The human eye and the garbage "evolutionists" clai
-
Again, I prefer to study creation itself. It truly a berillian miracle and guidebook in itself. As for jesus BEIG god. Well as I was taught to understand as a child, Jesus was a human vessel for god to teach the people of the area. He placed a certain level of his own wisdom within the human body of christ and sent him to earth to lead the poeple down a more righteous path. So therefore, a PIECE of christ was in fact god, but once he became human he became the son of god. Sure it's been over simplified over the years, but that is what I was taught of it. Not to say I ever really baught it, but I will say the MAN of Jesus of Nazarath WAS a great teacher and blessed medicine man. BUT he was sent for the people of a particular place and time. Not necesarilly for myself in MY time. I have never heard or rea anything about the Koran that leads me MYSELF to believe that it s anything more than a very GOOD observation of the world and an in depth attempt at explaining tat world. %90 of the laws are simple common sense. People just need those words to appear to come from a place of authority before they will follow them. Same goes for almost all humans in almost all situations. They are simple rules that will lead to a greater good for a general population. but again, as in every case on earth, some laws are not going to work cross culturally or in another geographic place. It is IS the word of god, it was itended for the people that recieved in THEIR time and place.
Simply my opinion. I do not expect anyone else to share it, but I don't suspect I am on my own with it either. to each his own.
-
here is a link that shows the simplest of example of why I believe the koran is meant for a specific people in place and time. Polyandry, the act of a woman marrying multiple men. In Tibet, men out number te women so drastically that species survival lead to th act of polyandry to allow all men the chance to marry and procreate. this goes against the Koran, but is RIGHT for THESE poeple. AS times change, if the natural ration of men to women change so will the need for this law within it's religion etc... Again this is just one simple example that explains MY stance. It is not an attempt to sway you from yours. I just feel ths example will better explain myself to others.
http//www.case.edu/affil/tibet/tibetanSociety/marriage.htm
-
Peace sawtooth and all. I have to agree,sawtooth, that some of the quran was relative to the time and so were the past prophets. Should we only consult one book which only has an aspect of the truth when there is a never-ending amount of knowledge in the universe. I try to check my understanding of life from myself and the world around. We should not be scared to think with our conscience.(ie the interaction of your will/knowledge with the will/knowledge of others around you.)I speak as someone that recognises aspects of the truth from many different books and sciences. We should also recognise we do not comprehend everything totally,there is always more to know.(new angles on topics)
Peace. -
peace bmbmm,
how is it impossible for a cell to evolve?
don't bacteria evolve all the time? ?and JK, give it up. You've been proven wrong again and again. Soon, you'll leave this thread too (once you are presented with questions you or khalifa cannot answer) and start a new topic bashing evolution (which you're eventually going to leave again).
-
Any evolutionist (PhD) here, I want to join some people to issue a "FATWA" against evolution lol Because it is rubbish!
My my, wasn't it you who was riling against the priesthood of traditional Islam?
-
There is no scientific evidence for evolution. If there is, as a biochemist and Molecular Biologist, I would be the first person to support it. Trust me there is no evidence for evolution. It is impossible for a cell to evolve.
There is evidence for evolution. As a taxonomist, I will point to the hierarchical nature of the classification of organisms as evidence for evolution. Also, the fossil record clearly points towards evolution and not separate creation.
Bacteria evolve. They are cells. Hence, cells can and do evolve.
-
Hi Andya,
Why use a magnifying glass if we got a microscope, and why use a microscope when we can use a confocal, and why use a confocal if we have the state-of-the art deltavision-deconvolving microscope, and why use this if we have the mighty electro-microscope lol ??????
All I am trying to say why don't we look at evolution from a biochemical-molecular biological point of view when we can? Why use the texonomical data when we have molecular biology and X-crystalography to pinpoint evolution (if it occurs)?
I do not see evidence for evolution, i totally reject it. I have asked for evolutionist (PhD) to debate with me, were are they?
-
Hi Sawtooth,
Adaptation of a virus is due to the fact that it already got the genetic information to adapt. The genetic information determin the variation/recombination in its gene. Such as a smallpox remain smallpox, it would never change to a flu virus..etc.
Peace
-
Hi phoenix1,
Bacteria evolve all the time, because it has got plasmid DNA apart from its genomic DNA. Plasmid can be transfer, which sometimes give bacteria resistant to other antibiotics. Give you an example, E. coli on your face remains E. coli for ever, it will never become another bacteria.
Peace
-
Hi Jonny,
My PhD thesis was Molecular Cloning and Characterisation of major proteins in Squid photoreceotor cells. The squid/octopus got polar vision, and the photoreceptors are completely different, i.e the signal trasnduction in these cells follow the general signalling pathway, using Phospholipase C (PLC) as the main enzyme, and they are arranged towards plane-polarised light, wereas in vertebrate, like us, the photoreceptors are not and there is a reson for that. First they use Phosphodiesteriase (PDE) as the main enzyme for phototransduction. Seconday they are indeed arranged away from the direction of incomming light because 1) they can be protected and 2) there is shedding of the disc membrane at the tip of the outer-sagment of these cells (in squid photoreceptor there arn't any disc membrane, they have microvilli where the photoreceptor-rhodopsin is situated), the sheeded membrane is disposed by the cells that surrounds them.
Peace
-
Peace "phoenix1",
and JK, give it up. You've been proven wrong again and again. Soon, you'll leave this thread too (once you are presented with questions you or khalifa cannot answer) and start a new topic bashing evolution (which you're eventually going to leave again).
JK- Ill NEVER GIVE UP, NEVER x, AS LONG AS GOD WILLS. GOD Bless!
-
Peace "andya",
Any evolutionist (PhD) here, I want to join some people to issue a "FATWA" against evolution lol Because it is rubbish!
My my, wasn't it you who was riling against the priesthood of traditional Islam?
JK- He used that ironically. Doesnt the smiley tell you that? GOD Bless!
-
Peace bro "bmbmm",
Hi Jonny,
My PhD thesis was Molecular Cloning and Characterisation of major proteins in Squid photoreceotor cells. The squid/octopus got polar vision, and the photoreceptors are completely different, i.e the signal trasnduction in these cells follow the general signalling pathway, using Phospholipase C (PLC) as the main enzyme, and they are arranged towards plane-polarised light, wereas in vertebrate, like us, the photoreceptors are not and there is a reson for that. First they use Phosphodiesteriase (PDE) as the main enzyme for phototransduction. Seconday they are indeed arranged away from the direction of incomming light because 1) they can be protected and 2) there is shedding of the disc membrane at the tip of the outer-sagment of these cells (in squid photoreceptor there arn't any disc membrane, they have microvilli where the photoreceptor-rhodopsin is sutuated), the sheeded membrane is disposed by the cells that surrounds them.
Peace
JK- Thankyou for this information. GOD Bless!
-
I do not see evidence for evolution
the fact that animals can go through very different stages is a good indicator of evolution. But i dont belive in random evolution, only random mutation.
Frogs is a good example, they breed underwater using geels, and then later develope lungs. This does not mean that they are without air for a period inbetween.is it evidence? not really, but then again, what is?