Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. Questions/Comments on the Quran
  4. Verse 3:7 Discussion.

Verse 3:7 Discussion.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Questions/Comments on the Quran
11 Posts 5 Posters 62 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    unknownuser
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    OK.. I would like you all to use everything you know about grammar and sentence structure and try to answer the following simple question concerning verse 37.

    Below is the verse in English, as it appears in the ProgressiveMuslims translation, without any changes.

    {He is the One who sent down to you the Scripture, from which there are governing verses; they are the essence of the Scripture; and others which are similar. As for those who have disease in their hearts, they will follow what is similar from it seeking to confuse, and seeking to derive an interpretation. But none know its interpretation except God and those who are well founded in knowledge, they Say "We believe in it, all is from our Lord." And none will remember except the people of understanding.}

    If you look closely at the underlined part in the english text, you notice that it constitutes a run-on sentence. There is something very wrong with the way the verse is read. The way I see it, there should be a full stop, (or at least a pause - such as a semi-colon) somewhere in that sentence.

    Here is the question Who is the subject in the sentence "We believe in it, all is from our Lord."
    Who are the "WE" there??

    The way I see it, there are two possibilities

    1st possibility

    There is a full stop after the word God, in which case the verse would be read as such

    {....As for those who have disease in their hearts, they will follow what is similar from it seeking to confuse, and seeking to derive an interpretation. But none know its interpretation except God ( FULL STOP ) And those who are well founded in knowledge, they say "We believe in it, all is from our Lord."...}.

    In this case, the subject of the sentence is "Those who are well founded in knowledge".

    If we agree with this interpretation, then only GOD knows the true and ultimate meaning of the "mutashabih" (allegorical) verses of the Scripture, while those "who are firlmly rooted in knowledge" - although they might ponder over their meanings and formulate their theories about them- but in the end, they will concede that the allegorical verses are there to test us, and weed out the faithful from those who have a disease in their hearts, and that only GOD knows their true meanings.

    2nd possibility

    That the full stop comes after the phrase "those who are fully rooted in knowledge"; in which case the verse would we read as such

    {...But none know its interpretation except God and those who are well founded in knowledge ( FULL STOP ). They Say "We believe in it, all is from our Lord."...}

    If we are to agree with this second interpretation, then we will have accepted that both God, and those who are firmly rooted in knowledge can interpret the "mutashabih" verses.

    This conclusion leads us to two questions

    a- (meaningwise), who exactly are those "who are firmly rooted in knowledge"?
    b- (sentence-structure-wise) Who is the subject of the underlined "THEY"??

    But if we read the verse as it is, in the ProgressiveMuslims translation, it is clearly a run-on sentece ( poor grammatical structure).

    This is a serious issue which must be addressed, because it is casuing great "fitna". Even if we read the verse in Arabic, we will note that there should be a full stop somewhere...

    Appreciate your feedback..

    Peace.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • U Offline
      U Offline
      unknownuser
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      By the way, I'm in favor of #1.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Offline
        U Offline
        unknownuser
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Peace Pazuzu,

        I am In Favor of a FULL STOP after "None knows it's interpretation but GOD". I believe this fits within the overall message of the quran. Also, there is a personal opinion of mine that I would like to share with you concerning this verse/topic.

        It is my humble belief and opinion that a person will interpret that part of the verse in accordance with their personality and disposition. It is my belief that a person who fully recognizes GOD as the ONLY ONE who is All Knowing and the One who Teaches the quran will favor a complete stop in that sentence, whereas someone who may believe that they are wise enough and knowledgable enough think that they can do enough research to not only decipher the meaning themselves, but believe that they have deciphered the correct meaning.

        We should all bear in mind that this verse is speaking of BOTH types of people that I have mentioned. And we should also remember that there are passages in the quran which say that it's verses Guides the former and yet these same verses will Misguide the latter.

        My humble 2 cent$..... peace

        Salaam,
        Damon.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P Offline
          P Offline
          phoenix1
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          peace
          I will post the link later, but in a thread started by Ahmed baghat on this subject, Arnold posted Ayman's explanation on this. Ayman said that the word translated as "interpretation" actually means "original interpretation."
          When we look at a painting, we can derive several interpretations, and they can all be right or wrong, but only the artist himself knows the true/original interpretation. Only the artist knows what he actually intended.
          Based on that, I think 37 is teaching us to be humble in understanding this world.

