Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Users
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Free Minds Forum Icon
  1. Home
  2. General Issues / Questions
  3. General Issues / Questions
  4. Muhammad Shaikh adds "Muhammad" to the kalima!!!

Muhammad Shaikh adds "Muhammad" to the kalima!!!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Issues / Questions
32 Posts 6 Posters 118 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    CavemanDoctor
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    CavemanDoctor

    Blindly ignorant. Thank you.

    Distinguish messangers? I did not say anything which is against Qur'an and I am not distinguishing messangers.

    Peace

    I wasn't making fun of you; I meant "blindly ignorant" in the very literal sense. You are intentionally ignoring what the Qur'an says.

    And you saying you're not distinguishing messengers doesn't make it so. You are mentioning Muhammad's name and no one else's. As the Qur'an says, the majority of those who believe in God don't do so without some form of idol worship .

    I am not trying to judge you. This is between you and God. But Im asking you, brother, to look deep within yourself and ask God for guidance. Why the need to place Muhammad's name next to God's? Just because you don't want to take on some arbitrary "Progressive" label? Is that a good reason?

    I'm sorry if what I said came across as rude.

    Peace.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Offline
      K Offline
      KGB
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      Peace CavemanDoctor

      Don't worry. I have been insulted real harsh.

      All my statements related to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) are according to Qur'an.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C Offline
        C Offline
        CavemanDoctor
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        Peace CavemanDoctor

        Don't worry. I have been insulted real harsh.

        All my statements related to Prophet Muhammad (SAW) are according to Qur'an.

        Peace

        Not really. For one, your signature says Muhammad is the Last Messenger. Of course this is nowhere to be found in the Qur'an. But oh well. I'll seek guidance from God and I pray we all do the same.

        Peace.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Offline
          K Offline
          KGB
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          Peace CavemanDoctor

          According to my understanding of Qur'an he is the last prophet and last massanger. You might have different interpretation.

          Are you forcing me to follow your interpreation of Qur'an?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Offline
            C Offline
            CavemanDoctor
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Peace CavemanDoctor

            According to my understanding of Qur'an he is the last prophet and last massanger. You might have different interpretation.

            Are you forcing me to follow your interpreation of Qur'an?

            Peace KGB

            Where have I forced you to do anything? No need for sensationalism. There is no compulsion in religion. With that said, however, interpretations are not all equally valid.

            If I believe that the Qur'an says that Jesus is the best prophet, and you disagree, can I just throw up my hands in the air and proclaim, "don't force anything on me. You have your interpretation, I have mine" ? No, my interpretation would be less valid since it does go against the Qur'an's specific command to not distinguish between messengers.

            If you can show me where the Qur'an says Muhammad is the "Last Messenger," I would love to hear it. I will gladly accept that I am wrong, thank God for giving me the correct understanding, and change.

            Peace.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • U Offline
              U Offline
              unknownuser
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Peace all,

              Prophet Muhammad is the last prophet (nabi), but is he the last messenger (rasool) ?

              Allah says in al-qur'aan that He chooses messengers from humans and angels (malaika) (2275). The angels of death are called "rasool" (661, 737) and these rasools will come after Muhammad. There are rasools who record our moves (1021), these rasools obviously will come after Muhammad. Al-qur'aan is called a rasool (6510-11), al-qur'aan is still in this world after Muhammad.

              So is Muhammad really the last rasool according to what Allah tells us in al-qur'aan ?

              For discussion on this topic see the following link

              http//www.free-minds.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3199&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=75

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • A Offline
                A Offline
                arnoldyasin
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Peace,

                It is always interresting to see how people defend their pre-programmed concept.

                First nowhere in the Quran is Muhammed mentioned next to God's, from over the 35 testimony's, NOT one, gives Muhammed next to it, or is part of the testimony. Even in the Quran there are only TWO occurences of people walking up to Muhammed to proclaim his messengership, and both these times, they're called hypocrites. KGB you say nothing you say, goes against the Quran, ok, where do you get your testimony from then?

                Do you think Muhammed himself proclaimed this in his prayers? Prove your point from the Quran by SHOWING proof with verses.

                God says to mention Him alone. When i say to you, i'm alone in my room, does that mean there are more people in my room besides me? Or that there is no one except me? And don't say, Muhammed is lower then God, so it doesn't matter you mention him next to Him, because even your children can be your illeh next to God, your ego and so on. When i say to you, call me alone, are then also gonna call my dog? Is that mentioning me alone? No. Saying Muhammed's next to God is a man-made testimony. And don't play i only call him-a- messenger card.....

                Where is your proof that you CAN mention him next to God, and where is your proof that you HAVE to mention him next to God? Because this is exactly what it is all about. It is not by mentioning Muhammed next to God, that you see Muhammed as a an idol. It is your defending this made-up testimony that is your idol, it is YOUR behaviour that is your idol. You just want to mention Muhammed without any proof what so ever, so it is not Muhammed you're defending here, it is your ego. This is what most people don't see. It is not about who you mention, it is about WHY you mention it. Your defending your ego here.........

                4523 Have you seen the one who took his ego as his god, and God led him astray, despite his knowledge, and He sealed his hearing and his heart, and He made a veil on his eyes? Who then can guide him after God? Will you not remember?

                3945 And when God Alone is mentioned, the hearts of those who do not believe in the Hereafter are filled with aversion; and when others are mentioned beside Him, they rejoice!

