Light and the Children Of Adam

arnoldyasin

Peace,

The 'pairs' doesn't refer to just being two, it refers to that everything is made with opposites, like sweet and salt, hot and cold, + and -, man and woman. And the differences between the races is because 200.000 years ago (at least) the human species started most likely in Africa, and started with one race. When this race spread over the earth, they started to live an remain in certain lands with certain enviroments. Just like the first peoples were formed through their enviroment, likewise these people were influenced by their new enviroment and started to adapt to that specific enviroment.

People in Europe lost their dark skin as they didn't need the protection no more and especialy they needed every little bit of sun they could get, so they skin changed to take in more sun and lost the pigment. Every enviroment formed the people in what we see now. Short, tall, their colour, beards or not. They all, we all have the same origin with the same first race, but through spreading to different enviroments, we adapted to those enviroments. I believe the first race is adam, and we are bani adam.

Hope this clears it up.

Peace

unknownuser

Peace,

When you refer to a country we use 'she' or 'he', also a palace with it's inhabitants is refered to as 'she' in many languages. So that Adam is approached as 'him', doesn't take away at all that it is refering to a group or people.

You are doing your best to you make you point else BS!

arnoldyasin

Peace,

When you refer to a country we use 'she' or 'he', also a palace with it's inhabitants is refered to as 'she' in many languages. So that Adam is approached as 'him', doesn't take away at all that it is refering to a group or people.

You are doing your best to you make you point else BS!

Typical answer from people who can't answer... )

unknownuser

The quotations you provide from the book prove that the author is ignorant of the physics

Science sucks IMO

Especially physics, no body has ever seen a fricken atom before, it amazes me how people can believe atoms exist but deny the existence of God, there?s more proof that God exists then there are that Atoms exist!!

I read in a book that every contemporary "scientific fact" today can be proven false due to the limitations and flaws of research. 'Science' is flawed beyond belief o o, has any body read the book "Science Has It?s Limits"?

A lot of stuff in science is blind belief )

I read in the book "God Arises" that in the future technology will be so advanced you will be able to see the past, like your watching TV or something. Obviously it sounds too good to be true but if you actually read the book you could understand that the idea was not as wacky as it sounds, especially when the author used verses from the Quran to prove his point.

Peace,
sugar

unknownuser

Peace,

When you refer to a country we use 'she' or 'he', also a palace with it's inhabitants is refered to as 'she' in many languages.

Humans/people are refered as THEY or THEM not 'he' / 'she'.

So that Adam is approached as 'him', doesn't take away at all that it is refering to a group or people.

Nothing but conjectureing bs

unknownuser

sure it is a fairly weak argument but I don't believe that it is conjecture or BS.

This Adam and Eve phenomenon has to be the most powerful argument about questioning Quranic divinity IMO. It is a miles better argument then some of the BS scholars have come up with in the past. Don't you think we should continue this discussion to the Quranic Divinity section? >D >D

I asked my sis about this argument and she said that she accepts it as illogical as it is. I asked someone else when i was a kid and they said maybe incest was not forbidden then yuck yuck coz the earth has to be populated some how yuck yuck and certain minor laws have been changed over the years i.e. extra food prohibitions imposed on the Jews. Ever thought that Adam and Eve could be an allegorical description for God telling us that we did not evolve from apes?

peace,
sugar

phoenix1

peace sugar,

i don't think it's a good argument against Quranic divinity, but certainly a great argument for allegorical interpretation of the quran as opposed to literal.

unknownuser

Peace,

Arnold;
I believe myself Adam refers to the first peoples and their spouses, as the plural is used here

You are free to believe what you want to believe but your explaination doesnt fit right.

Then his Lord sent commands to Adam and turned towards him Indeed He is compassionate and kind.

As per your logic then the word here should hv been 'them'. But here the word is HIM.

And We said to them "Go, all of you. When I send guidance, whoever follows it will neither have fear nor regret;

Story points towards Adam, mate & satan not many humans.

But those who deny and reject Our signs will belong to Hell , and there abide unchanged."

Sure!

