How Many Wives, can You have according to Quran?
-
Ahmed says
Why a single woman has to marry a married man?
Why not? Besides there can be many reasons; for love, for lust, for money, for security, for fame etc.
well, most women will not, I think most virgins will prefer to marry a single man, and I guess over 90% of will have this attitude
all that other reasons you listed above are not accepted in my books except security, i.e. "if that woman was threatened physically or financially and could not find any other protection other than to marry a married man". but yet the married man should be ready to committ the sin of not being equal with two wives
Haven?t you ask yourself this question bro?
Is that important?
don't worry about it then
Would you allow your virgin daughter to marry a married man?
I think Abu Bakr had better mental level then me.
well, I'm not going to be side tracked with a story that happened about 1400 years ago when humans had close to nill compared to what we have today, just forget the past unless it is related to a verse in the Quran you want to discuss, I don't think that Aysha marriage to the great prophet was discussed in the Quran
what a virgin woman is missing to not to deserve to marry a man who is not already married?
I think we have to ask it From Ayesha but sorry we cant contact her.
same comment as my last comment, however I'm asking you, not Ayasha, but thanks for letting me know that she is not contactable therefore I'm asking you the same question again
The solution of marrying any 4 women is not a solution when we fear not to be just with the orphans, or what do you think?
What you are trying to bring forward is the translation of the verse according to your understnading,
did I suggest it was to anyone's else understanding?
and I said Ok let us agree. The verse is talking about marrying 2's 3's anb 4's women who are mothers of orphans.
Men can only marry widows with orphans as far as the verse states, it starts with mentioning that if we fear to be unjust with the orphans then we marry up to 4 women who had them
Does it says up to 4? please read it again does it impose any limit?
If you fear not to be just with the orphans then marry any 4 women of you choice,
Come on bro that does not makes sense at all
Yes, it does not make sense at all. So? we take that the verse says
Marry in two's , three's and four's the women who are widow and have kids.it seems it is the only option because orhans were mentioned as a proplem and that was the proposed solution for that specific propblem, however I delibertly didn't talk about "Ma Malakato Aymanikom" because it is very rare to happen nowdays to have women in your care, I have never seen it in my 40 years of life anyway, I'm trying to tackle the issue of Muslim men abusing this very restricted law and deceiving theor first wives, but at the end of the day it is my personal opinion
Therefore Quran allows to have more than one wife or when you marry a widow you don't call her wife?
a silly question and I decline to answer it
If you call widow a "wife" than quran allows you to marry morethan one wives according to the verse you quoted, well if you have any other word for "wife" who is a widow than we want to know it.
that is the rest of your silly question above and it has to exit through the second ear without processing, sorry I don't take silly comments seriously
Women are not slaves for men to talk about them as a max number to marry, this is ridiculous,
Well ridiclous or not one thing is sure your reading and understanding of Quran is either not complete or you have not gone ethrough the verses in which "SLAVES" the WOMEN SLAVES" are allowed to have sexual relationship with.
look mister quran know it all, I did not accuse you of not reading the Quran because i don't know you, so please don't commit this childish crap and accuse me as such because you don't know me
regarding the verses of the salves, this is circumstantial and mostely for the old days 1400 years ago when slavery was common, now I don't see women slaves around me or hear about them other than what I hear or read about the prostitution industry and the Quran yet tackled this issue of forcing women into prostitution against their will, I see "Ma malkato Aymankom" as not slaves, Quran was against slavery anyway and always encouraged to raise their status to legal wives, the Quran never allow illegal sex, but if men wants to understand it this way, i don't care, neither I will carry any of their sins nor they will carry any of mine, I'm a one woman marraige believer and will stay this way till I die inshaallah
also the arabic word "Abd" which means "Slave", was only used by Allah to decribe the people as his slaves, it was never used to describe a man being a slave to another man, but if it did then again it will be an encouragment to free him/her from the slavery
Also prohibited are the women who are already married, unless they flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you.
Now these women are niether divorced nor widow ; what do you say?
Jaxal wrote
How many sisters here on the forum are with children? would even one of you be OK to share your husband with another woman?this question was asked on a sunni forum that I don?t like and to my shocking surprise most sisters there came with an answer that they will be happy to share their husband, now I now that most of them are F of S, and surely brain washed
Are you sure they were brain washed? many in moderen Europe and USA share their husbands and wives for enjoyment shortly and permanently wink
Honestly I?m not a fan of this life style, but I have seen them, I lived in the states for a while and with the westerners for over 20 years
In your attempt to show us that that particular verse you mentioned is regarding Orphan's and their mothers you are not able to get my question
So I repaet it once againI?m not showing anything claiming to be the right answer for whatever, I?m just sharing my thoughts that I feel comfortable with, but there are things that is clear and strong, my strongest argumet is this
- the prophans are the problem in the only verse that allow to marry more than one "rwo, three or four", it was never mentioned any where else, consequently the proposed solution must be related to the problem not bloody a totally different solution that satisfy the evil lust of most men. a problem that men has to fight themselvs and they will be rewarded by hoor el-ein, now why women will not be rewarded sexually as the men in paradise?, have you ever asked yourself that question?