                7218 And the temples are for God, so do not call on anyone with God.
                7219 And when God's servant stood up to call on Him, they nearly banded to oppose him.
                7220 Say "I only call on my Lord, and I do not associate anyone with Him."

                770 They said "Have you come to us to serve God alone and abandon what our fathers had served? Bring us what you promise if you are of the truthful ones!"

                4012 This is because when God Alone was mentioned, you rejected, but when partners were associated with Him, you believed. Therefore, the judgment is for God, the Most High, the Most Great.

                4084 So when they saw Our might, they said "We believe in God Alone, and we reject all the partners we used to set up!"

                604 There has been a good example set for you by Abraham and those with him, when they said to their people "We are innocent from you and what you serve besides God. We have rejected you, and it appears that there shall be animosity and hatred between us and you until you believe in God alone." Except for the saying of Abraham to his father "I will ask forgiveness for you, but I do not possess any power to protect you from God." "Our Lord, we have put our trust in You, and we turn to You, and to You is the final destiny."

                Of course, you're gonna say you believe in God alone, of course. But then i wonder were do you got your proof, a permission from God to mention Muhammed next to Him? If you say there is nothing wrong with it, how then is not given in the Quran? Why then do you defend a man-made idea? What exactly are you defending? Muhammed's messengership? You know that is not the case here, what you are defending is your idea that you WANT to mention Muhammed next to God. Because this what 3945 is about. I don't say you see Muhammed as a god, but if you defend something that is not given in the Quran, then you see your point of view as a god. You let your point of view that depends on man-made perception be your boss. You say nothing goes against the Quran what you do. Ok, prove your point then. Please, think for a while on this, this no attack on you personally, this is only to make you think, this is not my view of the Quran, this IS the Quran itself. Think carefully, what are you defending here? The Quran, or you?......

                Peace

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jonny_k
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Peace bro "AB",

                  I also found out that your counting does not include 9129 which conatins 1 "la ilaaha illa HU" making its occurence 30 instead of 29. So does this mean you now believe that 9128&129 do NOT belong to the Quran? If it does Alhamdulillah. If it doesnt then Allahu Akbar, He showed you a great sign. GOD Bless!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • U Offline
                    U Offline
                    unknownuser
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    Peace bro "AB",

                    I also found out that your counting does not include 9129 which conatins 1 "la ilaaha illa HU" making its occurence 30 instead of 29. So does this mean you now believe that 9128&129 do NOT belong to the Quran? If it does Alhamdulillah. If it doesnt then Allahu Akbar, He showed you a great sign. GOD Bless!

                    Peace bro

                    I don't think so man, this is what i said before after it was corrected once

                    1. , "La Ilah Ila...", "There is no God but...", 36 times

                    2. , "La Ilah Ila Hu", "There is no God but Him", 29 times, includes 9129

                    3. , "La Ilah Ila Ana", "There is no God but Me", 3 times

                    4. , "La Ilah Ila Allah", "There is no God but Allah", 2 times

                    5. , "La Ilah Ila Anta...", "There is no God but You", 1 time

                    6. , "La Ilah Ila alazi...", "There is no God but The One Who...", 1 time

                    i checked it again and it is accurate and includes 9129, i dpn;t believe yet that 9128-129 are inserted into the Quran

                    Peace mate

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • J Offline
                      J Offline
                      jonny_k
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Peace bro "AB",

                      Peace bro "AB",

                      I also found out that your counting does not include 9129 which conatins 1 "la ilaaha illa HU" making its occurence 30 instead of 29. So does this mean you now believe that 9128&129 do NOT belong to the Quran? If it does Alhamdulillah. If it doesnt then Allahu Akbar, He showed you a great sign. GOD Bless!

                      Peace bro

                      I don't think so man, this is what i said before after it was corrected once

                      1. , "La Ilah Ila Hu", "There is no God but Him", 29 times, includes 9129

                      JK- No i checked it twice with 9129 theres 30 "la ilaaha illaHU". Heres the list

                      1. 2163
                      2. 2255
                      3. 32
                      4. 36
                      5. 318(THIS VERSE CONTAINS THE STATEMENT TWICE) Maybe this was your mistake
                      6. 318
                      7. 487
                        6102
                      8. 6106
                      9. 7158
                      10. 931
                      11. 9129
                      12. 1114
                      13. 1330
                      14. 208
                      15. 2098
                      16. 23116
                        1 2726
                      17. 2870
                      18. 2888
                      19. 353
                      20. 396
                      21. 403
                      22. 4062
                      23. 4065
                      24. 448
                      25. 5922
                        2 5923
                      26. 6413
                      27. 739
                        GOD Bless!
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • U Offline
                        U Offline
                        unknownuser
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Thanks bro

                        yes you are right 318 was my mistake

                        you code 19 followers are really good at counting wink

                        Peace

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Offline
                          J Offline
                          jonny_k
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Peace bro "AB",

                          Thanks bro

                          yes you are right 318 was my mistake

                          you code 19 followers are really good at counting wink

                          Peace

                          JK- Praise be to GOD. I believe GOD wanted to show a sign in a similar way he showed bros Edip Yuksel and Rashad Khalifa. They too took the count of the word "Allah" initially to be 2698 inc 9129, without realizing that together with 9129 it should have been 2699. This was realized only years later. Maybe if RK and Edip came up with 2699 they would not have believed theres a pattern based on no. 19 in the Quran and this would remain hidden for perhaps another 1000 yrs, who knows. So Praise be to GOD. GOD Bless!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Users