Peace brother

Please be aware this argument has absolutely no merit, because the plural in the verb may indicate that the order was for Adam, his mate and Iblis

is there anything that may suggest that can not be a possibility?

when they find it, we can then look into their argument, other than this they can keep companioning Iblis

Salam mate

unknownuser

Peace,

When you refer to a country we use 'she' or 'he', also a palace with it's inhabitants is refered to as 'she' in many languages. So that Adam is approached as 'him', doesn't take away at all that it is refering to a group or people.

You are doing your best to you make you point else BS!

LOL bro

How about "Bani Adam" then

"The people of the group of people", LOL that is funny

Cheers

unknownuser

Peace,

When you refer to a country we use 'she' or 'he', also a palace with it's inhabitants is refered to as 'she' in many languages. So that Adam is approached as 'him', doesn't take away at all that it is refering to a group or people.

You are doing your best to you make you point else BS!

Typical answer from people who can't answer... )

Sorry bro arnold

I beleive Marlboro answer was spot on

now we would like you "if you don't mind" to explain to us all the meanings where the word Adam appeared in the Quran and convince us how it fits your logic

thank you

unknownuser

sure it is a fairly weak argument but I don't believe that it is conjecture or BS.

This Adam and Eve phenomenon has to be the most powerful argument about questioning Quranic divinity IMO. It is a miles better argument then some of the BS scholars have come up with in the past. Don't you think we should continue this discussion to the Quranic Divinity section? >D >D

I asked my sis about this argument and she said that she accepts it as illogical as it is. I asked someone else when i was a kid and they said maybe incest was not forbidden then yuck yuck coz the earth has to be populated some how yuck yuck and certain minor laws have been changed over the years i.e. extra food prohibitions imposed on the Jews. Ever thought that Adam and Eve could be an allegorical description for God telling us that we did not evolve from apes?

peace,
sugar

Peace

can you enlighten me please how the story is illogical?

Cheers

unknownuser

peace sugar,

i don't think it's a good argument against Quranic divinity, but certainly a great argument for allegorical interpretation of the quran as opposed to literal.

Good bro

now we have a subject in hand

can you discuss this with me, but not in masses, just one point after the other

cheers

unknownuser

can you enlighten me please how the story is illogical?

If incest is forbidden how did Adam and Eve populate the earth ???

i don't think it's a good argument against Quranic divinity

I know a Christian guy who stopped believing the bible was word of god coz of that.

Peace,
Sugar

unknownuser

can you enlighten me please how the story is illogical?

If incest is forbidden how did Adam and Eve populate the earth ???

i don't think it's a good argument against Quranic divinity

I know a Christian guy who stopped believing the bible was word of god coz of that.

Peace,
Sugar

Fine bro, but after you prove to me that it was forbidden for brothers and sisters to marry each other from day 1 "The day Adam and his mate were sent to earth"

if you can prove that, then you have a point, if not then the story will stand logical

Cheers

unknownuser

Fine bro, but after you prove to me that it was forbidden for brothers and sisters to marry each other from day 1 "The day Adam and his mate were sent to earth"

if you can prove that, then you have a point, if not then the story will stand logical

Well why didn?t he say in his fully detailed, unambiguous something like

?I now prohibit incest from my system?

like he did when he was talking about food prohibitions i.e.

3/93 All food used to be lawful for the Children of Israel

5/3 Prohibited for you are animals that die of themselves, blood, the meat of pigs, and animals dedicated to other than GOD. (Animals that die of themselves include those) strangled, struck with an object, fallen from a height, gored, attacked by a wild animal - unless you save your animal before it dies - and animals sacrificed on altars. Also prohibited is dividing the meat through a game of chance; this is an abomination. Today, the disbelievers have given up concerning (the eradication of) your religion; do not fear them and fear Me instead. Today, I have completed your religion, perfected My blessing upon you, and I have decreed Submission as the religion for you. If one is forced by famine (to eat prohibited food), without being deliberately sinful, then GOD is Forgiver, Merciful.

BTW I?m a girl.

Peace,
sugar