How many wives are allowed for a Muslim according to Quran??
therfore let us stick to the question.for a true and 100% submitter it has to be ONE, because a true submitter will always try to avoid the least of things that will cause any unfairness and because Allah created us and He knows us the best, He knows that men can not be equal between women so they SHOULD MARRY ONLY ONE
the prophets are different than us and dealt differently by Allah, I can elborate if you like
And if take your answer that Quran says "Marry only one"
than
Have you read the following verseI have read the Quran more than 15 times thoroughly for the the last 25 years and I?m still learning but sure I read the verse many times
Only with their spouses, or those who are rightfully theirs, do they have sexual relations; they are not to be blamed.
I guess the word used here is Plural for wives, do you agree? and in addition to that Slaves.
Oh yeh I agree that it is plural, but the funny thing is this, you want to take it as Allah is talking about a single believer who have many wives, what a perfect case of manipulation by you, you see mister rajah, when we talk about one man who has many cars we say
His cars, right mister?
But if we will talk about a few men each with one car, then we say
Their cars
And sure the whole sura is talking about the Mo?menoon "A Plural", not a single mo?min and consequently when we talk about their spouses we should say their spouses, the verse did not say ?his spouses? but nice try, here is all the verses from the start of the sura to verse 6, you will sure know what I mean
The believers must (eventually) win through,- ?
?Those who humble themselves in their prayers; ?
?Who avoid vain talk; ?
?Who are active in deeds of charity;
?Who abstain from sex, ?
?Except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess,- for (in their case) they are free from blame, ?(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)can you see my point?
For ?Malakat Aymanaikom?, I believe I responded to this already and I consider them as orphans who are in desperate need for care, I can also acceot it as slaves but only at the old days when slavery was common and legal, this is how the Quran can live with all generations
there is part in your comment that I will respond to it later
Allah knows best
peace
-
Hey Raj-ah, here the part that I still need to respoond to it sorry, I just needed to confirm a few issues
Also prohibited are the women who are already married, unless they flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you.
Now these women are niether divorced nor widow ; what do you say?
Sorry I don?t see the above flawed translation as what the Arabic verses below said
(24)
what you posted ? flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you? is a total lie
again I decline to respond because I don?t have time to waste with people are trying to deceive, sorry
Those among you who cannot afford to marry free believing women, may marry believing slave women...
Slave women, Quran talks about women slaves and you say it is ridiculous.
(25)
now you are not deceiving when you translate right, but again I don?t see ?Ma Malkatu Aymanikom? as slaves, rather weak women in our care who has no one to care for them, they like orphans for me
peace
-
SaLaM Ahmed
Im glad you agreed with my post. But just one thing
possible but she will be called a sl** even by non muslims
A woman marries 4 men, which is againt God, and she is considered to be a slut. A man marries 4 women, also againt God, and he is supposed to be doing womankind a favour. Do u see? This is why neither men nor women are allowed to marry more than 1 wife at a time, along with other reasons, even if it is for supporting them. A man is as much of a slut as the women will be if they take more than one spouse.
-
SaLaM Ahmed
Im glad you agreed with my post. But just one thing
possible but she will be called a sl** even by non muslims
A woman marries 4 men, which is againt God, and she is considered to be a slut. A man marries 4 women, also againt God, and he is supposed to be doing womankind a favour. Do u see? This is why neither men nor women are allowed to marry more than 1 wife at a time, along with other reasons, even if it is for supporting them. A man is as much of a slut as the women will be if they take more than one spouse.
Peace bro
yep I agree thant muslim men has changed the restricted polygamy into a dirty deceotion game that only added to the very well and long esatblkished conspircy against the women of the world
believe it or not bro, I hardly saw any muslim man marrying another widow with children to care for her children as the only motive, I have see many rare incidents where the brother marry his sister in law when his brother died just to care for his children and this sound legal to me
but most men who abuse this restricted license as you said and i second that should be called sluts
peace
-
Ahmad
Your posts ranged from calling me Liar to deciever and all kinds of Adhominiems, this approach is adapted when arguments are not sufficient;any way
Let us start from your second postSorry I don?t see the above flawed translation as what the Arabic verses below said
And you never Translated it so we can see what your translation is.
what you posted ? flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you? is a total lie
And your Proof is? any one who calls another a Liar without proof is.....?
again I decline to respond because I don?t have time to waste with people are trying to deceive, sorry
You have wasted enough time answering my post already! but where you don't have satisfactory answer your logic changes. NO problem.