          Another thing about this verse is that if it is talking about al kitab, then it may be talking about this universe and not the quran.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • U Offline
            U Offline
            unknownuser
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            37

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • P Offline
              P Offline
              phoenix1
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              003.007
              YUSUFALI He it is Who has sent down to thee the Book In it are verses
              basic or fundamental (of established meaning); they are the foundation
              of the Book others are allegorical. But those in whose hearts is
              perversity follow the part thereof that is allegorical, seeking discord,
              and searching for its hidden meanings, but no one knows its hidden
              meanings except Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge
              say "We believe in the Book; the whole of it is from our Lord" and
              none will grasp the Message except men of understanding.
              PICKTHAL He it is Who hath revealed unto thee (Muhammad) the Scripture
              wherein are clear revelations - they are the substance of the Book - and
              others (which are) allegorical. But those in whose hearts is doubt
              pursue, forsooth, that which is allegorical seeking (to cause)
              dissension by seeking to explain it. None knoweth its explanation save
              Allah. And those who are of sound instruction say We believe therein;
              the whole is from our Lord; but only men of understanding really heed.
              SHAKIR He it is Who has revealed the Book to you; some of its verses
              are decisive, they are the basis of the Book, and others are
              allegorical; then as for those in whose hearts there is perversity they
              follow the part of it which is allegorical, seeking to mislead and
              seeking to give it (their own) interpretation. but none knows its
              interpretation except Allah, and those who are firmly rooted in
              knowledge say We believe in it, it is all from our Lord; and none do
              mind except those having understanding.
              KHALIFA He sent down to you this scripture, containing straightforward
              verses - which constitute the essence of the scripture - as well as
              multiple-meaning or allegorical verses. Those who harbor doubts in their
              hearts will pursue the multiple-meaning verses to create confusion, and
              to extricate a certain meaning. None knows the true meaning thereof
              except GOD and those well founded in knowledge. They say, "We believe in
              this - all of it comes from our Lord." Only those who possess
              intelligence will take heed.

              The "waw" can be used both to separate a new sentence and for addition
              (similar to an English "and&quot. We find examples of both types of usages
              in the great reading. So only looking at the "waw" doesn't tell us
              enough information to decide either way. So we need to look at other
              info in the passage. When we look at the rest of the passage we see that
              the verb coming after "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge" is
              the verb "say" in the plural ("yaquloon&quot. Now notice how all
              translators above, except for Khalifa, correctly don't put the pronoun
              "hum" (they) before "yaquloon" and they just replicate the exact Arabic
              sentence as "those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say". Only
              Khalifa is forced to put the pronoun "they" before "say", which is
              non-existent in the Arabic original, to make the passage work. This is
              for the simple reason that Khalifa knew very well that not putting the
              "they" in front of "say" and adding "those well founded in knowledge" to
              GOD would result in "GOD and those well founded in knowledge say".
              Since, clearly the sentence "We believe in this - all of it comes from
              our Lord" cannot be uttered by The God, then he needed to change the
              words and insert a pronoun that is not in the original Arabic. The other
              translators didn't have to do that because they ended the sentence
              before the "waw". So in this case, the evidence from the passage itself
              leans heavily towards the "waw" being used as a sentence separator as
              opposed to for addition.

              More evidence is in the word "taawil" itself. I don't think that any of
              the translators really did a good job in translating this key word. The
              word comes from "awal" which means "original/first/ultimate". So it is
              not just any meaning/understanding/interpretation but it is the
              original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Now this
              type of meaning can only be known to the author of the text that is
              subject to interpretation. This is true even for human authors. For
              example, you can understand and interpret what an author means in a
              novel but maybe you don't know that he or she based this passage on a
              childhood experience or a certain likes and dislikes, etc. Essentially,
              you would heve to delve into the psyche of the human author to know the
              original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. Of course,
              this is impossible.

              Other passages of the great reading confirm this understanding. You see
              the same word in 753. It is addressing those who are waiting or expect
              the original/first/ultimate meaning/understanding/interpretation. The
              passage says that when the actual original/first/ultimate
              meaning/understanding/interpretation comes, it will be on the day of the
              account and by then it will be too late.

              Look around you and empirically verify the right path by comparing it to
              the path of the stayers (16-7). You will see that the people who think
              that they have the original/first/ultimate
              meaning/understanding/interpretation have stopped trying to get closer
              to the truth. They are misguided and not progressing. If you or I
              thought that we had the original/first/ultimate
              meaning/understanding/interpretation, then we wouldn't be here today. It
              is only those who are firmly grounded in reality that know that what we
              know is far less than what we don't know. This is true about all of The
              God's signs in the universe and not just in the great reading.

