabic collection of previous Biblical Hebrew and Greek scriptures.

As such?.we already know that the Koran?s information is a second-hand translation that has attempted to cross the Hebrew and Greek language barriers?

Knowing this?.why would you want to put your faith in a second-hand source instead of the original?.?

This is illogical.

Likewise, the so called bible contains stories from long before Jesus. Virgin Births and ressurections are not new

Then?.this would make the Koran out to be a copy of a copy of a copy??exactly how far back to you really want to go?..?

Why waste time cherishing what your sect has, why not focus on changing behavior, unifying.

There is plenty of low-hanging fruit in educating Muslims to the origins of their book of faith?

It is clear what the followers of the bible here choose to do, create division and war one against the other.

I think that the suicide bombers that cling tenaciously to their Koran while blowing themselves (and others) up in the name of their ?god??.have this ground pretty well covered already?

Thanks?

progod

Peace,

Now you don't understand what I'm saying. . . figures. Read and read well

Which point?.?

The Koran copying Biblical scriptures?.or the authors who penned the text??

Both.

You said

Just as the authors? told us?

The Koran can only copy.

Who are the authors of the Quran?

And where did they say that the Quran can only copy?

Who are these authors that "penned the text"?

Godbless,
Anwar

unknownuser

Peace be upon you,

Then you acknowledge that the Koran is simply an Arabic collection of previous Biblical Hebrew and Greek scriptures.

No, I acknowledge that there are men and woman who have the ability to recieve inspiration from the God, since the beginning of time, and they are given the same message, which is then written by the pen to distribute to mankind, however, mankind always tries to tamper with the message, sometimes knowingly so they can imprison the minds of those who are unaware and cause them to fight amongst each other. So each time a person brings TRUTH, it is a confirmation of the TRUTH that came before it.

As such?.we already know that the Koran?s information is a second-hand translation that has attempted to cross the Hebrew and Greek language barriers?

I have no clue where you got that. Think of it this way, a pure white light shining through different colored window panes, you are reading from a DIRTY BLUE window pane, we are reading from a LESS DIRTY Green pane, I am trying to get to that Pure White Light that manifests through ALL of the window panes.

Knowing this?.why would you want to put your faith in a second-hand source instead of the original?.?

This is illogical.

You are prevented from understanding me because of your emotionality. If you would calm yourself and transcend theses colored panes, you would join me in bringing peace and not fighting this against that, but only search for verifyable truth. There is no God but THE GOD, it is the pure light that flows through all of us "windowpanes", including the Jesus Windowpane.

Quote
Likewise, the so called bible contains stories from long before Jesus. Virgin Births and ressurections are not new

Then?.this would make the Koran out to be a copy of a copy of a copy??exactly how far back to you really want to go?..?

We MUST go to the beginning, as I have done. So what is the point of trying to make the "Koran" a copy if the "Bible" has the same so called "faults"? What is the point of that? Suppoose they were BOTH copied from something else, except the BIBLE was a weaker copy that "Koran"? How can you prove otherwise with having already admitted "copy after copy after copy?"

Quote
Why waste time cherishing what your sect has, why not focus on changing behavior, unifying.

There is plenty of low-hanging fruit in educating Muslims to the origins of their book of faith?

Why not direct that back to the beginning? To the white Light? Why are you directing them to another window pane?

Quote
It is clear what the followers of the bible here choose to do, create division and war one against the other.

I think that the suicide bombers that cling tenaciously to their Koran while blowing themselves (and others) up in the name of their ?god??.have this ground pretty well covered already?

Theres no real difference between you and them, neither one is promoting peace and unity because you both follow window panes and not the pure light.

unknownuser

Greetings anwar,

Thanks for your reply?

Peace,

Now you don't understand what I'm saying. . . figures. Read and read well
Quote
Which point?.?

The Koran copying Biblical scriptures?.or the authors who penned the text??

Both.

You said
Quote
Just as the authors? told us?

The Koran can only copy.

