To Layth and Mods: Challenge to Danish's Insult to Al-Quraan
-
-
Peace OpenMind,
I feel it un-ethical to engage in a debate with a 14 year old.....No offense...
Don't worry about this, it's strange how if one was only two years older they could have been asked to moderate a debate by the same person, but the slightest gap makes it unethical
-
Elenais not barbarism the same for everybody?
If it was, would we be having this discussion. Enquirer's definitions come from his westoxification whereas mine are from al-quraan.
Anyway, the parts debating could stick to dictionary definitions, like "define " on google.
We're not looking for definitions but for notions. Relative values if you like.
-
Don't worry about this, it's strange how if one was only two years older they could have been asked to moderate a debate by the same person, but the slightest gap makes it unethical
peace SC,
good point.
enquirer, age doesn't matter. And for all you know, he (and myself) could be lying about our age. So you can't just assume that the person isn't mature enough or knowledgeble enough to have a debate with.
-
age doesn't matter. And for all you know, he (and myself) could be lying about our age. So you can't just assume that the person isn't mature enough or knowledgeble enough to have a debate with.
That is a very valid observation, and change your nick will you? D -
Peace open-mind and all. I feel it un-ethical to engage in a debate with a 14 year old.....No offense...
Please, explain to me why it's unethical.
Dodge after dodge after dodge.
I'll take your response as you dodging due to your incapability of debating, even with a 14 year old. Indeed, this is a record low for you.
-
As for the 'empirical' bit,that may be fine for you,but what is up with other older characters (not you open-mind.) that you need mutiple proofs for such basic things as 'do we need food to survive'...?
I make the assumption that i dont need to repeatedly prove this obvious fact by copious logic,quranic references,documented data,etc,etc...
I suggest that possibly scriptural legalism has eroded some peoples common-sense at a basic level and profound level...
peace all. ps;open-mind;because of your age im not applying any of this criticism to you... handshakeNo. Enquirer, when you say "my evidence is life experiences," we don't really understand what you mean. Sure, it sounds happy and fun and profound, but when you truly think about it, it means nothing.
When you posted the contradictions thread, you didn't even give a verse. Not one verse! And when others confronted you about it, you simply brushed it off and stated that "others can find them." This is what we mean. You can't just say/assume things and expect us to accept it as truth. BRING EVIDENCE!
You always have an excuse, thist time it's my age (which in itself is absurd, considering debate has nothing to do with age). Always an excuse to dodge. So sad.
-
Peace
Yet another example that shows you bring nothing to prove your claims. This is in another thread talking to mquran
And really,i believe you have read your own version of 'reality' into the quran by the use of dictionaries,circular logic,random interpretations,apologetics and illusions... I have seen your techniques now,whereby you conceal/hide many of your more wacky/idiosnycratic interpretations,while publicising those that may be useful in a debate...
He even asks you to show him how. Why do you just say things without pointing how? Even me, a naive and ignorant 14 year old, has the respect and decency to, at least do that. Oh well.