Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. The Radio Spectrum Should Be Private Property?

The Radio Spectrum Should Be Private Property?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
1 Posts 1 Posters 33 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z Offline
    Z Offline
    Zlatan
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    http//www.mises.org/story/1662
    http//www.mises.org/journals/essays/marcus.pdf

    The Spectrum Should Be Private Property The Economics, History, and Future of Wireless Technology

    "The human right of a free press depends upon the human right of private property in newsprint."?Murray N. Rothbard

    Is the radio spectrum a unique resource that belongs to the public, or can it be privately owned like any other good or service? Most people assume that public ownership is axiomatic?a starting point rather than the historical consequence of special interests pretending to misunderstand economics.

    This is wholly incorrect. And given the mass clamor for wireless services, the full-scale privatization of this resource is essential. In this essay, I will review, from a Rothbardian perspective, the history, economics, and potential future of American wireless technology, and explain why we must abandon current policy.

    The Conspiracy

    Murray Rothbard made the following distinction between shallow and deep conspiracy theories the shallow theorist asks cui bono??who benefits??and then assumes the hidden beneficiaries were responsible; the deep theorist also asks cui bono? but then looks for documentary evidence that the beneficiaries really were pulling the strings.

    "Scholarship," Rothbard quipped, "is essentially confirming your early paranoia through a deeper factual analysis."

    the rest of the article you can find here

    http//www.mises.org/story/1662
    http//www.mises.org/journals/essays/marcus.pdf

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Users