Who are the authors of the Quran?

And where did they say that the Quran can only copy?

Godbless,
Anwar

Let?s first review a couple of examples that demonstrate that the Koran is merely a copied collection of previous Jewish and Christian scriptures?

Walaqad darabna lilnnasi fee hatha alqur-ani min kulli mathalin wala-in ji/tahum bi-ayatin layaqoolanna allatheena kafaroo in antum illa mubtiloona (30.58 )

Reviewing the key terms in this ayah?

= ?darabna?

?darabna? definition

Plural. We have set forth. It comes from the root ?dzaraba?, which means to heal, strike, propound, put forth a parable, go, make a journey, travel, mix, avoid, take away, put a cover, shun, mention, state, propound, set forth, compare, liken, a like in stature and make, seek away, march own, set, impose, prevent, fight, traffic with anyone?s property for a share in the profit, leave for sake, take away a thing.

An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume five, pp. 1777 - 1783
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 328 - 329

?darabna? is used three times in the Koran, and in each and every case, the term is integrated within Biblical content.

= ?mathalin?

?mathalin? definition

Noun. Parable, likeness, similitude, like, reason, proverb, discourse, equivalent, comparison, sign, lesson, an example, case, state, condition, argument, match, an analogue. It comes from the root ?mathala?, which means to resemble, imitate, compare any one with, be or look like some one, bear a likeness.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume eight, pp. 3017 - 3018
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar pp. 525 ? 526

Here, as in numerous other Koranic locations, we have the term ?mathalin? which means to imitate or make an analogue to something.

We already completely understand that the ?alqur-ani? in this ayah refers to the collection of Jewish and Christian scriptures?

So?let?s plug this ayah into context?

30.55 And a day/time the Hour/Resurrection starts the criminals/sinners swear/make oath (that) they did stay/remain except an hour, as/like that, they were being lied to/turned away.

30.56 And those who were given/brought the knowledge and the faith/belief said "You had stayed/remained in Allah's term/fate/destiny Book to the Revival Day/Resurrection Day, so this (is) the Revival Day/Resurrection Day, and but you were not knowing.

30.57 So (on) that day those who caused injustice/oppression, their apologies/excuses do not benefit (them), and nor they, they be allowed to offer reconciliation/appeasement .

30.58 And We have set forth to the people in this the Koran from an equivalent/likeness, and if you came to them with a verse/evidence/sign those who disbelieved will say "That truly you are except wasters.?

30.59 As/like that Allah stamps/seals on those who do not knows' hearts/minds.

The Hour of Resurrection??

Allah?s book?..?

Hardly new information.

Where have we heard this before?.?

Thus?it is quite clear that the collection called the Koran is merely an imitator of the previous scriptures?

Amazingly, this same exact phrase is also used here?

Walaqad darabna lilnnasi fee hatha alqur-ani min kulli mathalin laAAallahum yatathakkaroona (39.27)

So?let?s also plug this ayah into context?

39.23 Allah descended the information's/speech's best, a Book looking alike/resembling/ similar doubles of twos Koranic verses, (the) skins (of) those who fear their Lord tremble/shiver from it, then their skins and their hearts/minds soften to Allah's remembrance/reminder, that (is) Allah's guidance, He guides with it whom He wills/wants, and who Allah misguides so (there is) none from a guide for him.

39.24 Is who fears with his face/front the torture's bad/evil/harm (on) the Resurrection Day, and was said to the unjust/oppressive taste/experience what you were gaining/acquiring.

39.25 Those from before them lied/denied/falsified, so the torture came to them from where/when they do not feel/know/sense.

39.26 So Allah made them taste/experience the shame/disgrace/scandal in the life the present/worldly life, and the end's torture(is) greater if they were knowing.

39.27 And We have set forth to the people in this the Koran from an equivalent/likeness, maybe/perhaps they mention/remember.

39.28 An Arabic a Koran, without/other than of bent/crookedness/indirectness, maybe/perhaps they fear and obey.

Now?.this is actually quite revealing now isn?t it??