Following are different translations of well known translators and they all indicate towards what I said
004.024
YUSUFALI Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
PICKTHAL And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
SHAKIR And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise.
Rashad Khalifa Also prohibited are the women who are already married, unless they flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you.And even an average Muslim knows that what is which the right hand possess. When there is a War and a women is got as slave who is married, No one goes to get Divorce from her husband she is just married or used by the one who captures.
I will not shout like you that It is wastage of time arguing, but rather will wait for a clear and comprehensive answer from you.
Now offcourse if you want to discuss it in Arabic and end up with Muta being legal well go on. -
Let us see what you have to say in your earlier post
well, I'm not going to be side tracked with a story that happened about 1400 years ago when humans had close to nill compared to what we have today, just forget the past unless it is related to a verse in the Quran you want to discuss, I don't think that Aysha marriage to the great prophet was discussed in the Quran
Humans had close to nill?? Amazing, you follow a Book that is 1400 hundred years old which was revealed through a Human, but you think to the persons for whom it was revealed were close to nil. Besides have you ever heared the names of great greek philosphers, the roman poets etc. I think not, otherwise you would have not compared the ancient people with Nil.
Related to a verse in the Quran??
I think I got engaged with the wrong person!
How many verses do you need to be pointed out to you which deal with wives and lives of the marriage life of Prophet?it seems it is the only option.....
a muslim man can marry up to four wives.....
Allah advises us to marry only one wife
These all are your quotes so what is Final according to your opnion
- One wife?
- Up to four wives?
- One wife and and up to four widows with kids?
- One wife and Slaves who are captured during war?
- One wife at a time up to four?
I think you are confused and trying to make others confuse.
a silly question and I decline to answer it
Well I don't know who is silly here?
look mister quran know it all, I did not accuse you of not reading the Quran because i don't know you, so please don't commit this childish crap and accuse me as such because you don't know me
Well I am starting to know you now.
Rest of post will be answered in my next post.
-
Ahmad
Your posts ranged from calling me Liar to deciever and all kinds of Adhominiems, this approach is adapted when arguments are not sufficient;any way
Let us start from your second postSorry I don?t see the above flawed translation as what the Arabic verses below said
And you never Translated it so we can see what your translation is.
what you posted ? flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you? is a total lie
And your Proof is? any one who calls another a Liar without proof is.....?
again I decline to respond because I don?t have time to waste with people are trying to deceive, sorry
You have wasted enough time answering my post already! but where you don't have satisfactory answer your logic changes. NO problem.
Following are different translations of well known translators and they all indicate towards what I said
004.024
YUSUFALI Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
PICKTHAL And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
SHAKIR And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah's ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise.
Rashad Khalifa Also prohibited are the women who are already married, unless they flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you.And even an average Muslim knows that what is which the right hand possess. When there is a War and a women is got as slave who is married, No one goes to get Divorce from her husband she is just married or used by the one who captures.
I will not shout like you that It is wastage of time arguing, but rather will wait for a clear and comprehensive answer from you.
Now offcourse if you want to discuss it in Arabic and end up with Muta being legal well go on.look bro, I'm sorry I just get mad when I see people posting wrong translation to serve their argument
I will read your comment and respond later to it
sorry again
peace
-
A muslim may marry 3 additional women(must be widows) at a time, ONLY when the following are obeyed.
- when the widows with orphans is incapable of providing , and taking care(of herself and her children) on her own. and is in desperate need of safety and security, and when marriage is the ONLY final resort, with which the man(who wishes to help) can provide for, protect and help them.
*And he is permitted to go ahead, under the above conditions, ONLY if he is capable of being just and impartial among all his wives and capable of providing for all his wives and children, financially and emotionally adequately, in a just and impartial manner.
*The above does not mean women(widows) are incapable of providing for themselves and being secure on their own. They are very much capable of that.
But if a woman is not able to, and needs/requires help and wishes a man to help her and if a man(who wishes to help) cant provide the help required adequately, without marriage, ONLY then, can he marry the woman in question.
*And the man can marry ONLY after obtaining consensus from his exsisting wife.So, in the above, there are too many clauses and conditions, which pretty much rule out 'permisibility of polygamy' in today's world.
- when the widows with orphans is incapable of providing , and taking care(of herself and her children) on her own. and is in desperate need of safety and security, and when marriage is the ONLY final resort, with which the man(who wishes to help) can provide for, protect and help them.
-
well, Jaxal, Man marrying 3 additional women is implicated ONLY BECOZ those days, men were the bread-earners. Majority of the women were dependent on the man financially, since they did not work, coz they didnt know to or werent allowed to etc and a man had more say in the affairs of the world etc. So, it was only natural for a widow(there were loads of them after the battle of uhud and very very few men left) with children to find herself absolutely desperate and in need of help.
