Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. A question for all of you

A question for all of you

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
8 Posts 5 Posters 82 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Selam all
    I do not really know how many of you brothers here happen to stumble uppon a site that has really troubled me ? roll . The site is http//answering-islam.org.uk/
    This muslim brother has reached a very interesting conclusion and, to be honest, I agree with him so far. Do we have someone here that has a different opionon or that proves otherwise? I would like to know what you brothers think of that site and the author of the article Is the Injeel less or more trustworthy than the Quran? http//answering-islam.org.uk/Authors/Farooq_Ibrahim/trustworthy1.htm
    God bless you all and thank you in advance.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Offline
      M Offline
      Mel_Funktion
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      salam

      I say hogwash. It is christian propaganda and it is so painfully obvious it makes me laugh. I know for a fact that christianity is a sunworship relegion, and that the gospels (socalled injeel) is based purely on astrotheology and the use of mushrooms

      The Bible is called the graetest story ever told. Not the greatest collection of facts. So if this brother have found a new way. peace to him, i hope he fids peace. But his study is hardly objective.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z Offline
        Z Offline
        zenje
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Peace Fatos,

        This muslim brother has reached a very interesting conclusion and, to be honest, I agree with him so far.
        You seem to have decided that this person is/was a muslim. ?

        I didn't even finish a third of the first part. That's what happens when someone writes stuff like this;
        When I started to study the Injeel to determine what it says about God? message...
        and then quotes Matt roll

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Offline
          M Offline
          mquran
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Salaam Fatos,

          This 'farooq ibrahim' fellow seems to accept that al-injeel is in fact the new testament. Al-quraan clearly refutes this because it implies al-injeel has certain elements (48/29) and (9/111) which the NT doesn't have. Its sad that 'muslims' accept non-quranic definitions but hey, what can you do.

          Oh Fatos, Here's your 'muslim brother's testimony of faith

          http//answering-islam.org.uk/Testimonies/farooq.html

          Jesusu akbar ??!!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • A Offline
            A Offline
            Ali_Omar
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Dear Fatos,

            This ?Farooq Ibrahim? is either a ?hard core? Christian on a mission, or a person who has left the quran due to resignation under the heavy burden of Hadith.
            Either way, a somewhat confused personality. ?

            Please do not let ?answering-islam? trouble you; it is a Christian missionary site.
            Whether the stories they write are disproved or not, does not matter, even though some people have done a lot of work on that. They are on a mission, and when you are on a mission you do not see left or right, you follow your path, no matter what. voo

            However, even though it is a Hislamic site, you may get some counterbalance by looking into ?answering-christianity.com?. ~0
            Besides there are numerous sites dealing with this from time to time.

            Regds

            Ali Omar

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Offline
              M Offline
              mquran
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Jochen Katz,author of Answering Islam was part of Ropelist about 7 years ago. He got whitewashed when all his attacks on traditional islam failed and so he wrote this

              http//www.answering-islam.org.uk/Misc/tradition.htm

              To me, the best part of all this is we put al-quraan to work. Al-quraan put to work yeilds its true conceptual power. That's how we increase our imaan.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • U Offline
                U Offline
                unknownuser
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Thanks to all of you for pointing out who that man really is. I did not know that he was some christian missionary. I kind of had a feeling he was but to be honest anyone could have easely fallen just like me. Anyway, he was so good at it that I must addmit I almost swallowed the bait compleately shock ops
                I will try, God willing, to be a lot more careful next time someone shows something like that.

                There is still one question i would like to ask and that is

                Is it true that our today Quran is compiled just like it is said in Hadith?

                Thanks brothers

                May God bless you all

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Offline
                  M Offline
                  mquran
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Is it true that our today Quran is compiled just like it is said in Hadith?

                  See 80/11-16 please. That's all we need on that issue.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Users