Look at what we have just been told?

? A book resembling two Koranic verses
? The Resurrection Day
? The Koran is a likeness
? Not just any ?collection? Koran?but an Arabic Koran

Now?the last part is truly amazing as it identifies this copied ?Collection? of scriptures by the qualifier ?Arabic?.

If the ?Collection? that is being discussed was already in Arabic, then there would have been absolutely no need whatsoever to tell us of the language that the material is in; as it would be self-evident?

As it is?.the authors specifically make this point to inform us of the translation of the ?Collection? that has transpired?.

Obviously, from the Greek in this case.

Who are these authors that "penned the text"?

Observe these interesting comments by Lane?

Every language without a written literature tends to decay more than to development by reason of foreign influences; and the history of the Arabic exhibits an instance of decay remarkably rapid, and extraordinary in degree. An immediate consequence of the foreign conquests achieved by the Arabs under Mohammad?s first four successors was an extensive corruption of their language; for the nations that they subdued were naturally obliged to adopt in a great measure the speech of the conquerors, a speech which few persons have ever acquired in such a degree as to be secure from the commission of frequent errors in grammar without learning it from infancy?.

Such being the case, it became a matter of the highest importance to the Arabs to preserve the knowledge of that speech which had thus become obsolescent, and to draw a distinct line between the classical and the post-classical languages. For the former language was that of the Kur-an and of the Traditions of Mohammad, the sources of their religious, moral, civil, criminal, and political code? and they possessed, in that language, preserved by oral tradition, - for the art of writing, in Arabia, had been almost exclusively confined to Christians and Jews?.

The classical language they called, by reason of its incomparable excellence, ?el-loghah,? or ?the language? and the line between this and the post-classical was easily drawn, on account of the almost sudden commencement, and rapid progress, of the corruption.

?.I often have found in my knowledge of modern Arabic a solution of a difficulty; but without great caution, such knowledge would frequently have misled me, in consequence of the changes which have taken place in the applications of many words since the classical age.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, pp. vii ? viii; xxii - xxiii

It is quite inescapable that Islam?s ?prophet??.which is not even mentioned in the Koran? did NOT write the Koran?

Moreover?the authors, who did finally put pen to paper, and translated the Hebrew and Greek into Arabic, were more than likely Christians?..!!!

Thanks?

progod

Wow, The rebuttals to your assumptions are in your posts. THey are actually in the very things that you put in bold. You don't even see it. That is a shame.

Godbless
ProGod

mmkhan

Let?s review the true understanding?

= ?alqur-ana?

?alqur-ana? definition

Originally meaning the Collection; ?I collected together the thing? or ?I read, or recited, the book or scripture?; and then conventionally applied to signify the Book of God that was revealed to Mohammad; it also signifies the revelation, meaning that which is termed the mighty, or imitable which is read, or recited, and written in books or volumes. A name for the Book of God, like the book of the Law revealed to Moses and the Gospel.

is so called because it has collected the histories of the prophets, and commands and prohibitions, and promises and threats, and the verses or signs, and the chapters.

It comes from the root ?qara?a?, which has the primary signification he collected together the thing; put it, or drew it, together; part to part, or portion to portion. He read, or recited, the scripture chanting; he read or recited anything in any manner, without, or from, or in a book.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume seven, pp. 2502 - 2504
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 448 - 449

Why we need to beleive in Lexicon or other dictionaries?

Dear Albion, when you said correctly that the root of AlQuraan is "Qara'a" then how could you translate it wrongly? Remember we are trying to understand AlQuraan and AlKitaab here. It is not just the matter of Quraan or Kitaab but we are discussing on THE Quraan and THE Book.

Why THE? Because it explains the usage of word in it by itself.