              I think that 37 and 7431 are linked together by 226. Here is my
              translation of those passages

              1. He is the one who descended on you the book. From it are judging
                signs that are the origin of the book, and others that are allegorical.
                So in the case of
                (1) Those in whose hearts there is blurriness, they pursue what is
                allegorical from it (the book) desiring the "fitna"/trial/affliction and
                desiring its (what is allegorical from the book) original
                interpretation. And none knows its (what is allegorical from the book)
                original interpretation except The God. And,
                (2) Those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say "We have faith in it
                (the book), both (types of signs) are from our Lord."
                And none remembers other than those with intellects.

              2. The God does not shy away from citing any kind of allegory, from a
                mosquito to what is greater. As for those who have faith, they know that
                it is the truth from their Lord. As for those who are unappreciative,
                they say, "What did The God mean by such an allegory misleading many
                thereby and guiding many thereby?" But He never misleads thereby except
                the wicked.

              3. And we didn't make the owners/companions of the Fire except
                controllers; and
                We didn't make their count except as a "fitna"/trial/affliction for
                those who have been unappreciative;
                so that
                (1) those who were given the book be sure, those who had faith increase
                in faith and those who were given the book and those who had faith do
                not have doubt.
                And, so that
                (2) those in whose hearts there is sickness and the unappreciative say
                "What did The God want with this example?" Like this The God misguides
                whom He wills and guides whom He wills.
                And none knows your Lord's soldiers except Him.
                And it is nothing except a reminder for the humans.

              I hope that you can see those connections.

              Peace and all best wishes,

              Ayman

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S Offline
                S Offline
                seekingtruth1111
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                This video is giving another interpretation of the verse 37

                https//www.youtube.com/watch?v=7pGVnehfAaI&lc=z22tflhjxxihxprb104t1aokgeafydmaclolxgag20x3bk0h00410.1571267058713427

                Its translating "ma tashabha minhu" as "what is similar from it" and rendering it as other scriptures that is similar to IT (the book/Quran) not the mutashābihātun verses from the book.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  amin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Many things in life is unspecific, need not be strict, even practicing Salat i think comes in this, so we dont need stricter laws for these, even the Zakat, those things that vary with conditions, and i think the verse advises people seeking interpretation with search for strict signs and laws and often misled and bring discord. People of understanding knows when and how (much of) it need to be done.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I Offline
                    I Offline
                    Iyyaka
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    Salam,

                    the 2nd possibility but before to conclude a large effort must be taken to understand some concepts

                    • "We believe in it" => Believe is not a correct translation
                    • ""mutashabih" (allegorical) " => Not allegorical

                    and to raise the rhetorical structure of all the passage where s3v7 is included s3v1 to s3v25

                    Peace

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Offline
                      S Offline
                      seekingtruth1111
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Salam,

                      the 2nd possibility but before to conclude a large effort must be taken to understand some concepts

                      • "We believe in it" => Believe is not a correct translation
                      • ""mutashabih" (allegorical) " => Not allegorical

                      and to raise the rhetorical structure of all the passage where s3v7 is included s3v1 to s3v25

                      Peace

                      Peace

                      Also to clarify what is IT in "We believe in it" ?

                      Is it "what is similar(verses) from IT(the book/quran) or Just the Quran?

                      Also what is "All from God" ?
                      Is it all the verses from Quran or All the scriptures from God?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I Offline
                        I Offline
                        Iyyaka
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        Peace

                        Also to clarify what is IT in "We believe in it" ?

                        Is it "what is similar(verses) from IT(the book/quran) or Just the Quran?

                        Also what is "All from God" ?
                        Is it all the verses from Quran or All the scriptures from God?

                        Salam seekingtruth1111,

                        You raised good questions and the relationship between The book - Quran.
                        Below my answers...

                        You qoted "Also to clarify what is IT in "We believe in it" ?"
                        => We rely upon(or rallying to or convinced to..) IT = QURAN

                        You qoted "Is it "what is similar(verses) from IT(the book/quran) or Just the Quran?"
                        => QURAN but my translation is not similar but "and others that seem equivocal"

                        You qoted "Also what is "All from God" ?
                        Is it all the verses from Quran or All the scriptures from God?"
                        => QURAN

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Users