If Women were bread earners and were considered/treated equally then, propably this polygamy option would not have even come up.
polygamy was ONLY permitted for the sake of helping desperate widows with children(who cant help themself). How would polyandry help?
And the marriage is not to satisfy one's lust but its permissible only IF its the only possible way of helping the widow in question adequately.Like I said, there are too many clauses and conditions, which rules out 'permisibility of polygamy' in today's world.
-
Peace,
I read the instruction as 4 wives being allowed on condition that 3 are mothers of orphans who are being taken in under the mans care.
I am aware that 44 has been argued to mean mothers of orphans, while others have argued that it means to 'marry off' the orphan females (which I do not subscibe to as a limit is not required in this case)...
Peace Layth I personally subscribe to that verse meaning to marry off the orphan females. However, the part which you placed in brackets, I understand where you are coming from, but perhaps the verse was 'metaphorical' and means that you can marry off many orhpans at the same time.
If I remember correctly, the verse literally meant something like the following
'If you have orphans that you can't deal with, then OF THOSE that are suitable, marry them off in twos threes and fours'.
The Sunnis 'forgot' to translate the word that meant 'of those', so they twisted it to suit their own perversions.
Having said that, I am not aware of any explicit verse stating the marriage 'ratio'.
However, if one man = one woman I don't see how either can be married to more than one.
Roshan
-
Hi Jaxal,
Well, Since conditions today are different, most of the clauses and conditions wont be met
such as-In Today'S world
*Women can be financially independent
*Women can be socially independent
*Woman is considered in equality and hence wont be deprived.
*There are organisations and other sources to help desperate women
*Women do not outnumber men and hence widows can very well marry single men if they so wish.
*And in today's society (laws), marriage cant be the only resort to help a desperate women adequately. They can be absolutely helped with out having to marry.
*And moreover, Man cant be just and impartial to 2 or more wives. And no woman would wish to share her husband.So, considering all of the above, most of the clauses dont get met, and hence Polygamy wont be permissible in today's world.
-
SaLaM PM
Ok so we agree with each other then that in today's world, there is no reason to commit polygomy , something which wasnt allowed in the first place.
Now, you said
well, Jaxal, Man marrying 3 additional women is implicated ONLY BECOZ those days, men were the bread-earners. Majority of the women were dependent on the man financially, since they did not work,
In today's world, dont you see men with kids and not being able to cope with the ability to bring those kids up on their own. In this case, isnt it permissible for a woman to do the good deed now and marry 4 guys like that to support them, or help them?
-
SaLaM PM
Ok so we agree with each other then that in today's world, there is no reason to commit polygomy , something which wasnt allowed in the first place.
Now, you said
well, Jaxal, Man marrying 3 additional women is implicated ONLY BECOZ those days, men were the bread-earners. Majority of the women were dependent on the man financially, since they did not work,
In today's world, dont you see men with kids and not being able to cope with the ability to bring those kids up on their own. In this case, isnt it permissible for a woman to do the good deed now and marry 4 guys like that to support them, or help them?
Jaxal,
cant that guy who wishes for a wife to support him, in his family life, marry a single woman(never married, divorcee, widow)? why does he have to marry a married woman?And when its come to polygamy it is not just about fulfilling financial needs. there are other factors as well. those days, women were not considered equal or infact significant, without a man on her side. they would be socially, econimically deprived in the society etc.
Untill recent years( a few decades), even in India, a child wont be admitted in school, without the dad's presence during admission etc. so, sometimes, in a biased society, such stuff becomes important
PS I agree Polygamy is one other issue thats been abused by the so called muslims, just like most other rulings. People fail to see 'why' something has been said.
check this out
http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4440 -
IF U wanna say why not polyandry
polyandry will make sense only if all of the following were true at a given time
*Men are considered inferior to woman in a society and a woman's word counts more than a man's.
*Women are the majority bread earners and men arent allowed to.
*Man has no say in any affairs.
*Women are more physically stronger than Men
*Men are dependent financially and socially on woman, and have no means to carry on their own.
*Men outnumber women in a large proportion.(41 or more)
*the widow man can not absolutely provide for himself or for his children, without a woman's help.
*there are no organisations and other sources to help the desperate man.Since we know, all of the above cant be true, Polyandry wont make sense.
The idea is not to disintegrate the family system(one husband-one wife-their children) -
SaLaM PM
cant that guy who wishes for a wife to support him, in his family life, marry a single woman(never married, divorcee, widow)? why does he have to marry a married woman?
Cant the woman marry a man who is not already married? Why the double standard? If a man is good enough to marry more than 1 woman, why isnt a woman good enough to marry more than 1 man? Unless ofcourse it is YOU who see them as unequal.
those days, women were not considered equal or infact significant,
Yea well those days are gone. So this argument is invalid