"And a reading (qur'aanan) that We have separated, so that you may read (li-taqra-ahu) it to the people over time; and We have brought it down gradually." 17106

"Do not move your tongue with it to make haste. It is for Us to gather it and relate (qur-aanahu) it." 7517
"So when We relate (qara'-naahu) it, you shall follow its reading (qur-aanahu)." 7518

"Thou shall uphold the Salaat at the setting of the sun, until the darkness of the night; and relate (qur-aana) AlFajr (Salaat), relating (qur-aana) AlFajr (Salaat) has been witnessed." 1778

Please note that all words used in these verses are in relation with Quraan there is no AL that means there is no THE used with AlQuraan. So, you can easily understand what Quraan means.

No Lexicon or other dictionaries required to understand this word.

Thus, as we can clearly see for ourselves, the Koran is not ?original? at all. It is merely a ?Collection? of previous scriptures (Mainly OT and NT Gospels), that have been collected and pulled together in an attempt to imitate the Holy Bible.

The authors who penned the Koranic text went to great lengths in acknowledging as truth, their Biblical origins.

A big claim without any proof? It looks funny.

Let?s review the definition for ?the Book??.

= ?alkitabu?

?alkitabu? definition

Lane references sura 22 in his definition

Thalika alkitabu la rayba feehi hudan lilmuttaqeena

That The Book no doubt/suspicion in it, (it is) guidance to the fearing and obeying. (22)

?That is the book, or scripture?; as though combining in itself the excellences of all other books or scriptures; or meaning that is preeminently the book, or scripture. The Pentateuch or Mosaic Law; and the Gospel, or Book of the Gospels; the Scriptures of the Jews and Christians. Divine prescript, appointment, or ordinance; judgment, or sentence; fatal decree or predestination.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, p. 74; volume seven, p. 2590

Again Lexicon? Try get meaning from AlQuraan. And what about the root of AlKitaab? Not interested?

KTB is the root word of AlKitaab. That literally means "to write". Remeber AlQuraan is in relation with "Reading" and AlKitaab is in relation with "Writing". That it. This is very simple and easy to understand with no complications.

"O my people, enter the holy land that Allah Has written (kataba) for you, and do not turn your backs, or you will become losers." 521

"And if those who believe in Our revelations come to you, then Say Peace be upon you, our Lord has written (kataba) mercy upon Himself, that any of you who commits sin out of ignorance and then repents afterwards and amends, then He is Forgiving, Merciful." 654

And also check 2187, 612, 951, 5821-22. And lot more are there. Please note that there is no AL means there is no THE in the above quoted verses before KTB.

Is this not clear enough to understand the correct meaning of words used in AlQuraan?

Thus?it is quite clear, even at this point, and even without performing any scriptural comparison(s) whatsoever, that ?the collection? that comprises the Koran, is basically the Jewish and Christian scriptures.

This is beyond any reasonable doubt.

How? How did you come to such conclusion with out any proof?

Furthermore, let?s review some Koranic passages that will shed even more clarity on what it claims to be?

Alif-lam-ra tilka ayatu alkitabi waqur-anin mubeenin

15.1 A L R , that is The Book's inseparable message, and (a) distinct/clear Koran.

Here we have the astounding statement (from the Koranic authors) that the Jewish and Christian scriptures ?alkitabi? are inseparable ?ayatu? from the Koran.

"The Koran"? How can you twist the words or mistranslate the words of AlQuraan just to make your point? Where did you get this "THE Koran" from that verse? The word used in the above verse is simply "Qur-aannin" That simply means "READING".

Compare to this ayah?

Ta-seen tilka ayatu alqur-ani wakitabin mubeenin

27.1 T S, that is the Koran's inseparable message, and (a) distinct/clear Book.

In order to re-emphasize that the Koran is no more than a collection of Jewish and Christian scriptures, the Koranic authors transposed the order of the same juxtaposed words; this time around claiming that the Koran is inseparable from the ?alkitabi?.

"ALKITAABI"? Again?

How can do that again and again? How much will you twist the words? This is not fair at all. The word used in the above verse is simply "Kitaabin" that clearly means "Writing".

Now see how you can make your fake claim possible?

Are we beginning to see the picture now?.?

Oh yes! I am seeing clearly now how you are trying to make the picture.

And?look at these examples?

Wama kana hatha alqur-anu an yuftara min dooni Allahi walakin tasdeeqa allathee bayna yadayhi watafseela alkitabi la rayba feehi min rabbi alAAalameena

10.37 And this the Koran was/is not that it be fabricated from (by) other than Allah, and but confirmation (of) what (is) between his hands, and detailing/explaining The Book, no doubt/suspicion in it, (it is) from the Lord of mankind and the jinn.

The Koran details/explains the Jewish and Christian scriptures?..?

Jewish and Christian Scriptures? Read and Read and again Read the verse carefully. It says "Bayna Yadayhi" that means "Between HIS hands". Who is HE here? Where this Jewish and Christians Scriptures came in between?

What are you doing brother, FEAR your Creator.

Who would have guessed?

Kitabun fussilat ayatuhu qur-anan AAarabiyyan liqawmin yaAAlamoona

41.3 A Book its verses were detailed/explained/clarified, an Arabic Koran to a nation reasoning/comprehending/knowing.

The Jewish and Christian scriptures are inseparable from an Arabic Koran?.?

Again? What do you mean by "Arabic Koran" here? Remember it is not AlQuraan.

There is absolutely no doubt that the authors who penned the Koran (as we know it today) borrowed Biblical material.

In fact, they quite proudly made it a blatant point to say so?.

Take care?

) You need the care brother. You have to take care. You made authors of AlQuraan? I don't know how much you make your fake claims with out any proof.

Bring in any proof from The Book or The Reading if you are TRUE.

InshaAllah, you will never find any thing contradicting in it as it was sent my All Knower. Alhamdulillah.

May Allah guide us all towards the Truth.

Regards,

MMKhan

progod

MKhan,

You can't get meanings of words from the Koran. Muhammad and his people didn't get the meaning of the Koran's words from the Koran. They got it from thier parents and community and the language of that community was preserved in the lexicons. So it is right that he is using the lexicons. But if you look at the lexicons they don't even support what he is saying. He is making BIG jumps you can't see that.

Godbless,
ProGod

unknownuser

Greetings anwar,

Thanks for your replies?

Wow, The rebuttals to your assumptions are in your posts. THey are actually in the very things that you put in bold. You don't even see it. That is a shame.

Perhaps (if you are confident), you could show us specifically where you are talking about.

We understand if you decline? wink

You can't get meanings of words from the Koran. Muhammad and his people didn't get the meaning of the Koran's words from the Koran. They got it from thier parents and community and the language of that community was preserved in the lexicons. So it is right that he is using the lexicons.

Too bad that you cannot follow your own advice?

But if you look at the lexicons they don't even support what he is saying. He is making BIG jumps you can't see that.

I buttress my position with the Lexicons?.of which, you apparently do not?

If you have an issue with my conclusions, then feel completely free to bring forth your references to the contrary.

If you refuse to do this?then your comments are no more than your unreferenced opinion?.and have no scholarly merit whatsoever?

Thanks?

unknownuser

Greetings mmkhan,

Thanks for your reply?

Apple Pie wrote
Let?s review the true understanding?

= ?alqur-ana?

?alqur-ana? definition

Originally meaning the Collection; ?I collected together the thing? or ?I read, or recited, the book or scripture?; and then conventionally applied to signify the Book of God that was revealed to Mohammad; it also signifies the revelation, meaning that which is termed the mighty, or imitable which is read, or recited, and written in books or volumes. A name for the Book of God, like the book of the Law revealed to Moses and the Gospel.

is so called because it has collected the histories of the prophets, and commands and prohibitions, and promises and threats, and the verses or signs, and the chapters.

It comes from the root ?qara?a?, which has the primary signification he collected together the thing; put it, or drew it, together; part to part, or portion to portion. He read, or recited, the scripture chanting; he read or recited anything in any manner, without, or from, or in a book.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume seven, pp. 2502 - 2504
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 448 - 449

Why we need to beleive in Lexicon or other dictionaries?

Because the classic lexicons preserve the ancient languages.

Why THE? Because it explains the usage of word in it by itself.

"And a reading (qur'aanan) that We have separated, so that you may read (li-taqra-ahu) it to the people over time; and We have brought it down gradually." 17106

"Do not move your tongue with it to make haste. It is for Us to gather it and relate (qur-aanahu) it." 7517
"So when We relate (qara'-naahu) it, you shall follow its reading (qur-aanahu)." 7518

"Thou shall uphold the Salaat at the setting of the sun, until the darkness of the night; and relate (qur-aana) AlFajr (Salaat), relating (qur-aana) AlFajr (Salaat) has been witnessed." 1778

Please note that all words used in these verses are in relation with Quraan there is no AL that means there is no THE used with AlQuraan. So, you can easily understand what Quraan means.

No Lexicon or other dictionaries required to understand this word.

Perhaps in your rush, you overlooked the word that you are now using?

Let?s review the word, once again?

is so called because it has collected the histories of the prophets, and commands and prohibitions, and promises and threats, and the verses or signs, and the chapters

It comes from the root ?qara?a?, which has the primary signification he collected together the thing; put it, or drew it, together; part to part, or portion to portion. He read, or recited, the scripture chanting; he read or recited anything in any manner, without, or from, or in a book.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume seven, pp. 2502 - 2504
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, pp. 448 - 449

Here is the definite article ?al??

= ?al?

?al? definition

The definite article. In Arabic it is used to give the meaning of Most, All, Complete, Maximum, Whole, The, and to denote comprehensiveness, that is to say all aspects or categories of a subject, or to denote perfection and includes all degrees and grades.

Anything which has a quality requiring it to be regarded as sacred, or inviolable; which has some right pertaining to it.

It is also used to indicate something which has already been mentioned or a concept of which is in the mind of the writer or reader.

References
An Arabic-English Lexicon, E.W. Lane, volume one, pp. 74 - 75
The Dictionary of the Holy Qur?an, 1st edition, Abdul Mannan Omar, p. 25
A Dictionary and Glossary of the Koran, John Penrice, p. 7

In other words?.it is a collection of the written words (i.e. verses, and chapters are from books) from previous prophets?i.e. Biblical prophets?.and the holy Bible was written in Hebrew and Greek?.not Arabic?

Quote
Thus, as we can clearly see for ourselves, the Koran is not ?original? at all. It is merely a ?Collection? of previous scriptures (Mainly OT and NT Gospels), that have been collected and pulled together in an attempt to imitate the Holy Bible.

The authors who penned the Koranic text went to great lengths in acknowledging as truth, their Biblical origins.

A big claim without any proof? It looks funny.

Quote
Thus?it is quite clear, even at this point, and even without performing any scriptural comparison(s) whatsoever, that ?the collection? that comprises the Koran, is basically the Jewish and Christian scriptures.

This is beyond any reasonable doubt.

How? How did you come to such conclusion with out any proof?

Quote
There is absolutely no doubt that the authors who penned the Koran (as we know it today) borrowed Biblical material.

In fact, they quite proudly made it a blatant point to say so?.

Take care?

You need the care brother. You have to take care. You made authors of AlQuraan? I don't know how much you make your fake claims with out any proof.

Bring in any proof from The Book or The Reading if you are TRUE.

InshaAllah, you will never find any thing contradicting in it as it was sent my All Knower. Alhamdulillah.

There is a complete smorgasbord of proof.

If you doubt the power of the classic lexicons?then take my challenge to bring forth ANY portion of your book of faith that is completely free from Jewish and Christian influence.

Your brother anwar graciously declined the offer?as he (deep down) understands that the Koran really is no more than a collection of the previous Jewish and Christian scriptures?

In time?you will also succumb to the obvious?

Quote
Let?s review the definition for ?the Book??.